ru
en-2
de-1

→ Archive (2011–2015)
→ Archive (2016–2020)

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, INS Pirat!

Could you please explain...

edit

Could you please explain why you added a {{NoUploads}} template to Category:Carl Barks?

Could you please leave your explanation at Category talk:Carl Barks#Inappropriate warning...? Geo Swan (talk) 23:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Arkady Ostrovsky, March 2018.jpg

edit
 
File:Arkady Ostrovsky, March 2018.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Arkady Ostrovsky, March 2018.jpg

edit
 
File:Arkady Ostrovsky, March 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 23:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

YouTube

edit

Hi, I've noticed that you've uploaded quite a number of screenshots from YouTube videos with Creative Commons licences, and was wondering if you could let me know what procedure you follow when adapting and uploading them? I'm looking into uploading some and want to know what the best practice is. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Mattythewhite, hello. Not sure what exactly you are struggling with. The YouTube search has a Creative Commons filter. Firstly, be careful and make sure that the video (or its part/screenshot), you want to upload to WikiCommons, is indeed a property of the channel owners and not just a reused content from elsewhere.
    For example, the CC-licensed TV footage on some anonymous YouTube channel "username37542" is likely the license laundering. Take note if the channel is verified (though it's not always a definitive sign in this regard, both ways: this is an official channel of the TV network, yet not verified, and the licensing of a movie trailer here is, conversely, dubious); if it's not verified, look for backlinks to the channel from the official website if it exists, etc. The minor copyrighted elements (in a video licensed by the legitimate authors) are appropriate though.
    There are some online services to get the video files of different resolutions from YouTube. I don't know about their correlation with the YouTube user policies, so I won't name any specific ones. Check on YouTube for what is the top resolution available: for the different videos, it could be accessible through the one serviсe but not from the other.
    To make the screenshots, I use the free MPC-HC player (ALT+I saves a screenshot, CTRL+ →/← shows a video frame by frame). If we talk about the portraits, I choose the most relaxed facial expressions. Preferably, eyes fully open (both are seen; aimed in a face direction or at a camera), mouth closed (it's usually still a phase of talking, but it could be not discernible from a screenshot - like it's just a calm face), face not cropped by the frame borders. I think, I make up to a couple dozen screenshots, but usually less than that. Then I choose the best one (or a couple if there is a number of good shots from different views).
    I crop the shots with the free Paint.NET editor. The slanted upper arms are usually not to be cropped vertically: it's either the tight cropping from the sides or the whole cropping out of the shoulders. But I'm not a pro in photography. Everything that I described regarding the composition is just intuitive.
    While uploading, put the YouTube-CC-BY tag and the review request (the latter without any parameters). AFAIK, the publication date is not really relevant for the CC-licensed works (in comparison to the copyrighted ones), so, instead of writing in the YouTube date as it is, I use pretty often the {{Other date}} template with the "by" argument. --INS Pirat (talk) 23:04, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oh, OK, you're a license reviewer. So I don't get your question. --INS Pirat (talk) 23:16, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

YouTube

edit

Hello INS Pirat I hope you're doing well. I reviewed some of your youtube upload, and I must say you're helping reviewer with the timestamp. I suggest if you could use Template:From YouTube for file source description for future uploads. Thanks for volunteering, stay safe. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 14:26, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Anastasia Vedyakova, February 2021.jpg

edit
 
File:Anastasia Vedyakova, February 2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.220.239.209 22:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

You also do not have the right to contribute obscene images that are contrary to the rules of the message, while defaming a worthy person. There are quite a few links on the Internet to other photographs of this person, but you yourself made the decision to include this very bad frame in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.92.140.135 (talk)

If you find this picture obscene and defaming, you should nominate it for deletion again with this reasoning (i.e. COM:PEOPLE#Defamation). Regardless of my opinion, I don't have either the technical ability to delete it or the user rights to decide on application of the Wikimedia policies. --INS Pirat (talk) 20:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Vedyakova Anastasia Konstantinovna.jpg

edit

Hello INS Pirat I hope you're doing well. I have removed your no permission tag and fix the upload. Thanks, stay safe. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 15:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Question

edit

Hello INS Pirat I hope you're doing well. I reviewed your upload File:Andrea Arcangeli, May 2017.jpg. Beside him, who's the lady. Do you have any idea?. After searching on web I found these Paola Calliari. Please have a look, and confirm. Thanks, stay safe--C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@INS Pirat: could you spare a minute and solve my doubt. Thanks--C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 14:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Ah, sorry, I forgot about this topic. However, I can't say for sure. --INS Pirat (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Greg Brockman, 2019.jpg

edit
 
File:Greg Brockman, 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Spartaz (talk) 17:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Vitaly Anufriyenko, January 2020.jpg

edit
 
File:Vitaly Anufriyenko, January 2020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dudek1337 (talk) 19:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Christopher Gattelli, 2018.jpg

edit
 
File:Christopher Gattelli, 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

184.102.97.186 20:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Sam Feldt press shot 2021 (cropped).jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sam Feldt press shot 2021 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sam Feldt press shot 2021 (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 220.246.140.228.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Darius McCrary, June 2016.jpg

edit
 
File:Darius McCrary, June 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:100C:A203:FD7F:8808:AA63:9B10:E739 09:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Duncan Ferguson, January 2023 (cropped).jpg

edit
 
File:Duncan Ferguson, January 2023 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yep, but not my fault. INS Pirat (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Dimitry (Yeliseyev), April 2020.jpg

edit
 
File:Dimitry (Yeliseyev), April 2020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Günther Frager (talk) 15:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply