Rc1959

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rc1959!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 08:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 13 years ago19 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Rc1959!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image:Croix de l'Evangile, Paris, sur le plan de Roussel (1730).jpg was uncategorized on 18 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Chapelle.Saint.Denis.1860.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Mathis.Zundten.Estree.Chapelle.Saint.Denis.1565.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Croix.Evangile.Inselin.1707.terroir.Saint.Denis.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Chapelle.Saint.Denis.1814.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Wimille en 1656.jpg was uncategorized on 23 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Tour d'Odre au XVIIIè siècle.jpg was uncategorized on 23 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Tour d'Odre, 154, Boulogne sur Mer..jpg was uncategorized on 23 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:La Tour d'Odre en 1550, Boulogne-sur-Mer..jpg was uncategorized on 23 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Wimille en 1815 sur la carte de Cassini.jpg was uncategorized on 23 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Ancienne enseigne de l'Ecole du Sacré-Coeur, rue Jean Cottin, Paris..jpg was uncategorized on 30 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Statue de la Vierge au coin de la rue de la Madone, Paris.jpg was uncategorized on 30 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Le chemin des Fillettes en 1707, Paris.jpg was uncategorized on 31 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Butte des Cinq Moulins, sur le plan de circonvallation de Paris, 1789.jpg was uncategorized on 31 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Redoute de la Flache, 1870, sur la plaine d'Aubervilliers.jpg was uncategorized on 31 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Remi0430.jpg was uncategorized on 19 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Vue extérieure des ruines du Château de Becon en 1870.jpg was uncategorized on 21 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Les casernes de Courbevoie, dessin de Nicolas Pérignon.jpg was uncategorized on 22 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Entrée des Casernes construites sous Louis XV. Eugene Atget, 1901.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:36, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Becon.Inselin.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:15, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Rue.du.Landit.Saint-Ouen.1827.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Les.Colonies.françaises.Helio.Sadag.1931.Flammarion.Haute-Volta. Bobo-Dioulasso. La Mosquée.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Les.Colonies.françaises.Helio.Sadag.1931.Flammarion.Haute-Volta. Bobo-Dioulasso. La Mosquée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--ghouston (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue de la Vierge au coin de la rue de la Madone, Paris.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

File:Statue de la Vierge au coin de la rue de la Madone, Paris.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Doalex (talk) 08:40, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour et merci pour ton message, en ce qui me concerne les explications utiles seraient de savoir si tu as pris cette photo toi-même et avec quel moyen, la mention travail personnel se rattache sauf erreur, au fait de prendre soi-même une photo et non, par exemple, d'effectuer un travail sur une photo capturée sur un écran d'ordinateur et de la recadrer, je dis tout ceci au conditionnel. Il faut savoir également qu'un administrateur de Commons a jugé que ce fichier ne pouvait pas faire l'objet d'une suppression jusqu'à maintenant, mais pour bien clarifier les choses il faudrait que tu me répondes sur les points évoqués en préambule, avec mes remerciements anticipés. --Doalex (talk) 10:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bonsoir DoAlex

Oui, je confirme que cette photo a été prise par moi-même, avec un appareil numérique Sony autant que je m'en souvienne (C'etait en 2011). Salutations. Rc1959 (talk) 20:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

J'en prends acte et j'informe l'administrateur de Commons de ce fait. Merci pour ta collaboration et désolé pour le malaise occasionné. --Doalex (talk) 07:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Paris 18 (31088243023).jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour RC 1959, c'est encore Doalex, je viens t'exposer un changement qui concerne l'article de fr.wp fr:Rue de la Madone (Paris) et en particulier l'infobox et la photo sujet de mon intervention. Je compte placer au moins 4 photos sur Commons concernant cette rue qui encadre parallèlement le fr:Square de la Madone, par la suite je compte remplacer la photo de l'infobox, qui à mon avis, n'illustre pas vraiment la rue (mis à part la plaque de la rue) mais qui est remplie essentiellement par le magasin de produits asiatiques. En conséquence je te demande ton accord pour modifier l'image actuelle qui émane de Flickr et peut être que tu es l'auteur sous le nom de Guilhem Vellut. Si tu es d'accord je téléverse mes photos prises le 30/09/2018 et te remercierait, si tu le souhaites, de bien vouloir m'aider dans le choix d'une image. Je précise que j'habite le quartier depuis très longtemps et je compte m'impliquer dans lefr:Projet:Paris et plus spécialement sur le quartier Chapelle et alentours. Très cordialement. --Doalex (talk) 08:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello DoAlex,

Merci du message. Fais ce que tu penses etre bon, bien entendu. Je ne suis pas Guilhem Vellut et ai utilisé cette image car elle était là, tout simplement. Très excellente chose que de travailler ce quartier dans lequel j'ai aussi habité. Comme tu verras, j'y ai aussi un peu contribué en me déplaçant lentement vers la Plaine-Saint-Denis. Si tu en as le temps et si ça t'amuse, il manque des photos de la https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_Tristan-Tzara , https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_Jean-Cottin , https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impasse_Raymond-Queneau , https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_Cugnot , le pont de la rue Riquet, etc ... Merci ! Rc1959 (talk) 22:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, merci pour ces encouragements et effectivement je connais bien ce coin et je suppose également qu'il existe une catégorie sur les rues de Paris sans images ? J'ai du temps et le besoin impératif de marcher pour des raisons de santé, de plus pour moi c'est un plaisir de saisir des photos actuelles car tout spécialement dans ce quartier les rues se transforment à une vitesse incroyable, je me suis fixé depuis 1982 à côté du métro Marx-Dormoy ! --Doalex (talk) 10:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Re bonjour Doalex. Oui je connais bien ce quartier. Il y a peut-etre moyen de continuer en conversation privée. Rc1959 (talk) 21:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Re bonjour: Autres rues sans photos: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_Gaston-Darboux https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_Charles-Lauth https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_Gaston-Tissandier bref, de facon generale le quartier Charles-Hermite. Je ne crois pas qu'il existe de categories specifiques pour les rues sans images. Attention à ne pas vous faire chouraver votre appareil photo dans ces coins-là. Bien cordialement. Rc1959 (talk) 08:33, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Effectivement il y a de la matière ! Même l'avenue de la Porte-d'Aubervilliers n'est pas illustrée...Sinon en général je corresponds par courriel pour lescommentaires de toutes sortes pour éviter de transformer mes PdD de Wikipédia et Commons en discussions qui s'étirent et s'éloignent des sujets et pour mon APN très discret il faudrait être fou pour me le taxer, il est si vieux que seuls les collectionneurs seraient intéressés :-) . --Doalex (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Fontenay-sous-Bois.Rue Notre-Dame.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Patrick Rogel Hi Patrick. I have added the correct date (always befo0re WW1) to these files and the eidtor or author. Thsee are all postcards published long before 1924. Rc1959 (talk) 14:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour. Vous n'expliquez toujours pas pourquoi ces images sont dans le domaine public en France. Par ailleurs, PD-old-70-1923 n'est pas valide car si vous n'indiquez pas le(s) nom(s) du(des) photographe(s), comment pouvez-vous affirmer qu'ils sont morts depuis 70 ans ? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 4 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Villepinte.Rue de Paris.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Factual details are being added to these images. Regards. Rc1959 (talk) 10:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Once again you can't use {{PD-old-70-1923}} if you don't know the photographer's name and his date of death. Please select another license. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:26, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please consider these two examples which are similar to my uploads: Date very close (Because of the stamp), only one side of the card, unknown author.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Archives_FRAD078_000-012_000-028-686.jpg License:

	This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information).
	This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.

PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bourdier_-_SAINT-NOM-LA-BRETECHE_-_Gare_du_Tramway_de_Versailles_%C3%A0_Maule.JPG License:

This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous.
This applies to the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of 70 years after the work was made available to the public and the author never disclosed their identity.
Important: Always mention where the image comes from, as far as possible, and make sure the author never claimed authorship.

Note: In Germany and possibly other countries, certain anonymous works published before July 1, 1995 are copyrighted until 70 years after the death of the author. See Übergangsrecht. Please use this template only if the author never claimed authorship or their authorship never became public in any other way. If the work is anonymous or pseudonymous (e.g., published only under a corporate or organization's name), use this template for images published more than 70 years ago. For a work made available to the public in the United Kingdom, please use Template:PD-UK-unknown instead.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.

Public domain works must be out of copyright in both the United States and in the source country of the work in order to be hosted on the Commons. If the work is not a U.S. work, the file must have an additional copyright tag indicating the copyright status in the source country.
Note: This tag should not be used for sound recordings.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ferme_ch%C3%A2teauneuf.jpg License:

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license.

You are free:

to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

You may select the license of your choice.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%89tang-la-Ville-_Dolmen001.jpg License:

	This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information).
	This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.

PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse

Which one should be used ? As you can see, there is no deletion requestion on these images. I tend to conclude that all of these licenses should suffice. Rc1959 (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please focus on your uploads and not other user's (if you think these uploads are not valid please request their deletion). In my opinon none of these templates can be used:

{{PD-old}}: no because you provide no evidence that author is dead more than 70 years ago;
{{PD-anon-70-EU}}{{PD-1923}}: no because publisher's, photographer's initials or name are watermarked on some images;
{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}: no because it's not your own work.

Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Patrick Rogel. Also, hundreds of absolutely similar uploads here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Semeuse_stamps_on_covers_and_postcards_(5c). My point of view is that these images are in the public domain for various reasons. Your point of view implies that they are not. You will certainly understand that it does not make sense to treat these uploads in isolation, as this is exactly the same situation. You should therefore contact these contributors, possibly request deletions of their images, see what their opinion is, and possibly escalate this situation to administrators. Due to the scale of this situation, this will avoid doing hundreds of times the same investigation, and also ensure that the right decision is taken for the good of Wikimedia Commons. Regards. Rc1959 (talk) 17:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Don't be afraid: for the good of Commons I didn't intend to lauch a mass DR of "hundreds" of files. Indeed as we say in French "N'allons pas plus vite que la musique" so please wait for an Administrator to close this request (but it may be long). Anyway I'm pinging @Taivo: who discussed with you. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Patrick Rogel I believe you might feel satisfied to see that these (very) old postcards which very probably were in the public domain, and despite the sincere efforts I provided to precisely document them in good faith, are now deleted for good. I also note that you did not give any help or positive suggestion to keep them, that I would have been happy to follow. This is the rule of Commons and there is no reason to complain, but I note that there are still thousands or ten of thousands of similar cards in Commons which are in danger to be deleted, therefore I urge administrators to realise that your judgement was subjective and not inclined to the good of Commons. Regards. Rc1959 (talk) 08:07, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Postcards

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Rc1959, thanks for your postcard uploads. Maybe you are interessted in COM:WPPC. Best regards. -- sk (talk) 11:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hallo sk. Ja, danke schoen, ich bin sehr interessiert, das ist eine sehr gute Idee. Aufwiedersehen !! Rc1959 (talk) 11:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

You can insert your name under "Project participants". You are welcome. :-) -- sk (talk) 11:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Rue Cauchy (Clamart)

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Category:Rue Cauchy (Clamart) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

In addition, I noticed that you've made malformed deletion requests. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 23:12, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

You did it again in this edit. Warning: if you do it one more time, I will be forced to report your actions. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 10:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Rue Émile-Raspail (Clamart)

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Rue Émile-Raspail (Clamart) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 07:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:La Garenne-Colombes.Eglise Saint-André Sainte-Hélène.jpg

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Centre de Villejuif.Société générale des plans indicateurs.1930.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Centre de Villejuif.Société générale des plans indicateurs.1930.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Centre de Villejuif.Société générale des plans indicateurs.1930.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Primhill Computers logo.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Primhill Computers logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Cathédrale Saint-Paul d'Abidjan.1991.1.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. rubin16 (talk) 05:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:The BL King’s Topographical Collection- "Veües et Perspective du Pont, et du Temple de Charenton.".jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:The BL King’s Topographical Collection- "Veües et Perspective du Pont, et du Temple de Charenton.".jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:The BL King’s Topographical Collection- "Veües et Perspective du Pont, et du Temple de Charenton.".jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:The BL King’s Topographical Collection- "Veües et Perspective du Village et du Pont de Charenton.".jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pourquoi?

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Dia duit! Maidin mhaith! Conas atá tú? Quoi? -- DeirgeDel^t_a^c 10:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC) & DeirgeDel^t_a^c 10:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Trout from River Owenmore, County Sligo, Ireland

Special:Diff/764255156. Sorted.

Done -- DeirgeDel^t_a^c 00:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

My mistake, you are right. Apologies. Rc1959 (talk) 06:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I was laughing. Anyway I have created Category:Veterinary clinics in the Republic of Ireland for it and also does the photo location co-originates. Thankyou. -- DeirgeDel^t_a^c 07:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks too. Rc1959 (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

CPA de châteaux d'Evry

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour Rc1959

Je ne suis pas arrivé à reconnaitre dans Evry (Essonne) les deux châteaux représentés ici : File:Evry.Ancien château.1905.jpg et File:Evry.Le château.jpg.

Après quelques recherches, j'ai pu identifier le premier. En fait, il se trouvait dans la commune d'Evry (Yonne), comme on le voit aussi dans cette CPA.

Je vais des recherches pour le second. Poudou99 (talk) 22:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Un grand, très grand merci ! J'y ai passé un quart d'heure sans succès. Passez une excellente soirée, avec mes félicitations ! Rc1959 (talk) 22:06, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Tract manifestation samedi 29 janvier 2022 Ministère de la Santé, Paris, France.png

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Tract manifestation samedi 29 janvier 2022 Ministère de la Santé, Paris, France.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Postcards of Gare de Fontainebleau, Avon

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour Rc1959

En fait, la gare de Fontainebleau - Avon est située sur le territoire de la commune d'Avon, à proximité certes de la limite avec Fontainebleau. Poudou99 (talk) 23:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Affiche murale Dianétique.Paris.1990.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Affiche murale Dianétique.Paris.1990.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Certes, mais la photo est prise d'assez loin, et incorpore d'autres éléments ? Rc1959 (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tes remerciements

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Salut,

La reconnaissance pour le travail effectué est trop rare. C'est pourquoi j'ai beaucoup apprécié tes remerciements pour ma contribution sur l'image de la carte postale des halles de Dax, sur l'image de la carte postale du grand magasin de Bergerac et sur le monument aux morts dans l'église Saint-Nicolas de Châtillon-sur-Seine que tu as ajoutées et mes modifications sur les catégories que tu as créées sur le monument aux morts d'Abzac, sur le monument aux morts de Coutras, sur les monuments aux morts de la guerre Franco-Prussienne dans le Gers, sur les monuments aux morts de Châteauroux et sur le monument commémoratif de la bataille de Buzenval. Au plaisir. Sylvain. Chêne de la sagesse (talk) 06:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Marseille.Caisse d'Épargne.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Un immeuble parisien vers 1989.jpg

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Un immeuble parisien vers 1989.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 14:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Serpula lacrymans

Latest comment: 4 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Rc1959, the classification of File:Serpula lacrymans (mycelial cords emanating from door).jpg into Category:Serpula lacrymans was done 1. according to the file name, and 2. because this image was cited in the article of the English Wikipedia on this species. I am a botanist, not a mycologist, so for surity of identification, please ask other experts, e.g. User:Strobilomyces, who corrected many misidentified fungi. Kind regards, Thiotrix (talk) 10:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dear Thiotrix. Many thanks for this. Rc1959 (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic