Fernost
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Bahnhof Holzwickede 1902.jpg was uncategorized on 8 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Wdrcc.png was uncategorized on 28 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
|
File:Pro-eleven-visualisierung-fotomontage-0007-3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
File:Pro-eleven-visualisierung-fotomontage-0007-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alan (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Your help with your images please
editGreetings Fernost! I have been reviewing images without source and I find that many of your images are missing source, but a fix is simple! Please open up your own photography images and change them as I have changed your image of File:Badewanne in Senioreneinrichtung P4670041.JPG. It is simple, merely add "{{Own}}" to each of the images which you took, and those templates "no source" will disappear. Your help is most gratefully appreciated; I'm one of the admins going through over 50,000 no source images and asking uploaders who are still active to help with their own images to reduce the backlog and to save the images from nomination as "no source." Thanking you again for your help. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- P.S. notice that on some of your 2013 images like [:File:Samsung Hardddrive Head Crash DSCN0125.JPG], you have "own photography" typed on that line. That is fine, the {{Own}} template is the same thing, but automates the process. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:EMV Schirmbox für DUT P1210009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bilderfrage
editHallo, du hast da viele gute Bilder hochgeladen, danke! Bin jetzt alle durchgegangen, hab die Vorlageninfos ein bisschen verbessert und bestmögliche Kategorien ergänzt wie bei [1] passend zu fr:Charbonnage du Hasard de Cheratte. Bei einigen Bildern fehlen aber immer noch Ortsinfos, so dass sie momentan "ganz weit oben im Kategorienbaum hängen" (zB. bei "abandoned buildings" statt bei "former power plants in Belgium" oder bei "ruins of industry buildings in Germany") oder unter unidentified locations stehen.
Oft würd zur besseren Einsortierung/Zuordnung schon die Info helfen, aus welchem Land (Staat) ein Bild überhaupt ist. Du hast offenbar in mehreren Ländern Fotos gemacht und zB. bei dem Friseursalon (31) gäbe es Category:Barber shops by country. Hier gucken ja nicht nur Leute aus Deutschland oder Europa, so dass es schon interessant ist zu wissen ob das Foto eine Einrichtung aus Brasilien, Japan, Belgien oder Deutschland zeigt ;)
Bei Bildern wie dem großen "Stadtgas-Schieber" (9) oder dem Gasometer (8) wär sicherlich eine noch genauere Angabe sinnvoll, also Stadt oder sogar wie das Werk(?) hieß/heißt, weils vielleicht schon passende Wikipediaartikel gibt (ebenso bei den Stollen/U-Verlagerungen/Bergbaumuseen/Altgebäuden usw). Ich hab schon ein paar Mal gesehen, dass andere User durch Ortsinfos plötzlich wichtige Infos beigesteuert haben, was genau abgebildet ist, zB Hersteller/Maschinen/Gebäudeinfos ergänzen konnten, was ohne Land/Ortskategorisierung nicht möglich gewesen wär, oder dass sie Bilder dadurch in Artikel einbauen konnten. Vielleicht erkennt ja so auch noch wer das Knallgerät-Fabrikat (29) wieder oder weiß mehr zu diesen Borsigkesseln (11).
Bei einigen deiner Bilder vermute ich dass du vielleicht keine ganz konkreten Ortsinfos machen möchtest, das ist ok, aber wenigstens Staat und Bundesland (und eventuell Landkreis, Gebirgsname auf regionaler Eebene oder so) würden die Fotos echt aufwerten.
Ich hab Mal alle Bilder rausgesucht, zu denen du noch was präzisieren könntest (entweder gleich bei den Bildbeschreibungen oder in der Galerie hier drunter, dann kümmer ich mich drum). Wär jedenfalls super. Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 19:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
-
1
-
2 (siehe auch Frage)
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
File:Zeche Zollverein Schacht 12 Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2003:45:477A:29F3:25F4:3229:3B1F:1EB7 18:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)