Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Bernt Fransson!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

WLM i Sverige

edit

Hej det verkar som om en del av dina byggnadsminnen har fått fel nummer när du laddade upp dem. Var hittade du dina nummer? /Lokal_Profil 01:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Stort tack för påpekandet. Har hämtat nr från Riksantivarieämbetets bebyggelsereg.BBR. Goda hälsningar

Bernt

Ok. OM du hämtar numret direkt från deras sida så se till att du använder det nummer som i följer texten "anlaggningId=" i url:en. Om du använder exempelvis "historikId" istället så blir det fel. Det kan ofta vara enklare att hämta ID direkt från kartan på [1] eller från listorna på svenskspråkiga Wikipedia. /Lokal_Profil 16:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hej! Tack för hjälpen och ett utmärkt tips Glada hälsningar --BF (talk) 19:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

E-post / Wiki Loves Monuments

edit

(don't understand Swedish? Read this message in English!)

Hej!

Tack för de bilder du har laddat upp i samband med Wiki Loves Monuments tävlingen. För att du ska kunna vinna priser i tävlingen krävs dock att du i dina inställningar har angivit en e-post adress samt se till att "Tillåt e-post från andra användare" är förkryssat. Om du sällan är inne på ditt konto kan det även vara bra att kryssa för "Skicka e-post till mig när något händer på min diskussionssida", på så sätt får du lätt reda på om någon vill kontakta dig angående en bild. Hälsningar. /Lokal_Profil 19:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Bernt Fransson,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 21:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Svar: Stort tack för detta meddelande.BF--BF (talk) 16:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Våthult.jpg

edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Svar: Many thanks for your attention. I've fixed the licensing. Greetings Bernt--37.2.148.7 15:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Tannåker klockstapel 1941.jpg

edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:55, 25 December 2012 (UTC) Svar: Many thanks for your attention. I've fixed the licensing. Greetings Bernt--37.2.148.7 15:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply



català | English | español | עברית | svenska | +/−

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear Bernt Fransson,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,

the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art
 
Message delivered by odderBot on 13:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Svar:Stort tack för meddelandet.Glada hälsningar Bernt--BF (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

edit
 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 17:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your message Happy greetings Bernt Fransson

Category:Hemmesjö_gamla_kyrkas_klockstapel

edit
 

Hemmesjö gamla kyrkas klockstapel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 03:18, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Berga_kyrkas_klockstapel,Kalmar_län

edit
 

Berga kyrkas klockstapel,Kalmar län has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 03:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Arby_kyrkas_klockstapel

edit
 

Arby kyrkas klockstapel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 09:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!

edit

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!

edit
 
Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bild sjön Örken

edit

Hej, denna är kategoriserad som Braås. Är det orten Braås som syns i bakgrunden (dvs om kategorin skall vara även Braås)? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%96rken_01.jpg

Går det att fastställa platsen för den här bilden? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rhododendron_Aromi_Sunrise_3039.jpg MVH Stalverk80 (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC) Svar:Tack för uppmärksamheten. Bilden är tagen i den sydvästra utkanten av Braås samhälle. Gott Nytt År! Bernt FReply

Kategorier

edit

Bemærk venligst at jeg har fikset en række kategorier du har oprettet det seneste år. Se f.eks. Åfors glasbruk og Ankarsrums kyrka. --Hjart (talk) 13:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Felaktigt daterade bilder

edit

God dag! Först och främst ska Du ha ett stort tack för alla Dina fantastiska bilder – det blev en trevlig överraskning för mig att stöta på dem. Emellertid har jag tyvärr lagt märke till att en del av Dina bilder automatiskt verkar ha daterats felaktigt. Jag bör förtydliga att detta inte är Ditt fel, utan sannolikt har kamerans klocka gått fel, vilket inneburit att felaktiga datumuppgifter lagts till till filernas metadata, vilka en bot i sin tur har utgått ifrån och placerat bilderna i felaktiga datumkategorier (som denna). Jag är villig att hjälpa till med att rätta datumen m.m., men jag skulle i så fall behöva Din hjälp. Om vi skulle börja med den kategorin som exempel, är månaden uppenbarligen fel. Men tror Du annars att året stämmer? Lägg märke till att ifall man är osäker på en bilds exakta datering tillåter Commons en att endast ange år, eller till och med ett intervall (exempelvis "2003–25 oktober 2011"). Med vänliga hälsningar, VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 16:12, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hej och tack för dina uppmuntrande ord om mina bilder. Jag uppskattar att Du vill hjälpa till att rätta datum på mina bilder. Bilderna är tagna med en liten Fuijkamera och tydligen har inte datum fungerat. Det kan även bero på att jag missat med inställningen. Kameran finns inte längre i min ägp utan hamnat på miljöstationen. Har svårt att erinra mej vilket år och datum bilderna är tagna. I vilket fall inte 2003. Möjligen tidigast 2006. Bäst att ange årsintervall. Är mycket tacksam för din hjälp att göra justeringar.
Goda hälsningar
Bernt Fransson BF (talk) 07:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Träslovsläge_kyrka

edit
 

Category:Träslovsläge_kyrka has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


//LevandeMänniska (talk), 21:19, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply