Letartean

Vous trouverez les archives de ma page de discussion sur cette page. N'hésitez pas de me laisser un message, tous les commentaires sont appréciés, bon ou mauvais.

Rouge et Or

Salut,

J'aimerais comprendre pourquoi tu as retiré de cette image (entre autres) de la catégorie category:Basketball in Canada pour ensuite ajouter Category:Rouge et Or à la catégorie category:Basketball in Canada alors que le Rouge et Or est une équipe sportive universitaire qui regroupe toutes les activités des personnes engagées dans des sports à l'université Laval. Cela comprend les équipes de basketball, de soccer, de football, de volleyball, de golf, de course à pied, etc. Je pense qu'il serait pertinent d'annuler ces modifications.

Amicalement, Letartean (talk) 21:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Salut aussi,

Alors en fait j'effectue régulièrement du tri dans les catégories de basket-ball généralistes, afin d'éviter que celles-ci ne soient trop remplies et inutilisables, et notamment les catégories "Basketball dans tel pays", bien que d'habitude j'essaie de ne pas tout casser dans le classement préalablement effectué. Et dans ce cas, j'avais mis "Rouge et or" et "McGill Redmen" sur le même plan et je n'avais pas vu qu'il s'agissait d'une équipe multisports. Ce que je te propose, c'est plutôt de laisser "Basketball teams of Canada" et d'ajouter "Volleyball teams in Canada", "Athletics in Canada", et caetera, quitte à créer des sous-sections "College basketball in Canada", "College volleyball in Canada" etc. pour préciser le caractère multidisciplinaire de l'équipe. Je ne suis pas braqué sur la question et on pourrait tout reverter comme tu le préconises, mais j'ai peur que dans le cas contraire on se retrouve avec un gros dossier "Basketball in Canada" dans quelques années alors qu'il est possible de ventiler dans des sous-dossiers pertinents. Si tu as une autre proposition, je reste encore une heure ou deux dans le coin, puisque je suis en train de finir trier les photos basket-ball des JO de Londres et c'est pas de la tarte --El Funcionario (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Commons presentation

Hello.

I volunteered to give a presentation to a local photography club in NY about Wikipedia and Commons.

I had hoped I would find a lot of canned presentations which I could "borrow".

There are fewer than I had hoped.

I liked yours a lot, but my audience speaks English.

I wonder if I could get a copy of the underlying PowerPoint, which I could then translate, giving credit to you of course.

I also plan to do some generic slides on Wikipedia, but I can find those or create those myself, and I had hoped to imbed your Commons presentation into my overall presentation.

Just as a reminder , I am talking about: this presentation--Sphilbrick (talk) 21:46, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Letartean⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Letartean,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Letartean, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Prix Cycliste de Québec 2014 - 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata et Commons

Salut,

J'ai trouvé la réponse à ma question ici.

Cordialement, Louperivois Ψ @ 14:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Letartean, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2015 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:19, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

De-adminship

Hi Letartean! This is just to inform you that earlier today, you had your adminship privileges revoked on Meta by a Wikimedia steward; as you are an experienced editor, you were instead added to the autopatrolled user group (which doesn't affect your editing anyway). Thank you for you service as an administrator, and I hope you will stay active on Commons as a regular contributor. Of course, please do feel free to re-apply for adminship when you get more active :-) Thank you! odder (talk) 11:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynx rufus - Zoo Sauvage de Saint-Félicien - 2016-07-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:29, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca fuscata - Zoo Sauvage de Saint-Félicien - 2016-07-19 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panthera tigris altaica - Zoo Sauvage de Saint-Félicien - 2016-07-19 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Commons Meetup in Montréal in August

Hello Letartean,

I would like to invite you to the Commons Categorizer Meetup 2017 in Montréal in August (the exact date is not fixed yet and will be determined by the Wikimania programme committee). If you want, you can add your name to the list of interested users and propose discussion topics.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 10:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

OTRS pour affiches de films par des distributeurs québécois

@Letartean: salut, Simon m’a dit que tu étais un expert OTRS. J’ai 6 distributeurs de films qui doivent promouvoir leurs films. Pour ce faire, ils acceptent de mettre dans le domaine public une version basse résolution de leurs affiches (700 px x 700 px). Mais le gars de l’OTRS semble dire que c’est pas assez. Or, les distributeurs ont le droit de faire ce qu’ils veulent des affiches, et en faisant une œuvre dérivée (basse résolution), je vois pas comment ça pourrait être problématique. J’ai évidemment une déclaration signée de chaque distributeur, avec la liste des films qui sont sous leurs droits de diffusion.

J’aimerais si tu pouvais m’assister dans cette demande. Parce que j’ai 200 affiches de films que je veux pousser avec PattyPan… C’est injuste que seul les anglais aient les affiches de films… ;-) --Antoine2711 (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Salut!

Désolé pour le délais de réponse, j'étais très éloigné de mon ordinateur cete semaine... J'avoue que je ne sais pas trop par où commencer pour te répondre. Je commencerais par te demander de me pointer vers la discussion que tu as eue avec la personne d'OTRS, si celle-ci est publique, ou de me fournir plus de détails sur celle-ci. En particulier, est-ce que la personne d'OTRS t'a fourni des raisons pour justifier que "c'est pas assez"?

En particulier, je ne crois pas que l'on peut verser des images dans le domaine public au Canada. J'ai l'impression qu'on peut simplement accorder une licence non-restrictive. Aussi, je ne sais pas à quel point le distributeur est "propriétaire" du droit d'auteur sur une affiche de film. Peut-être que l'auteur de l'affiche ou le réalisateur du film retiennent des droits.

Finalement, concernant ta remarque sur les anglais et leurs affiches, tu es conscient que celles-ci fiurent dans les articles à cause du "fair use" qui n'est pas accepté sur Commons. Ce n'est donc pas vraiment une comparaison valide. D'autant plus que je ne suis pas certain que ce sont toutes les maisons de distribution qui sont à l'aise avec l'utilisation de leur matériel sous la clause du fair-use.

Je suis à ta disposition pour en discuter plus longtemps si nécessaire. Amicalement, Letartean (talk) 02:26, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

@Letartean: salut, oui, tous les points que tu soulèves sont valides et doivent être adressés. J’ai une bonne réflexion amorcée depuis quelques mois là-dessus. Dis-moi, est-ce qu’on peut chatter sur FB ou Hangout, ou parle téléphone ? Je t’ai laissé un message privé sur FB… --Antoine2711 (talk) 23:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)