Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kusurija!

TUSC token 3d5e498cf64ca6315186534b69c82550

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 31080ff38b9b0cab232d864c64360dcd

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 3e23d82186f4ad46195450948c071d8e

edit

Please help with transferring images from Wikipedia to Commons

edit

Please help with transferring images from Wikipedia to Commons technology explanation. About 1 year I'm trying understand this technology, but without any results, except one accidental, which history I didn't record and can't find it by Wikimedia Commons tools too. So again I can't transfer any image, as I don't understand needed technology. Please help. --Kusurija (talk) 10:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC) tadyReply

Hello, you should ask for help at Help Desk or Village Pump. it's really easy to use CommonsHelper to transfer images from local wiki to Commons. Some basic information is available at Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons and detailed instruction on using the tool is at User:Magnus Manske/Commonshelper interface/Help en --Justass (talk) 23:20, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 2a20be63630debb8fb362b90a46e34ed

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Poznámky

edit

{{speedydelete|reason (Newcategoryname)}}

TUSC token 604d9711a7defcec849e1196cb139e38

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Kusurija!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token aa8fa5125f04f01328608d0779448dc2

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 1368db18bb9d613a6b7912f9dae31a0b

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


 
Hello, Kusurija. You have new messages at GiW's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

TUSC token 7260adb900e686821432a0d931341da1

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Gogjó cs.png

edit
 
File:Gogjó cs.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ju gatsu mikka (^o^) appelez moi Ju (^o^) 15:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Wuxing cs.png

edit
 
File:Wuxing cs.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ju gatsu mikka (^o^) appelez moi Ju (^o^) 15:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dubysa

edit

Sveiki, jei neklystu žemėlapyje maps.lt (įrašykite į langelį Padubysys, Pakruojo r. sav.) yra klaida, kad Pakruojo rajono tvenkinys stovi ant Dubysos. Jau renkant kategorijas, man buvo kilęs įtarimas. Reiškia, ant Dubysėlės? (kažkur turėjau ir jos foto ...) Tada ištaisyčiau klaidinantį aprašymą po failu [1].--Vilensija (talk) 06:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sveiki, miela Vilensija. www.maps.lt klaida turbūt neįsivėlė, nebent tokia pat būtų įsivėlusi ir daugelyje kitų šaltinių, kas yra mažai tikėtina. Daugyvenės intakas Dubysa (kodas: 41010531) yra minima ir čia ir knygoje Lietuvos upės: B. Gailiušis, J. Jablonskis, M. Kovalenkovienė, Kaunas, Lietuvos energetikos institutas, 2001, 678 psl., ir popieriniuose Lietuvos žemėlapiuose. Tai, kas Jus galėjo suklaidinti yra faktas, kad neegzistuija šios Dubysos šaltinis, kadangi šiuo pavadinimu jinai prasideda tik nuo Jūsų minimos Dubysėlės (kodas 41010533) ir (www.maps.lt minėtas kaip Kirmėliupis) ir Raudonupelio (kodas 41010532) santakos (koordinatės: 55° 52' 8.67", 23° 50' 47.24"). Už tai manau, jog nieko keisti nereikia. Su pagarba --Kusurija (talk) 17:23, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Neieškojau popierinių šaltinių, pasirodo – ištakos iš tos santakos ... Neprošal būtų dar vienas straipsnis apie kitą Dubysą :)--Vilensija (talk) 17:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Taip. Labai atsiprašau, jog neberašau į cs:vikipediją nieko apie Lietuvą, nes jau metai, kaip streikuoju. Ir nematau, kad tai padėtų. Bet buvau priverstas atsisakyti rašyti straipsnius apie Lietuvą, kurie būtų paskui pakeisti į man nepriimtino pobūdžio dezinformaciją ar net savotiškai įžeidžiantys, be galimybės man juos atitaisyti atgal (dėl 3 revertų taisyklės, dėl to, kad nerandu pakankamai svarių nuorodų ir t.t.). Tai, kas privertė streikuoti: yra prastumiamas nesąmoningas čekiškas pavadinimas "Žmuď" vietoj Žemaitsko ar bent jau Žemaitie, "Kurský záliv" vietoj Kuršský záliv (Kuršių marios; juk ne nuo Kursko kilęs pavadinimas), išmirusios tautos, daug įtakuojančios žemaičius mano kolegos vikipedistai prastūmė pavadinimą Kurové (lietuviškai išvertus: Vištos) vietoj Kuršové/Kurši ir t.t. Kadangi daug kur reikia minėti šiuos ar panašiai iškreiptus kitus pavadinimus, tai praktiškai nebelieka apie ką rašyt. Bandžiau prašyti Hugo.arg komentuoti, bėt jam į tai nusispjaut. Jo nuomonė: kaip čekai sugalvojo, taip ir gerai. Tiktai, kad tai nėra visų čekų nekompromisinė nuomonė o tiktai šaikos tų mano kolegų čekiškoje vikipedijoje, kurie dabar turi valdžia ir diktuoja kitiems akivaizdžias nesąmones. Ir nėra, kas juos sudrausmintų ir netgi po mano užuominų, kad su tomis nesąmonėmis vistiek kažkada reikėtų kažką padaryt, (be to, kad suprastų ką turėjau omeny - kaip ir kur) iškart pagrasino užblokavimu visiems laikams... P.S. jeigu jie atkastų, kad šias problemas nagrinėju ir kitur, negu čekiškoje vikipedijoje, tikriausiai mane užblokuotų. --Kusurija (talk) 18:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Palikite cs ramybėje, tegul jie ten nusisuka sprandus, ir ateikite į lt.--Vilensija (talk) 19:22, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tai, kad aš pakankamai gerai nemoku lietuviškai... Ir lietuviški šablonai truputi kitokie, negu čekiški, nemokėčiau su jais elgtis... Be to, rašau čekiškame vikižodyne japoniškus bei žemaitiškus žodžius ir čekiškame vikiverzitete skaičiavimo sistemas... --Kusurija (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:II MelnragėBotanTab.jpg

