Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

October 13

[edit]

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Xyzbcazxy5242 (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1977 photograph, has 2017 Exif data but photograph is blurry and looks cropped. Abzeronow (talk) 00:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph is blurry and cropped, but it is not altered and is a photograph of who it says it is. What's the problem? 172.79.192.80 03:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is, who took the original photo? This is very small and looks like a photo of the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1939 French photograph, would need more information on publication and the photographer to determine actual copyright status, very likely restored by URAA. Abzeronow (talk) 00:41, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no free copyright issued: Link SilverBullet X (hit me up) 01:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely an own work. Based on this thesis (https://kc.umn.ac.id/id/eprint/21185/4/BAB_II.pdf), this file is a crop from a photo owned by the company. Symphonium264 (talk) 02:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage outside userpage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:17, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is no longer needed Mj kavyapriya (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a duplicate file of [1] TansoShoshen (talk) 05:04, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is no longer needed Mj kavyapriya (talk) 05:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected copyright violation - watermark on the image indicates the International Labour Organization (ILO) claims copyright whereas the uploader to Commons does not appear to be acting on behalf of the ILO. Redtree21 (talk) 05:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. Redundant to File:ORT Logo.svg --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside rejected draftt, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blakkez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos from a copyrighted book.

Günther Frager (talk) 00:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why deletion? It's my personal photo screen shot of the book of KunstHerz but not other camera I order from Germany about the book. It's a documentary purpose. Hopefully you can give authorize.. What is another option for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakkez (talk • contribs) 06:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC) And another book of Robert J Wickenheiser and Terrance Lindall The John Milton Projects 2009-2015 by Terrance Lindall and this book is a gift for me and that's why I photo screen shot this Art book, but I have authorize to photo screen shot and photo copyright to my camera and part of the document and share to the world of knowledge.. Thanks...[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:DW. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 15:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Blakkez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope / copyvio: as previously, photos from a copyrighted book, as well as some out-of-scope personal artwork and photos.

Omphalographer (talk) 06:15, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nikitha Jotheswari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: photos of various subjects all taken at oblique angles and/or with obtrusive filters. Please hold your camera level when taking pictures and disable image filters (like the text overlay in File:Puli kolam.jpg or the "film" appearance in File:Cute pencil.jpg).

Omphalographer (talk) 06:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd  Keep File:Cute pencil.jpg. Other photos that might be worth saving and that I'd on balance recommend keeping, though perhaps someone might want to straighten most of them out, are File:Milk sweet.jpg, File:Beetroot juice.jpg, File:Muskmelon juice.jpg, File:Steamed dumpling.jpg, File:Panacotta.jpg (because it's mango panna cotta), File:Pondicherry entrance gate.jpg (because it's much bigger than the alternative). I'd vote to  Delete the rest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cute pencil.jpg has the "film filter" I was mentioning. It could be cropped but the resulting image would be under 400x600, barely a usable size. File:Pondicherry entrance gate.jpg has some weird lighting (reflections off a car window?) as well as the oblique angle. A lot of the food images have part of the subject partially out of frame, so it would be difficult to straighten them out without cropping out even more of the subject in the process or leaving a blank space "outside" the photo after rotation. Do we really have so few photos of food that we need to keep these? Omphalographer (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The question would be what photos we have of those specific foods and drinks. I didn't see any equivalent photos of mango panna cotta, but I didn't do a search for other photos of rose milk sweets. Considering that no space is saved when files are "deleted," maybe you should do those kinds of searches before nominating photos for deletion, but if you don't, it makes a whole lot of sense to err on the side of keeping files visible in borderline cases. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are worse images on Commons and we still keep them. Some people might appreciate the odd angles as a form of an artistic quirk. They might be usable for food or traveling blogs etc. where being educational can be achieved without following a strict "encyclopedic" format or style like on Wikipedia. So, while such images might not be suitable for use in Wikipedia, they still may be suitable for use on other platforms. Nakonana (talk) 09:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Atlas front page.jpg and File:Atomic habits book.jpg might need to be deleted as they show potentially copyrighted book covers.
I've added categories to all other photos and think they can be kept. Nakonana (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably copyvio - offical award. Look at YT material on the conference website Sławek Borewicz (talk) 06:39, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Iskhair (talk · contribs)

[edit]

spam and/or useless images

Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by GoldRoger487 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Offensive
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Rationale needs elaboration. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like someone is offended by the hammer and sickle. That's totally OK, but serious reference sites don't delete important symbols and images just because they may be offensive. Can you imagine if Wikipedia were restricted to inoffensive subjects? It would become utter pablum, rather than an encyclopedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It should no longer be deleted as it is the flag of the Centre of Indian Trade Unions and not a joke about the romanian polician Florin Citu.
I will add Category:Centre of Indian Trade Unions and Category:Flags of trade unions in India categories beside the current ones.GoldRoger487 (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

identifiable pictures of minor individuals. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 09:02, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blank with no content Rathfelder (talk) 09:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused render of File:Bandeira londrina.svg, no obvious use Nutshinou Talk! 09:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused render of File:Parana Municip Londrina.svg, no obvious use Nutshinou Talk! 09:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unusably small and compressed render of File:Parana Municip Londrina.svg, no obvious use Nutshinou Talk! 09:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, very small render of File:Bandeira de Londrina (alternativa).svg: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/Bandeira_de_Londrina_%28alternativa%29.svg/180px-Bandeira_de_Londrina_%28alternativa%29.svg.png, no obvious use Nutshinou Talk! 09:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The picture was claimed not to be thje school in Przybynów. The author admitted that it might not be a building in Przybynów ([2]). Since 'lack of information is better than wrong information", the picture shoul be deleted. Michał Ski (talk) 09:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since lack of information is better than wrong information, delete the possibly wrong information from the file description and ask for COM:File renaming, but why delete the photo? Better yet, ask people on Polish-language Wikipedia whether anyone can identify the building. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The name of the photo Przybynów school DK12 should be changed to Przybynów building DK12 and the photo should be left in the Buildings in Przybynów category.
I made a virtual Google trip through Przybynów and did not find this building. Selso, is there a chance it is not in Przybynów? Michał Ski (talk) 11:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just keep in the category Category:Unidentified locations in Poland and wait for someone to identify it properly. Once you delete it, no-one is going to do it ever. --Botev (talk) 21:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio: The picture is under Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License. It cannot be used for this Wiki. VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ZASEMI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

bunch of personal images of non contributors, non notable, possible copyvios.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 10:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kettel Hello,
I am currently contributing to the improvement of a Wikipedia page that lacks visuals, particularly in the section dedicated to club athletes for the 2023-2024 season. As part of this project, I have uploaded several images of athletes that correspond to this section.
My goal is to provide relevant and quality illustrations to enrich this page by adding images alongside the text, thus offering a better experience for readers. I am uploading these images in advance to save time, as it requires careful organization and consideration to select the best photos and their placement in relation to the text.
Thank you for your understanding and support in this effort to enhance Wikipedia. ZASEMI (talk) 11:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you establish the notability of Remi Segura? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Nv8200pa as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 11:09, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly not one of the "Personal photos by non-contributors. Low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions." Please check the caption at the bottom left corner of this photo and keep. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@NearEMPTiness: It is claimed to be from 1888, so if this is the case, it can't be a "Personal photo by a non-contributor". It is not a picture anyway. Yann (talk) 22:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per [3] depicted sculpture is a 2012 artwork by artist Harold Holden of Kremlin, OK and is therefore still protected by copyright. Wikicommons accepts only free-to-use media. DanielPenfield (talk) 11:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo taken by myself and is therefore my intellectual property which I have given permission to be used. It is part of the Fort Smith National Historical Site and in plain view of the traveling public. I am not claiming any ownership of the statute. Jlt78 (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but the statue is under copyright. Unfortunately, the US has no Freedom-of-panorama rule for statues and similar artwork. PaterMcFly (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As others have mentioned, your photograph is a derived work of the original artwork and therefore anyone using your photograph would also need to seek the permission of the original artist to use it without infringing on his intellectual property rights. The "plain view of the traveling public", also known as Freedom of panorama, is also explained in the section on "Artworks and sculptures" in COM:FOP US. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, statue is copyrighted so we unfortunately cannot host this photo. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 22:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vergosnet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

definetly not own work+ some of files are photos of screens.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:33, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

γιατί διαγράφεις τις φωτογραφίες; Το λήμμα είναι πιο αντιπροσωπευτικό και ενδιαφέρον, να έχει φωτογραφίες. Είναι στιγμιότυπα δικά μου απο βίντεο ελεύθερα στο you tube. Παρακαλώ μην είστε αρνητής στον εμπολουτισμό του λήματος. Μην αλλάξεις τη δομή. Το έχω αναλάβει προσωπικά και θα το εμπλουτίσω με τα ονοματεπώνυμα των ηθοποιών που ακόμα δεν τα ξέρουμε. όταν γινει αυτό, θα μπουν όλες οι εκτακτες συμμετοχες κατά σειρά εμφανισης, κατά σειρά εμφάνισης επεισοδίου. Ευχαριστώ. Vergosnet (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you say "it is free licensed", ok.. give me link where you get these free licensed videos please. also you indicated these are your own works? modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 04:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


οι φωτογραφίες είναι στιγμιότυπα απο βιντεο. Παρακαλώ να μην διαγραφτουν. 14.48, 13 Ekim 2024 2a02:85f:fcbf:f601:197b:c21:a1ab:efbf

Files uploaded by FinlandCar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Asser Wallenius.jpg, there is "photo: unknown", that indicates photo dont belong to FinlandCar. and also File:Satsuma_GT_(My_Summer_Car).jpg is ingame screenshot. so that is completly copyvio.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 12:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wasing1990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not notable, out of project scope, check: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80:%D0%AD%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80_%D0%90%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 12:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ashugaur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashu_gaur please remove. + and it is possible copyvio.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 12:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original photo is originally clicked, with no copyright. Also the image is on Social Media and Public Sharing Domain by the User so not a copyright violation for putting the image as person's identifier reference photo Ashugaur (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The metadata credits Sebastian Rudnicki and is marked all rights reserved. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

image visiblement pas libre de droits Lefringant (talk) 12:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

image visiblement pas libre de droits Lefringant (talk) 12:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Blubbernnuter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused content related to personal project, has no educational value outside of said project: en:User talk:Blubbernnuter#Speedy deletion nomination of Joels science inquiry project

Nutshinou Talk! 13:15, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tiagofachini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused content related to non-notable band, out of scope: pt:Usuário(a)_Discussão:Tiagofachini

Nutshinou Talk! 13:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted background

Trade (talk) 15:04, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please elaborate how these files are breaking any copyright rules. I took these pictures and they do not violate any copyright laws or rules to the best of my knowledge. ThatGerman (talk) 16:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Depicted statue seems to be recent and thereby still in copyright. Unfortunately, Benin has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, we need either a permission by the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

File:卵と私オムライス.jpgとの重複。 ノボホショコロトソ (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can not be own work, since this is a photograph or an artwork which may or may not be free. Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the original uploader of this file. After reviewing this file, I cannot verify its copyright status and request it is deleted and removed from Commons. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Wiiformii as Logo (help=off) See my talk page. Yann (talk) 18:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is in the public domain and should not be deleted.
This insignia is a coat of arms of a German Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (corporation governed by public law). According to § 5 Abs.1 of the German Copyright law, official works such as coats of arms and flags are gemeinfrei (in the public domain). Since the Federal Republic of Germany is the legal successor of the Weimar Republic as well as of the "Third Reich" this law is also applicable to flags and coat of arms promulgated before 1945. Furthermore, the insignia is part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment (official work) issued by a German authority or court, which means it is classified as gemeinfrei by the same law (§ 5 Abs.1 UrhG). Onyx Moose US (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake MultipleRocketLauncher (talk) 19:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file (a ca. 1935 German photograph) was taken from the image database of the Bundesarchiv (German Federal Archive), see [4], but it is not a part of the large batch which was given to Commons by the archive under a CC license and uploaded by bot in 2008.

The file was uploaded by a Commons user in 2018, claiming that the photo is in the public domain because its author is anonymous and it was published over 70 years ago. However, we do not know enough about the context, time and place of first publication to determine if this is actually true.

Per COM:Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works, it is enough if the identity of the author has become known in some way that the photograph is not anonymous and a copyright term of 70 years pma applies. Also, a 1935 German photograph is very likely still protected in the US per the URAA. The file should therefore be deleted. It can be restored in 2056 with PD-old-assumed. Rosenzweig τ 20:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This is a 1942 photo by German (based in Regensburg) photographer Christoph Lang, who lived from 1895 to 1966 [5]. So the photograph is not in the public domain yet in both Germany and the US, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2038 (URAA). Rosenzweig τ 21:34, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


May not be below COM:TOO UK. Can't edit the page itself due to cascading. -Ahri Boy (talk) 22:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If that's so, then the file that this has been derived from needs to be deleted, too. Schwede66 22:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused animated logo of something apparently called "The Fifth Circle". Unclear what this is meant to represent. Omphalographer (talk) 22:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Badly-named uncat since 2017 Ukrainian photograph. Something that looks like a Ukrainian quote in upper center, possibly copyrighted. No context as to why this photograph is in scope. Abzeronow (talk) 23:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep This might be Hutsul embroidery and a quote by poet Natalia Baklai (Q12080464). Someone who knows more will be able to provide some basic context. Sinigh (talk) 13:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not visible. File cover changed Tolga Theo Yalur (talk) 23:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope, copyright? Oesterreicher12 (talk) 23:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]