Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/09/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Shaqlawa.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_by_ChatGPT_4.0_&_Dall-E_3.0_(2024).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I Want to upload new one DJ Ash Army (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. No need to upload another photo, en:Draft:Ash Army has been deleted 3 times. --Achim55 (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate in low resolution. --StomboyCarGeek (talk) 08:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
UPした本人です。選択を間違えてしまいました。 Bluepurple8 (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Ya no es util Alan Yevenes Torres (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#F10, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 06:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Because it was accidentally uploaded and I don’t feel comfortable with it being online for anyone to see. Minor889102 (talk) 22:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - I don't need to elaborate so Wheatley2 (talk) 22:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 06:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Alf.picerno (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
uploader request Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 15:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Ошибки в описании, лишнее (Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Russia-peril) Svitenko Kate (talk) 17:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Ошибки в описании, лишнее (Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 in Russia-peril) Svitenko Kate (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:David Bowie in 2003
editThe Flickr user didn't take this photos. It is even clear from the description of File:David (2484439750).jpg: «From the dvd A Reality Tour».
Günther Frager (talk) 19:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio https://allyangula2024.com/home - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, F1. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rogerrfontaine (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope: plain text; original research.
- File:Base 10 calendar sync lunar and solar cycles research 02.pdf
- File:Base 10 calendar sync lunar and solar cycles research.pdf
- File:Base-10- calendar-10hourclock- solar lunar cycles synchronized.pdf
- File:Base-10-calendar- april month 2010.pdf
- File:Base-10 Calendar Month Names.pdf
- File:Base-10 calendar -zodiacal signs.pdf
- File:Intro to Base 10 calendar- historical evolution of keeping time.pdf
- File:Base-10 Calendar - intro text to base 10 calendar.pdf
Omphalographer (talk) 01:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- As well as:
- Different account, but clearly the same person. Omphalographer (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
COM:PENIS Эlcobbola talk 23:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: literally just vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Uploader has mirrored the image-frame from the actual music video of the movie: Song Thandana Thandana on Youtube (Mentioned is the exact timestamp, from which the mirrored screenshot is uploaded) --106.51.110.101 03:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- delete per nomination. No licensing information. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. 100% a screenshot of a media being played on a device. Cannot be the work of an external party other than that of film crew. -- 106.51.110.101 03:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Got it.. Screenshot of copyrighted Youtube video (with timestamp): Song:‘Nagunagutha Bandavale’; Film:‘Baalida Mane’
Details: Baalida Mane (1997 Kannada film) --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 07:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Got it.. Screenshot of copyrighted Youtube video (with timestamp): Song:‘Nagunagutha Bandavale’; Film:‘Baalida Mane’
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Youtube screenshot of Kannada film:Mata (2006 film). Youtube video link with timestamp:[1] -- 106.51.110.101 03:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Youtube video screeshot of an interview: [2] -- 106.51.110.101 03:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
"Own work" seems extremely unlikely; looks like a bad reproduction of a frame from a film, with the aspect ratio wrong. Jmabel ! talk 00:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry Sir,
- I took this snap
- Gangaasoonu (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Gangaasoonu: Are you saying you actually took this picture in 1984, or just that you photographed a movie screen? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- shot this in my yashica camera in 1984 during shooting of Ade_Kannu kannada movie. This was in an old hard copy photo album.
- In 2023, used mobile phone to take photo of that and uploaded into my personal google photos & then uploaded here
- Gangaasoonu (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Gangaasoonu: Are you saying you actually took this picture in 1984, or just that you photographed a movie screen? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
shot this in my yashica camera in 1984 during shooting of Ade_Kannu kannada movie. This was in an old hard copy photo album. In 2023, used mobile phone to take photo of that and uploaded into my personal google photos & then uploaded here Gangaasoonu (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Gangaasoonu: OK. Please see my remarks on the related Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vijayaranjini 1984 vaadiraj movieset.jpg. We might as well continue discussion in one place, if these are exactly parallel. - Jmabel ! talk 22:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader's assertion of own work, AGF. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Screenshot of Youtube video; video-link with timestamp: Song:‘Ide Nota Ide Aata’, Film:‘Ade Kannu’ (1985). Uploader even convinced many, by lying in a previous deletion-nomination (above) and has uploaded many similar screenshots. Requesting strict action against the uploader. --106.51.110.101 04:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping @Jmabel: , @P199: --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 05:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Traveling now, and I don't have time to look at this closely but, yes, if uploader was outright lying this calls for an indef block. If the video is reusing a still photo that they took, that could be another matter. - Jmabel ! talk 11:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Impossible.. Its just a simple screenshot of a copyrighted Youtube video.. --106.51.110.101 06:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. User will be blocked for these actions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
"Own work" seems extremely unlikely; looks like a bad reproduction of a frame from a film, with the aspect ratio wrong. Jmabel ! talk 00:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry Sir,
- I took this snap
- Gangaasoonu (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Gangaasoonu: Are you saying you actually took this picture in 1984, or just that you photographed a movie screen? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- shot this in my yashica camera in 1984 during shooting of Ade_Kannu kannada movie. This was in an old hard copy photo album.
- In 2023, used mobile phone to take photo of that and uploaded into my personal google photos & then uploaded here
- Gangaasoonu (talk) 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Gangaasoonu: OK. A question and a comment: (1) isn't this a bit distorted from the original photo? Might it be possible to do a better scan? (2) You probably would do well to specify that on the page, much like what I did at File:John M. Spargur.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 22:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Distorted, pardon me.I couldn't infer distortion in this image.
- I have a huge cache/swathe of such old images & I'm using the older version of CamScanner (newer versions are banned in India) in 13 MegaPixel Back Camera of Lenovo K3 Note Mobile Phone, Saved to Gallery (sorry, if that sounded like an Attorney :( )
- I'll use your tip,
- In Source field of the Image, will mention "Photographed from earlier Yashica Camera Roll, Scanned using <Phone + Lineage Software>"
- Probably, rather than blindly uploading the scanned images, I Gangaasoonu (talk) 04:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Gangaasoonu: OK. A question and a comment: (1) isn't this a bit distorted from the original photo? Might it be possible to do a better scan? (2) You probably would do well to specify that on the page, much like what I did at File:John M. Spargur.jpg. - Jmabel ! talk 22:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Gangaasoonu: Are you saying you actually took this picture in 1984, or just that you photographed a movie screen? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader's assertion of own work, AGF. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Screenshot of Youtube video; video-link with timestamp: Song:‘Ide Nota Ide Aata’, Film:‘Ade Kannu’ (1985). Uploader even convinced many, by lying in a previous deletion-nomination (above) and has uploaded many similar screenshots. Requesting strict action against the uploader. --106.51.110.101 04:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping @Jmabel: , @P199: --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 05:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm traveling, don't have time to check into this. If the uploader is lying, this calls for an indef-block. If the video is reusing a still photo that they took, that could be another matter. - Jmabel ! talk 11:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Impossible.. Its just a simple screenshot of a copyrighted Youtube video.. --106.51.110.101 06:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. User will be blocked for these actions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The image is not taken by uploader during a film-shoot, but from an actual copyrighted film itself. Video-link from Youtube with timestamp: [3] --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 06:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Image has appeared in muliple Youtube videos: (@0.08 sec), [4] (:with timestamp) --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 06:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Screenshot of a copyrighted film scene in Youtube: Video link with timestamp --2406:7400:107:682:0:0:0:1 07:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LordBirdWord (talk · contribs)
editUnable to confirm the source, all images are credited to George Micro YouTube videos which do not, twelve hours after these images were uploaded, exist.
Copyright concerns per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with @GeorgeMicro1, where George Micro appeared to be posting stills of candidates' social media footage to Twitter and incorrectly claiming them to be photos that he had personally taken. This may be the same thing but on YouTube.
- File:William Lee Hunt for President.jpg
- File:Jackie Carpio, Host of Personal Politics.jpg
- File:Daví for President.jpg
- File:Tony Jones for Narragansett Town Council.jpg
Belbury (talk) 11:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, the video exists. It has YouTube BY-CC Marked. What’s the problem? And also, why is Tony Jones image in here? It’s not even apart of the Debate2024. The debate would’ve been copyright claimed if none of the content was original. LordBirdWord (talk) 13:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Where is the video? The URL source given for all four of these images goes to a This page isn't available. Sorry about that. YouTube 404 page.
- My mistake on the Tony Jones image, I see you're crediting it to the New Era Party of Florida rather to George Micro. But the YouTube link you provide for that file's source is still a 404 page. Belbury (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I’m terribly sorry. Is there an email I can send the links too? I tried sending them through here but the message wouldn’t send. LordBirdWord (talk) 23:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Commons filters out short links like youtu.be, so it might work to write out the full youtube.com URL. You can email via COM:VRT if not. Belbury (talk) 09:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hunt, Carpio, and Daví: https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=iAvDIO7Z-b7OCe3o&v=F0i5KXMs2A4&feature=youtu.be
- New Era Party of Florida Video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=3ZXoth_HOQDkiwYa&v=1A4majDGAJY&feature=youtu.be LordBirdWord (talk) 19:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I replaced the broken link with the new link in all 4 photos. LordBirdWord (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks.
- The first link is a livestream of a promotional video call between several people. Is there anything that tells us that George Micro owns the copyright to that broadcast, rather than it being an upload of a livestream that he watched online?
- The second link is a minute-long video of a low-end AI voice reading out a script over this static low resolution photo of Tony Jones, on a channel with no other uploads. I wouldn't have much confidence that this was the channel's own picture of Jones, from that, although I can't find the image anywhere else online. Belbury (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- I actually have no idea about all of that information. I just saw CC-BY and thought that meant it was Copyright free. I deeply apologize for all of that. If these images are copyright, then please delete them. I understand, and I’m sorry for the mistake. I’m friends to George Micro, and he doesn’t know the answers to these questions as well. LordBirdWord (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- I replaced the broken link with the new link in all 4 photos. LordBirdWord (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Commons filters out short links like youtu.be, so it might work to write out the full youtube.com URL. You can email via COM:VRT if not. Belbury (talk) 09:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I’m terribly sorry. Is there an email I can send the links too? I tried sending them through here but the message wouldn’t send. LordBirdWord (talk) 23:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Was actually gonna comment before it was closed and reopened, but
Delete the Tony Jones one, as its a crop from this photo from Jones's Facebook page. For the first one though, there is a part where the moderator Jackie Carpio thanks George Micro, so I think there's a chance that he could actually be the organizer as he claims in the description. reppoptalk 18:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- I realized that too. George was mentioned in the beginning and the end by Jackie. Would that mean he had copyright claims? LordBirdWord (talk) 20:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. In the beginning and end, George Micro is directly mentioned as organizer by Jackie Carpio. LordBirdWord (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No evidence this is a free image. Uploader copied it from arz.wiki where it is untagged and has no evidence it is a free image. Uploader has also falsely claimed another editor transferred it to Commons, and has a history of uploading copyright-violating images of the subject. Number 57 (talk) 20:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- File:احمد شفيق (cropped).jpg should also be added to this DR. Jonteemil (talk) 22:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:54, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Unused, low quality map. Out of COM:SCOPE The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in China A1Cafel (talk) 08:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Saint-Martin (France) A1Cafel (talk) 08:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 08:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bahrain A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Syria A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iraq A1Cafel (talk) 10:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted portrait A1Cafel (talk) 10:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iran A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
per en:Armando Bernabiti, this is a work by architect Armando Bernabiti who died in 1970, so still protected until 2040, and there is no suitable freedom of panorama in Greece. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
per en:Armando Bernabiti, this is a work by architect Armando Bernabiti who died in 1970, so still protected until 2040, and there is no suitable freedom of panorama in Greece. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Paul-André Robert died in 1977, so this painting is protected by copyright in Switzerland until 2047 (70 years after the creator's death). If the uploader "Neues Museum Biel" has acquired the rights to the painting (in addition to it being physically in their collection) and release it under a free license, they should send VRT permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Françoise Robert is a living artist, so her works are protected by copyright. If the uploader "Neues Museum Biel" has acquired the rights to this work (in addition to it being physically in their collection) and releases it under a free license, they should send VRT permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Marie-Françoise Robert is a living artist, so her works are protected by copyright. If the uploader "Neues Museum Biel" has acquired the rights to this work (in addition to it being physically in their collection) and releases it under a free license, they should send VRT permission. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Probably copyvio. Uploader has stated that Pinterest as the source, no metadata. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Scan from a book or magazine, need permission for the original photo via COM:VRT Wdwd (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 16:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, artist Valdis Albergas died in 1984 A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, artist Valdis Albergas died in 1984 A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
The monument was completed in 1965 by Laimonis Blumbergs (1919–2014) and Aivars Gulbis (1933–). There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia, permission from the artists is required A1Cafel (talk) 17:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Small photo without camera data, found in Facebook multiple times before upload into Commons, the uploader's only contribution. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
This book cover may be in the public domain, but it is not a faithful 2D reproduction. A new copyright was created when this photo was taken. ✗plicit 23:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I violated the rules in making this Randomuser795 (talk) 02:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Van Nelle tobacco packs
editDerivatives, COM:PACKAGING.
Quick1984 (talk) 08:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Derivative, copyright status of the original artwork is not specified. Quick1984 (talk) 08:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- i have uploaded this photo. am the copyright owner of this photo. it is me on the photo. why did you request to delete it? Misha most (talk) 01:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 08:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Non copyrighted drone shots of Tope Mankiala Stupa — Rawalpindi — Mahatma Budha — Nazish.webm
editSame file already exists (File:Non copyrighted drone shots of Tope Mankiala Stupa - Rawalpindi - Mahatma Budha - Nazish.webm) and has all information about it available. Yuyutsu Ho (talk) 08:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- It already is tagged for speedy deletion. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 00:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete While I disagree that the topic is out of scope, this specific image doesn't really bring much to the table.--Leptictidium (talk) 06:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope / copyvio: plain text, vague source. Omphalographer (talk) 00:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blankenfeld (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope: plain text. These images are clearly screenshots of text, not original documents.
- File:Denis Cousin cyclisme Icaunais 1970.png
- File:Gentleman Armeau 1968.jpg
- File:Karl von Tschirschky 1785.jpg
- File:1785 von Tschirschky allemand.jpg
- File:Karl von Tschirschky 1785.png
Omphalographer (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Low-resolution image with doubtful own work claim, especially considering the upload history of Special:Log/Ashrefavira. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: strangely formatted printout of a user sandbox containing personal messages. Omphalographer (talk) 01:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: not sure what this is a photo of, but it sure isn't a flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Fake license review by uploader. There is no indication of CC licensing.
- File:Ministro-adjunto-para-a-juventude-e-desporto-scaled (cropped).jpg
- File:Ministro-adjunto-para-a-juventude-e-desporto-scaled (crop).jpg
- File:Ministro-adjunto-para-a-juventude-e-desporto-scaled.jpg
- File:Eunice-silva-768x1136 (crop).jpg
- File:Eunice-silva-768x1136 (cropped).jpg
- File:Eunice-silva-768x1136.jpg
- File:Alexandre-monteiro-683x1024 (cropped).jpg
- File:Alexandre-monteiro-683x1024 (crop).jpg
- File:Alexandre-monteiro-683x1024.jpg
- File:Gilberto-silva-768x1152 (crop).jpg
- File:Gilberto-silva-768x1152 (cropped).jpg
- File:Gilberto-silva-768x1152.jpg
- File:Carlos-santos-828x1024 (crop).jpg
- File:Carlos-santos-828x1024 (cropped).jpg
- File:Carlos-santos-828x1024.jpg
- File:Ministro-augusto-veiga-1387x2080 (crop).jpg
- File:Ministro-augusto-veiga-1387x2080 (cropped).jpg
- File:Ministro-augusto-veiga-1387x2080.jpg
- File:Filomena-goncalves-683x1024 (crop).jpg
- File:Filomena-goncalves-683x1024 (cropped).jpg
- File:Filomena-goncalves-683x1024.jpg
- File:Amadeu-cruz-768x1116 (crop).jpg
- File:Amadeu-cruz-768x1116 (cropped).jpg
- File:Amadeu-cruz-768x1116.jpg
- File:Edna-oliveira-768x1033 (crop).jpg
- File:Edna-oliveira-768x1033 (cropped).jpg
- File:Edna-oliveira-768x1033.jpg
- File:Rui Alberto de Figueiredo Soares official portrait, (Νέα Υόρκη, 19.09.2022).jpg
- File:Joana Gomes Rosa Amado-768x1152 (cropped).jpg
- File:Joana Gomes Rosa Amado-768x1152 (crop).jpg
- File:Joana Gomes Rosa Amado-768x1152.jpg
- File:Paulo-rocha-768x1152 (crop).jpg
- File:Paulo-rocha-768x1152 (cropped).jpg
- File:Paulo-rocha-768x1152.jpg
- File:Jorge-santos-816x1024 (crop).jpg
- File:Jorge-santos-816x1024 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jorge-santos-816x1024.jpg
- File:Rui-figueiredo-768x1154 (crop).jpg
- File:Rui-figueiredo-768x1154 (cropped).jpg
- File:Rui-figueiredo-768x1154.jpg
- File:Janine-lelis-793x1024 (cropped).jpg
- File:Fernando-elisio-768x1096 (crop).jpg
- File:Fernando-elisio-768x1096 (cropped).jpg
- File:Janine-lelis-793x1024.jpg
- File:Fernando-elisio-768x1096.jpg
- File:Vpm-olavo-correia-768x1036 2(cropped).jpg
- File:Dr. Jose Ulisses Correia e Silva, official portrait (cropped).jpg
- File:Vpm-olavo-correia-768x1036 (cropped).jpg
- File:Vpm-olavo-correia-768x1036.jpg
- File:Dr. Jose Ulisses Correia e Silva, official portrait.jpg
0x0a (talk) 02:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, jpg of small resolution without metadata, all other images (of similar content) by uploader were copyvios: User talk:Phichet9707 Nutshinou Talk! 03:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gustavo the Image Flag (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope: fictitious flags.
Omphalographer (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kashishyoga1 (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope: personal certificates.
- File:Yoga Alliance Certification Copy for 300 hrs Hatha-Ashtanga-Vinyasa Practice.jpg
- File:Yoga Alliance Certification Copy for 200 hrs multi-style yoga practice.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused images of plain text.
Omphalographer (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused, unidentified video game screenshot. Omphalographer (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 10:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 1980. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. see same request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bust of Mykola Pigorev in Ternopil Микола Василечко (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flags and parliament diagram.
Omphalographer (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
AI generated image of a historical figure - nonsense characters, three different images of the same person that look completely different - should not be used in an encyclopedia or any respectable educational setting.
- File:Maharshi Pāṇinī codifying Sanskrit Vyakaran.jpg
- File:Maharshi Panini codifying Sanskrit Vyakaran.jpg
- File:Maharshi Panini codifying Sanskrit Vyakarana.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I would be surprised if there weren't some existing historical art of this person/event; that should be used instead of these randomly computer-generated images. Omphalographer (talk) 06:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:His name-Johnson Carter You were born in 1896 June 7 birth place-Naples Italy Died-1975 August 24 Died place brussels Belgium Cause of death assassinated cause to kill He went to a.jpeg
edit
Out of scope: unused AI-generated "photo", filename suggests some sort of fiction or hoax. Omphalographer (talk) 06:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a deity; associated article cs:Pili náboženství was speedily deleted. Omphalographer (talk) 06:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:46, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
No FOP in North Macedonia for 2D works.
- File:Contemporary Art Museum (North Macedonia) 2022 October 03.jpg
- File:Contemporary Art Museum (North Macedonia) 2022 October 05.jpg
- File:Muzej na sovremena umetnost (9).JPG
Quick1984 (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
3D sculpture , Tawian has FoP for buildings only. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:AI-Generated Illustration of Utah Territorial Militia Outside Fort During the Morrisite War, 1862.png
edit
out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, I see no problem with historical images. It is still in scope. If anything I think this helps people see what happens if it is a lesser known historical event. LuxembourgLover (talk) 21:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't need to reinstate my arguments here Wheatley2 (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete As noted on a related RFD, AI imagined images are more likely to skew than to inform understanding of historical events. A contemporary portrait of such an event might suffer from similar biases, but that can be mitigated through context about the painter and when they were working. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- The same thing can be done here. Add context to the file description and if it's used to the caption. It's already in the title. Prototyperspective (talk) 19:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- As noted on a related RFD, that's not really the same thing. A painting like File:Batalha de Campo Grande - 1871.jpg, completed two years after the battle by an artist who wasn't present, can be examined in terms of the artist's nationality, philosophy of work, patrons, and where it fits in his body of work. That can help determine what might be true, what might be exaggerated, and what might be overlooked or obscured in the painting. You can examine the prompt used to generate an AI image, but that only provides a small hint into what went into the algorithmic decisions being made in rendering an imagined view of a historical event. —Tcr25 (talk) 23:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- The same thing can be done here. Add context to the file description and if it's used to the caption. It's already in the title. Prototyperspective (talk) 19:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Artistic view of a British trench during the Battle of the Somme (World War I), by ChatGPT 4.0 & Dall-E 3.0 (2024).png
edit
out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, I see no problem with historical images. It is still in scope. If anything I think this helps people see what happens if it is a lesser known historical event. LuxembourgLover (talk) 21:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - LuxembourgLover has been spamming all nominations of AI art of historical events with this message, per my statements were on the other nominations for AI art for historical scenes. Wheatley2 (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: No offense, but wouldn't his (LuxembourgLovers) opinions be biased, as he is the one who created these images? Wheatley2 (talk) 22:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- The original uploader is welcome to make their points. It's widely common that they can vote for keeping it and what matters is their rationale, not your biased views of what would be biased or not since that shouldn't matter if one looks at the actual arguments made. Prototyperspective (talk) 19:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: I only voted on three nominations, and bias is normal on Wikipedia, especially when it comes to an editors page creation or upload. LuxembourgLover (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: No offense, but wouldn't his (LuxembourgLovers) opinions be biased, as he is the one who created these images? Wheatley2 (talk) 22:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete AI imagined images are more likely to skew than to inform understanding of historical events. A contemporary portrait of such an event might suffer from similar biases, but that can be mitigated through context about the painter and when they were working. —Tcr25 (talk) 13:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- The same thing can be done here. It's already done in the file title to some degree. Prototyperspective (talk) 19:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not really the same thing. A painting like File:Batalha de Campo Grande - 1871.jpg, completed two years after the battle by an artist who wasn't present, can be examined in terms of the artist's nationality, philosophy of work, patrons, and where it fits in his body of work. That can help determine what might be true, what might be exaggerated, and what might be overlooked or obscured in the painting. You can examine the prompt used to generate an AI image, but that only provides a small hint into what went into the algorithmic decisions being made in rendering an imagined view of a historical event. —Tcr25 (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- If the image is to be used it should be sufficiently self-explanatory or be explained in the file description why the image looks like it does. In the above case for example it only shows cavalry so one would have to specify what is flawed and even if it's flawless that doesn't mean it's to be used. You can also view more works of the same prompter for insights on the philosophy of work which often can't be done to a meaningful extent for conventional fully manual artists and the nationality is not necessarily useful for context. It's not algorithmic decisions, it's a human using algorithms as a tool and e.g. selecting fitting images and reprompting, the algorithmic decisions made are fairly irrelevant as it's the end result that is the subject. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not really the same thing. A painting like File:Batalha de Campo Grande - 1871.jpg, completed two years after the battle by an artist who wasn't present, can be examined in terms of the artist's nationality, philosophy of work, patrons, and where it fits in his body of work. That can help determine what might be true, what might be exaggerated, and what might be overlooked or obscured in the painting. You can examine the prompt used to generate an AI image, but that only provides a small hint into what went into the algorithmic decisions being made in rendering an imagined view of a historical event. —Tcr25 (talk) 22:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- The same thing can be done here. It's already done in the file title to some degree. Prototyperspective (talk) 19:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Non-user with a nice smile 186.175.78.77 23:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:PM Imran Khan receives Prime Minister of Malaysia Mahathir Mohamad at Nur Khan Airbase.webm
editStandard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:PM Imran Khan and Malaysian PM Dr. Mahathir Mohamad Combine Speech at Dinner 22 March 2019.webm
editStandard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Prime Minister of Malaysia Mahathir Mohamad at Reception Ceremony at President House in Islamabad.webm
editStandard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad conferred with Pakistan’s highest civilian award Full-HD.webm
editStandard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Pesanan Keselamatan Jalan Raya sempena Hari Raya Aidilfitri oleh YAB Tun Mahathir & YB Anthony Loke.webm
editStandard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Spam + anonimity errosion of someone. זור987 (talk) 06:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also derivative work. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Spam + anonimity errosion of someone. זור987 (talk) 06:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Commerical logo/2D art - Tawian has FOP for architecure/buildings only. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Commerical 2D art, Tawian only has FoP for buildings/architecture. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Not clear Soumava2002 (talk) 08:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep. Seems like a perfectly reasonable image of an identified post office in India. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 08:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Is this allowed? Isn't this a copyricht violation? DirkVE (talk) 12:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of scope as plain text regardless. Omphalographer (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- •COM:INUSE means it's not out of scope. My question would be: Is User:Jvrooijen the author of this text? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Non-free photo of the 3D object (PD itself), taken from third-party website. Рhotographer's permission required. Quick1984 (talk) 12:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
This template page is created in error Iwuala Lucy (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 13:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Private image LevandeMänniska (talk), 19:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, we have the original b/w image (File:Hitler as young man.jpg), I see no reason for which educational purpose Hitler in color should be Carl Ha (talk) 21:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, we have the original b/w version: File:Adolf Hitler 1936 (foto carnet).jpg Carl Ha (talk) 21:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Flickr washing 2603:8000:3F01:BB2B:D8AB:C373:F012:8509 22:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence of Flickrwashing. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
background photo maybe copyrighted and also out of scope Carl Ha (talk) 21:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio ©2023 Ben Rose Photography / CHRIS ALUKA BERRY - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Not clear Soumava2002 (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren von Wikipedia, mein Name ist (Name redacted) und ich bin die Besitzerin des Hauses (Bachstraße 3 in Kassel) auf dem Wikipediabild. Ich bitte inständig darum, dass das Bild meines Hauses nicht digital sichtbar ist. Ich weiß, dass es rechtlich möglich ist, in der Weise wie das Haus digtial sichtbar ist, im Internet darzustellen und bitte aus persönlichen Gründen - um Löschung. Mit freundlichen Grüßen (Name redacted) 2.200.133.178 20:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No offense to our polite petitioner above, but a house on the street, shot from a public location, is perfectly OK to host on Commons. If you had wanted more privacy, it might have been a good idea not to state your name publicly, as we would have had no idea who owned or lived in that house, otherwise. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Info Name for privacy reason as Oversight action redacted. Raymond (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and as this house is apparently registered as a monument, so a photo of it is in COM:SCOPE. --Rosenzweig τ 10:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
It's obviously not own work- it was taken from https://www.olympedia.org/athletes/82247. Even Olympedia doesn't know when or where the photo was taken, or who took it. (But do we trust them to do due dilligence?) If it was taken in Hungary or Switzerland (her home country and the country of the Olympics were held in 1948), this could easily be protected. We have no evidence that this is an anonymous publication, only that Olympedia doesn't know the author. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It meets PD-EU and PD-Swiss, Tineye search over 50 billion images and found no one claiming an active copyright, and no information to contradict the circa 1948 date. --RAN (talk) 03:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- A lack of Tineye results for an image means nothing. We know that the image has been published on Olympedia; the fact that Tineye doesn't show that just demonstrates how unreliable it can be. Omphalographer (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). I noticed you put the template on the image, claiming each of the following statements:
- 1)The photograph was published over 70 years ago.
- 2)The author's identity was not published alongside the photograph
- 3)The photo was
- i)published in Switzerland AND
- ii)over ago fifty years ago AND
- ii)Switzerland courts would consider this non-creative enough to be copyrightable.
- 4)The photo was published circa 1948
- Please prove them. Thank you! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- The license only requires that there was "reasonable evidence". We generally rely on Occam's Razor, we accept the simplest explanation, doubt could be used to denigrate any image. For instance: Who took the picture? It must be the named photographer, right? What if the photographer was in the bathroom, and an assistant pressed the shutter release. What if the photographer's spouse pressed the shutter release while the photographer adjusted a light. What if a monkey entered the photo studio while the photographer, their spouse, and the photographer's assistant, were inattentive and the monkey pressed the shutter release. What if the camera was on a random timer, and no one was responsible for pressing the shutter release. --RAN (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) Okay. Please provide reasonable evidence that any of the above of true Thank you! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- The license only requires that there was "reasonable evidence". We generally rely on Occam's Razor, we accept the simplest explanation, doubt could be used to denigrate any image. For instance: Who took the picture? It must be the named photographer, right? What if the photographer was in the bathroom, and an assistant pressed the shutter release. What if the photographer's spouse pressed the shutter release while the photographer adjusted a light. What if a monkey entered the photo studio while the photographer, their spouse, and the photographer's assistant, were inattentive and the monkey pressed the shutter release. What if the camera was on a random timer, and no one was responsible for pressing the shutter release. --RAN (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Without any information where the photo was taken and first published, we cannot determine the copyright status of this photo in either the US or a possible country of origin, and since the person shown was born in 1928, it obviously cannot be old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 10:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Heinz-Jürgen Oertel - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am the owner of the picture Plupp (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- You own it, but did you shoot it? Ownership is not copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - If we just assumed for images to be copyvios and delete them all the time, almost all photographs taken by people would be nominated for deletion. (I will change my vote if proof is shown that is it a copyvio) Wheatley2 (talk) 22:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Which photo by Oertel could be the possible source? If M2k~dewiki means Zigeunermausoleum_Osendorf.jpg than that's obviously not the case because there's a different vegetation on Oertels photo and the gable is still complete on Oertels picture (the upper part is missing on Plupps photo). The light (shadow) is also different from the older picture.--Hallogen (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to doubt own work. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Then why did User:Krd delete it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Büşra ÖZCOŞKUN (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely own works, jpgs of small resolution, all other uploads by uploader were clearly pulled from several places on the web: User talk:Büşra ÖZCOŞKUN
Nutshinou Talk! 03:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
I don't know if this complies with Commons policies or not, but just to say that this image is intended to disparage the subject, and was uploaded in connection with an attack page on the same. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- How do you define it as an attack page when it gives fact with references? 2601:647:5A00:4150:194A:551E:DBD5:A4A 08:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dear DoubleGrazing,
- Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I did not intend for the page to be perceived as an attack, and I apologize if it came across that way. My goal was to document the allegations and controversies surrounding Damien Charles Weber in a factual and neutral manner, citing reliable sources.
- I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies, especially regarding neutrality and biographies of living persons. I will review the content and revise the language to ensure it aligns with Wikipedia’s guidelines on maintaining a balanced and non-disparaging tone. I am open to collaborating on any changes necessary to bring the page into compliance.
- Thank you for your guidance, and I look forward to resolving this issue constructively.
- Best regards, 2601:647:5A00:4150:194A:551E:DBD5:A4A 08:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete G3 - vandalism, if not it is obviously out of project scope. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Badges of Komsomol
editDerivatives, copyright status of the original artworks is not specified.
- File:Award - 50th Anniversary of the Komsomol of Primorye.jpg
- File:Badge Комсомол.jpg
- File:Medaille Festigung der FDJ und Komsomol.jpg
- File:Orden-Komsomol-6-10.jpg
- File:Orsk Museum 53.jpeg
- File:VLKSM 70th anniversary.png
- File:Юбилейный значок ЦК ВЛКСМ «50 лет ВЛКСМ», 1968.jpg
- File:Юбилейный значок ЦК ВЛКСМ Молодому передовику производства 1968 г.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 08:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Not own work. May be PD. 186.175.78.77 22:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with sourcing or proof of PD. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted magazine covers and light boxes in Japan. Solomon203 (talk) 10:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 10:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 1980. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. see same request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bust of Viktor Chaldaev in Ternopil Микола Василечко (talk) 10:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 11:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 11:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 11:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Source indicates that the photo was uploaded from Facebook but there's no indication that this was released under a Commons-acceptable license seav (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also likely FoP issues. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Non-free screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Non-free screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
The very last of this user's uploads not to be nominated for deletion or tagged as copyvio. This photo gives off the same copyvio vibes as those expressed in these DRs: 1, 2, 3. As for the PS in general, this photo doesn't really add anyhthing "educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject" and is low res. Sinigh (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ulvi Guliyev
editThis is basically the exact same photograph of some politician from Azerbaijan it seems, uploaded by two different users years apart, both claiming own work and both having very little uploads. I think we need VRT to keep these files, or one of them.
Rosenzweig τ 12:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig, they have been taken by National Assembly of Azerbaijan (meclis.gov.az). And they are not free. Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 18:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Derivatives of modern 3D artworks, no FoP in Russia for these.
Quick1984 (talk) 12:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
This is not a gallery page: with only one file. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. The text has been copied to the file. JopkeB (talk) 14:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
pricacy person portrayed in this screenshot - person noted https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BeReal&curid=5731627&diff=68084182&oldid=67670705 to be the person in this image and does not want to be publically exposed Hoyanova (talk) 13:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely unfree. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a work of art in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 14:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
No Es El Original OrlandoWKD503 (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE. If it's the wrong flag, replace it with the right one in all of those articles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Ya No Me Servira OrlandoWKD503 (talk) 15:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep per last deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- The Organization of the logo really is a non-notable institution. This file is not in use, Delete. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 20:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Could be kept just because it's a beautiful logo, but I know that won't happen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Copyviol from https://www.diocesivolterra.it/s-e-mons-roberto-campiotti/ . Antonio1952 (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Low quality duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gage_into_the_Sky_(18891263491).jpg QuincyMorgan (talk) 18:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faribamomeni79 (talk · contribs)
editPersonal photos for article in enwiki (article was deleted as Unambiguous advertising or promotion)
- File:Dr. Aliakbar Momeni Implantologist.jpg
- File:Dr. Aliakbar Momeni Oil Painting.jpg
- File:Dr. Aliakbar Momeni Violinist.jpg
- File:Dr. Aliakbar momeni Dentist surgeon and Implantologist.jpg
- File:Dr. Aliakbar Momeni in 2024.jpg
- File:Dr. Aliakbar Momeni - Modern Medicine Co Exhibition 2002.jpg
- File:Dr. Aliakbar Momeni Modern Medicine Co.jpg
- File:Dr. Aliakbar Momeni in highschool.jpg
- File:Artwork from Dr. Aliakbar Momeni 1975.jpg
- File:Artwork from Dr. Aliakbar Momeni 1970.jpg
- File:Dr Aliakbar Momeni early childhood.jpg
- File:Dr. Aliakbar Momeni 2024.jpg
Killarnee (talk) 18:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
not useful Mateus2019 (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Oh yes it is! View of Earth, showing part of the International Space Station. You're bored with such images already, they're so common to you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ikan Kekek. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
apparent copyvio: a photo collage of graduares a class of 1971 Altenmann (talk) 20:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Altenmann,
- This photo collage of graduates of Interdom 1971 is a creation of all the Interdom graduates 1971. Regards. Nic shad (talk) 01:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
After moving this file from enwiki, I noticed the image title in the metadata (which didn't appear on enwiki for some reason), which seems to indicate that the author and subject are different from what the uploader said. If there's a different author on this photo, they presumably hold the copyright. TheCatalyst31 (talk) 21:08, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Josef Sallanz - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Heinz-Juergen Oertel - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Looks too official to be "own work"; image used all the time elsewhere Malik Nursultan B (talk) 22:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Behind the logo there is a blurry image of something that is neither text nor geometric figure, therefore the license is falsified. Taichi (talk) 22:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#United Kingdom and Commons:Deletion requests/PD ineligible signatures. DrKay (talk) 16:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Upload by a vandal. Does not show South Chase Wisconsin, likely not to be the work of the editor MtBotany (talk) 04:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Non notible, added by vandal to the page Chase Wisconsin on English Wikipeida as a "joke" MtBotany (talk) 04:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Does not potray what the uploader claims, along with other vandalism on en.wikipeida this should be deleted MtBotany (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Does not potray what the uploader claims, along with other vandalism on en.wikipeida this should be deleted MtBotany (talk) 04:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
This photo is taken from Rix FM's Facebook page (aka the radio channel organising this). Kakan spelar (talk) 13:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:18, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE. It appears that the nominator was aware of this policy but engaged in a bad faith attempt to circumvent it by removing the image on French Wikipedia minutes before nominating it here, which did not prevail. Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Neutral I agree with the rationale; however the image is in use and is not so blatantly misleading or inaccurate to justify overriding that policy. It’s French Wikipedia’s problem that someone chose a subpar illustration for their article. Dronebogus (talk) 17:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no longer in use. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:49, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
The file seems to be taken from a CBS News video, but the file information summary says "Source: Own work". LightNightLights (talk) 16:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [edited LightNightLights (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)]
- (This is my first Commons deletion request, and I might not know info that other, more experienced, editors know about Commons, copyright, or deletion requests.) LightNightLights (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I don't think a US map with some states colored is above the ToO. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Randomstaplers as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.cbsnews.com/video/super-tuesday-2024-presidential-election/%7Chelp=off ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see copyrightable content in the image. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree Yeah, but the design and drop-shadow... too risky. It would have been safer if it had been uploaded to Wikipedia for fair use instead.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I suspect there's an attribution violation somewhere. "Own work"?⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I just fixed the attribution, but I don't think shadow and placement are copyrightable in this image either. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree And then there's the filename. "Z5227494646617 05395d24887d2f92f2feb466507b8c87.jpg".⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I just fixed the attribution, but I don't think shadow and placement are copyrightable in this image either. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'll also point out this diff. That's pretty incriminating.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- ooh, good catch. I've now added this information to the file description page. Not sure what to put into the "Author" field now. "CBS News"? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree After looking at the documentation again, it appears one could get away with saving this image as PD, as it falls below the TOO, but I'm still worried about that drop shadow. Also, if this file is to be saved, this file has to be renamed.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 03:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- File:Appraisers.com - Map of the United States - May 2002.gif seems to be the go-to example.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 03:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree After looking at the documentation again, it appears one could get away with saving this image as PD, as it falls below the TOO, but I'm still worried about that drop shadow. Also, if this file is to be saved, this file has to be renamed.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 03:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- ooh, good catch. I've now added this information to the file description page. Not sure what to put into the "Author" field now. "CBS News"? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I suspect there's an attribution violation somewhere. "Own work"?⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree Yeah, but the design and drop-shadow... too risky. It would have been safer if it had been uploaded to Wikipedia for fair use instead.⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 02:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. We shouldn't need to pilfer these sorts of images from news web sites; we have our own map templates for marking up groups of states, like File:Blank US Map (states only).svg, and we can and should use one of those instead. Omphalographer (talk) 04:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Delete, not in use and can be easily recreated using SVG/higher resolution, in terms of copyright however, this is way below the TOO. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Omphalographer and User:ThelmaCow. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Needless lower quality/resolution duplicate (also uploaded at a later date than the original) of File:Byzantine Constantinople-el.svg. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:26, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Needless duplicate (also uploaded at a later date than the original) of File:Byzantine Constantinople-el.svg. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Kuban People's Republic.svg Wheatley2 (talk) 09:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Kuban.svg and File:Flag of Kuban People's Republic.svg Wheatley2 (talk) 10:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment - Use {{Duplicate}} or {{Vector version available}} templates instead of deletion request. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of the File:Flag of Kuban People's Republic.svg, one of two (or more) copies of the flag made by this user. Wheatley2 (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality photo of an unidentified (and, probably, unidentifiable) crustacean. No realistic educational use -> out of scope. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 11:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
This is not a gallery page: with only one photo. In my opinion a gallery page has a lot of images and the purpose is "to present readers with a structured and meaningful collection of the media found here on Wikimedia Commons" (see Commons:Galleries). This gallery page does not meet these criteria. JopkeB (talk) 11:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
even though the image might be published under a free license on Flickr, the original postcard (modern, 21th century postcard of North Macedonia) is for sure copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 15:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Non-free game screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am the creator of the game. I created the website where the simulator is active. Thank you for looking out for the community tho! HSQ0503 (talk) 23:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Non-free game screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Non-free game screenshot Astrinko (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate and low quality JPG. --StomboyCarGeek (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate. StomboyCarGeek (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:12, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
The photo here claims to be representing a castle, however, maybe due to low visibility, I can't really see any castle. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 16:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope material (?). 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no meaningful contributions by this user. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Very low-quality statistical graph, data source is much too vague to verify. Not realistically useful for any educational purpose. Apocheir (talk) 18:44, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. A "correlation" with is no correlation at all; it's misleading to even draw the line on the graph. Omphalographer (talk) 05:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Unidentifiable diagram in an unusual format. Unused. Apocheir (talk) 19:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable person, not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in it.wiki. Uploader claimed it to be a selfie – does not look like that, probably real photographer's copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use in The Signpost. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:25, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, AI generated images are unsuitable for illustrating historic events in Wikimedia pages Carl Ha (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Is Asad Hayat and the uploader the same person? 186.175.78.77 22:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Yes...it takes less than 10 seconds to figure out that User:FSCEM45212 is User:Asadwarraich before they were globally renamed. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Regards, Aafi (talk) 05:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Again, Asad Hayat... 186.175.78.77 22:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep What? --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense DR. Regards, Aafi (talk) 05:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
files in Category:Videos featuring unidentified music need to have their music identified or be deleted / get their audio removed. Somebody please do so. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Now tagged for speedy deletion. Prototyperspective (talk) 15:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 08:28, 9 November 2024 UTC: No permission since 1 November 2024 --Krdbot 10:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
no evidence of copyright ownership or good license Altenmann (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Altenmann, I took this picture in Grozny, Chechnya 1995 with my Polaroid camera. I have the original photo. The photo in Wikimedia is a scanned version of the original photo. Regards. Nic shad (talk) 01:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader's assertion is plausible enough for me. The photo's format is fitting a Polaroid. No external source for the photo found. To the uploader, Nic shad, maybe you could take a scan in higher resolution, though? Thanks for the picture. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
apparent copyvio a 1986 photo pinched from www.jalehesfahani.com Altenmann (talk) 20:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Altenmann,
- This is a message of Jaleh Esfahani Cultural Foundation of December 14, 2023:Четверг, 14 декабря 2023, 9:41 -05:00 от [email protected]: "You can use the photo alone for the purpose you described below. However, if you will be referring
- to this photo and showing Jaleh Esfahani, you need to send the text to us before you do so. Kind Regards Jaleh Esfahani Cultural Foundation." I used this photo with the permission of Jaleh Esfahani Cultural Foundation. Regards. Nic shad (talk) 01:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: "You can use the photo alone for the purpose you described below" isn't the kind of free license we need, unfortunately. Commons requires that photos can be freely used by anyone, also commercially. "However, if you will be referring to this photo and showing Jaleh Esfahani, you need to send the text to us before you do so" is also a restriction not accepted here. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Advertising artwork on vehicle side is of recent origin. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: As Taiwan has only FoP for architecture per COM:FOP Taiwan, we don't need to discuss the applicability of FoP for art on vehicles in Taiwan, as there is no FoP for artistic works anyway. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:08, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Essentially a 2D artwork on a vehicle , Taiwan has FoP only for architecture. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. See Category:Itasha. Solomon203 (talk) 07:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: As Taiwan has only FoP for architecture per COM:FOP Taiwan, we don't need to discuss the applicability of FoP for art on vehicles in Taiwan, as there is no FoP for artistic works anyway. Most of the pictures in Category:Itasha should probably not have been uploaded to Commons. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
postcard from the 1970s +/- is copyright protecterd Albinfo (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; looks like a case of flickrwashing. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Postcard of 1973 is copytight protected Albinfo (talk) 15:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; looks like a case of flickrwashing. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
most probably a copyright protected postcard Albinfo (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the borders and the format of the image are indicative of a postcard; copyright protection (flickrwashing) likely. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
1966 postcard of Yougoslavia is most probably copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; apparently just a bit too recent for {{PD-Yugoslavia}} - a photograph published before January 1, 1966 would be in the public domain. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
1966 postcard of Yougoslavia is most probably copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 16:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; apparently just a bit too recent for {{PD-Yugoslavia}} - a photograph published before January 1, 1966 would be in the public domain. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
late 1960s postcard of Yougoslavia is most probably copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; apparently too recent for {{PD-Yugoslavia}} - a photograph published before January 1, 1966 would be in the public domain. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 18:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
i would think this is beyond TOO for Sweden? TheLoyalOrder (talk) 03:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's a simple cross. Who holds the copyright for that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- different countries have varying levels of Threshold of Originality, I think the Swedish TOO might be met by this image TheLoyalOrder (talk) 23:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see how this could be copyrighted anywhere, but is Sweden specifically relevant? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- its from a paradox game, paradox is based in sweden - seeCOM:TOO for info on threshold of originality TheLoyalOrder (talk) 23:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. Keep per COM:TOO Sweden. Clearly less complex than this disallowed logo but also the 2nd "OK" one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info.
- its from a paradox game, paradox is based in sweden - seeCOM:TOO for info on threshold of originality TheLoyalOrder (talk) 23:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see how this could be copyrighted anywhere, but is Sweden specifically relevant? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- different countries have varying levels of Threshold of Originality, I think the Swedish TOO might be met by this image TheLoyalOrder (talk) 23:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek, and I suppose that crosses that look more or less exactly like this one have been known in Sweden for a long, long time. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
The uploader sourced this file from the website of the US National Weather Service: https://www.weather.gov/lot/Palm_Sunday_Outbreak where it's been hosted since 2015 without attribution
The Crystal Lake Historical Society identifies it as the work of local photographer Jim Seymour (d.1988[5]) It is one of a batch of 21 photographic prints that was donated to the society in 2000. The Society is unaware of any prior publication.
The Society has featured Seymour's photos of the tornado aftermath in a slideshow on its website since at least 2010, although due to a technology change, it's not possible to verify with complete certainty that this photo was among them. Nevertheless, the physical print in the Society's collection is the only original source known and documented for this image.
The tornado took place in the United States in 1965
The rationale for hosting it on the Commons has been:
- a belief when the NWS general website disclaimer states that information on the site is "in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise" it necessarily means noted with a formal copyright notice, and that the absence of a formal notice accompanying an image equates to an assertion by the NWS that the image is in the public domain.
- a set of terms and conditions used for a time by the NWS Sioux City office for public contributions
However:
- There is nothing to connect this image with the Sioux City office (it was published by the Chicago office)
- A recent analysis of over 200 third-party images has found that whatever the NWS intends by "specifically noted otherwise" in their disclaimer, images that are known to be protected by copyright are routinely published on NWS websites without formal copyright notices, or sometimes without any attribution at all. Very many examples exist, spanning major media outlets, photographers who claim that they never relinquished their rights to their photos, and permissions granted to the NWS in public that did not include release into the public domain. Not a single one of these examples was published by the NWS with a formal copyright notice.
- The most likely conclusion is that the NWS does not intend "specifically noted otherwise" to mean "specifically noted with a formal copyright notice". Alternatively, if that really is the intention of those words, the NWS has deviated from this intention so thoroughly as to render the disclaimer unreliable as an assertion of public domain status.
Copyright of images taken in the United States prior to March 1, 1989 depends on the circumstances of their first publication, rather than when they were actually taken. (see COM:HIRTLE).
This image might already have entered the public domain if it were first published before 1989 without meeting all the requirements for protection, but this cannot simply be assumed. Alternatively, for example, if it was first published in a book somewhere between 1965 and 1977 (and the formalities were correctly carried out), it will enter the public domain somewhere between 2061 and 2073. Or if the photo was never published before 1989, then it will pass into the public domain in 2059, 70 years after Seymour's death.
Without details of its first publication, we cannot assess the copyright status of this pre-1989 US image and therefore must delete it unless someone can provide this information.
 | Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
- Weak delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 12:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and the linkd RfC. --Krd 15:10, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Keetanii
edit
These images were all uploaded by myself User:Keetanii about 12 years ago. I believe they should now be deleted because they're of poor quality (literally scanned copies of printed photos (not digital)) and there are better photos that do the same job available on Wikimedia Commons. Keetanii (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment a number are in use Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- For those images that are in use, I'd be happy to replace them with a better photo, available on commons, however I didn't do this myself as I felt it was a conflict of interest since I'm the one asking for my photos to be deleted. Please advise. Keetanii (talk) 07:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Most in use, all have educational use potential. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: A copyright appears in the metadata, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
While the text of the note may have been published, bibliographically speaking, in newspapers in 1932, with or without a copyright notice, for US copyright purposes publication (general publication) can only happen if authorised by the author. Any contemporary newspapers publishing this text would have done so as fair use, not because the suicide note was somehow public domain or, even more ridiculously, licensed under a compatible free license. In order to ascertain the note's copyright term we need to know when the first authorized publication happened, which, absent evidence to the contrary may have been "never"—it is entirely possible that all subsequent publications have been on similar fair use grounds—or may have happened at any point in the intervening years (if the estate or heirs granted permission to someone writing a book about the affair, say).
Since it is pretty much impossible to prove that it was never published with permission before 2003 (when {{PD-US-unpublished}} would come into play), we must assume per COM:PRP that publication with permission happened somewhere in the time window where a pub. +95 term applies (if publication was late enough that the term was pma. 70 it would have long since expired).
The best bet for anyone wanting to try to save this file is to trawl through the oldest books about this topic looking for one giving the full text of the note and mentioning in the text somewhere that they have the permission of the heirs (even indirectly in the form of thanking them for assistance or graciously permitting etc.). If found it may be reasonable to conclude that first publication happened no later than that time and copyright expires 95 years after that book was published, or it could be that that book either lacked a copyright notice or failed to renew copyright in the 28th year after publication.
Note that the file is in use on many Wikipedias and several of them may have EDPs permitting fair use material ala. enWP. Before deleting these should be notified and given the opportunity to import the file locally if desired and permitted by their policy. Xover (talk) 07:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep You disregard the very valid {{PD-US-unpublished}} option as "Since it is pretty much impossible to prove that it was never published with permission before 2003". It is just as impossible to prove that it was published with explicit permission. (If it was widely published without anything being done againest it by the heirs, I'd count that as implicit permission to have it published). PCP good & fine, but this arguing about a 92 year old low res one-sentence long suicide scribbeling is copyright paranoia. ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:11, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Of course not. You can positively prove that it has been published any number of ways. A prime example, a book that publishes it and says it is used by permission of the heirs (which is a very common practice). But as I also mentioned, you could even just make it plausible that this has happened by finding a book where the heirs have in some way participated, for example by the author thanking them for assistance or similar, without making the permission explicit. The opposite is true for proving it was never published, simply because you cannot prove a negative. Failing to find a publication does not mean there isn't one, just that you failed to find it.And copyright owners failing to act in some way has never been a valid argument. The heirs could have failed to act for any number of reasons, lack of awareness being one obvious possibility, and unlike trademarks this affects their rights not one bit. But more to the point, the contemporary publications were in newspapers and were reporting on current events. That is, they were publishing it under the fair use doctrine (an affirmative defence against a claim of copyright infringement which does not apply to Commons and is explicitly not permitted under Commons policy). There was essentially nothing the heirs could have done to prevent this.So… In order to preserve this you'd need to find a publication that is 1) plausibly the first (general) publication, and 2) that failed to comply with the required formalities (notice, renewal, etc.). Xover (talk) 16:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- COM:PCP requires "significant doubt" (emphasis original). What I see here are vague claims that the publication might not be authorized, or it might have been authorized, but too recent, or it might not have been at all. And any of this might be a problem. I think that's far from significant doubt.
- The file in question is either {{PD-US-no notice}}, or {{PD-US-unpublished}}. If we're not sure, we can add both tags.
- And the purely hypothetical case that the heirs -zero clue who they are- have somehow agreed the "publication" of a 1932 suicide note between 1977-2003? This goes wayyy beyond any reasonable research, and it is up to you to prove that.
- And that this would somehow reset the copyright clock, are there any cases to look at? (Copyrighting someone's 92 year old suicide note.........)
- Either way, some more input is certainly needed here. ~TheImaCow (talk) 01:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Of course not. You can positively prove that it has been published any number of ways. A prime example, a book that publishes it and says it is used by permission of the heirs (which is a very common practice). But as I also mentioned, you could even just make it plausible that this has happened by finding a book where the heirs have in some way participated, for example by the author thanking them for assistance or similar, without making the permission explicit. The opposite is true for proving it was never published, simply because you cannot prove a negative. Failing to find a publication does not mean there isn't one, just that you failed to find it.And copyright owners failing to act in some way has never been a valid argument. The heirs could have failed to act for any number of reasons, lack of awareness being one obvious possibility, and unlike trademarks this affects their rights not one bit. But more to the point, the contemporary publications were in newspapers and were reporting on current events. That is, they were publishing it under the fair use doctrine (an affirmative defence against a claim of copyright infringement which does not apply to Commons and is explicitly not permitted under Commons policy). There was essentially nothing the heirs could have done to prevent this.So… In order to preserve this you'd need to find a publication that is 1) plausibly the first (general) publication, and 2) that failed to comply with the required formalities (notice, renewal, etc.). Xover (talk) 16:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per TheImaCow. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
This logo has a texture that does not make it a simple figure, therefore it could be exceeding the COM:TOO. Taichi (talk) 22:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Logo with texture and three-dimensionality that does not make it simple, therefore it could be exceeding the COM:TOO. Taichi (talk) 22:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Logo with different specific fonts in each letter and placed at specific angles on a very specific irregular background, therefore it could be exceeding the COM:TOO. Taichi (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
