Gianfranco
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
ItalyDefense images
editquindi cosa suggerisci? credo che però in questo caso si possano caricare sulla wiki italiana... rimango in attesa prima di un'eventuale cancellazione! ciao Nickel Chromo 09:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- come posso controllare se le immagini erano su marina.difesa.it prima del 23. 5. 2006. ? Grazie --Orlovic (talk) 12:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Rispondo qui che la risposta è comune:
- intanto salvatele, tenetene una copia privata per sicurezza.
- Per caricarle su it.wiki, tenete conto che le regole si vanno unificando quindi occorre che rispettino i criteri dell'EDP (la maggior parte ho idea che li rispetteranno, sui disegni ho fortissimi dubbi). Ma per un parere più competente, contattate Trixt o Cruccone.
- Per cercarle dovreste ritrovare la pagina di difesa.it da cui le avete prese (non basta il link generico) ed inserire l'indirizzo in http://www.archive.org/web/web.php (Take me back). Se la pagina era archiviata (e la foto risulta presente) in una versione prima del 23 maggio 2006, era stata rilasciata in PD e dunque resta PD (una volta PD non si torna indietro), quindi linkate la pagina di archive.org che la contiene e precisate magari "already released in the PD - [link_a_pagina_copia_su_archive.org see]" o qualcosa di simile.
- Se non c'è prova che fossero state rilasciate in PD prima del 23 maggio, vanno cancellate. Chiedetela per favore voi stessi la cancellazione, così evitiamo polemiche accessorie non impellenti...
- Per i disegni, a naso la vedo male, a meno che non si tratti di opere realizzate per l'Amministrazione che vanno in PD 20 anni dopo il primo utilizzo, ma dubito che ci siano informazioni del genere. Nel dubbio chiedetene voi stessi la cancellazione per prudenza, dato che non solo sono disegni ma potrebbero in alcuni casi anche essere progetti, quindi termini di copyright ben diversi.
Fatemi sapere... Buon lavoro --Gianfranco 13:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Bolzano
editHi. The photo sure existed there before May 2006... but I can't prove it. It's a pity, that another source of free WW2-era images falls off... Pibwl 20:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Un esempio
editVedi qui se e OK --Orlovic (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Credo che tutte le foto di navi storiche su qello site esistevano dal 2003. Io ne ho sistemato un 6-7 ma richede piu lavoro. Spero che un paio di persone in piu possono contribure (da it. wiki) --Orlovic (talk) 13:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Villa_Celimontana_452.jpg
edit
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Villa_Celimontana_452.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 17:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- removed tag. "m/m" stands for "me medesimo", myself in Italian, and is a legally relevant indication in the State in which it was produced (Italy). --g 04:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
|
File:Schermata registrazione 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nicla Vassallo
editMi pare non ci siano problemi, Gianni Ansaldi è un fotografo abbastanza noto, e le foto paiono essere sue, nel senso che l'account pare fare riferimento a lui stesso. Semmai il problema, noto, è sulla voce che è fatta in maniera orrenda. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 00:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Stemma Santa Sede
edit...allora per favore esprimiti dove conta, cioè qui ;-D --Gambo7 (talk) 08:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Sentenza Bulgari
editHo risolto la questione più diplomaticamente. Mettere in piazza la privacy di una persona non è mai una cosa che incontra le mie simpatie. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016
edit
|
Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno. Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione. Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste |
|
|
File:Landing plane at Rome-FCO 32.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Monte Viglio Avezzano
editCiao Gianfranco ti volevo chiedere se è possibile trasferire qui in Commons questa foto mi puoi aiutare per favore? --Marica Massaro (talk) 19:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Grazie di cuore Gianfranco --Marica Massaro (talk) 07:19, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Carlo-Lapucci-Lago-Trasimeno.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File source is not properly indicated: File:Spiaggia di Santa Marinella.jpg
edit
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Spiaggia di Santa Marinella.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Spiaggia di Santa Marinella.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
|
|
File:Natoflag.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:Balgarska armiya stadium, sector A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FOP in Italy for recent buildings
editCiao, to sottopongo una cosa che ho scritto per Commons. L'idea generale è che gli edifici non registrati presso la Direzione Generale Arte e Architettura contemporanee e Periferie urbane cadono sotto la soglia di originalità, perché neanche gli eredi possono più esercitare il diritto d'autore. Ciò vuol dire che, per Commons, le foto di tali edifici si possono riprodurre, mentre quelle di edifici considerati con "importante carattere artistico" potrebbero essere protette per COM:PRP. Il testo è: User:Ruthven/Italian Copyright Law. L'idea è di arrivare a modificare il {{NoFoP-Italy}}. Ti pregherei di indicare eventuali modifiche in discussione, perché anche altri lo stanno rileggendo. Grazie ;) --Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
|
|
File:Castel Belvedere, Baselga di Piné (TN).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Ciao, per questo, pensi che potrebbe essere PD perché opera di un ente dello Stato (l'Aeronautica militare) pubblicato più di 20 anni fa? --Ruthven (msg) 19:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- no Ruthven, no carissimo @Ruthven: , nel quadrotto in inglese puoi leggere «This provision shall not apply to photographs of [...] technical drawings». IMHO, 70 pma a meno che non sappiamo che l'opera sia stata commissionata (e non ad esempio acquistata) dallo stato; ed è un po' difficile affermarlo con certezza. --g (talk) 23:22, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Pensavo piuttosto ad usare questa licenza: {{PD-ItalyGov}}, perché pubblicata dall'Aeronautica militare più di 20 anni fa. --Ruthven (msg) 12:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: no, appunto: pubblicata ok, ma chi ci dice che l'opera è stata realizzata da un impiegato dello stato (ministeri, etc) o da un disegnatore su commissione dello stato? Quello che vedo può allo stesso modo essere stato acquistato dallo stato (se mai è stato dello stato). Lo stato può ben aver pubblicato un'opera che non è stata creata per conto dello stato, il punto è questo. Se è andata come speriamo (craeta da disegnatore dipendente dello stato o a contratto dello stato che ne fu committente), sì, PD-GOV (di sicuro non è PD-Italy); ma per risolvere il "se" bisogna sapere chi l'ha commissionata. Il problema non è capzioso: questo disegno potrebbe averlo fatto fare l'Aeronautica ad uso dei piloti e delle contraeree, ma ugualmente può essere uscito tanto dalla fabbrica delle mitragliere quanto da quella delle munizioni, quanto ancora dalla Macchi, e per nessuno di questi ultimi varrebbe il PD-GOV. Che notizie abbiamo? --g (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Vedi la discussione a Wikipedia:Vaglio/Macchi_M.C.205#Attenzione_al_copyright...: tutto è partito da lì. --Ruthven (msg) 15:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: no, appunto: pubblicata ok, ma chi ci dice che l'opera è stata realizzata da un impiegato dello stato (ministeri, etc) o da un disegnatore su commissione dello stato? Quello che vedo può allo stesso modo essere stato acquistato dallo stato (se mai è stato dello stato). Lo stato può ben aver pubblicato un'opera che non è stata creata per conto dello stato, il punto è questo. Se è andata come speriamo (craeta da disegnatore dipendente dello stato o a contratto dello stato che ne fu committente), sì, PD-GOV (di sicuro non è PD-Italy); ma per risolvere il "se" bisogna sapere chi l'ha commissionata. Il problema non è capzioso: questo disegno potrebbe averlo fatto fare l'Aeronautica ad uso dei piloti e delle contraeree, ma ugualmente può essere uscito tanto dalla fabbrica delle mitragliere quanto da quella delle munizioni, quanto ancora dalla Macchi, e per nessuno di questi ultimi varrebbe il PD-GOV. Che notizie abbiamo? --g (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Pensavo piuttosto ad usare questa licenza: {{PD-ItalyGov}}, perché pubblicata dall'Aeronautica militare più di 20 anni fa. --Ruthven (msg) 12:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Quesito tesserino
editCiao, mi servirebbe un parere su quest'immagine. Abbiamo l'autorizzazione per la foto, ma il tesserino in sé sarebbe sotto copyright del CLN, che però è stato sciolto alla fine della guerra. In che modo questo tesserino potrebbe rientrare nel pubblico dominio già dalla fine della guerra? Dobbiamo attendere 95 anni dall pubblicazione per stare tranquilli? --Ruthven (msg) 08:22, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Ciao, ti ricordo che se aggiungi il template di OTRS accettato, devi anche rispondere al ticket e all'utente. In alternativa, puoi inserire {{OTRS received}} in attesa di rispondere. Buona continuazione! --Ruthven (msg) 16:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ciao Ruthven, come detto attendevo di vedere che finissero i caricamenti e le permission per fare un messaggio unico. Hanno terminato? --g (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ne hanno aggiunto uno. Ho risposto. Al prossimo caricamento sicuramente scriveranno 2-3 mail nuove ;) Nota l'uso della funzione "link", per collegare senza unire autorizzazioni simili, ma trattate in tempi diversi. --Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Dedica puccini.jpg
edit
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dedica puccini.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Copyright status: File:Convento dell'osservanza montalc.jpg
edit
Copyright status: File:Convento dell'osservanza montalc.jpg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Convento dell'osservanza montalc.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
OTRS?
editHI Gianfranco, are you a OTRS-volunteer? If yes, it would be helpful to place the related template {{User OTRS}} on your userpage. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Túrelio, done, thank you for your note :-) --g (talk) 09:11, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
File tagging File:Toffa2017-2.jpg
edit
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Toffa2017-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Toffa2017-2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Image without license
edit
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the 
→ Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 18:02, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
|
|
File:Delta S4 salita.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
|
|
File:NURAGHE LOSA01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
edit|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Distrazione
editEh eh chiedo scusa, Gianfry, ma non si era detto due mesi di blocco discussioni talk utente e voci e ns:WP? Perché non mi spiego questo :) Se siamo sbloccati entrambi è meglio, io credo, ma non capisco la differenza, forse è distrazione? -- Blackcat 
11:04, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 |
File:Catherine-Asaro.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
edit
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
edit
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
edit|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Gloria di Sant'Agnello, Santuario di Sant'Agnello Abate - Roccarainola (NA).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 04:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Lazio wiki logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
edit
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
edit
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)