User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/de juin à août 2011

Félicitations

Félicitations pour l'image du jour --Llez (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Merci j'en profite pour te renouveler mon plaisir de voir tes photos de coquillage auxquelles tu prends tant de soins. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Félicitations de moi aussi, j'en profite pour fêter dignement ce changement de mois en faisant le ménage, ça devenait trop long à charger, cette page.--Jebulon (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Loggia dei Cavalieri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GooEnough detail that I can see her thong and the wonderful paintings. --Saffron Blaze 19:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euploea phaenareta (Large Crow).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 13:48, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazza dei Signori e Palazzo dei Trecento.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 20:38, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Firenze

Mon hôtel est mitoyen de la parfumerie-apothicairerie ! Ce fut ma première visite ! C'est merveilleux, on y retourne avant notre départ dimanche, c'est sûr ! --Jebulon (talk) 21:02, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Francesco (Treviso) Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - A bit dark but valuable indeed and best out of two images for now in commons.--MrPanyGoff 05:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charaxes varanes vologeses (Mâle) (face dorsale).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very detailed and useful --Llez 07:57, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Spot and cables removed. I am lost RAW file and I think that I need a better monitor because I work with 13 inches. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo 20:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm uploading the image now--Miguel Bugallo 20:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup

Merci beaucoup. Regarding the present voting behaviour of our FPC "voting experts" I fear, that we will have only birds and panoramas as "Pictures of the day" in future. --Llez (talk) 09:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Patience... il faut laisser passer l'orage. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:05, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historis odius (Dos).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chrysochroa rajah.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 19:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église dell'Angelo Raffaele(Plafond).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments bit noise, but for QI okay, maybe you denoise it --Taxiarchos228 09:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus 18:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Jacob Hübner

The File:PortraitHuebner .jpg is now in commons. I'm going to nominate it for VI these days, OK?--MrPanyGoff 13:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

• Sure of course! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
  • The file is lacking source information. I don't know if this is a problem for VI nomination... though there is nothing about the source in the rules. The description and categorization are only required.--MrPanyGoff 12:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
    • I do not think there have a problem --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charaxes varanes (Pearl Charaxes), Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santi Apostoli (Venice) - Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - The only image in commons. Gives good idea of the interior.--MrPanyGoff 20:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gymnetis stellata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 10:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:25, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: La Loggia dei Cavalieri (Treviso).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
La Loggia dei Cavalieri (Treviso).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anaea archidona (Male).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good to me--Lmbuga 19:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historis odius face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Llez 15:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC) Good quality --Llez 15:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Question:File:Eudicella-gralli.jpg/user Holleday

Good morning Mr. Archaeodontosaurus, sorry for this mail but can you help me with my picture of Eudicella gralli? I´m not 100% sure about the species? You uploaded very good pictures from tropical bugs and maybe you know the exact species? The story about the pictures:-): Yesterday I got a new flashlight and in Germany was a very rainy day but I want test this new light. Therefore I took pictures of my only two old prepared bugs, uploaded this pictures and look for the species (then I realized that my upload was to fast:o)). Thank you very much and many greetingsH. Krisp (talk) 05:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

No problem for the genus but I am not very convinced by the species. The criteria for determining Cetonids are complex and I do not control all. If in doubt you should leave with the genus sp.

You have a problem focusing with F20 you should have all of the insect clear, but the legs are not. My advice to focus manually, not on top of the animal but a little lower.

For background it must be strictly white, if you want to see the bristles (hairs) of the animal if it takes a lot to work after trimming, or choose colored backgrounds strange to make them appear.

Gives the dimensions in the caption, which place a marker on the photo.

The quality required for studio work is always more important than work in vivo.

Good hunting with your new flashlight! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Archaeodontosaurus, thank you very much for your answer! At first I will change the genus in sp.. Your opinion about the clearness, the backround and the marker is correct and I understand this. My beetlepics really not good enough for a studiowork! Can I withdraw the pics although I didn´t nominate these? Feel free to tell me your opinion if you find another errors in some of my nominated pics in the future! Till now I focus at the top of the animals and your tip about the manual focus is very good-I will try it:o)! What is your favorite focus? Many greetings H. Krisp (talk) 15:29, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

There are no rules, everyone has their habits. F20 seems to me appropriate, but try not to exceed if the background noise increases exponentially. Another technique is to make staking Focus: you make an image of the body, then focus on feet and merges the two pictures. try, it's an interesting technique --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I read something about this technics and I will try it! Many greetings from rainy Germany H. Krisp (talk) 12:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

FPC

Salut mon ami!
Je ne m'afflige pas, si la FP nomination était mauvais. Cela à la façon de la chance accidentelle :), à la façon de la pêche du poisson. Il y a une pêche ou non la pêche. Il n'y a pas de perte, il y a seulement agréablement temps passé. La critique apporte aussi le profit. La critique oblige à travailler mieux.
Je vous souhaite seulement d'agréables émotions de la coopération sur le Commons.
Très amical, Georges -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Finally, I  Support this photo because the other good competitor gives detailed view of the main facade but with strong perspective deformation.--MrPanyGoff 23:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerapterus pilipennis (Male).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very interesting Cerapterus male. --Vizu 20:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo dei Trecento.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:18, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golofa claviger MHNT.ZOO.2004.0.457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done photo. Good QI and good FP candidate IMO -- George Chernilevsky 19:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lio (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - Well, it is the only image which gives an idea of the exterior.--MrPanyGoff 22:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:26, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cicindela chinensis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met. Useful. --Llez (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support too All criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Grattoir à museau plat sur lame LARTET.jpg

Salut.
ça fait un moment que je regarde ton grattoir et quelque chose me gêne. Je crois que c'est la composition.
Pourquoi deux reflets et pas trois ? Je comprends bien ce que tu as voulu faire. Mais du coup, le profil au dessus a l'air de flotter dans les airs. Je me demande si ça ne serait pas mieux sans reflet du tout, mais je ne sais vraiment pas.
En tous cas, c'est très intéressant, et les bonnes légendes de photos (merci de ton compliment pour le coffre à bijoux) permettent d'aller plus loin, et d'apprendre des tas de choses passionnantes.
Moi, je fais dans l'archiduc et les princesses, aujourd'hui. Je n'ai proposé que l'archiduc, mas il est mignon, non ? J'en ai profité pour tenter d'apprivoiser les "langswitch" et autres mystérieux "templates", j'espère que y'aura pas trop gourance.
Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 14:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Je profite de cette occasion pour te féliciter, comme il se doit, de ton image du jour. La composition du"grattoir à museau plat" relève de la recherche que je faisais l'an dernier car cette image date un peu. J'ai un petit stock de silex que je distille pour ne pas lasser. Je partage les même interrogations que toi, et j'ai fini par ne plus laisser les reflets. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ischnocelis hoepfneri.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:08, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:02, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prehnite Gyrolite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 08:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historis odius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prepona licomedes Bresil Ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 09:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnocelis hoepfneri MHNT.ZOO.2004.0.320 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 10:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grattoir à museau plat sur lame LARTET.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Marziale (Venice) (Interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --MrPanyGoff 11:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 23:33, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Underexposures

Tu as raison pour Galilée et Savonarole. ça doit venir du réglage de mon écran domiciliaire (Imac), car chez moi ça parait très bien, et sur mon ordi pro, ça parait tout gris et fade. Je vais tenter d'améliorer la chose--Jebulon (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caligo martia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope, very detailed --Llez (talk) 06:23, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:27, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Bravo

Pour l'image du jour! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Je me demande si tu ne t'es pas trompé de page... Ceci étant dit, tu mérites effectivement des bravi pour tes photographies ! Rama (talk) 05:40, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Ce qui est grave c'est que çà m'arrive souvent. Je le renvoie à notre ami Llez‎. Ton intervention pour Grenoble a été très positive le contact entre l'Université et le Muséum ont été renoués. Merci encore. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

« Grave », je ne dirais pas. Et puis encore une fois, si c'est là le prix à payer pour tes photos, ça n'est pas cher.

Ce que tu me dis pour Grenoble illumine ma journée. Merci, vraiment.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 05:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Louis Lartet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I tend to support, but should all the tools he discovered be in his 'personal' name category? W.S. 20:14, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
• In fact he discovered many, but there are very few who are identified as found by him and from his collection. Some are holotypes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

 SupportI didn't find any other competitor in "Commons". Maybe could we create a sub-category of Category:Louis Lartet for the tools ? I don't know. Is it a policy in "Commons" ? --Jebulon (talk) 07:51, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Good thinking Jeb ;-). It's a bit weird to look for a person and find a cat mainly populated with old bones. It is not a policy of course, but feel free... W.S. 11:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure I appreciate this kind of sarcastic humour, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 14:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

• Not sarcastic, but rather appreciative!! W.S. 15:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

• Again...--Jebulon (talk) 21:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:25, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa Sant'Alvise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

deletion of QI nomination

Why did you do this??? [1] --LC-de (talk) 14:39, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

• I think there was a conflict of publishing. I never had the intention to clear your nommination. Sorry for the inconvenience involuntary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Renommage

J'ai demandé le renommage de ton église des capucins....--Jebulon (talk) 10:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

• Parfait je l'ai fais. Merci entre les daltonien et les dysorthogrpahique tu as du travail...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:50, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Michele in Isola (Venice), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Tough choice.--MrPanyGoff 23:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Camera location is wrong. --Ikar.us (talk) 14:45, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
• Delete opposition. --Ikar.us (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:33, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golofa claviger (2-Horned Rhino Beetle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in scope. W.S. 11:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caligo martia (ventre).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 06:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Marziale (Venice) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - A Hard decision because this image here gives good view of the bell tower and the canal with the boats.--MrPanyGoff 16:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Fixed

 Done. Fixed manually. Très amical, Georges -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci

Bonsoir Archaeodontosaurus !

Thank you for your kind comment on the VIC talk page!

Kind regards, --Slaunger (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio di San Sebastiano (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Reversed heading.  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 14:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
• I saw and I understood. Thank you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anaea archidona .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support criteria met for a studio photo. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:45, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:23, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cithaerias Esmeralda MHNT.ZOO.2004.0.976 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Llez 16:37, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chisesa delle Cappuccine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Rocco (Venezia) (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support It gives best view of the church, imo.--MrPanyGoff 21:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Lio - Venice (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --MrPanyGoff 07:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:12, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campo Santa Fosca - Paolo Sarpi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 15:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kallima paralekta (Indian Leafwing), Female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, though gallery has no taxonomic information ;-). W.S. 22:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
• Yes, but the category has and I do not know if we just put the taxinomy in the gallery. Thanks... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Well, if you do a search, and the gallery exists, you will be directed straight to the gallery, bypassing any category structure (try it!). That's what galleries are for, to give that extra bit of info for a selection of images. Categories, IMO are just a way of arranging and structuring the images. W.S. 06:01, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
    • BTW, the lack of taxonomic info as well as standard taxon categorization goes for most of the shell pictures readily promoted here. W.S. 06:10, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I agree, and that's the meaning of the proposed rule for a promotion VI. Images must refer to a category or a gallery where information taxynomique are given. I do not control enough English to start this procedure --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Commons is multi-lingual. You are welcome to start anything (or answer any comment) in French. I'll be happy to read it. W.S. 06:37, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. W.S. 22:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

VI en doublon

Bonjour cher ami, Tu as supporté une image en VIC alors qu'il existe déjà une VI pour ce scope (que tu avais supportée à l'époque, d'ailleurs) : voir Commons:Valued_image_candidates/candidate_list#Astyanax_mexicanus. Je l'ai rajoutée à la MVR en cours. --Myrabella (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

• Voilà une erreur que je ferais plus souvent, pour avoir le plaisir de te voir dans VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

• Merci de ta courtoise réponse :-) Je recommande cependant, pour la santé et la viabilité du label, de veiller à vérifier l'existence préalable d'une VI pour tout scope naturaliste, étant donné le nombre notable d'images promues jusqu'à aujourd'hui. Par ailleurs, je crains fort que mes visites sur la page des VIC ne causent quelque déplaisir... De fait, je me suis éloignée du projet VI car comme vous avez pu le remarquer, je ne suis pas en phase avec l'orientation actuelle du projet, trop élargie à mon goût et manquant de rigueur. Or, j'aime les jeux avec contraintes - mon côté oulipien, sans doute ! Désolée pour les désagréments éventuels, je vais rentrer dans ma réserve ;-) --Myrabella (talk) 22:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

• C’est maintenant que tu as tord. Car si nous défendons deux visions différentes, mais pas antinomiques, il faut un équilibre au système, et s’est sciemment que je te demande de rester car l’harmonie de l’ensemble ne peut se concevoir dans la discussion.

Dans un véhicule il faut un moteur mais il faut aussi des freins…--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

thanks for your support and vote in VI

Thank you very much for your corrections and your vote to my first contribution in VI. I have to watch VI bit more to learn about the "scope", which is not so easy to understand in the first sight. With the support of committed people like you it is a great pleasure to be part of COMMONS / WIKIPEDIA. regards --J. Lunau (talk) 11:29, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

• It is a pleasure. Come back often to VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archaeoprepona licomedes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and I think it meets all 6 VI criteria. But I am new to VI voting, so others may correct me please, if needed. --J. Lunau (talk) 09:56, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 12:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giacomo di Rialto (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - Good enough to give the idea of the inner atmosphere.--MrPanyGoff 09:34, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araneus quatratus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:02, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Tour télé bavaroise

Salut. Tu as oublié de signer ta promotion de la tour télé de Nuremberg en VI.
Tant que j'y suis, je trouve notre débat sur les statues très intéressant, et je dois remercier Myrabella pour son intervention. Elle m'a un peu fouetté les sangs, mais ça m'a forcé à bosser et c'est très bien. Heureusement, comme on dit dans mon métier, j'avais des billes (c'est toujours une bonne idée de photographier les cartels, j'essaie de ne jamais y manquer). Sauf que, pris par l'enjeu, je me suis couché à deux heures du matin et que bon, là... C'est plus d'mon âge !!
Bref, va signer! --Jebulon (talk) 08:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giovanni Evangelista, Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Because of interest, no competitors, and quality.--Jebulon (talk) 23:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taygetis excavata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Félicitations

Félicitations pour l'image du jour. --Llez (talk) 08:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Merci c'est toujours un plaisir... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Je me joins, mais après, on va arrêter de se féliciter les uns les autres tous les jours !

Vu que vous êtes les meilleurs, on ne va jamais cesser !--Jebulon (talk) 11:45, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Ce sont les dernières images vu la guerre en FP. Nous allons au devant d'un refroidissement de nos effusions... Hélas.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Felice Chiesa exterieur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morpho menelaus didius Male Ventre MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 20:10, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Fosca (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Thank you for the reason for relevance. --Ikar.us (talk) 13:43, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madonna dell'Orto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC) Sera meilleure si tu coupes la tige au premier plan...--Jebulon 14:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC) j'étais sûr que tu me le demanderai. C'est fait. --Archaeodontosaurus 15:44, 2 July 2011 (UTC) Il y a un pb de cache, mais j'ai trouvé la correction. Merci, c'est mieux, non ?--Jebulon 16:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morpho didius Male Dos MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 14:23, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paraponera clavata (bullet ant).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Maybe background could be in more dirt white so eyes can concantrate more on black. --Mile (talk) 20:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Well observed. I have a problem I should address with the "pile" of insects. Despite two light sources have always shadows. To avoid having to clip all the animal hair by hair, the background color I chose is the most important shade between the hairs. What gives me some weird background colors. I'll try another method in the future. Thank you for your vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. W.S. 05:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wardite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support in my opinion it meets all six VI-creteria. All others of the 74 Wardite files I saw are much smaller and not as good in color --J. Lunau (talk) 14:19, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 08:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Proserpine et chargement

Hé non, ça ne vient pas de mon ordinateur, je viens d'essayer depuis mon portable, et ça ne marche pas mieux. Essaye si tu peux...--Jebulon (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Titanacris Albipes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very detailed. --Saffron Blaze 21:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Alvise (Venice) Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 13:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olios argelasius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Its good. --Mile (talk) 19:30, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Titanacris Albipes Vol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Quartl 16:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Dolfin-Manin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Halictus scabiosae.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Shows best the whole animal --Llez (talk) 09:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support File:Venezia - Chiesa di S.Lorenzo.JPG gives a closer view of the facade, but the nominated image also shows the campo and the rio nammed after this church (cat. added, by the way), which is relevant additional information. In addition, much bigger resolution => OK to me, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Question I've read in it:WP and en:WP that Marco Polo was more likely buried in the ex-cappella di San Sebastiano? --Myrabella (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
• So the chapel was destroyed. She stood there : 45.437686,12.345521. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Cerceris sabulosa MHNT.jpg

Impressive- as are all your insect photos. And taxonomic entomology is a visual subject so high quality photos are always in demand. I enjoy all your work. The stone age artefact photos from the fine museum of Toulouse are amongst the best I have seen, showing the little blades as true works of art from our distant past.Best regards from Ireland Robert aka Notafly (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morpho menelaus huebneri MHNT Male ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 00:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Girolamo (Venezia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Dolfin-Manin (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Surprisingly low coverage of Venice palaces in Wikipedia. --Ikar.us (talk) 09:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Your wish is my command, I will begin to fill that hole. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. W.S. 05:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Re:Chantilly jaune

Ayé, j'ai changé les couleurs, c'est vraiment mieux indeed. Tu peux jeter un coup d'oeil ? Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 18:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Il vient d'y avoir une promo sur les chiens du duc d'Aumale. Comme elle n'est pas signée, je n'exclus pas que tu n'y sois pas étranger... Me trompe-je?--Jebulon (talk) 21:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Wael Khalil (black and white).jpg

I reduce the noise on the image so is the image good enough now to get your support? -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 12:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ca' d'oro (Venice) - Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:50, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca' d'Oro facciata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:13, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Error?

Hi,

decline but support? Must be an error. --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:10, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok, it was. :-) --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

• Correction made ​​thank you --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Araneus quadratus (Four-spot orb-weaver).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. Big resolution, scale added -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:00, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca' Sagredo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carabus auratus (golden ground beetle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope, very detailed --Llez (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Grassi (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and very useful -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:36, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa (European mole cricket).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very detailed. All critera met --Llez (talk) 13:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho didius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:25, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olios argelasius MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --H005 17:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Sagredo (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Neutral for now. What is the significance of this palace? I didn't find an article in any of the wikis (or maybe I missed them?). W.S. 15:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
• There is an article on Wiki(it) on him, and we must look primarily to the family Sagredo. There is an article on Wiki (it) and (fr). The palace was not a rich facade on the Grand Canal, but it is very extensive, today is a hotel. It is well known to Venetians as it is in the path of Santa Sofia (traghetto).--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Ok, so maybe time to write an article on the palace then on fr:? ;-) W.S. 20:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
    • Only a small part of Venetian monuments is processed. I work modestly, I'll have much time to do it, lasted the Republic of Venice ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oedipoda caerulescens (Blue-winged Grasshopper).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Hint You should add the dimensions at the very last of image manipulations so that it is also sharp and possibly also antialized. W.S. 15:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
• Very well seen, I did not realize that. I understand and I corrected.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope now. W.S. 20:44, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: San Felice (Venice).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
San Felice (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:52, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Vendramin Calergi (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melolontha melolontha MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High resolution and quality. --Quartl 21:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Pavement du Ca' d'Oro

Hello !

Suite à ta proposition, voici Commons:Valued image candidates/Ca' d'Oro Pavement‎, la page de nomination de VI des 3 images de pavement du Ca' d'Oro.

Bien à toi.

--M0tty (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

C'est corrigé ! Merci ! --M0tty (talk) 09:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthidium manicatum (European wool carder bee) Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment As there exists obviously some sexual dimorphism, I think one should add "Male" to the scope. --Llez (talk) 05:43, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Done very fair --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 06:36, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:49, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

QI Calocochlia cailliaudi

Hallo, I suppose you promoted the Calocochlia picture. Could you please correct the signature? Many thanks --Llez (talk) 06:09, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

George has already corrected. I do not overload but it's a very good image, the choice of background is very good. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stromatolithe Paléoarchéen - MNHT.PAL.2009.10.1 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 07:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emmelina monodactyla MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI to me --Llez 09:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

VI

As you told, I have nominated File:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya.jpg for VI here. Regards, Vibhijain (talk) 10:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

I geocoding important? I have got the date only. Vibhijain (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

After a lot of look up, i got the location and i have added the Camera location and also the personality right warning. Vibhijain (talk) 10:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Can you tell how much upport are needed for VI status? Vibhijain (talk) 13:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neozephyrus quercus (Purple Hairstreak) Female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The separate upper and lower images may be nominated as a VI set. Images of living individuals may be nominated in the appropriate subscope. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Re:

Hi Arch. There is no problem, you do not worry. This photo is only one photo. I am in agreement with you in this: the respect to an anonymous person is more important than a photo. For (to?, by?) me, we can forget it. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo 17:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

• Now I understand your words: "If you have any questions I will always be there for you." Thanks--Miguel Bugallo 23:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
• If you have any problem as the screen calibration I am always happy to discuss with you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Calocera viscosa

Hello Archaeodontosaurus, nice to hear from you! How do you do? Sorry my late answer but I have a new job for a short time and I must learn so much:-(! Oh, I saw Ramaria botrytis in our forrest. How do you prepare it? Have you a good recipe for me? Thank you very much and many greetings from Germany H. Krisp (talk) 18:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

It is cut into slices in the vertical direction and is fried. He did not have much taste in itself but all art is to serve with a sauce of mushrooms. It rains a lot in the south of France and we have large quantities of Krombhozia and Xerocomus ... I eat. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

I will try it too! Thank you! Oh, in 2011 we have not a good summer here in Germany: It´s often rain and sometimes I feel like a fish or frog :-(!Anyway the mushrooms grow everywhere.H. Krisp (talk) 18:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Copris lunaris. MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 19:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

QI

Aucun soucis pour ton commentaire, je vais chercher si je trouve les espèces, sinon l'image ne sera pas une QI (et y a bien plus grave dans le monde). PierreSelim (talk) 09:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Pale Blue Dot unaltered.jpg

Hello, Archaeodontosaurus. You have new messages at Surajt88's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Suraj T 11:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

I have changed the scope of File:Pale Blue Dot unaltered.jpg at Commons:Valued image candidates/Pale Blue Dot unaltered.jpg from "Earth, picture of Earth taken from space" to "Earth, as seen from from inter-stellar space" as per your suggestion. Please re-confirm your vote. Thanks. Suraj T 12:32, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miltochrista miniata MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good --Llez 13:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melolontha melolontha Ventre MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Llez 09:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pterophorus pentadactyla MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Certainly difficult to photograph. --Quartl 12:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa delle Cappuccine (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. พ.s. 19:16, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amauris niavius (The Friar) Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support. Useful. Suraj T 04:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. พ.s. 19:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eucera nigrescens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support only one in scope and a great shoot, for me all VI criteria fullfilled, and usefull -- J. Lunau (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:09, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

SET?

Bonjour, c'est quoi un SET?--FALCOM (talk) 09:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graellsia isabellae MHNT male dos .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful. --Quartl 15:15, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Re:File:Anaco de fresco da Colexiata de Santa María de Sar – Santiago de Compostela-2.jpg

Good idea. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo 13:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Projet Phoebus: user:Yug

• Réponse: User_talk:Yug#Projet_Phoebus

Yug (talk) 16:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charaxes distanti MHNT dos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work.. --Berthold Werner 14:54, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:44, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:15, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Camponotus fellah.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope; criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:50, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:54, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

VI problem: I saw that, thougth its software bug at the beggining now i see problem still there. I made copy-paste of name, so dont know what went wrong. --Mile (talk) 11:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

p.S. Solved ! I did mistake at scope...put locomotive to cat scope, even in wrong way. LOL

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pycina zamba MHNT ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and for me a QI--Holleday 17:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Graellsia isabellae (Spanish Moon Moth), imago.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Graellsia isabellae (Spanish Moon Moth), imago.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morpho menelaus huebneri - Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope--FALCOM (talk) 10:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Request Could you also add the authors of the subspecies to the gallery? พ.s. 18:06, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:43, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eunica mygdonia MHNT ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The colors look strange, even for a pinned specimen, compare [2], [3]. --Quartl 16:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC) I confirm the proper color temperature. Specimen that is not old, acquired by the museum 4 years ago. Never exposed (not bleached). --Archaeodontosaurus 14:27, 12 August 2011 (UTC) Okay to me then. --Quartl 15:37, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cerceris sabulosa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:23, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Michiel dalle Colonne (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 08:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:10, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Titanacris albipes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good. --Quartl (talk) 09:44, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pescaria (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Palace is part of fishmarket ? --Mile (talk) 18:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, the entire ground floor is reserved to the fish market. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Rich fishmarket anyway. --Mile (talk) 13:49, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:11, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Murex

Hallo, thanks for supporting. The scope was added, but unfortunately the "=" in front of it was "lost". It is corrected now. I asked George Chernilevsky before nominating, for I was not shure, how to deal with in such a case (existing VI against a new candidate). He said, that it is possible to open a MVR with a already existing VI in the usual way. --Llez (talk) 12:30, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

• Yes there was already precedent. This label is a temporary label. Other photopgraphes come back to what we won. But we will apply, so they have a lot of work. :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Oubli de signature

Merci de m'avoir signalé l'oubli de ma signature à la page QUC. J'avais un peu perdu l'habitude après une absence prolongée. --Cayambe (talk) 15:28, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Charaxes numenes.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Charaxes numenes.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:58, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euphaedra (Xypetana) xypete MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good making and QI for me--Holleday 16:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de sagaie MHNT PRE.2011.0.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, interesting and useful --Jebulon 10:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

C'est pas sorcier

Bonjour mon ami.
Merci infiniment de ton vote et de ton appréciation sur le "sorcier". C'est vrai que c'était compliqué à photographier, et modestie mise à part, j'ai été agréablement surpris du résultat. Surpris aussi que cette étonnante "oeuvre" ne figure pas déjà dans "Commons", même en fac-simile. Donc tant mieux si j'apporte quelque chose à cet égard.
Tel le touriste moyen que je suis, j'ai arpenté la vallée de la Vézère quelques temps cet été, et j'ai donc tout un tas de photos liées à la préhistoire à mettre en ligne.
Je compte sur ton savoir et ton amicale vigilance pour vérifier mes légendes et éventuellement corriger mes erreurs, ou mettre les liens qui pourraient être utiles, ou même placer ces images dans WP si ça te semble bon et "useful".
J'ai naturellement aussi quelques images de cailloux taillés, mais tu as placé la barre tellement haut que je ne pense pas les publier.
Bien à toi,--Jebulon (talk) 14:12, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Il n'émet plus : donc il est en vacances. Maintenant je sais que tu es revenue et où tu es allé. Vacances studieuses et utiles dont je te félicite. On va s'occuper du sorcier...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Tu es un optimiste, toi ! J'aurais pu être mort, ou pire : avoir cessé de m'intéresser à "Commons" !--Jebulon (talk) 16:44, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

tu as raison tu aurais pu être mort, car la deuxième hypothèse n'est pas recevable. Dans le premier cas tu aurai eu quelques lignes, flatteuses, dans les journaux et il n'en à rien été. Tu avais très justement mis ton sorcier dans la grotte, je l'ai rajouter à André Glory, Toulousain d'adoption qui nous a laissé une partie de ses collections. Ces temps-ci l'ambiance est bonne... Profitons!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Du coup j'ai rajouté aussi un p'tit quelque chose à l'abbé Glory.--Jebulon (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Merci!

Merci beaucoup pour cet accueil chaleureux. J'ai fait les modifications selon vos conseils. J'espère que cette nomination passera car je suis un peu faché de voir cette image rajoutée partout. Je me dis que si mon image était VI et QI, ça serait un argument non négligeable pour ma photo.

Au plaisir de travailler ensemble à nouveau, Letartean (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Il faut un peu de patience. Attend que le label te soit accordé et tu pourras, en toute légitimité, faire les changements adéquats. Le Lavel VI est fait pour çà... aussi.

Maintenant que tu as compris reviens nous voir avec d'autre photos... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

QIC Ornithoptera goliath

Hallo, your nomination (I think it's yours) lacks signature --Llez (talk) 05:37, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

• Thank you, I do a lot of blunders...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prepona laertes laertes MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 17:36, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Tibaes Church Interior.JPG

Hello Archaeodontosaurus, thanks for your evaluation. What do you mean by tilted, it's like if the image is not horizontally aligned? -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 10:11, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Counterclockwise rotation of several degrees over the entire image. She leans to the left. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:57, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Figure Féminine MHNT PRE.2011.0.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, usefull and well described. --Coyau 16:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dynastes hercules ecuatorianus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Lmbuga 15:54, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ornithoptera goliath samson MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 08:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Blaberus craniifer

Salut, il faudrait me donner un lien vers le fichier en question (cela simplifierait le traitement...). A titre indicatif je n'ai pas de connaissances approfondies en la matière, je reproduis en général ce qui est marqué sur la plaquette indicative décrivant l'espèce. Il peut donc y avoir erreur, elle du ressort du zoo dans ce cas. Guérin Nicolas ^(messages) 15:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Si tu es sur tu peux changer le nom ou la description. Personnellement je me déclare incompétent en la matière, j'ai juste recopié la description qu'en donnait le zoo. Bonne continuation. Guérin Nicolas ^(messages) 17:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Gorille

Tu as un (autre) admirateur ! Je soutiens sans réserve ! Remarque sur la première photo: je comprends pourquoi, mais il manque la mandibule...--Jebulon (talk) 16:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Wow! c'est inespéré. Bien observé pour la mandibule mais... elle ne manque pas c'est pour voir la formule dentaire de cet aimable animal. La série des crâne (elle n'est pas encore totalement versée dans COMMONS) m'a été commandée par José Braga pour illustrer ses cours à la fac. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:57, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blaberus giganteus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Llez 15:55, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Miltochrista miniata (Rosy Footman).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Miltochrista miniata (Rosy Footman).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di S.Giorgio dei Greci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Get yourself to Burano for a tower that really leans:) Saffron Blaze 16:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boloria dia - Weaver's Fritillary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good and useful in that it shows both the lower and upper surfaces. I think File:Boloria.dia.7558.jpg is also very good. Perhaps an "upper, in vivo" subscope nomination would be appropriate. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment For me there is no conflict between the two types of images, "in vivo" and "Mounted" and the two complement each other. I'm always the one hand for two in the gallery. The one and the other should be entitled to a label value. it's just a matter of scope.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Michiel del Brusà.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Black line at the top should be cropped --Llez (talk) 22:11, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

 Done Thank you.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Necrodes littoralis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giorgio dei Greci (Venice), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

The most inclined tower in Venice.

•  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 15:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emmelina monodactyla (Morning-glory Plume Moth).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Form and structure of the wings well visible. --Llez (talk) 11:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Singeries

Bravo pour la promotion de ton crâne de gorille. Je me régale toujours autant avec tes productions. Ça fera une belle image du jour!
mon ami est de retour, il m'a gratifié les cabanes d'un commentaire méprisant comme il sait si bien le faire... Fini de rigoler en FPC, la récré est finie, c'est la rentrée! --Jebulon (talk) 23:06, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

ps, pour l'archivage de ta page, on fait comme d'habitude, je suppose?

Puisque tu me le propose si gentiment c'est avec plaisir que tu pourrais archiver ma page. Merci pour le gorille, comme je ne suis pas le présentateur je n'avais pas été avertis... et j'ai oublié d'aller voir. J'espère que l'ambiance restera bonne... Je vais tout faire pour essayer... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atrophaneura aristolochiae goniopeltis MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 07:48, 28 August 2011 (UTC)