Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MistValley!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Escultura Hipopótamo, Resistencia.jpg

edit
 
File:Escultura Hipopótamo, Resistencia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Perfectnews (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bandera pápago (o'odham).svg

edit
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bandera pápago (o'odham).svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hi there! This flag you made an SVG of is missing source information to confirm that its original design is freely licensed. The flag appears to be from 2012 [1] and is above Threshold of Originality in the USA, so should be presumed copyrighted. Right now you are listed as the author of the flag, which is a field intended for information about who the copyright holder is (i.e. the original designer). Converting a flag to SVG format does not confer authorship status, and you cannot legally release it as Creative Commons. Only the original designer of the flag can do that. If you have any information on who designed this flag, and whether the original designer released it with a free license, please update the file description! Thank you, Intervex (talk) 02:20, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply