Yiyi

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Yiyi!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Deleted content

---

Hello Yiyi, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Fidal.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Trixt (talk) 19:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Yiyi!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Fidal.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2009.
• Image:Molini Marzoli Massari-Busto Arsizio2.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Molini Marzoli Massari-Busto Arsizio1.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Molini Marzoli Massari-Busto Arsizio3.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Vortex (atletica leggera).jpg was uncategorized on 30 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Order of Jamaica.gif was uncategorized on 6 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Order Of Distinction.gif was uncategorized on 6 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Joker (DC Comics) - transparent background.png was uncategorized on 17 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 22:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Spilla per i partecipanti al festival della qualità dell'atletica leggera.svg.png was uncategorized on 27 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 00:16, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Operazioni navali prima guerra mondiale.jpg was uncategorized on 18 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Lamine Diack IAAF president.jpg

I see that you added the {{Delete}} template to the above image requesting that the image be reviewed for possible deletion. Unfortunately you did not provide a reason for this deletion. Could you please correct the {{Delete}} template by including a reason for deletion. Just follow the information on the incomplete delete template on the image page. Then complete steps 1 through 4 in the deletion template by creating the deletion requests subpage, adding the deletion request to the deletion requests log, informing the uploader of the image and checking the usage of the image. Please note that the easiest way to nominate individual images for deletion is to click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the side bar. It is best not to manually add the {{Delete}} template. It may in fact be easier for you to just remove the current {{Delete}} and then re-nominate the image for deletion by clicking on the "Nominate for deletion" link in the side bar. Please make sure that you have disabled any pop up blocker in your web browser before clicking on the "Nominate for deletion" link. If you have any questions you can ask at the Commons Help Desk or on my talk page. Thanks --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lamine_Diack_IAAF_president.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lamine_Diack_IAAF_president.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Captain-tucker (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Robin Tunney.jpg

File:Robin Tunney.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Denniss (talk) 19:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Rory Cochrane.jpg

File:Rory Cochrane.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Denniss (talk) 19:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token kiki

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Re: cambio nome immagine

 Fatto - Non c'è nessun problema! :-D

Volevo chiederti una cosa. Leggo qui sopra "I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!", in che consiste? A che serve? Mi spiegheresti un po'? Ciao. Angelus^(talk) 14:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:External links barnstar.svg sources

Please, attribute your files correctly. File:Original Barnstar Hires.svg, not File:Original Barnstar Hires.png. Ain92 (talk) 20:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Straneo, Floriani, etc...

Sono voci che avevo già creato su en.wiki (della Straneo ho pure caricato la foto di Erik, puoi usarla). Te lo dico, non per farti avere uno spunto, so che non ne hai bisogno, solo per ricordarti almeno di aggiungere gli interwiki (di regola essi vengono messi dal bot solo se c'è quello della en.wiki da o verso). --Kasper2006 (talk) 17:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Ha senso la bandiera italiana in una lista di italiani?

Anche a te faccio la domanda del titolo per pagine come it:Migliori prestazioni italiane nei 100 metri piani femminili. --Kasper2006 (talk) 11:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Yiyi sei troppo intelligente per capire che la storia della "minimenirrima percentuaale" è un colossale arrampicarsi sugli specchi. Per fare una prestazione italiana bisogna essere "italiani" PUNTO (vedi recenti casi di Gloria Hooper, Bencosme, Cerrone etc.). Così è così per la FIDAL, ma quel che è peggio è così per il 100% (attualmente si parla di solo poche centinaia di nomi, ma sono tutti), nelle pagine che io avevo creato sulle "migliori prestazioni". Dre Rock, comunque, aveva dato una risposta diversa dalla tua, parlando di OBBLIGATORIETA' all'uso del template che crea questo colossale BUG. Ma da quando siete rimasti solo in due a decidere sugli stili dell'atletica, la questione non può neanche essere discussa. Potrei fregarmene perché tanto non ci sono più, ma nello specifico la cosa mi spiace perchè quelle pagine "che voi avete solo ripreso ed aggiornato", le avevo create e curavo io da anni. Diciamo che potevate avere un po' più di rispetto per il mio lavoro. ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 07:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Non è che non si vogliono è che sono "straordinariamente" ridondanti. Segnalo anche a te che ho caricato molte immagini di atleti italiani fatte da Erik ad Helsinki Category:Athletes from Italy. --Kasper2006 (talk) 08:33, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Phosphate group alternative.png

File:Phosphate group alternative.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.247.169.153 23:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Phosphate group.png

File:Phosphate group.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.247.169.153 23:24, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Strutture chimiche

Ciao :-) solo una segnalazione tecnica per avvisarti di Commons:Deletion requests/Files depicting wrong chemical structures, hanno contestato alcune immagini che ti avevo commissionato al Laboratorio grafico e quindi, una volta sostituite con quelle corrette (fatte da ANGELUS), ho messo in cancellazione quelle contestate. --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 13:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Yiyi, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 14:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Un milione di voci.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lobo (howl?) 16:30, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Richiesta bot

Hello, Yiyi. You have new messages at Ricordisamoa's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Ricordisamoa 18:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quarzo morione.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:13, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Struttura molecolare di una zeolite.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

WLM participating countries

Hi Yiyi. I am just wondering, why do you remove Egypt every time you edit file:Participating Countries WLM 2013.svg? Can you return it there? Thanks --aad_Dira (talk) 21:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC).

No worries. Thank you for fast response and fixing! --aad_Dira (talk) 22:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC).

Hi Yiyi, could you please update your beautiful map about WLM2013 according to Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013/Participating countries page? I think, Belarus should be white and Nepal should be red (I didn't check every country). Thanks in advance! Samat (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt reaction! :) Samat (talk) 15:36, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molen De Adriaan (Haarlem).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry, but it lacks sharpness and perspective correction, a pity --Poco a poco 14:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment Let's not rush things Diego, I uploaded new version. Please have another look. --Iifar 14:47, 1 September 2013 (UTC) The bulding at left in background seem very tilted --Christian Ferrer 16:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment Last fix. --Iifar 17:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Good enough IMO --Christian Ferrer 17:18, 1 September 2013 (UTC) No need to put it to CR, much better now indeed, over QI threshold, thanks! Poco a poco 19:33, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Yiyi, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Yiyi, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

File:Gabriella Dorio 2.jpg

File:Gabriella Dorio 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 12:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Yiyi⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Yiyi,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Ebola

Sareste in grado di aggiornare File:Ebola 1976-2014.svg per includere l'epidemia nella Repubblica Democratica del Congo? Delphi234 (talk) 22:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, of course. But can you tell me the approximate coordinates so that I can put the blue spot in the correct position? --Yiyi (talk) 08:56, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

I was not exactly sure what the spots represented, is that the location of the first case? In the DR Congo, it originated in en:Boende, Equateur,[1] although this says the first case was contracted by someone "from Ikanamongo Village".[2] The DR Congo outbreak is not related to the outbreak that originated in Guinea. There is also one case and one death in Mali, from someone traveling from Guinea. So far it has not spread to anyone else, but the WHO will wait until 42 days have passed to make sure.[3] Delphi234 (talk) 09:35, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Blue dots are outbreaks in 2014; red dots are outbreaks from 1977 to 2012; brown dots are outbreaks in 1976. So, if I understand (but my English is't so good :-P), I have to put blue dots in Boende and in Ikanamongo Village. Is it correct? --Yiyi (talk) 11:00, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

No, only one blue dot in Boende. Ikanamongo is likely nearby, but refers to the same person. No, solo un punto blu in Boende. Ikanamongo è probabile nelle vicinanze, ma si riferisce alla stessa persona. Delphi234 (talk) 17:03, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok, perfect. It will be ready tomorrow :-) --Yiyi (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

No. It's ready now. --Yiyi (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Why are there two blue dots in Guinea? There was only one outbreak there in 2014, which began in en:Meliandou (in December 2013, but was not recognized until 2014), and that outbreak is the one that spread to Senegal, Mali, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Nigeria. Would it make sense to only have two blue dots, one in Guinea, one in DR Congo, but color in all of the countries that it spread to from Guinea - Senegal, Mali, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Nigeria? Although I am not really sure it makes any sense to include Mali, because there was only one case there, someone who caught it in Guinea, and died in Mali roughly three weeks ago. So far no one else in Mali has gotten Ebola, but WHO will wait three more weeks to be sure. Delphi234 (talk) 21:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

To realize the map I based on this map. If you have another source that confirm what you say, I can modify. Ok for Mali. --Yiyi (talk) 11:23, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia libera i monumenti - Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2014.pdf

One source image link is missing or broken, please fix. Denniss (talk) 10:30, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia libera i monumenti - Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2014.pdf

File:Wikipedia libera i monumenti - Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2014.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 17:31, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Foto su QI

Ciao Dario,ho visto un pò' delle tue foto su QI. I ragazzi,giustamente,sono selettivi,se ti posso aiutare dimmelo. Comunque ti posso suggerire di non usare mai e poi mai sopra i 400 ISO altrimenti c'è troppo rumore e poi devi lavorare un po' di più sulla distorsione delle immagini,la torre che hai messo insomma deve essere dritta,e il cielo azzurro altrimenti le declinano! Se hai bisogno sono qui,fa piacere avere un altro italiano con cui parlare . Buona serata. --LivioAndronico talk 21:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

licenza CC BY SA con limiti

Ciao, ho visto le dichiarazioni indicate sull'immagine che tu hai caricato [4] questa doppia dichiarazione di licenza CC BY SA e licenza limitata in base alla legge italiana, te la sei inventata o ha delle solide basi normative? Ciao--Susanna Giaccai (talk) 07:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimitero monumentale di Busto Arsizio - capitello.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Orientation repaired --Smial 14:34, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door of the tabernacle in San Filippo Neri baptistery in Busto Arsizio.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Martin Kraft 14:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre di villa Ottolini-Tosi a Busto Arsizio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 14:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Israel President's Medal ribbon.svg

I wrote about the Israel President's Medal and have never seen any mention or image of a ribbon version. What is the source that shows the ribbon exists? DGtal (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo del Tessile in Busto Arsizio, Italy 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Meeting Wikimania Esino Lario May 2015 - 39.JPG

Grazie, mi è servito. --Nemo 14:24, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Archeowiki logo O.svg

And also:

• File:Archeowiki logo V.svg
• File:Archeowiki logo.svg —LX (talk, contribs) 19:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Michele e grattacielo a Busto Arsizio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support ok now! --Hubertl 17:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madonna con Bambino dormiente - Biagio Bellotti.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Ambrogio, affresco di Biagio Bellotti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Clemente papa by Biagio Bellotti.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No significant defects --Daniel Case 01:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Jemolo by Biagio Bellotti.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For its size, no significant defects --Daniel Case 01:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloria di San Sabino by Biagio Bellotti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can yoy improve the bottom crop? A (small) part of the painting is missing. --C messier 17:06, 4 March 2016 (UTC)  Done--Yiyi 10:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)  Support OK (although smaller). --C messier 17:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muso di gatto europeo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:02, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edicola di San Carlo Borromeo - Busto Arsizio 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:02, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carità - mortorio di San Michele Arcangelo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angelo - affresco basilica di San Giovanni Battista - Busto Arsizio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit too soft, but OK for me. --C messier 19:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

article "Antonino Paternò Castello, marchese di San Giuliano", map about First Balcan War

Dear Yiyi,

acc. to the map information, you have been the translator of this map from Bulgarian into Italian but unfortunately there are two mistakes in the Italian version of that map which are not existing in the Bulgarian origin. So I believe they are made within the translation:

1) Tърново-Сеймен has been translated into Veliko Tărnovo which is not the same place. Veliko Tǎrnovo is a city north of the Balcan range, just ~50 km from the Roumanian frontier on river Danube while you have located it near to the Bulgarian-Turkish frontier.

2) The Italian version contains two places named Komotini: a) for Гюмюрджина (which is right) and b) for Мерхамлъ in the Bulgarian one.

MfG Jan Engelstädter (de-wiki) --176.4.68.214 08:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Israel President's Medal ribbon.svg

File:Israel President's Medal ribbon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DGtal (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Foto da tagliare per Wikivoyage

Eccola: [5] --Campi03 (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crespi's Mansion and an old turbine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:06, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Wikimania 2016 - GLAM (03).jpg

File:Wikimania 2016 - GLAM (03).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:Liam Wyatt and Jane Darnell's User digest at Wikimania 2016 01.jpg. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Revent^talk 19:33, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Wikimania 2016 - GLAM (01).jpg

File:Wikimania 2016 - GLAM (01).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:Liam Wyatt and Jane Darnell's User digest at Wikimania 2016 05.jpg. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Revent^talk 19:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Viale della Gloria

Perché non è un'informazione direttamente correlata all'immagine. Altrimenti potremmo scrivere un'intera voce enciclopedica nella didascalia, visto che la variante ferroviaria ha innescato delle trasformazioni urbanistiche estese e importanti.--Arbalete (talk) 05:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

WLM main Template:Monumento italiano

Hello Yiyi! You are a member in Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Italy, so I try to ask you: The main Template:Monumento italiano does not show Template:Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer, so it is not visible in description pages. Is a repair necessary? Or is it sufficient to have a link to it:Progetto:Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 (I have made a Redirect in the Italian Wikipedia, to make the Template-link working: View one of the uploaded photos, maybe File:Scultura in ferro “Cavallo morente” 02.jpg). But the link in the Template 'Authorisations' does not go to a PDF-licence or something like that. And: In Commons:Freedom of panorama#Italia we should write a little bit about exceptions for WLM photos and the chances to make photos in that context, it is not understandable there (I have written new User GiacomoQuaggiotto (art sculpture “Cavallo morente”). Can you help or translate? --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 05:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Photo requests in Varese and Milan

Do you do photo requests in Varese and Milan? If so I can give you a list of ideas! WhisperToMe (talk) 04:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Excellent! I have a list of photos for each area in Lombardy:

Milan:

• Lycée Stendhal de Milan - via Laveno, 12 - 20148 Milano
• German School of Milan/Deutsche Schule Mailand/Scuola Germanica di Milano - Via Legnano 24 20121 Milano
• Scuola Giapponese di Milano/ミラノ日本人学校 ("Japanese School of Milan") - Via arzaga 10, 20146 Milano ITALIA
• Scuola Svizzera di Milano - Via Andrea Appiani, 21 - 20121 Milano
• The British School of Milan - two entrances: Via Pisani Dossi, 16 (Main Entrance) and Via Rombon - Map
• American School of Milan - Via K. Marx 14 20090, Noverasco di Opera Milan, Italy
• International School of Milan - Via Bernardino Telesio, 25 20145 Milano
• Ethiopian Airlines city office - Via Albricci, 9 20122 Milan
• Former Lufthansa Italia head office, Centro Leoni, Via Givanni Spadolini n. 7 20141 MILANO (MI)

Varese:

• European School, Varese - Via Montello, 118, 21100 Varese VA, Italy

Other cities:

• Gallarate: Head office of/sede di Air Italy - Corso Sempione 111, 21013 Gallarate (VA) - Map
• Somma Lombardo: Head office of/sede di Neos - Via della chiesa 68 21019 Somma Lombardo (VA) Italy - Map

As long as this isn't too far:

• Campione d'Italia (exclave surrounded by Switzerland) - Scuola Elementare and Scuola Media, Via Riasc 5 and Scuola Materna G. Garibaldi, via Totone

WhisperToMe (talk) 16:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Wikimania_2016_-_Going_mobile_and_keeping_editing:_needs_and_challenges_to_edit_Wikipedia_from_mobile_devices

Category:Wikimania_2016_-_Going_mobile_and_keeping_editing:_needs_and_challenges_to_edit_Wikipedia_from_mobile_devices has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Effeietsanders (talk) 09:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Wikimania_2016_-_Wikisource_–_how_can_we_better_support_a_small_Wikimedia_project

Category:Wikimania_2016_-_Wikisource_–_how_can_we_better_support_a_small_Wikimedia_project has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Effeietsanders (talk) 09:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Wikimania_2016_-_Designing_the_future_I:_A_roadmap_for_Wikidata

Category:Wikimania_2016_-_Designing_the_future_I:_A_roadmap_for_Wikidata has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Effeietsanders (talk) 09:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trionfo della Religione, fresco in Cardano al Campo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough quality, I think. Resolution a little low, and there is quite some chroma noise in full resolution. Counteracted by very accurate alignment and crop, good colors and exposure. --Slaunger 20:07, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliquiario della beata Giuliana nella basilica di San Giovanni Battista a Busto Arsizio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A few small unsharp areas but overall a good pic. QI. --W.carter 08:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sant'Antonio con il Bambino by Biagio Bellotti.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Background removal process looks OK at 100%. --Peulle 10:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:AzimontiCarlo.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:AzimontiCarlo.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:AzimontiCarlo.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cavarrone (talk) 14:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikimania 2016 photo selection

Thank you for choosing two of my photos in your short selection of Wikimania 2016 photos at Category:Selection Wikimania 2016 bis! What do you use this category for? Deryck Chan (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Sounds cool, let me know when it comes out! Deryck Chan (talk) 09:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Yiyi, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Foto da cancellare

Ovviamente scherzavo nella mail: mica mi devi rispondere (lo specifico, perché non si sa mai) :P

--Ruthven (msg) 14:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Museo delle Grigne - E 031 - Sega per assi.jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Museo delle Grigne - E 031 - Sega per assi.jpeg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

JuTa 17:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Museo delle Grigne - EL63 - Pseudolimea salmoiraghi (chiusa).jpg

Copyright status: File:Museo delle Grigne - EL63 - Pseudolimea salmoiraghi (chiusa).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Museo delle Grigne - EL63 - Pseudolimea salmoiraghi (chiusa).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martirio di San Pietro - Chiesa dei Santi Pietro e Paolo - Malesco.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An elephant in Kruger National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Autoritratto, the most significant work by the Italian painter Biagio Bellotti..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the syntax changes.
•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili

Concorso Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018 (English version)

Gentile Yiyi, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Gatto europeo

Hello Yiyi , I saw your picture of cat below. You categorize it in Category:European Shorthair. This breed is commonly confused with house cat. Did you buy this cat from a breeder or are you a breeder of European Shorthair? Regards,--Abujoy (talk) 19:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Yiyi,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Depicts testing

I noticed that you tried out depicts on Test-Commons. Please take a moment to let the developers know what you think, whether it's answering their direct questions, leaving your own feedback, or even noting if you don't have any feedback to give at this time. It would be much appreciated. Thanks. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Riserva naturale Torbiere del Sebino

Ciao, ho visto che hai creato una nuova categoria per le Torbiere del Sebino ed hai attribuito questa categoria ad alcune delle mie recenti foto. Non ho capito bene quale era lo scopo ma penso che una delle due categorie vada eliminata. Ciao e grazie --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Esino Lario 1000 02.jpg

Che famo? Carichiamo foto fatte mentre si guarda altrove? Dai, mettimi un bel {{SD|G7}} nella pagina, che poi la levo. Grazie Ruthven (msg) 13:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Ruthven: oddio, sì ti prego eliminala! Mica mi ero accorto :-/ --Yiyi (Dimmi!) 17:05, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Podisma silvestrii male on female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful Charles (talk) 23:02, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!

---

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:26, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

File:FridaysForFuture 2019 in Olgiate Olona, Varese, Italy 04.jpg

File:FridaysForFuture 2019 in Olgiate Olona, Varese, Italy 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 01:29, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa Capuani 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, but it could be sharper. --C messier 14:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Yiyi,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Yiyi,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Italy.svg

Copyright status: File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Italy.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Italy.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

--Killarnee (T•1•2) 05:10, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di Santa Maria Assunta, Porto Valtravaglia 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, straight verticals and sharp till the top --Michielverbeek 17:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cappella Tomasina, cimitero di Saltirana a Castelveccana 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Kathrine Switzer, una delle prime donne partecipanti a una maratona (Boston 1967).jpg

File:Kathrine Switzer, una delle prime donne partecipanti a una maratona (Boston 1967).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tibet Nation (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Sport records icon EUA.svg

File:Sport records icon EUA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

185.209.238.238 10:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Sport records icon EUP.svg

File:Sport records icon EUP.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

185.209.238.238 10:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Sport records icon RM.png

File:Sport records icon RM.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

185.209.238.238 10:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Sport records icon MS.png

File:Sport records icon MS.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

185.209.238.238 11:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Sport records icon MSA.png

File:Sport records icon MSA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

185.209.238.238 11:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Sport records icon RMA.png

File:Sport records icon RMA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

185.209.238.238 11:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:The Life Electric in Como.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

WLM 2021 in Azerbaijan

Hi Yiyi,

Could you please replace this photo with another one here?

There is no FoP in Azerbaijan. This mausoleum was built in 1980s and its architects are known (one of them Abdulvahab Salamzadeh died in 1983).

Best regards, --Interfase (talk) 04:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Women_in_STEM

Women in STEM has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.

If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italia è iniziato!

Ciao! Siamo felici di annunciarti che Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italia è iniziato. La tua partecipazione ci aiuterà a valorizzare le aree naturali protette d'Italia e mostrarle al mondo grazie a Wikipedia e agli altri progetti Wikimedia.

Visita la pagina del concorso e scopri le regole: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italy. Qui potrai scoprire come partecipare. Per qualsiasi domanda, non esitare a scriverci al seguente indirizzo: infowikilovesearth.it.

Grazie,
il team organizzatore di Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italia 01:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Stai ricevendo questo messaggio perché hai già partecipato al concorso in passato

Wiki Loves Marche è iniziato: partecipa anche tu!

Se non sai cosa fotografare, clicca forte qui!

Ciao Yiyi,

ho visto che hai contribuito a Wiki Loves Monuments. Se ti va, carica qualche foto anche per il concorso locale Wiki Loves Marche (pubblicità progresso).

Tanto per far gola al concorso nazionale, quest'anno abbiamo premi da favola: ti anticipo soltanto che la premiazione avverrà sabato 7 gennaio 2023, alle 17 al Castello di Gradara. Il resto lo lascio alla tua fantasia.

Coraggio, prendi la tua macchina fotografica, il tuo smartphone o quel che vuoi, e carica foto come se non ci fosse un domani!

Grazie e a presto,
Giacomo Alessandroni ^{What's up!} 15:39, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Grazie per aver partecipato a WLM Lake Como 2022

Grazie per aver contribuito con le tue fotografie all'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments - Lake Como. La pregiuria ha selezionato le foto finaliste tra cui saranno scelti i vincitori: link. La cerimonia di premiazione si terra' martedi 13 dicembre a Como: se sei interessato a partecipare segui gli aggiornamenti sulla pagina dell'evento.--Ysogo (talk) 14:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC) Questo messaggio e' stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Thank you for having contributed with your pictures into the 2022 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments - Lake Como. The prejury has selected the finalist pictures among which the winner will be choosen: link. The winning ceremony will be hold in Como on Tuesday December 13th: if you are keen to join, follow the updates on the page of the event.--Ysogo (talk) 14:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC) This message has been delivered through Global message delivery system)

Grazie per aver partecipato a WLM Italia 2022

Grazie per aver contribuito con le tue fotografie all'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments. La pregiuria ha selezionato le foto finaliste tra cui saranno scelti i vincitori: Castelli, Monumenti. La cerimonia di premiazione si terrà sabato 3 dicembre a Formigine: se sei interessato a partecipare segui gli aggiornamenti sulla pagina dell'evento.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Thank you for having contributed with your pictures to the 2022 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments - Italy. The prejury has selected the finalist pictures among which the winners will be chosen: Fortifications, Tradional contest. The awards ceremony will be hold in Formigine on Saturday December 3rd: if you are keen to join, follow the updates on the page of the event.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) This message has been delivered through Global message delivery system)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cimitero Austro Ungarico Squarci di Luce.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cimitero Austro Ungarico Squarci di Luce.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mole Antonelliana di sera.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mole Antonelliana di sera.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Yiyi,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Kathrine Switzer, una delle prime donne partecipanti a una maratona (Boston 1967).jpg

File:Kathrine Switzer, una delle prime donne partecipanti a una maratona (Boston 1967).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Geni (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Azerbaijan

Good day, Yiyi.

I am glad to invite you to select the best 15 pictures of Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in the Azerbaijan contest. This month we have 284 pictures:

Would you like to be a jury member for this contest as well? The selection process will end on 1st September.

The criteria are mostly the same. The main object on the image must be the natural object or landscape. The image must have higher quality. And also there must be no more than 10 images from each category (Landscapes and Macro/Close-up)

Best wishes, Interfase (talk) 02:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Interfase, sorry for the delay in my answer, but I didn't see your message. In any case yes, you will receive an email from Ysogo with our ranking. Thank you for involving me again this year. -- Yiyi (Dimmi!) 19:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Prova di WLM2023

Buongiorno Yiyi,

ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Anche quest’anno torna Wiki Loves Monuments: da oggi al 30 settembre puoi partecipare caricando le tue foto per contribuire a illustrare il patrimonio culturale italiano: vai sul sito wikilovesmonuments.it e scopri come fare!

Oltre ai 20.000 monumenti già in concorso, quest’anno si aggiungono più di 60.000 edifici religiosi, tema centrale di quest’edizione. Prendi la tua macchina fotografica, o il tuo smartphone, e individua i monumenti in concorso tramite la nuova web-app – disponibile sia da mobile che desktop – app.wikilovesmonuments.it, da cui potrai anche caricare direttamente i tuoi scatti. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite.

A livello nazionale verranno premiate le dieci migliori fotografie: cinque per gli edifici religiosi e cinque per le altre categorie di monumenti; queste immagini parteciperanno anche alla fase internazionale del concorso. Non sono ammesse immagini con watermark o cornici, né fotografie eccessivamente elaborate in postproduzione. Qui puoi consultare Il regolamento completo e per qualsiasi dubbio puoi scrivere a [email protected].

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento! --:Ysogo(talk) 05:12, 31 August 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

File:Sedi dei campionati del mondo di atletica leggera.svg

Ciao! Mi sono accorto che il file in oggetto è aggiornato al 2019. Potresti aggiornarlo con le sedi degli ultimi campionati del mondo di atletica leggera? Grazie in anticipo ;) --ZandDev (talk) 11:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Ciao ZandDev, ora dovrebbe essere a posto. Prova a dare un'occhiata. --Yiyi (Dimmi!) 11:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Si il file adesso è aggiornato. Ho visto un punto giallo fuori posto ad ovest degli Stati Uniti. Inoltre mi sembra che nella legenda del file sia fuorviante indicare il rosso chiaro come il colore dello Stato che ospiterà i successivi campionati mondiali di atletica quando (attualmente) il prossimo Stato che li ospiterà (Giappone) è colorato rosso scuro visto che ne ha già ospitati due. Ho aggiornato anche la didascalia del file, rimasta al 2013. --ZandDev (talk) 15:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 è iniziato: partecipa anche tu!

Buongiorno Yiyi,

ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Anche quest’anno torna Wiki Loves Monuments: da oggi al 30 settembre puoi partecipare caricando le tue foto per contribuire a illustrare il patrimonio culturale italiano: vai sul sito wikilovesmonuments.it e scopri come fare!

Oltre ai 20.000 monumenti già in concorso, quest’anno si aggiungono più di 60.000 edifici religiosi, tema centrale di quest’edizione. Prendi la tua macchina fotografica, o il tuo smartphone, e individua i monumenti in concorso tramite la nuova web-app – disponibile sia da mobile che desktop – app.wikilovesmonuments.it, da cui potrai anche caricare direttamente i tuoi scatti. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite.

A livello nazionale verranno premiate le dieci migliori fotografie: cinque per gli edifici religiosi e cinque per le altre categorie di monumenti; queste immagini parteciperanno anche alla fase internazionale del concorso. Non sono ammesse immagini con watermark o cornici, né fotografie eccessivamente elaborate in postproduzione. Qui puoi consultare Il regolamento completo e per qualsiasi dubbio puoi scrivere a [email protected].

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento! --Ysogo(talk) 05:0, 1 September 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Ritorna Wiki Loves Puglia anche nel 2023!

Ciao, ti scrivo perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments con fotografie della Puglia. Ritorna anche quest'anno, per la quinta edizione, il concorso regionale di Wiki Loves Monuments dedicato alla Puglia: Wiki Loves Puglia. A partire da quest'anno partecipano anche tutte le chiese e gli edifici religiosi; c'è anche un'altra novità: le fotografie verranno caricate su Wikimedia Commons attraverso la nuova app del concorso. Vorrei invitarti a partecipare anche quest'anno con le tue fotografie della regione entro il 30 settembre! Inoltre, abbiamo in programma ben 13 wikigite in diversi comuni pugliesi, compresa un'editathon a Brindisi il 9 settembre. Ti aspetto! Grazie, --Ferdi2005_(talk) 10:38, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Grazie per aver partecipato a WikiLovesMonuments 2023 - Italia

_{(English version available here)}

Ciao Yiyi, grazie per aver partecipato all’edizione italiana di Wiki Loves Monuments 2023!

È stato un anno da record, con oltre 52.000 immagini caricate su Wikimedia Commons, di cui già 2.800 utilizzate sui progetti Wikimedia (numero destinato ad aumentare). Stiamo davvero documentando il patrimonio culturale italiano insieme!

In attesa del risultato dei lavori di selezione delle fotografie da parte delle giurie, ti chiediamo di dedicarci pochi minuti del tuo tempo per rispondere a un breve questionario (anonimo), che ci aiuterà a fare ancora meglio il prossimo anno: link al sondaggio sul limesurvey di Wikimedia Italia

Grazie ancora. --Ysogo(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:LAC Lugano 01.jpg

And also:

• File:LAC Lugano 02.jpg
• File:LAC Lugano 07.jpg
• File:LAC Lugano 08.jpg
• File:LAC Lugano 09.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Italy - 1080x1920.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Italy - 1080x1920.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Didym (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

File tagging File:Paul Koech 2.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Koech 2.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paul Koech 2.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

And also:

• File:Muktar Edris.JPG
• File:Paul Koech 3.JPG
• File:Paul Koech 1.JPG
• File:Andrea Lalli 2013-01-09.JPG
• File:Daniele Meucci 2013-01-09.JPG

Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

WLM 2024 map

Hi Yiyi,

Thanks for keeping the WLM 2024 map up to date!
The Moroccan team requests to also include the Western Sahara, as their competition will also cover this region. Ciell (talk) 07:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Ciell.  Done. What about Crimea? Should it be dark red? Yiyi (Dimmi!) 08:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Yiyi, thanks!

The Russia team is very explicit in not accepting photographs from disputed territories to their competition, and this includes Crimea.

Ukraine does include Crimea in the list of eligible monuments on their WLM page. Ciell (talk) 09:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

(So my proposal is to have it the same way it was in 2023.)

With your the latest change you did for Russia, you undid a change by the Moroccan team. Was this intentional? Ciell (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

@Ciell no, sorry. Now it shoud be ok. Yiyi (Dimmi!) 18:26, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lesina, lo specchio del cielo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Lovely! --Tagooty 03:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giovani stambecchi in accoppiamento.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alba sulle alpi Giulie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upupa in posa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, lovely composition and colours. --Tagooty 00:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Nice light --FBilula 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bacoli - Comune di Bacoli - 2024-09-30 01-37-14 001.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs more specific Categories. Otherwise good. --Tagooty 00:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)  Support Good picture by @Enrica Ridolfi: --Plozessor 03:35, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angera - Rocca Borromeo - 2024-09-10 00-03-50 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annone di Brianza - Comune di Annone di Brianza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GiovanniPen 14:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Museo delle Grigne QRpedia.png

Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 02:30, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruco di Sfinge dell'Euforbia 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. Yiyi When you nominate someone else's photo, please provide the author's name. Here it is Maurizio Carlini --Jakubhal 04:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airone cenerino in atterraggio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A. Öztas 23:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doppio grifone in volo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Picture is good but you must mention the author (Scosse) in the nomination. --Plozessor 04:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC)