Stef48

Archive Toutes mes photos

Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, Stef48!

Les premiers pas Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Obtenir de l'aide Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.		Outils et astuces Indiquez par Babel les langues que vous maitrisez, ainsi que vos compétences infographiques Toutes vos importations de fichiers sont visibles sur votre galerie. Signez vos messages sur les discussions en tapant ~~~~ Utilisez CommonSense pour trouver les bonnes catégories pour vos fichiers. Pour créer un lien vers un fichier, tapez : [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], cela donne : Image:Foo.jpg Si vous importez des fichiers d'un autre projet (comme Wikipédia), utilisez l' outil prévu pour. Vous avez fait une erreur ? Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : {{bad name|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}} Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

--Kanonkas_(talk) 19:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Uploading images from Flickr

When you see a free image, please upload it by using either easily bryan's upload page or magnus' upload page. I've noticed that you've already uploaded some images - can you edit the text by using the Flinfo] tool, where you write the image number? Yuval Y § Chat § 19:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

When you upload an image you haven't created, you must licence it as same as it has been licensed, as you can see here. You can also read the manual, but pay attention that the movie posters are copyrighted, so you'd better read Commons:Derivative works to make sure that there isn't any copyright violation. Yuval Y § Chat § 19:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Distribution_cinema_3.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Distribution_cinema_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Megapixie 02:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cinema_underground_02.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Cinema_underground_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Megapixie 02:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sergio_leone.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Sergio_leone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Patstuart (talk) 18:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cine-Mende-4.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Cine-Mende-4.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cine-Mende-1.JPG

Image deletion warning

Image:Cine-Mende-1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Oui Steff je pense que ta version floutée est très bien! (pourquoi tu m'as parlé en anglais sur ma page de discut'? T'as pas remarqué que c'était moi?) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:14, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Qui est-il?

Are you using Commons as a self-promotional media? --Dodo 07:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I do understand. You have uploaded the poster of your movie and inserted it into fr:Cinéma. Is your movie relevant enough not to consider this a self-promotion raid? Please give some proof. Regards. --Dodo 14:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Again, I do understand. You have uploaded a poster of your short movie and linked it at fr:. You say the movie is not very important... IMHO, this is a pretty good example of self-promotion. But I won't be deleting the image again. Let it be: it harms you, not me. --Dodo 17:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

It's pretty clear: the only thing the poster will get here is promotion. Please don't pull my leg. --Dodo 05:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Petit conseil

Salut Stef (ou plutôt re-salut puisque je viens de te poster un message aussi sur WP!)
J'ai remarqué qu'il y avait pas mal d'images que tu uploadais sans aucune catégorie. Or ça ne donne aucune visibilité à tes photos donc peu d'espoir de les voir utilisées. Alors j'imagine bien que, si ton niveau d'anglais est bien mais pas top, c'est parfois dur de savoir où catégoriser! Mais je te rassure, malgré mon expérience australienne qui m'a permis d'avoir un niveau relativement correct en anglais, j'ai aussi des lacunes! Du coup, voilà comment je procède: je m'aide des interwiki sur WP et le Wiktionnaire pour trouver des traductions de termes que je voudrais mettre en cat et je vérifie ensuite si elles existent sur Commons. Et, si tu ne connais pas, il y a aussi un outil bien utile dans les préférences: onglet Gadgets->Hot Cat. Ca te fournit des cases en bas de page pour rajouter facilement des cat et l'avantage c'est que lorsque tu commences à écrire ça te propose des cat existantes! Sinon, quand tu n'arrives vraiment pas à trouver des cat précises, mets au moins une cat relativement vague (comme category:Film industry pour la catégorie-mère sur le cinéma) comme ça tes images sont au moins trouvables quelque part et il y aura beaucoup plus de chance que quelqu'un d'autre les trouve et précise la cat plus tard que si l'image n'est pas catégorisée du tout! Voilà, c'était le petit conseil du jour! Mais au pire, je passe de temps en temps voir ce que tu as uploadé pour rajouter des cat --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Ouaif... WikiSense, je trouve que c'est rarement top mais ça peut aider de temps en temps, c'est vrai. Mais a priori ça n'aide que si ta description est en anglais! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Projection cinématographique.gif

Ben... y a pas de fichier sur ça? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Guide de suppression. Je te conseille de te faire un petit mémo sur ton profil Commons (comme je fais quoi!) Sinon, pour l'image, tu ne peux pas la transformer en JPG? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: Your message

Thank you Stef I'll try doing my job good :) Best regards, --Kanonkas_(talk) 07:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:John_cassavetes_3.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:John_cassavetes_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

98.210.176.233 10:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Affiche anonymat

Mon cher Stef. Je crois comprendre, évidemment, pourquoi tu as voulu uploader une nouvelle version floutée de ton affiche. Mais l'ancienne version est encore dispo dans l'historique ici. Veux-tu que je fasse une demande de suppression de l'ancienne version? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

 Done... grâce à Collard --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:DonJuanPoster2.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:DonJuanPoster2.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

-Pruneau (talk) 19:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I've correct the problem : [1] Stef48 (talk) 20:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:DietrichIKIHM.jpg

Hello. Image:DietrichIKIHM.jpg which you uploaded has many absurd listed. Please pay attention when uploading, and clean up categories, at least remove any cleary very wrong categories. For this particular image, might I reccomend "Category:Marlene Dietrich"? I see her, I don't see a telephone. :-) Thank you, -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Hapci-fr.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hapci-fr.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. —Angr 05:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

I've correct the problem [2] Stef48 (talk) 07:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:The Village - Shyamalan01.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Les bots ne font pas tout ! Une attente de confirmation d'OTRS est de rigueur ici. J'ai appliqué la licence que demande son auteur ... Cordialement (je parle à un bot ...) Stef48 (talk) 15:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gorges du Cians.jpg

Fiouf, on se croirait en Lozère ! Stef48 (talk) 18:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarde dans la catégorie, j'ai pris des photos d'en bas... notamment des roches rouges... - Zil (d) 21:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:LeMillionPoster.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:LeMillionPoster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Désolé... Teofilo (talk) 16:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

En deux mots en français : comme un livre avait annoncé clairement en 1995 que le poster avait été dessiné par Mercier (donc avant 1931 + 70 = 2001), on ne peut plus dire que c'est une oeuvre anonyme, donc il faut utiliser la règle "1er janvier suivant le décès de l'auteur + 70 ans". Comme Mercier est mort en 1995, l'affiche ne sera pas libre avant le 1er janvier 1996 + 70 = 2066. Teofilo (talk) 16:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Il est suffisamment célèbre pour avoir sa page sur Wikipédia qui est ici : fr:Jean-Adrien Mercier . Teofilo (talk) 17:39, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Oscar

File:Oscar du cinéma.jpg

Your

File:Academy Award Oscar.jpg

User:Emerson7

disparity???

ron_whisky 17:14, 2 mai 2009 (CET)

One of the two pictures should be delected.

The one is mine, and is younger than the second. Perhaps we should delete it.

Thanks Stef48 (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Harry Potter 6 Poster Movie.JPG

Português:

Essa imagem foi retira por mim e está no Flickr em Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 certo.

Français :

Cette image a été coupée par moi et est sur Flickr et em Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0, à droite.

Fm-pas (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

File:DeForestScreenShot.jpg

File:DeForestScreenShot.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--SRJ (talk) 23:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Stef48!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 02:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Stef48.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Ciné Jaude.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 20:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Louxor_-_Movie_Theater_-_1930.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Louxor_-_Movie_Theater_-_1930.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Coyau (talk) 15:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

File:LAtalantePoster.jpg

File:LAtalantePoster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 17:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Calogéro - clermont 1.JPG

File:Calogéro - clermont 1.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Kungfuman (talk) 17:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Hendrix et Eastwood (art de la rue).jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Hendrix et Eastwood (art de la rue).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

--dave pape (talk) 01:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

I understand :( Stef48 (talk) 06:21, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

J'ajouterais que le graffiti lui-même n'est pas en soi une oeuvre libre de droit puisqu'elle a un auteur (mais c'est vrai que retrouver sa trace est parfois un peu chiant!) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Biondo deserto.png

the Italian it:Template:Screenshot film is not equivalent to Template:PD-old! The author of the movie (or the last surviving author of many authors) is not dead for 70 years as written in Template:PD-old. The 20 years claim of it.wp isnt accepted on Commons, so this file ok on it.wp but it is not ok to move this file to Commons. I talk about it:File:Biondo deserto.png and it is written there: Do not move this file to Wikimedia Commons without adequate review! The criterias for review are written in Template:PD-Italy here on Commons, non of the criterias is fulfilled. --Martin H. (talk) 17:09, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Hum... Ok ! I'm sorry for the disagreement, I don't know.

Regards Stef48 (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Prayinginanger.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Prayinginanger.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prayinginanger.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Kam Solusar (talk) 17:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I've importated the media from the english Wikipedia. So I don't know what is the Source of it. But, you will must ask it to the original uploader... Regards Stef48 (talk) 10:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Stef48. I use the "Quick Delete" gadget that can be activated on the preferences page. It automatically adds the warning templates and notifies the uploader, saving a lot of time. In cases like this, where you only transferred images from other projects to Commons, you can ignore the warning. I know that there's not much you can do, so I also notified the original uploader, en:User:Chantoke. Regards, --Kam Solusar (talk) 20:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Signature_shyamalan.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Signature_shyamalan.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Corrected Stef48 (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Warner Bros 1920.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Warner Bros 1920.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Please don't use "WP" or something like "English Wikipedia" as author names when transferring files from individual Wikis. You must always provide the original author given over there, i.e. websites, usernames or personal names - the person or organisation who holds the copyright. And if there is no clear author stated, please don't put the file on Commons. De728631 (talk) 19:31, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Ratatouille_won_the_oscar.jpg

File:Ratatouille_won_the_oscar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.185.42.122 22:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Louxor - Movie theater - 2008.jpg

Bon jour Stef! Could you please help me with your uploaded photo: File:Louxor - Movie theater - 2008.jpg? When did the architect die? And: who is "Action Barbes"? Is it you? Did you photograph the image? Otherwise we need permission by "Action Barbes". Merci! --Saibo (Δ) 12:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Hy. In first, sorry for my bad english. I come back from a one week trip to Scotland, but I don't know speak english verry well.

You seem to have the architect die date (I am looking for the file). Action Barbes is a french organisation with wich I have had a contact on french Wikipedia. It was in august, 2009.

These informations help you ? Regards 82.252.245.244 20:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello again Stef, I hope you had a great holiday! :-) Your English is far, far better than my French!

I have found the architect birth(!) date from de:Le Louxor. But I do not have the architects date of death which is (maybe) needed since there is no Freedom of Panorama in France if this building is considered a work of art.

Who take the photo? → Who is the photographer? We need to document the permission if it was not photographed by you. Best wishes --Saibo (Δ) 21:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Just answer here - I watch this page. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

My holydays were so awesome !

The photography was taken by the Action Barbes secretary who has given photography's all rights to "Didier". I've been in contact with "Didier" at this e-mail address. You can also see this discussion about photographies (in french, sorry). Regards Stef48 (talk) 12:18, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Regarding your holiday: That's nice! :-)

Don't you know the architects date of death?

Sorry - my french is too bad for reading the collaboration page. As you might know permissions should be documented via OTRS. Could the photographer please send an email to our OTRS team? See Commons:OTRS/fr. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 18:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any news? Wish you good holidays! :-) --Saibo (Δ) 17:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I tried to help but the only information I found so far is that he was still alive in 1931 (see at the bottom of this pdf file - in French sorry) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi TwoWings, ah - thank you! So we maybe should delete (except we know that he died before 1940) the photo as this cinema is a remarkable piece of architecture (de:Le Louxor). What do you think? Too bad France has no FOP. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 19:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Universal_Talent_School.jpg

File:Universal_Talent_School.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

J Milburn (talk) 00:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Pellicule_Gangs_of_New_York.JPG

File:Pellicule_Gangs_of_New_York.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hold and wave (talk) 09:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:PMG_Mende_2009.jpg

File:PMG_Mende_2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Deuxtroy (talk) 17:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

File:PMG_Mende_2009.jpg

File:PMG_Mende_2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Deuxtroy (talk) 17:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Ciné Jaude.jpg

File:Ciné Jaude.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Koui² (talk) 15:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Affiche de Qui est-il?.png

File:Affiche de Qui est-il?.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Prof. Professorson (talk) 08:19, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Roman de gare.jpg

File:Roman de gare.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prof. Professorson (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Film projector3.jpg

File:Film projector3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 17:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 11:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Cannes bienvenue.jpg

File:Cannes bienvenue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 22:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Chaise réal.jpg

File:Chaise réal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 22:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Cannes 2005 Palace.jpg

And also:

• File:Cannes palace nuit.jpg

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:DietrichIKIHM.jpg

File:DietrichIKIHM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 20:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Catpeople1942.jpg

File:Catpeople1942.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

We hope (talk) 14:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Distribution cinema 4.jpg

File:Distribution cinema 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Charte cinéma 2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Charte cinéma 2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Charte cinéma 2.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Michael Haneke-2.jpg

File:Michael Haneke-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buxtehude (talk) 11:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

File:She Shoulda Said No!.jpg

File:She Shoulda Said No!.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Image The Devil s Weed.jpg

File:Image The Devil s Weed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Lelouchbis.jpg

File:Lelouchbis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KDS4444 (talk) 13:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Platoon.jpg

File:Platoon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 03:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Berlinale palace.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Berlinale palace.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:05, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Filmmaking.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Filmmaking.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Test Cannes.JPG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Test Cannes.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Massimiliano Fuksas, Antonello Venditti.jpg

File:Massimiliano Fuksas, Antonello Venditti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:17, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Regent cinema facade 2.jpg

File:Regent cinema facade 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:20, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Cannes palace nuit.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Cannes palace nuit.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Y.haruo (talk) 12:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Certains regard.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Certains regard.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Y.haruo (talk) 12:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Incense 7.JPG

File:Incense 7.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:26, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

File:BreadAlley2.jpg

File:BreadAlley2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Cannes 2005 Palace.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)