Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/04/16

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive April 16^th, 2013

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Elias antonopoulos

Out of project scope. Rahul Bott (talk) 04:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Rahul Bott. Out of scope on gallery space name. --Alan Lorenzo ^(talk) 04:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy - gone thanks Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Living Colour at WM29.jpg

An image previously published at Facebook and elsewhere before that. A possible cpvio. Rahul Bott (talk) 04:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedied as copyvio. –⁠moogsi (blah) 20:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vandilism at Mount Rushmore police are on the case 2013-04-16 01-04.jpg

The copyright of the underpinning photograph of Mount Rushmore has no release and there may be a personal rights issue if there is no release for the pasted in photograph. Fæ (talk) 07:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: nonsense Polarlys (talk) 10:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cephalaspis2.png

No author or license info at source. FunkMonk (talk) 21:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a copyright violation: is a screenshot of the Cephalaspis from "Walking With Monsters"--Mr Fink (talk) 21:26, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as the uploader this should be deleted without further discussion --Epipelagic (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per above. FunkMonk (talk) 22:01, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marilyn Monroe Playboy centerfold 1953.jpg

Public domain acid test Canoe1967 (talk) 01:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I came across the same image on Ebay. Marilyn Monroe calendar. There are detailed images there that show no copyright notice. I contacted a collector that can't take her calendar out of the frame but she did send a picture of a jacknife that doesn't have any copyright notice and has the same image. The knife is listed in a book called "Marilyn Memorabilia" by Clark Kidder as circa 1972. So it was published before 1977 and is probably not a pirated knock-off. ~~I will try to find contact info for Mr. Kidder and see if he can confirm as well.~~ The collector is also contacting other collectors to see if they have any memorabilia that shows no notice on the same image.--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an email to Mr. Kidder to join us here or contact me directly. If you do show up Mr. Kidder, then just click the lower edit button at the top right of this section. Type at the bottom and hit save page. Don't worry if it looks funny, we can fix format errors.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyright violation. I'm sure you can find many more prints of this and other Playboy images without copyright notice, but that's irrelevant. What counts is if there was a copyright claim with its first publication. In this case there was, 100% sure! Playboy is known for protecting their rights very carefully, and it is absurd to think that a 1953 issue of Playboy carried no copyright notice. It's probably on the title page or in the back of the magazine, but we can't see that on the image you uploaded, nor on the image on the source web site, which displays only two pages of the magazine. Jahoe (talk) 23:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The picture was taken in 1949, published on calendars in 1952, Hefner bought it in 1953. The 1953 Playboy does have a proper copyright notice but the calendar images I have seen do not.--Canoe1967 (talk) 23:22, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If, as you state, Hefner "bought it", that means that he bought the rights of the picture, so it is not PD unless you can prove that the first publication caried no copyright notice.

Discussing that here will not bring us to conclusions; I suppose you would have to sue Hefner in court and bring an original print of the first publication as evidence. Consider your budget before you do so, but I'm looking forward to the case Canoe1967/Hefner. ;)

Generally however, Playboy photos are copyrighted and thus not ok for upload on commons. Jahoe (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was published without notice before Hefner bought it though. I don't know how the rights changed hands. Hefner only paid $900 which is low for the full rights of an image that had already had (8?) million copies published. Playboy's first issue sold just over 50,000. The photographer sold it to the calendar company for $400, Marilyn was paid $50 for the shoot. Usually photographers just give a licence to others and never sell full rights. Full rights revert back to the photographer after a few years(28?) anyway unless they renew any copyright transfer.--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hefner was a clever businessman, so I guess he would not have paid $900 for a picture that is PD.

It is still a bit misty to me what you're trying to prove by uploading the image to commons, but never mind that. :) I'll leave further discussion to others, but I'll follow it interestedly. Jahoe (talk) 01:21, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See: http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm The published 1923 through 1977 with no notice section. That is our approved link from Template:PD-US-no notice. It basically means if any of the images are legally published without proper notice then all of them are public domain.--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyright violation. This was printed in 1st issue of Playboy which is known to be copyrighted. It is a Mirror image of the calendars.(appears to be right arm up calendars appear to be left arm up) If rights went back to photographer then its not public domain tell 70 years after his death. Theworm777 (talk) 11:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is where the law gets confusing. If any versions were legally published before 1977 then all versions become public domain. Putting a proper notice on afterward will not revert the fact that is has been published without. This is probably caused because proper copyright registry and any fees involved were not thought to be worth the effort by the calendar company. I may email them if they are still around and let them know they can start printing again. Mr. Hefner probably realized the importance and probably knew that he may have been too late at one point. I am amazed that no one has noticed this before on such an iconic image. I started investigating after they questioned the fair use image we have at en:wp.--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:31, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not necessarily irrelevant. The first publication definitely counts, but so did subsequent publications. Before 1978 (and mostly before 1989), the notice had to be on *all* copies. Courts did try to find ways to preserve copyright, and were lenient if a "relatively few" copies lacked notice. More questions come into play though... the linked calendar shows a derivative version of the photograph. Even if that had no notice, if the original photo is still considered copyrighted, as a derivative work the calendar photo is still not fully PD. Courts have ruled that a derivative work of a previously-published original which is still copyrighted is still subject to the underlying work's copyright (at least for the portions which are derivative). For example, episodes of a TV show which were not renewed were held to be derivative of the characters which were introduced in earlier episodes which were renewed. Another case was a movie which was not renewed, but still derivative of the original novel. So... I'm not sure that particular calendar is enough evidence of lack of notice for the original photograph. On the other hand, it sounds like there were calendars with the photo published before the Playboy issue. So, lack of copyright notice on those calendars might be different, since those were presumably a direct copy of the photo. You'd have to search the entire calendar for a copyright notice though, not just that page. Oh, and rights did not necessarily revert to the author after 28 years -- they may have sold renewal rights as well. If the author died before the renewal was filed, there were separate issues which may have reverted the rights to the estate, but if the author was still alive an earlier promise to sell the renewal rights would still have been valid. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The two copies of the calendar from 1952 and 1953 that the above collector has are in cases. This is a link to one image. I may be able to convince her to remove them from the cases to check for copyrights. I am still hoping that Mr. Kidder will respond as well. If they can confirm that there are no copyright marks on these would that justify keeping this file on commons? I am sure Playboy will lawyer up once they find out we are hosting the image but they are probably aware of the law and thus will just saber rattle to the WMF causing the Streisand Effect to ripple once again.--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What about copyright renewals? If it was published without a copyright notice, then it should be renewed 28 years after 1952, right? Playboy was probably renewed 28 years after 1953, which seems to be one year too late. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it was published without a copyright notice, it lost its copyright immediately. If it had proper notices, then yes it needed to be renewed 27 or 28 years later. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do those copies have just the Monroe month, or do they have the entire original calendar as distributed? Just the one month wouldn't be enough. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, there have been several court cases which touch on the public domain issue and the Monroe photographs. In every case, the validity for Kelley Studios copyright(s) to the Monroe images was upheld. The first printed pieces using the Monroe images did indeed have a copyright notice. Subsequent printings through the years, most of them boot-legged did not - however, since these printings were not approved, they do not carry any legal burden for Kelley. Additionally, registration for the renewal for the copyrights is in place. And finally, many states have a Right of Publicity statutes. This means that you would need a valid model release or permission from the Estate of Monroe in order to use the photograph(s) in any way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelley studios (talk • contribs) 17:14, April 18, 2013‎ (UTC)

Thank you for your input. In that case we should delete this image as copyright violation. w:Tom Kelley (photographer) passed in 1984 so I assume that copyrights won't expire until 95 years after the first publication?--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, could you cite the cases? That might be helpful in general (not that I doubt you for this case). And yes, any bootlegged calendars would not be relevant on the issue -- to become PD, they would have to be copies distributed with the copyright owner's authorization. As for publicity rights though, it is not at all correct that you would need a release from the estate to "use the photographs in any way". If the publicity rights were valid, they would cover usages of her likeness for "commercial purposes" but not further. Commons considers those non-copyright restrictions and those do not prevent upload in and of themselves (also see {{Personality rights}}). Those rights can vary by state, and in particular, the Ninth Circuit ruled last year that Monroe's publicity rights expired at her death. California recently changed its law to retroactively restore them, but the court ruled that New York's law applies on the matter, and so ruled that no such rights exist. Monroe actually died in California, but the estate had basically claimed that she lived in New York (in order to avoid California's inheritance tax), and the court ruled that position meant that New York's publicity rights law is the relevant one as well. But, all that is mostly immaterial here. We need to know about the copyright, and if that is still valid (seems pretty likely), then we can't keep the photos. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It may have been a drive by post which we do really appreciate as it cleared the issue up. Yes it would be nice to read the case results. It is not hard to find the company email if you want to go that route. We may also wish to put a tag on Marilyn's category like Category:Statue of the Little Mermaid (Copenhagen) in case another fool like me thinks he has found treasure like I did. I am also wondering if an article on the image itself would survive deletion review at the English Wikipedia. Some are complaining about the fair use image we have over there being used in Marilyn's article, so we could move it to its own. Include the history, images of the original studio, (new company in the building now and flickr should have images), who got paid how much and when, court cases, etc. "Golden Dreams" was the name of the centerfold image and "A New Wrinkle" was the other. We could call the article Golden Dreams and mention the other in the lead. Kelley Studios still sells them for $15 to $30. I may bring that up with the prudes that want the fair use image removed from her article over there.--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:01, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I searched http://cocatalog.loc.gov for Keyword for "Red Velvet Collection Marilyn Monroe Tom Kelley" this is the copyright catalog at http://www.copyright.gov/ and found these which I feel one of them is this picture and that this picture needs speedy deleted. Theworm777 (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Full Title	Copyright Number	Year
Marilyn : from the famed red velvet calendar session : no. 2 / photo. by Tom Kelley.	VA0000468375	1991
Marilyn Monroe variation : no. 8.	VA0001307646	1997
Kelley's Marilyn Monroe, knees pose, variation : no. 3.	VA0000861888	1997
Marilyn Monroe pose : no. 11.	VAu000692235	2006
Marilyn Monroe pose : no. 12.	VAu000692234	2006
Marilyn Monroe pose : no. 7.	VAu000662034	2003
Marilyn Monroe : variation no. 10.	VAu000590404	2004
Marilyn Monroe : variation no. 9.	VAu000590403	2004
Marilyn Monroe, knees pose variation : no. 3.	VAu000356087	1993
Marilyn Monroe stretch pose, variation number 1.	VAu000077446	1985
Marilyn Monroe stretch pose, variation number 2.	VAu000077445	1985
Marilyn Monroe--on the knees pose.	VAu000068923	1984
Marilyn Monroe--stretch pose.	VAu000068922	1984
Marilyn Monroe double exposure	VAu000019065	1980

I added a speedy tag to the image. #10 is the Playboy centerfold and #2 is the other calendar image.--Canoe1967 (talk) 21:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted-Will undelete this in 36 years time if i'm still around.--KTo288 (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Renault megane cc laguna lip wolfrace assassins rims Image.jpg

There are icons and texts on the image that suggest that it is not own work of uploader. Jespinos (talk) 00:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pierre Boulez Baden-Baden 01.jpg

1971 picture with PD-old license. According to the Conditions for the use of Gallica's contents, the commercial use of the images tagged "domaine public" is subject to payment and covered by a license. Sitacuisses (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pierre Boulez Baden-Baden 02.jpg

1971 picture with PD-old license. According to the Conditions for the use of Gallica's contents, the commercial use of the images tagged "domaine public" is subject to payment and covered by a license. Sitacuisses (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rock Bones En Radio Disney.jpg

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 00:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TransLatticeLogo BRW 2012.jpg

non-free company logo Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 00:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Does not meet threshold of originality to qualify for copyright protection. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thomas Bourguignon.jpg

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jimbo Fisher Florida State University Headshot.jpg

This is the photo from the official profile of the head football coach of Florida State. The license given is obviously absurd. It is POSSIBLE that this image is public domain as a work of the state of Florida, but I think the schools are allowed to hold copyrights, right? And even if they aren't, the athletic department may have special rules as an auxiliary ... or the photo might have been taken by a professional photographer who owns the copyright. It needs to be demonstrated to be public domain. UserB (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Julian Morris Breaking Dawn Part Two Premiere.jpg

This is a non-free picture according to the flickr source. Lucazeppelin (talk) 05:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Powermodule1.png

not own work Tknbeez (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Detail from artwork under a flyover section of the A4232 - Cardiff - geograph.org.uk - 1393524.jpg

Signed graffiti / mural, well above COM:TOO 99of9 (talk) 06:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Information plaque, St Mary Street - geograph.org.uk - 947861.jpg

COM:DW of drawing and text. 99of9 (talk) 06:31, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beaufort Hills ponds info board - geograph.org.uk - 1124172.jpg

COM:DW of graphic and text 99of9 (talk) 06:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oltucağ.jpg

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 09:15, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexandra Sojfer .jpg

Author is not uploader and similar discrepancies for same company are copyvios (see uploader talk page) — Racconish^Tk 09:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Le savoir faire 02.jpg

Author is not uploader and similar pictures for same company are copyvios (see uplaoder talk page) — Racconish^Tk 09:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page nominated since for speedy deletion in view of copyvio. — Racconish^Tk 10:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canne courbe en bois d'ébène, Ebony walking stick.jpg

Author is not uploader and simaliar pictures for same company uploaded by same contributor are copyvios (see uploader talk page) — Racconish^Tk 09:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page nominated since for speedy deletion in view of copyvio. — Racconish^Tk 10:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bcg tube3.png

It seems to come from dakhlavision.com without proper permission. Besides, it's really useless Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 10:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same applies to File:Bcg tube1.png and File:Rossella Piccinno foto Marocco.png. --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 10:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hans-forster.jpg

Own work? Really? Drive-by uploader, tiny size, no metadata, professionally posed. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gunvald Tomstad, sivil, 1942.jpg

This is the only upload of a new editor. It looks to me like a B&W photo that has been colored. It is unlikely that a 1942 image is actually "own work" of our new colleague. It appears to be a studio portrait ands therefore may not fall under the Norwegian "snapshot" rule. Althiough this image may well be OK for Commons, we will need some clarification of its actual status in order to keep it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ogni tanto faccio delle ciofeche anchio!... a proposito è "la luna " che gioca a nascondino (6667693295).jpg

Not realistically useful for any project. — SMUconlaw (talk) 11:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Viscontino (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ricordando ferragosto2 (5113011773).jpg

Not realistically useful for any project. — SMUconlaw (talk) 11:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Viscontino (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scia di luce (8307221753).jpg

Not realistically useful for any project. — SMUconlaw (talk) 11:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Viscontino (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Speravo fosse a fuoco invece..... (7837984626).jpg

Not realistically useful for any project. — SMUconlaw (talk) 11:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Viscontino (talk) 12:22, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rotaach vogel.jpg

del on DE, copyvio http://www.spd-worms-mitte.de/wormser-rotaach.html Nolispanmo 12:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rotaach.jpg

del on DE, copyvio http://www.spd-worms-mitte.de/wormser-rotaach.html Nolispanmo 12:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:National Container Company logo new version.png

non-free company logo Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 12:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain.

Please compare it with this logo with the similar license status: Gazprom --Blacknight87 (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Simple logo. –⁠moogsi (blah) 03:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Homenaje anita miro.png

{{PD-old}} doubtfull. Ju Ta 13:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Invitacio.png

{{PD-old}} doubtfull. Ju Ta 13:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Portrait Kim Yong Ho.png

Low resolution; no camera exif. Does not look like own work to me. Jahoe (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Princess Marina.jpg

previously deleted by Commons:Deletion requests/Post-1923 works by Philip Alexius de Laszlo DrKiernan (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I wonder why the software did not recognise the image when I uploaded it. It usually does and warns the user that the image had been deleted. Surtsicna (talk) 13:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea, but you can see it's identical apart from 1 pixel row by looking at the version that was transferred from here to wikilivres: http://wikilivres.ca/wiki/File:Laszlo_-_Princess_Marina_of_Greece,_1934.jpg DrKiernan (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Johann puch graphisch.jpg

Possible copyright violation. No author (specified as "Public Domain"). The work was created today and the author is dead for at least 70 years (PD-old). Jahoe (talk) 13:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Viatgeparis.png

{{PD-old}} doubtfull. Ju Ta 13:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Los Pop-Kids Logo.png

Not educationally useful - Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. It is not even the official logo of purported show and even if it were the copyright would not belong to the uploader Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Heinrich Tischler 1892- 1938, Selbstporträt 1937.jpg

Not in the PD in the USA (per URAA). Rosenzweig τ 15:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alison Brito.PNG

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LUCIO antunes.PNG

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20130329 180629 thumb.png

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 16:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kalinparsonsin2013.jpg

Self promotional; no reasonable expectation of educational value/usage. See also related images already deleted as described at User talk:Dash.tastix 208.81.184.4 16:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KParsons1.jpg

Self promotional; no reasonable expectation of educational value/usage. See also related images already deleted as described at User talk:Dash.tastix 208.81.184.4 16:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ahmad Javadi.jpg

Claim that this image is public domain seems absurd. It depicts a person who lived from 1917 until 2013. He's clearly over 26 in this photo, so even if the photographer died the moment he took this photograph, it wouldn't be over 70 years old. I guess it might be public domain in the US because we don't have copyright relations with Iran (is that still true), but regardless, it's not free enough for Commons. UserB (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:(Richie) the kind of psycho character when ricky or david piss him off his eyes turn from brown to red he is the best in a zombie battle 2013-04-15 16-38.jpg

COM:SCOPE Stefan4 (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"My Girls" 2013-04-14 13-22.jpg

COM:SCOPE: Unidentified people. Stefan4 (talk) 16:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2010-1-01-Galatasaray -2011-1-02-Beşiktaş-2012-1-03-Fenerbahçe-2013-1-04-İnter-2013-1-05-Yeniden Fenerbahçe Dönemi 2013-04-15 18-36.jpg

Out of scope: unidentified person. Stefan4 (talk) 16:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tellogol.jpg

Taken from ESPN; see this. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bethel 2013-04-15 10-51.jpg

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Stefan4 (talk) 16:57, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carpracha.jpg

Per COM:DW. Jespinos (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saquib Sohaib.jpg

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tahir Gjoci.jpg

Possible Flickr washing. Uploader has a long record of deleted uploads. The Flickr account contains a heterogenous mix of images. See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Amarda_Arkaxhiu.jpg. - 4ing (talk) 18:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of [1], (c) Renuar Photography. - 4ing (talk) 19:18, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Its a flickrwash. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tahir Gjoci2.jpg

Possible Flickr washing. Uploader has a long record of deleted uploads. The Flickr account contains a heterogenous mix of images. See also File:Tahir Gjoci.jpg. - 4ing (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of [2], (c) Renuar Photography. - 4ing (talk) 19:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fatmir Efica.jpg

Possible Flickr washing. Uploader has a long record of deleted uploads. The Flickr account contains a heterogenous mix of images. - 4ing (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Savo Gjirja.jpg

Possible Flickr washing. Uploader has a long record of deleted uploads. The Flickr account contains a heterogenous mix of images. - 4ing (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Savo Gjirja.png

Possible Flickr washing. Uploader has a long record of deleted uploads. The Flickr account contains a heterogenous mix of images. - 4ing (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kolë Xhumari.jpg

Possible Flickr washing. Uploader has a long record of deleted uploads. The Flickr account contains a heterogenous mix of images. - 4ing (talk) 19:22, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elvis Rroshi.jpg

Possible Flickr washing. Uploader has a long record of deleted uploads. The Flickr account contains a heterogenous mix of images. - 4ing (talk) 19:22, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Agim Hushi.jpg

Possible Flickr washing. Uploader has a long record of deleted uploads. The Flickr account contains a heterogenous mix of images. - 4ing (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fatmir Musaj.jpg

Possible Flickr washing. Uploader has a long record of deleted uploads. The Flickr account contains a heterogenous mix of images. - 4ing (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:StoneLaboratoryGibraltarIsland.jpg

please provide evidence of permission McZusatz (talk) 19:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless OTRS permission is given. Ww2censor (talk) 11:36, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leoguana Da Vinci by Edwards & Rudden 01.jpg

Derivative work. Powers (talk) 20:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this file & I agree with the deletion. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flier says lawyer sent him to Spain.jpg

The copyright to the New York Times from 16 January 1937 was renewed; the renewal number is R351835. See Catalogue of Copyright Entries: Periodicals (1964) page 408. Stefan4 (talk) 20:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are more in Category:Eddie August Schneider as well that need a look.--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I found another New York Times one which I nominated for deletion. The rest need to be checked too. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JessicaSanjuan.jpg

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 21:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:119156521bandadenaxho.jpg

band spam, unknown location. no educational value Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Лорадо.jpg

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Syed Ikramuddin Niazi1.jpg

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 21:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kemarau di Afrika.jpg

Low resolution and missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 22:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Photo on 2013-03-07 at 17.45.jpg

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rosie Roff Angel.jpg

Low resolution and no valid EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 23:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gressandro's Stamatiades signature.jpg

No enciclopédico Wikichasqui (talk) 01:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GressandrosLogo.jpg

No enciclopédico Wikichasqui (talk) 01:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penn State Hazleton Administration Bldg with Nittany Lion.jpg

dubious creative commons release claim, also non-free 3-D art Crazypaco (talk) 08:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sitio-barcelona-apertura-trinchera-berwick-1714.jpg

Duplicate, we have a better version here in File:Sitio Barcelona 1714 Obertura Trinchera.jpg Galazan (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A girl in a beach 2013-04-15 03-29.jpg

Out of scope: unidentified person. Stefan4 (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A good image showing being covered by sand on the beach. The fact that person is unidentified and unidentifiable covers COM:PEOPLE. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 18:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, useful picture illustrating a person coated with granular material. -- Cirt (talk) 06:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: –⁠moogsi (blah) 03:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A girl in a beach 2013-04-15 03-29.jpg

unused, personal file, see COM:SCOPE Polarlys (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per previous listing (closed only a week a ago). -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Vitacura.jpg

"licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Unported License.". No-Commercial licenses are not supported on Commons Jarekt (talk) 20:31, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: {{FoP-Chile}}. Amitie 10g (talk) 03:57, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{FoP-Chile}} is fine but it is not a license. We still need a license info provided by the photographer. --Jarekt (talk) 15:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader does not provided a valid license por his upload, but is not a reason for delete an image subjected to the Freedom of Panorama in Chile. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No license. –⁠moogsi (blah) 03:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AURALIZACION.pdf

out of scope INeverCry 20:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 03:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anar.jpg

Данное изображение имеет неясный лицензионный статус. Brooklein (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No license since 16 April 2013 –⁠moogsi (blah) 01:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anar.jpg

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Also, this is small photo without metadata, own work is not sure. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bunge Tanzania.jpg

Uploader request. not sure what license to use.. AliFazal (talk) 22:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CARLOS GARCIA AKA THE BOSS, CEO AND OWNER OF BEYOND EVERY FRIDAY NIGHT THE NEW THURSDAY HOT SPOT IN THE HD ATTRACTION THURSDAY, ALSO CREATOR OF INSANITY THURSDAYS ONE OF THE GREATEST THURSDAY NIGHT NIGHT CLUBS IN THE HD 2013-04-15 01-04.jpg

Appears to be an unused personal file which is out of scope. Also partially an advertisement. Stefan4 (talk) 16:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hotel Baobab Resort.pdf

Promo text, not in scope. - Ganímedes (talk) 11:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: promotional content, not in scope also only text Ezarateesteban 14:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Monument to Oskars Kalpaks (Riga)

There is no FOP in Latvia, hence these are unsuitable at this stage for Commons.

russavia (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Monument to Oskars Kalpaks (Riga)

No FOP in Latvia. The monument was revealed in 2006.

kyykaarme (talk) 11:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anawaschoudhary (talk · contribs)

Unused personal image, out of scope

Morning ☼ (talk) 10:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Anawaschoudhary, please take a moment to look at the scope page which explains the aim of this Wikimedia project. General photo album images are not "realistically of an educational purpose", so though your photographs of yourself, do not create any copyright problem, they are unlikely to be of much use for others. The IBOBI image has a different concern, it appears to rely on images from elsewhere which have not had the sources explained, but are likely to be in copyright. The policy of Licensing must be enforced so that everyone can safely reuse images from Commons for any purpose. Any image for which there is significant doubt on copyright has to be deleted. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 17:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 23:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anawaschoudhary (talk · contribs)

Out of scope, unused personal files.

Jespinos (talk) 21:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andythenice (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Charlestonsw com (talk · contribs)

Out of scope, unused personal drawings.

Jespinos (talk) 00:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diy1688 (talk · contribs)

useless on commons. only educational value: how not to use watermarks.

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dunia Semakin Tenat (talk · contribs)

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 18:01, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dzulhusni (talk · contribs)

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 20:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Felipe67 (talk · contribs)

Low resolutions and missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fenomena Gegaran Bumi (talk · contribs)

Low resolutions and missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 17:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Georgeteixeira (talk · contribs)

Possible copyvios or out of scope.

Jespinos (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Glermedia (talk · contribs)

Possible copyvios.

Jespinos (talk) 17:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaddith ayola (talk · contribs)

According to uploader, the photos were taken in Colombia, but these appear not to have been taken there. The photos are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 22:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kminiter (talk · contribs)

Low resolutions and missing (or no valid) EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 00:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Media Integratif 2013 (talk · contribs)

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Or-bi (talk · contribs)

The images are watermarked and are likely not own work of uploader.

Jespinos (talk) 21:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pascal Chagnon (talk · contribs)

Possible copyvios or out of project scope images.

Jespinos (talk) 20:18, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tanmay685 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thegooygooy (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: unidentified person.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tsveta.nesheva (talk · contribs)

Looks like collection of photos from web (including organization web site), not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asiatic Lion Gir Forest.jpg

Recreation of deleted File:Asiatic Lion Gir Forest India.jpg. As per the description for the deleted file, the image was first published on Facebook and hence, it is a cpvio. Rahul Bott (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i'm confused by this...

File:Asiatic Lion Gir Forest India.jpg isn't currently deleted, nor is there a deleted file with that name
This is not the same photo as File:Asiatic Lion Gir Forest India.jpg

–⁠moogsi (blah) 11:47, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sorry what happened was this. First File:Asiatic Lion Gir Forest India.jpg was deleted by HJ Mitchell and then this other File:Asiatic Lion Gir Forest.jpg was uploaded. Since I do not have access to deleted copies and both files were uploaded by the same user, I mistook them to be the same work (my memory playing with me in respect of similar images!) Eventually, the second file was restored by King of Hearts citing an identity ticket, but I forgot to close this deletion request. May be this settles the matter or do we still need permission for this particular work? Regards, Rahul Bott (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As the uploader is the same and there is no mention of previous publication of this image, as with the other, I don't think any further action has to be taken. Thanks –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anna Czerwińska-Rydel.jpg

Commons:Derivative work from book covers which are not necessary to illustrate article about author. May be cropped. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Piotr Michalik: How to crop a photo? Add the cut, is there a way to trim the already uploaded?

Kept: with the book covers cropped. I believe the remaining portions of the book covers and poster are de minimis –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Caniggia 1986.jpg

The image is {{Argentina}}. Jespinos (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This image is PD in Argentina so it was taken in 1986 so more than 25 years have passed since its publication. See {{PD-AR-Photo}} which is applied to most of the images of Argentine footballers published on the media. - Fma12 (talk) 20:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:URAA-restored copyrights. Jespinos (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This photo could be used only on the Spanish Wikipedia if it is not authorized in the US. But take in mind that if this picture is deleted, all the photos of Argentine footballers from 1971 to 1988 should be deleted as well. I suggest Jespinos to focus on all the pictures (most of them from El Gráfico sports magazine) rather than nominating one particular image as he did in this case. - Blacklord12 (talk) 12:44, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not PD in the source country on the URAA date, therefore copyrighted in the US. Files on Commons must be free to use in their country of origin, and the US where the servers are located. The argument that other stuff exists does unfortunately not stop this one image from being deleted, if you think that other images are in violation of policy then you're free to nominate them –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Argus 700 Records Party 26 November 2011.jpg

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 11:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cooking Under Ten.jpg

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 20:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Djig.jpg

out of scope - no educational value at this tiny size INeverCry 21:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Guesslook.ocm.jpg

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ifeanyi Dike Jr.jpg

out of scope - promotional image/unused personal image INeverCry 22:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Impress.pdf

out of scope INeverCry 22:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Little bat.jpg

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:22, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Silver Rider.png

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 22:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eddie August Schneider.jpg

Two completely different images in one. The current revision is claimed to be in the public domain because the issue of New York Times from 24 December 1940 wasn't renewed, but this document tells that it was renewed, so the licence claim is wrong. It should be possible to keep the other image in the history, though. Stefan4 (talk) 22:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, this upload occurred when I was testing out w:WP:FTCG during its initial development, so the split history might have been a bug or something. Is there any indication what the older image actually depicts? This, that and the other (talk) 07:23, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The older image should be deleted as a duplicate of File:Football Stadium View 3.JPG. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:52, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio and duplicate –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo fotona hq.jpg

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:31, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:27, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo HerculePro.png

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:27, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo marketing des deals.png

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:28, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ovision grafix.jpg

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 22:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Robinson Cavalcanti.jpg

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 22:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: previously published –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sanjib Ganguly Bengai Arambagh Kalyani Kolkata West Bengal.jpg

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Selección de versículos de El Mensaje Reencontrado.pdf

out of scope INeverCry 23:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: only text –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The 1979 Muslim Genocide in South Western Uganda.pdf

out of scope INeverCry 23:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:What would Bull do.jpg

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 23:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zarganar.jpg

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from JohannesErwinEugen.R

Those files were taken from the manufacturer's website: [3], [4] (please scroll down to the end). There is no evidence that permission was given to do so or the uploader is the photographer. The user has made several other uploads of pictures showing tractors. I only checked a handful of them – they seemed to be OK. --El Grafo (talk) 11:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checked some more: Most of them look perfectly fine but:

File:11er_Deutz.jpg seems to be from here (actually here –⁠moogsi (blah) 11:52, 30 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]
File:Deutz IN trac 6.60.jpg and File:IN trac 6.60.jpg are scanned from the cover of a book: [5]

-- El Grafo (talk) 12:32, 16 April 2013 (UTC) PS/JFTR: Uploader seems to be mainly contributing to de.wikibooks, so I left him a message there.[reply]

Deleted: per nomination –⁠moogsi (blah) 11:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Axentria (talk · contribs)

out of scope - promotional - unused text logos of non-notable company

INeverCry 22:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:28, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crusts (talk · contribs)

out of scope - promotional images/unused personal images

INeverCry 22:37, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:29, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ezeequ (talk · contribs)

out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 22:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:29, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheSilverRider (talk · contribs)

out of scope - artworks of non-notable artist - also, no permission

INeverCry 22:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Permission needs to be given via OTRS to release the rights on contemporary art like this –⁠moogsi (blah) 12:27, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Files from Simpio96 stream (All files)

Non-free licencing intended, courtesy deletion as per VP discussion --Pitke (talk) 13:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Keep when moved from flickr commons in the files were made available with proper license, read here Commons:Bar_italiano/Archivio/Archivio22#Foto_di_Simpio96Commons:Bar_italiano/Archivio/Archivio22#Foto_di_Simpio96. the user:Simpio96 has agreed with the procedure wikimedia commons. --Pava (talk) 14:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

after this has put the old license, releasing a commons as the sole source of initial free license --Pava (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To Catia has been explained all the consequences of a free license, several times. During the transfer was present in the description of the photographs marked "Do not use without my consent. Thank you" but is prior to the change of license. Since it has been used a tool of mass transfer, the description has not been changed. It 'been asked to rename images with descriptive text and a suitable description. The correct operation is to improve the photos do not delete. thank you --Pava (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I read the Google translations and it does seem she was confused and possibly pushed to change her Flickr licenses. She was very adamant about not wanting any derivative works as well as wanting to be notified for any use of her images. She also mentions that some were previously published so she would need to go through OTRS. She does state at the end that she would like them all deleted from commmons because she was confused about the licenses and I don't think could read the English on Flickr well. We should delete them out of courtesy.--Canoe1967 (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

have you read all discussion? there are 3 different threads on the same case (the user was inersperto) + discussion in his talk, you read everything in chronological order? Maybe Google translate does not translate well, indeed translates badly, but the conclusion was that Simpio96 has requested the elimination of some photos (with a baby) and those have been removed, the other did not ask for removal, said he returned to his flickr previous license and has not shown the intention to remove them. The sentence on the description of the photo is prior to changing the license (this was before his flickr donation) is not relevant is simply removed and replaced with a description. If you have questions you can ask to 'user Simpio96, warn of this discussion and expose himself dynamics. Or ask the BAR ITALIANO that will give you more missions, several directors have followed the talk --Pava (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We should ask Simpio96 if they want them deleted then. If they do then we should delete them. I did read the Google translations of all three threads. If Simpio96 uses the delete template here then we won't need Google to translate that. They are the rights holder so it should be their choice because they may have not fully understood what the licences meant. Are they aware of this DR?--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

yes, we can ask for his intervention, indeed indispensable, but one thing I do not understand: if he has called for the elimination of only a few pictures (of the baby) and left all the others, because you have these doubts? --Pava (talk) 19:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have him go through and tag with {{Speedydelete|1=Requested by photographer}} then and that should solve it. I thought he was a she. Sorry for the mix-up.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

but is not sure she wants this thing, in fact from what I remember she was in favor of its retention of commons. Was opposed only to cancel all 5 photos not those for which the license has changed,why you want to force delete her pictures without her expressly requests? --Pava (talk) 19:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want them all deleted if they don't want them deleted. Ask Simpio96 to come here and copy/paste the tag above to all the images that they want deleted. Then we can close this DR.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:42, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok --Pava (talk) 20:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are hundreds of images of theirs, we can't expect them to manually tag every single one should they want them all deleted. --Pitke (talk) 05:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote to Simpio96, I repeat that she has already made clear that he wanted to erase the imagery alone, however, will respond here if he sees fit. Otherwise we begin to categorize and describe the best images that are valuable to the commons. wrong is clear instead of misunderstanding or misinterpretation --Pava (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as said by Pava. Now let's see what she (Simpio96) says. --Viscontino (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Licencing is irrevocable. Either the files were copyrighted since the beginning thus uploading them was and is still is a blatant violation of copyright, or the files were released in CC-By-Sa and as we do usually we don't care whether the licence would be repealed. The only issue we should be take care of is possible personality rights infringements and delete photographs of people that don't want to appear here. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 20:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. And no, as far as I remember no user got their pictures deleted on request because of licence changing : it's made clear that release is irrevocable for obvious reasons that shouldn't be me to remind.
Delete I'm entirely not clear on whether Simpio96 understood the terms of the license when they changed it to CC-BY on Flickr. However, their last posts on the matter seem to indicate that they don't want to distribute their work under this license. As for irrevocability, we allow users to "change their mind" about photos uploaded under a free license and delete their photos on request as a courtesy. I see no difference between that and the situation here. However if this is the case, then the licenses also need to be changed back on Flickr to avoid confusion –⁠moogsi (blah) 23:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Courtesy deletion. Simpio96 appears to have made an honest mistake in changing the licensing on their files. -FASTILY 11:16, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Files from Simpio96 stream (All files)

Non-free licencing intended, courtesy deletion as per VP discussion --Pitke (talk) 13:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Keep when moved from flickr commons in the files were made available with proper license, read here Commons:Bar_italiano/Archivio/Archivio22#Foto_di_Simpio96Commons:Bar_italiano/Archivio/Archivio22#Foto_di_Simpio96. the user:Simpio96 has agreed with the procedure wikimedia commons. --Pava (talk) 14:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]