edit
 
File:II MelnragėBotanTab.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Daryona (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vodopád

edit

(Díky. I když teda vyzývám komunitu, aby přispěla polštinou (neboť ta moje je pořád neslavná, byť se průběžně lepší), ale každej jazyk navíc je dobrej. --Aktron (talk) 16:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

No já tu polštinu nezvládám vůbec, sice trochu rozumím, ale psát polsky bych si netroufl. Pokud bych narazil na něco významnějšího (můžete dát tip), nohl bych přidat i popisek v japonštině. Jinak rádo se stalo, už jsem měl obavy, že se to někomu nebude líbit, obvykle bývají moje příspěvky přijímány dost kriticky, z wikipedie jsem byl prakticky vyštván, na wikislovníku si ze mě někteří taky utahují/kritizují, občas si připadám, že je můj přínos spíš nevítaný. Takže vřelé díky za ocenění! --Kusurija (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Nevím, co je na litevštině špatnýho :-) Ano, mně taky popisky fotek ze Širokého Brijegu, nebo Vukovaru v cyrilici vyhodili, ale tak to se dá ještě pochopit. Co se týče japonštiny - jen s chutí do toho! Já jsem momentálně rád, když toho co nejvíce zpracuju (mám cca 2/3 za sebou už, ale i tak)... takže víc jak 2 jazyky tam dávat by mě strašně zpomalovalo - bohužel. Jinak je to pravda - na Wikipedii nevím, tamní komunita mi příjde víceméně zdravá, ale že na Wikislovníku vládnou poměry neslučitelné s příjemným tvořením svobodného obsahu, nejen že můžu potvrdit z vlastní zkušenosti, ale dokonce to tvrdí i další. --Aktron (talk) 17:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ready for use  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

edit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

edit
 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

edit

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

edit
 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Kusurija,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:SochaRaganaRudolfGindulis1981HČJuodkrantė.JPG

edit
 
File:SochaRaganaRudolfGindulis1981HČJuodkrantė.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 19:51, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ofocené fotky v Poděbradech

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Josef B. Jeschke.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Josef B. Jeschke.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

File tagging File:FarářkaMarieTaichová-Čejková.JPG

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FarářkaMarieTaichová-Čejková.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FarářkaMarieTaichová-Čejková.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Nelze vyfotit cizí fotku a napsat, že jsem autorem. Tím je pořád autor původní fotky a jemu zůstávají práva. Packa (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Jokūbavas church

edit

This your picture should be renamed and moved to Plikiai church. Thanks. --Vilensija (talk) 12:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Done. Thanks. --Kusurija (talk) 13:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Vilnia_outcrop

edit
 

Vilnia outcrop has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Powermelon (talk) 07:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A.Savin 01:49, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

No longer a penguin (talk) 11:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Popelė

edit

Sveiki,

Kaip rasti šio upelio pradžią, kai nėra hidrologinio kodo? Jų lt wiki niekas neįrašo, tai klausiu pas Jus. Girdėjau dar kitą pav. „Dubelė“. Žemėlapyje matyti, kad jungia dvi upes - Virintą ir Judinį. Galvoju, gal melioracijos darbų pasėkoje susisiekė su Judiniu... Vilensija (talk) 09:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dabar pat nežinau... Gal Jūs pastebėjot, kuria kryptimi teka? Kurkliai, Popelės upelis: pagal šitą paveikslą man panašu, kad išteka iš Virintos. Ir kad nuolydis šioks toks yra, tad mažokai tikėtina, kad galėtų tekėti pasikeitus sąlygom ir į kitą pusę. Kažkada vėliau pažiūrėsiu ir į literatūrą, gal pavyks kažką daugiau išsiaiškinti. Bet Jūsų informacija apie tekėjimo kryptį labai praverstų... --Kusurija (talk) 09:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Į Virintą. Kurkliuose prie bažnyčios patvenkta, teka žemyn, pro sinagogą (S, Nėries g. 4A) ir t. t. Nurodytas paveikslėlis gal ir klaidinantis, bet šio sklypo savininkas (nuo tiltelio) tiesiog nušienavęs ir prasivalęs vagą.--Vilensija (talk) 10:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dar pridėsiu: upelio vaizdas prie sinagogos.--Vilensija (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ~Cybularny Speak? 18:37, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Copyright status: File:Rodyklė.gif

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rodyklė.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@JuTa: OK, delete it. You may delete it speedy. This was only for illustration in discusion pages. Problem +/- solved therefore this file no more needed. Delete it speedy. --Kusurija (talk) 19:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:VanagaiBZNInfo001.JPG

edit
 
File:VanagaiBZNInfo001.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo of a poster/information board -- no indication the poster is under a free license
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Renata3 (talk) 21:50, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:VanagaiBZNInfo002.JPG

edit
 
File:VanagaiBZNInfo002.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo of a poster/information board -- no indication the poster is under a free license
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Renata3 (talk) 21:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:VanagaiBZNInfo003.JPG

edit
 
File:VanagaiBZNInfo003.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photo of a poster/information board -- no indication the poster is under a free license
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Renata3 (talk) 21:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:VanagaiBZNInfo001.JPG

edit
 
File:VanagaiBZNInfo001.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:VanagaiBZNInfo002.JPG

edit
 
File:VanagaiBZNInfo002.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:VanagaiBZNInfo003.JPG

edit
 
File:VanagaiBZNInfo003.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

edit
 
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
[email protected] -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Já fotím Litvu... --Kusurija (talk) 04:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Objects_without_name

edit
 

Objects without name has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

Small tributaries of the Baltic Sea in Lithuania has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 17:43, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


 
File:Plastika Žmogus-kankorėžis, Santakos parkas, Kaunas, Litva 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

edit
 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Sochy Park Klaipėda7vnuk.JPG

edit
 
File:Sochy Park Klaipėda7vnuk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:KamennáKočkaKlpKalviųG.JPG

edit
 
File:KamennáKočkaKlpKalviųG.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

edit
 
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

edit
 

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply