Jpcuvelier

Image:Synagogue_de_Bruxelles.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Synagogue_deBruxelles.jpg

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 15 years ago11 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Jpcuvelier!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:BERLIN, Tempelhof flughafen.JPG is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Brugge (BelGië), Godshuis de meulenaere 1613 Nieuwe gentweg;.jpg is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Château de NIEPPE (59850) France.JPG is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Godshuis de meulenaere 1613, Nieuwe gentweg,.jpg is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Four à chaux Sainte Barbe, construction -1853, Antoing .jpg is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Art déco, avenue Brugmann N°384 Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.JPG is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:France, Lille Synagogue , juin 2006 .JPEG is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Église de NIEPPE (Pont) 59850 -France .JPG is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Cimetière militaire belge de HOUTHULST (2).jpg is uncategorized since 5 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Hôtel de Ville de Liévin (Pas de Calais, France) 052.jpg is uncategorized since 14 March 2009. BotMultichillT 05:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Tournai (Belgique-Belgium, België), Grand'Place.jpg is uncategorized since 23 March 2009.
Image:Gare de LENS ( Pas de Calais, France) . LENS Station Railway.jpg is uncategorized since 4 April 2009.
Image:Berlin, U Bahn Warschauer station.jpg is uncategorized since 27 July 2009.
Image:Valenciennes,(nord de la France), Maison du Prévôt.jpg is uncategorized since 28 July 2009.
Image:Valenciennes, Maison dite espagnole, Office de Tourisme.jpg is uncategorized since 29 July 2009.
Image:Synagogue de Sedan.JPG was uncategorized on 27 August 2009.

File:Reynès Église le Vila 1.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour,

J'ai vu la modification concernant l'église/chapelle du Vila à Reynès. D'après mes renseignements pris auprès des autochtone, j'ai vécu 10 jours dans un maison jouxtant le bâtiment. Il s'agit bien d'une église, par ailleurs, la signalitique routière confirme qu'il s'agit d'une église. Des messes ont lieu régulièrement. Bonne continuation.--Bertrand GRONDIN (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Bains Dunkerquois.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Église fortifiée de Signy le petit.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Bonjour, tu as mis une nouvelle image de File:Église fortifiée de Signy le petit.jpg par-dessus une ancienne image. Mais il est d'usage de garder l'ancienne. Donc il est mieux d'en faire deux fichiers distinctes. Amicalement --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:51, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

--Jpcuvelier (talk) 13:19, 1 December 2018 (UTC)== Catégorisation de vos photos ==Reply

Merci pour vos informations ...Je vais faire au mieux dans ce domaine de catégorisation
Cordialement

Bonjour,

Merci pour les photos que vous publiez et qui complete la collection de manière intéressante.

Cependant, une remarque et demande.

Essayez de mettre les photos dans des categories les plus adaptées et au plus proche de l'objet. Les maisons classes à Tournai ont leur place dans Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Tournai et si possible dans une catégorie directement dédiée, comme par exemple Category:Rue Barre-Saint-Brice 12-14, Tournai. Le cas échéant, n'hésitez pas à créer une catégorie sur base de ce qui existe déjà.

N'hésitez pas à me contacter si vous avez besoin d'aide ou d'explications complémentaires.

Bonne continuation et bien à vous.

--H₂O^(talk) 10:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Suite à votre courrier, je tente par cette rubrique "discution" de vous répondre, suite à votre proposition d'un contact, et d'une autre manière que par le mail déposé de façon non orthodoxe se pourrait-il, dans la boite mail "Wiki@wilimedia .org". :Pour vous permettre d'entrevoir mes limites dans la compétence à déposer au mieux des photos dans le site Commons Wikimedia. Quelques exemples :

File:BRUXELLES (Brussel) —Placard "Réfugiés" -Immeuble du Comité d'Aide et d'Assistance aux Victimes de l'Antisémitisme en Allemagne.jpg

impossibilité de voir s'afficher le texte en anglais, ou en allemand des 3 photos importées ce 19 novembre 2018 sur le site en dépit des tentatives de corrections éventuelles à la rubrique modifier le texte" : signe "{ {" , "=" , etc.... notamment
Difficultés de trouver moi- même les catégories affinées et élaborées ; je ne les remarque la plupart du temps que par le fait, quelles furent mises préalablement -par vous j'imagine- .

Exemple :"Quai Notre-Dame (Tournai)" que je n'ai pas vu dans les sous rubriques de "Cultural heritage monuments in Tournai"

Merci, bien à vous

--Jpcuvelier (talk) 16:40, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bonsoir, juste en dessous de l'image il y a un menu déroulant qui est intitulé en français : "Sélecteur de langue", il faut sélectionner "Toutes les langues" (la première ligne) pour voir celles-ci.

Pour voir apparaître une catégorie dans une autre, il faut ajouter la catégorie mère dans le bas de la page. Mais attention, le Quai Notre-Dame à Tournai ne comporte pas que des maisons classées. Pour l'exemple, j'ai créé la Category:Quai Notre-Dame 8 à Tournai (car d'autres photos pourraient être publiées de ce bâtiment). Et j'ai mis cette nouvelle catégorie dans deux autres qui la lie à un ensemble cohérent.

Note : je me suis permis de mettre un peu d'ordre dans votre message ci-dessus, pour vous montrer comment procéder avec le langue Wiki de Commons.

Bien à vous.

--H₂O^(talk) 20:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:TOURNAI (Doornik) —Vue de face et vues des côtés du Pavillon Empire situé aux abords du Parc de l'Hôtel de Ville.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:TOURNAI (Doornik) —Vue de face et vues des côtés du Pavillon Empire situé aux abords du Parc de l'Hôtel de Ville.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

--Jpcuvelier (talk) 10:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Je ne sais pas comment prouver que ces photos sont bien de Jpcuvelier --Jpcuvelier (talk) 10:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC). cet ensemble de photos ayant tiré par mes soins.Ce n'est pas la 1ère fois que j'agis de la sorte afin de montrer un monument sur toutes les facettes ; aurai dû les importer en même temps que celles sur le même thème , il y a peu de temps Reply

Merci

Done. Secondarywaltz (talk) 13:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:TOURNAI (Doornik) —Les façades et les toitures de la maison sise 12 place Clovis, à l'angle de la rue Barre-Saint-Brice.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:TOURNAI (Doornik) —Les façades et les toitures de la maison sise 12 place Clovis, à l'angle de la rue Barre-Saint-Brice.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please help me with this. File:TOURNAI (Doornik) —Façades et toitures de l'immeuble sis n°12 place Clovis, à l'angle de la rue Barre-Saint-Brice.jpg is the one on the left, but I can't find the other one. Secondarywaltz (talk) 13:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Photo showing the views of two facades of the House located at 12 place Clovis, at the corner of rue Barre Saint Brice.

I changed the text of the description to better understand =>"Photo showing the views of two facades of the House located at 12 place Clovis, at the corner of rue Barre Saint Brice.". Please , I don't anderstand I have Added source information for this file. but the headband is always present.these photos are from my work. Thanks --Jpcuvelier (talk) 15:26, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

What is the second picture? Where was it uploaded? Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The second image represents the side of the house described, it helps to better understand the "Object" on the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_protected_heritage_sites_in_Tournai. This second photo has not been downloaded from any website. This is its first download here. It is attached to the 1st photo also taken by myself, but this 1st photo was separately uploaded to Commons. Both pictures are from my own work. I can download the second photo separately on Commons to prove, in view of the metadata, that the camera references are the same ( sony DSC-RX100M2), even if I currently also use a Canon. Thanks --Jpcuvelier (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I'll remove the tag and I don't think you will have any more trouble. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sur-catégorisation

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour,

Merci pour votre apport sur Commons.

Merci aussi de ne pas sur-catégoriser vos photos.
Ainsi, quand vous mettez une image dans Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Tournai, merci de ne pas ajouter Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Wallonia, car la première catégorie est déjà fille de la seconde.

Bonne continuation et bien à vous.

--H₂O^(talk) 08:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merci à vous, en ai pris note --Jpcuvelier (talk) 10:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:TOURNAI (Doornik) — Vues donnant sur le Couvent des Clarisses, quai Taille Pierres.jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:TOURNAI (Doornik) — Vues donnant sur le Couvent des Clarisses, quai Taille Pierres.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Henxter (talk) 09:39, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Réponse / Response to your mail 11-08-2019 Jpcuvelier

Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jpcuvelier,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jpcuvelier,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jpcuvelier,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Oignies — Panneau d'information - Abords du monument à Madame de Clercq, dit de la Découverte du Charbon.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ русский ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Classement des documents

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Salut,

Si tu as des photos de tramways dans le Nord Pas-de-Calais et en Belgique que tu postes n'hésites pas à m'envoyer un message privé pour identifier les objets sur la photo.

Amicalement,

--Arflhn (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC) Reply

@Jpcuvelier: , je viens de voir que tu as uploadé une collection massive de très très beaux documents,

Pour permettre leur utilisation sur les différents projets, je t'ai crée une catégorie de Collection Category:Collection Jpcuvelier, je t'encourrage à déposer tes nouveaux documents dans cette catégories, et je m'occuperai de les classer pour que les autres utilisateurs puissent facilement les retrouver (à l'inverse les documents mal classés tombent souvent dans l'oubli), pour te donner un exemple de classement avec la carte postale ci-contre :

À l'origine :

- Category:Tram transport in Lille, Roubaix and Tourcoing
- Category:Ancien tramway de Roubaix Tourcoing

Et classées :

- Category:TRT 300 type tram

- Category:Tram line A Roubaix - Tourcoing
- Category:TRT A type tram
- Category:Tram line N Tourcoing - Mouvaux
- Category:Roubaix Tourcoing tram network unidentified lines
- Category:Place de la République (Tourcoing)
- Category:Kiosque des tramways (Place de la République à Tourcoing)
- Category:Grand-Place (Tourcoing)
- Category:Chambre de commerce de Tourcoing
- Category:Place Charles et Albert Roussel (Tourcoing)

Pour les cartes postales comme pour tes photographies, je t'encourage à utiliser cette template: Template:Photograph qui est beaucoup plus précise et permet de dissocier le titre et la description (particulièrement utile pour les cartes postales) ainsi que l'auteur de l'éditeur (publisher=) exemple File:131. Lillle — Le beffroi – La Noble Tour – L'église Saint Sauveur - EC.jpg.

Enfin quand tu scannes un document avec une version complète recto-verso et une second pour l'utilisation sur les projets Wiki, tu peux utiliser ce petit modèle à insérer sur le document complet dans la section description :

For the full description and linked categories, see this file :

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ português do Brasil ∙ +/−

File:131. Lillle — Le beffroi – La Noble Tour – L'église Saint Sauveur - EC.jpg

Ça évite de recopier les catégories et les informations sur les deux pages (ce qui peut très vite s'avérer difficile à suivre) et ça évite de surcharger les catégories avec trop de fichiers identiques. [FAIT] Je vais créer une deuxième petite template presque identique à celle ci-dessus mais que l'on place sur le fichier à utiliser. [FAIT]

See the following file for the recto-verso version of the postcard:

English ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ +/−

File:131. Lillle — Le beffroi – La Noble Tour – L'église Saint Sauveur - vº- rº.jpg

Toujours est-il je détaille mais si tu veux que je me charge du classement de tes photographies sur le Nord-Pas-de-Calais, les fortifications, les chemins de fer je peux te donner un coup de main.

Enfin concernant la case : Source, je te conseille de mettre Collection Jpcuvelier ou ton nom prénom complet pour l'affichage dans le média viewer.

Amicalement, Arflhn (talk) 17:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC) ..............................Reply

Bonjour

Merci pour tout ce travail effectué sur des fichiers que j'ai déposé sur Commons Wiki. Je me sens pas trop capable d'en faire autant, ou même peut être l'envie de le faire! Aussi, suis-je assez admiratif... je ne sais même pas ce qu'est template!

Je tacherai de suivre au mieux tes conseils et suis pleinement favorable à une assistance pour le classement. Cela étant en ce moment j'ai mis un bémol à mes activités sur Commons Wiki , un peu malgré moi Bien cordialement

J-Pierre Cuvelier

Copyright status: File:Tournai (Doornik) — Vue sur les pinacles des contreforts - Uitzicht op de pinakels van de steunberen van de kathedraal.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Tournai (Doornik) — Vue sur les pinacles des contreforts - Uitzicht op de pinakels van de steunberen van de kathedraal.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tournai (Doornik) — Vue sur les pinacles des contreforts - Uitzicht op de pinakels van de steunberen van de kathedraal.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:MARKEN — Ansichtkaart 1920 met correspondentie.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@Jpcuvelier: since you were the uploader, I was wondering where the MARKEN — Ansichtkaart 1920 — carte postale traditionnelle ; un peu image d' Épinal" de la Hollande à une époque originates from. This is a text in French, referring to a person named "Eva" writing from Guînes (13 May 1914) to "Marie" at 56, Route de Boulogne, Fort Nieulay (Le Fort Nieulayà (Calais). Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 10:09, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour , je vais tenter de vous répondre sur le sujet de la carte postale Marken et sur le courrier entre "Éva et Marie Deloffe-Cousin". ne sachant de prime abord si j'ai bien compris votre question

"Image d'Épinal* c'est un genre de dessin particulie* , ancêtre sous certains aspects de la Bande dessinée d'aujourd'hui. Il s'agit d’une image très colorée. Ces images étaient imprimées à ÉPINAL (dans les Vosges, ) d’où son nom. Les sujets traités reprenaient des thèmes historiques, religieux, des histoires moralistes

Ces images inspirent une certaine nostalgie du temps passé.

Aussi au SENS FIGURÉ, une image d’Épinal désigne une idée ou un concept jugé dépassé ; qui ne reflète plus la situation actuelle.

Les habitants de Warken où je suis allé trois fois ne portent plus de sabots , ne portent plus de longues robes. Pourtant, des faillances , des broderie sont vendues aux touristes agrémentées comme si nous en étions encore à une autre époque

.qui ne représente plus la réalité. Mais le village est idéalisée de la sorte

Quant on écrit "Paris 'Ville Lumière on peu dire que c'est une image d'Épinal on, rabâche toujours les mêmes choses ; la chose n'est pas vérifiable c'est une gloire de pacotille !

Quant on dit que l'avenue des Champs Elysées à Paris est la plus belle avenue de monde : c'est une "image d' Épinal", c'est de la gloriole au ras des paquerettes.

ce que vivent les habitants de Warken ( j'y suis trois fois)

la carte postale n'a sûrement pas été acheté aux Pays Bas , On pouvait la trouver facilement dans le nord de la France, en achetant du chocolat à la frontière belge par exemple., l'image était donnée en sus comme on fait maintenant en allant chercher du tabac en Belgique, le commerçant offrant le briquet.

Elle pouvait être donnée à un enfant 'sage' pour le récompenser , elle pouvait être offerte par le commerçant pour l'achat de chocolat à la frontière belge où j'habitais dans les années 1960→ [[:fr:clef de Hollande... & Clef de Hollande

Je ne sais si j'ai pu répondre vos interrogations

* ( Épinal print) →https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Épinal_print

Hello, I will try to answer you on the subject of the postcard Marken and on the mail between Éva and Marie Deloffe-Cousin. not knowing at first sight if I understood well your question

"Image d'Épinal" is a particular kind of drawing*, ancestor in certain aspects of the comic strip of today. It is a very colourful image. These images were printed in ÉPINAL (in the Vosges, France), hence the name. The subjects dealt with were historical, religious, moralist stories

These images inspire a certain nostalgia for the past.

Also in the FIGURED MEANING, an epinal image designates an idea or a concept considered outdated; which no longer reflects the current situation.

The inhabitants of Warken, where I have been three times, no longer wear clogs, no longer wear long dresses. However, bankruptcies, embroidery are sold to tourists decorated as if we were still in another era

.which no longer represents reality. But the village is idealized in this way

When one writes "Paris 'Ville Lumière'" one can say that it is an "image d'Épinal", one always repeats the same things; the thing is not verifiable it is a glory of junk!

When they say that the Champs Elysées avenue in Paris is the most beautiful avenue in the world, it's an "image d'Epinal", it's a cheap glory.

what the inhabitants of Warken experience (I've been there three times)

The postcard was certainly not bought in the Netherlands, it could easily be found in the north of France, by buying chocolate at the Belgian border for example, the image was given in addition as one does now when going to fetch tobacco in Belgium, the trader offering the lighter.

It could be given to a 'wise' child as a reward, it could be offered by the shopkeeper when buying chocolate at the Belgian border where I lived in the 1960s→ [[:en:clef de Hollande... & Clef de Hollande

I don't know if I could answer your questions Jpcuvelier (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Jpcuvelier: mille fois merci pour cette 'leçon' fortement appréciée. C'est gentil, mais une traduction en Anglais n'aurait pas été nécessaire. Dommage qu'il n'y a pas (encore) un article en Néerlandais.

. Lotje (talk) 05:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:9. Wimereux les Villas de la plage - LL.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:9. Wimereux les Villas de la plage - LL.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:9. Wimereux les Villas de la plage - LL.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Lille — Jardin Vauban - Monument à Albert Samain.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Lille — Jardin Vauban - Monument à Albert Samain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 07:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour @Jpcuvelier: , j'ai vu un peu par hasard cette avertissement. Pour info, l'œuvre de Yvonne Serruys, morte le 1 mai 1953, ne sera dans le domaine public qu'au 1 janvier 2024, 70 ans accomplis après son décès. Pas de droit de panorama en France, donc il faut attendre cette date avant republication. Dommage. Cordialement et bonne continuation. --H₂O^(talk) 07:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Niepkerke —Het Monument voor de Doden. Eerste Wereldoorlog en Tweede Wereldoorlog.jpg

And also:

File:Nieppe — Le Monument aux Morts.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Kain — Passerelle de l'écluse sur l'Escaut.jpg

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Kain — Passerelle de l'écluse sur l'Escaut.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kain — Passerelle de l'écluse sur l'Escaut.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic