Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/10/01

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 1st, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por que podría ser utilizado como imagen porno 83.33.3.190 11:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons is not censored. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:09, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by SVG version SounderBruce 00:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, redundant to file:Puget Sound Regional Council logo.svg. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

if this is an image of a person with a mental illness, the uploader has violated their privacy rights under the US Hipaa laws, and thus this file should be deleted Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, probably not own work, but copyright violation. Also unusable for educational purposes, because it is not specified, what kind of mental illness he has. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Philmore1q2w3e4r (talk · contribs)

edit

All duplicates of File:1900-* Western Culture Timeline.jpg (not in this list) and now been superseded by File:1900-2010 - Western Culture Timeline.svg.

Fred the Oyster (talk) 01:34, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, speedy close as scaled-down duplicates. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry photo and cannot be used due to its low quality EurovisionNim 05:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, by Yann. This is uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of a unknown person and per the watermark of questionable legitimacy. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 08:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, how many Claudia Paolas I must delete? This is the fourth! Taivo (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, how many Claudia Paolas I must delete? This is the fifth! Taivo (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded in 08.2014 by 1-upload-user Tatafreitas (talk · contributions · Statistics) the photo is credited even after upload date per http://www.espectador.com/deportes/299819/penarol-es-un-equipo-jonathandependiente and http://www.futbol.com.uy/auc.aspx?246948,890 with "EFE" (en:EFE), a Spanish international news agency. Gunnex (talk) 07:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: Uploaded in 08.2014 by 1-upload-user GeorgetaB14 (talk · contributions · Statistics) the available exif indicates to photographer "Sebastian Ioan Burduja". Additional, the photo is cropped and was previously published (no exif) via http://www.amosnews.ro/fost-aprobata-conducerea-bancii-romane-pentru-credit-si-investitii-2013-10-21 (2013) = http://www.amosnews.ro/sites/default/files//styles/large/public/pictures/Stiri/c_dumbrava/burduja%20marinel.jpg (last modified: 03.2014) Gunnex (talk) 07:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope, unused, only edit of this user Cholo 3 (talk) 07:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonnotable work by possible outsider artist. we cannot operate as a free webhosting service for nonotable works that dont have a clear documentary use. there is also a question of personality rights, as the file may represent art by a person with a mental illness Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, did you read file description at all? This is one of the funniest vandalisms in Commons, what I have seen. Taivo (talk) 17:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded to commons by mistake Feelingfancyfree (talk) 08:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RMRicondo (talk · contribs)

edit

Unclear copyright status, unlikely own work, permissions needed.

Both related enwiki-entries were created by the uploader.


Gunnex (talk) 08:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, these are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rory Vaden NAMM 2013.jpg restored per ticket:2015012010018771
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davidmcdaniels1 (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, permissions and/or further details needed.

Both related enwiki-entries were created by the uploader.


Gunnex (talk) 09:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, now are all his contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 18:16, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: Uploaded in 08.2014 the photo (high res + exif available) was configured by user Parisstory (talk · contributions · Statistics) with source = "www.googlemaps.com", author = "Google" and an obvious {{Cc-zero}}-fail. Might be really "own work", but eventually also grabbed somewhere from Panoramio. Further details & tangible evidence indicating that this file is indeed freely licensed needed. Gunnex (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, author is Google -> not free file. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Profanity in title - image has no value Ballofstring (talk) 10:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, I deleted both the uploader's contributions as vandalism. Taivo (talk) 18:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image of a drawing - not valuable Ballofstring (talk) 10:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused shot of person - not of obvious value Ballofstring (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:36, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - seems to be a screencap of a 2011 film "Planet of Hamsters" (or something) - also not used Ballofstring (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not used and of no obvious value Ballofstring (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not used and has no obvious value Ballofstring (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:51, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not used - vanity shot Ballofstring (talk) 10:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:52, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not being used - vanity shot Ballofstring (talk) 10:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by G0nephishin (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, eventually attack and/or photoshopped, "funny" images (uploaded in a row on 31.08.2014), some of them mysteriously watermarked and/or based on unfree images (e.g. File:XP52L.jpg = http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01175/Submarine_1175564f.jpg, exif available, from telegraph.co.uk, 2008). No educational purpose and out of project scope.

Gunnex (talk) 11:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, they seem to me as attack pictures. I think, that it is better to delete them speedily. Taivo (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable private work of art from france - unknown artists, taken from a blog Cholo 3 (talk) 11:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apeironzool (talk · contribs)

edit

All these files (grabbed from Internet) are {{PD-Art}}-fails and copyrighted, like File:F183af7c imac.jpeg. File:Macpaint456.jpg + File:MacPaint.jpg are software screenshots containing most likely copyrighted elements. Borderline might be File:Microsoft-excel-3 39461 640.jpg.png.

Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mac128k320-300x210.jpg


Gunnex (talk) 13:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Microsoft Excel and Paint are not free softwares and computer is not PD-art. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission / copyright violation 37.5.6.207 13:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, probably own work and so not copyright violation, but unused drawings of non-notable artist are out of project scope. By principle, interesting drawing, but ... non-notable artist. Taivo (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joanpons99 (talk · contribs)

edit

unused personal files

37.5.6.207 13:20, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in my opinion file Joan Pons.jpg is quite funny, but both photos are small and without metadata. If the other depicts Joan Pons, then this cannot be own work as stated. I delete both as copyright violations. These are the user's last remaining uploads. Taivo (talk) 14:33, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free software, seems complex enough to be copyrighted. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik wilde het uploaden voor een pagina maar het is niet gelukt. Sabrinarijkers (talk) 13:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation Ramones1986 (talk) 14:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this seems to me a test, how fast we catch obvious copyright violations. Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Also the uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 14:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, Uploaded in 07./08.2014, most of them grabbed from Wikimapia, like File:ЖК "Чудо город".jpg (see byline) or File:ЖК "Перекрёсток".jpg = http://wikimapia.org/8851450/Fontanskaya-rd-33-1 (by "ArtemKo, uploaded 9 years ago") = http://photos.wikimapia.org/p/00/00/97/98/37_big.jpg. File:Логотип XV летних паралимпийских игр.jpg + File:Картинка летних паралимпийских игр 2016.jpg are logos for en:2016 Summer Paralympics. Obviously not own works, they might be also out of scope of {{PD-textlogo}}.

Gunnex (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, obviously not textlogos. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from my space - not self made. License incorrect. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity/promotional image. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 14:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity logo for non-notable singer. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused vanity/promotional image of non-notable person. out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I delete also file:Coste Boy En Las Carralejas De San Juan.jpg. These are the user's only uploads. Taivo (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image not of sufficient quality to be useful. Richard Avery (talk) 15:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, yeah, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 17:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is not a free site or OTRS compatible. Yanguas (talk) 15:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Fastily, because this was copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless without a description 37.5.6.207 16:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:03, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file 37.5.6.207 16:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, maybe copyvio. Taivo (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (6 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.6.207 16:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucas Nego4 (talk · contribs)

edit

Band with 2 videos on YouTube, but without a homepage or a facebook account

37.5.6.207 17:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I delete all the uploader's contributions. Taivo (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful redirect. I uploaded the original photo with a wrong street number. Tangopaso (talk) 17:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, yes, everybody can see from photo, that correct house number is 62. Taivo (talk) 18:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doubted to be media for free use, p.e. format, quality and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Car la personne n'est pas d'accord pour que sa photo soit utilisé Julie Monarque (talk) 17:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal photo without metadata, the uploder's request. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ces photos ne sont pas de moi je demande la suppression immédiate Julie Monarque (talk) 17:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doubted to be media for free use, p.e. format, quality and missing exif, as sell some (few) contributions by uploarder, Roland zh (talk) 17:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doubted to be media for free use, p.e. format, quality and missing exif, as sell some (few) contributions by uploarder, Roland zh (talk) 17:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:04, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author in the information-template does not match the EXIF. There is no Flickr-source (link), and hence we can not confirm the license either. Josve05a (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dupe of existing image, only use at en wiki will be speedy deleted Denniss (talk) 11:29, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible photoshop job based on news image/screenshot of unknown origin. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:45, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Fastily as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As for author of this woodcut, 50 years do not pass after the death. en:Li Hua(李桦) death in 1994. Therefore it cannot host on Commons unluckily.--Y.haruo (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – internet, author – unknown. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As for author of this woodcut, 50 years do not pass after the death. jiang-feng(江丰) death in 1982. Therefore it cannot host on Commons unluckily.--Y.haruo (talk) 18:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – internet, author – unknown. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As for author of this woodcut, 50 years do not pass after the death. hu yichuan(胡一川) death in 2000. Therefore it cannot host on Commons unluckily.--Y.haruo (talk) 18:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – internet, author – unknown. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Прошу видалити цю фотографію, так як вона була завантажена помилково. Last Stranger (talk) 18:34, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently unused personal image. The translation of the Hebrew description is "Hsknsg", and my suspicion that it was nonsense in the first place is compounded by the fact that entering "השקןשג" into Google *only* gives this image as a result! Ubcule (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file has Facebook filename and Facebook claims copyright to all its contents. Also, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image, no EXIF data, out of scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Fastily due to copyright violation (only 90×90 pixels). Taivo (talk) 12:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aymerbuitrago7 (talk · contribs)

edit

Appear to be photos of a relatively young guy who likes to play football, but there is nothing in the descriptions to indicate any major notability of this person that would make them useful within Commons' scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. (Google translation into Spanish: "Similares a fotos de un hombre relativamente joven que le gusta jugar al fútbol, ​​pero no hay nada en las descripciones para indicar cualquier notabilidad importante de esta persona que los haga útiles dentro de alcance Commons. Commons no es un álbum de fotos personal. ")

Ubcule (talk) 22:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal files are out of project scope. In addition, own work is dubious: the photos are small, resolution is different, but 720×960 is the biggest, and metadata is always missing. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear who this person is. In absence of further information, I would suggest that this is out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 22:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear in-scope purpose, apparent spam. Has the nerve to upload one logo with "all rights reserved" (i.e. to a website for freely-usable images), enough said.

Ubcule (talk) 22:27, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, spam. I delete also File:Bullets Universal Rhythm Logo (All Rights Reserved).jpg (this is the mentioned file with message "all rights reserved"). Then are all BulletsUniversalRhythm's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johncongo (talk · contribs)

edit

More vanity uploads of same user mentioned in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Latertinsna. (Note: I did not spot these myself, but am reposting as nomination was not properly carried out elsewhere).

Ubcule (talk) 22:39, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I delete also category:Johncongo. Then are all Johncongo's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously quite a professional photo, but not clear that this person is famous enough to make this in-scope. Ubcule (talk) 22:43, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo with text "Christine Turek photography". Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Short, single-page PDF of questionable usefulness, unclear reliability and full of typos. Ubcule (talk) 22:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NicolaL77 (talk · contribs)

edit

Blatant copyvios of various album covers and two press/publicity shots by or about band en:Linea77. Insufficient indication of permission.

Ubcule (talk) 22:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, mostly album covers and small photos without metadata, one photo had real author's name Riccardo Fantoni in metadata. These are the uploader's all contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked with "MAGYK PHOTOGRAPHY". Gunnex (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promo, out of project scope.

Sealle (talk) 18:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

These images seem to be out of scope. The tables are better done as a wikitable and the logo seems to be a personal logo of no use for people other than the artist.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2013. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obs.: I found several uncategorized Minecraft related screenshots etc. which I categorized in this category after iniciating this DR. Please evaluate these files too. Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2014. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. JurgenNL (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Various screenshots, logos and textures from Minecraft (which isn't freely licensed)

Logos
Screenshots
Derivative works of Minecraft textures

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of a non-free video game, thus making these images non-free deriative works.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense to me. I understand that Minecraft is closed source so a general screenshot of landscape that was generated by the program or programmers would not be my work. But there are a huge number of photos of real buildings in the Wikimedia Commons. The person who took that photo of a building probably didn't build the building, they only took the photo. Isn't that "derivative" work? I made that Bitcoin icon myself with several hours of labor, and then I took the photos/screenshots. Two parts of the creative process were my own and that creative work would not exist without my significant efforts. Can the brick maker sue the architect for his "derivative" work? And then the architect sue the photographer for using their building in the photographic "derivative" work? If what I posted is illegal to post, then it shouldn't be, and we should fight stupid laws like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatljuice (talk • contribs) 00:40, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

All real buildings have copyrights, until they expire. In many countries, Commons photographs are permitted by laws which specifically exempt the photographs from being derivative works, see COM:FOP. However, that is a bad analogy. Think, instead, of drawings of real buildings, including both the architectural drawings used to construct them, renderings used to show them before construction, and post construction drawings. All of them have copyrights and you will not see them on Commons without a specific license from the creator.
The brick maker cannot sue because bricks aren't copyrighted, but the architect can sue a photographer in many countries (those with no FOP law) and can sue someone who copies his drawings in every country.
Copyright law is not stupid. If it were not for copyright laws, few people would go to the effort of writing books or creating sculptures, because they could not earn money for doing it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that my analogy isn't perfect, but I think it's closer to accurate than yours James. Copies, or photos of architectural drawings would be more like copies or photos of computer code. A more accurate analogy would be if I went to Disneyland and built a tower out of foam blocks that are supplied by Disney and then took a picture of my creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, you are wrong. As I noted above, there are explicit exemptions in some countries for photographs of actual buildings. Minecraft is not buildings. Your Disney block creation would be a sculpture. In any event, with limited exceptions which don't apply here, every created work has a copyright. While there are exceptions for actual buildings (and other things) in some countries, any other copy of such a work is a copyvio. Since no exception applies to computer generated works anywhere, this is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're saying I'm wrong about. I'm trying to come up with an analogy that we can agree on so that arguments can be made from some sort of common ground. I understand that legally there may be a problem. I don't claim to know international IP law (I live in the US). I do believe that if there are laws that restrict what I posted, then those laws should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]



Let's start from scratch. There is nothing international about this -- it is all US law and Commons rules. One of two things is true. Either:
  • You drew these completely from your own mind with no reference to anything on Minecraft, or
  • These are derived from or use images or parts of images from Minecraft.
In the first case, they are your personal creations and we do not keep personal art from non-notable artists, see COM:SCOPE.
In the second case, your images are derivative works of the copyrighted work of other people and therefore must be deleted as copyvios.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Jim, derivative works from a copyrighted game artworks. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded 2015. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above.

Gunnex (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than "Other stuff doesn't exist", do you have a policy-based reason for deletion? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COM:L. Screenshots of a non-free video game (COM:SS). Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Self-promotional logo uploads and artwork by non-notable individuals. Out of scope, and on top of that many are likely copyvios.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots and assets from a copyrighted video game. I wonder how many of these I'll actually have to make.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What part of File:Discobeat Skin.png is Mojang's IP? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch on that one, I would've said the background but it doesn't appear to be Mojang's textures. However, we still can't be sure whether the background is freely licensed. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be the personal player model skin used by the uploader. From the publicly available logs at de.wp it appears that this may have been used for a self-promotional article that was deleted speedily – which raises the additional question of COM:SCOPE. --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment maybe a warning message equivalent to {{NoUploads}} might help to keep new uploads to the category down a little bit? --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Skin de Diamantum576.jpg has a watermark from novaskin.me/wallpapers, a page that seems to provide a functionality where you can place your own player skin into a pre-made wallpaper. They use CC-BY-SA-NC as a license for their stuff, so even if the background image was their own (which I'm tempted to doubt based on the other clearly non-free stuff they use) we can't keep it. --El Grafo (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:The Feed The Beast Launcher.png seems to show a separate software called Feed The Beast Launcher, which is licensed {{Apache}}. The screenshot shows logos for different Minecraft modpacks which might not be part of that license, however. Don't know if these might qualify for COM:De minimis/{{De minimis}}? --El Grafo (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the page to show the Apache license, rather than the CC-own work claim. Checking the Feed the Beast modpack list the modpacks included in the screenshot are All Rights Reserved, which I would assume includes the logo too. I'm not too sure about de minimis either, especially since one of the logos cover a decent amount of the image, but in the worst case the logos could be edited out in order to keep the image. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'd like to point out that the three which are struck out and stated to be "in use" are likely all COM:COPYVIOs as they are COM:DW of copyrighted game "Minecraft". A copyvio "in use" does not become ineligible to delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The last one (File:Tinkers Construct smeltery.png) is fine, I think: It doesn't contain anything from the original game, everything displayed comes from the Tinkers Construct mod which has a free license. --El Grafo (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment (Edit conflict) Not all of these files were nominated as copyright violations, some were also nominated as out of scope.
-Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of Minecraft, or derivative content using textures owned by Mojang.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The head of the skin appears to me to be a derivative of the Pig that appears in Minecraft, and I'd also imagine there was some issue with the Spider-Man uniform too. Either way, out of scope. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations or out of scope uploads.

Copyright violations
Out of scope

--Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voglio farti notare che la dichiarazione sulla immagine File:Herobrine skin ver. mod.png, non è esatta, non risulta nessuna copyright della Mojang su questo personaggi perché il personaggio è stato creato dalla comunità di Minecraft, inoltre l’immagine non deriva dal videogioco e stata realizzata dall’autore che la pubblicata, soprattutto il personaggio è una creepy-pasta ispirato a Minecraft. Inoltre Notch ha più volte dichiarato che il personaggio non esiste nel videogioco. Per tanto Mojang non ha mai avuto copyright sul questo personaggio immaginario. Qualsiasi riferimento della Mojang su Herobrine e solamente uno scherzò che fa alla comunità. Inoltre dire che l’immagine e derivato della skin del giocatore predefinito di Minecraft, ti poso dire che è deriva solo dalle abilità del autore della immagine che la realizzato in SVG e poi la salvato su http://minecraft.gamepedia.com in formato PNG.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 08:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter whether Mojang claim ownership or acknowledge the character, as this representation of it was made by modifying Minecraft textres. The Herobrine skin is clearly a derivative work of the Steve skin. Making minor modifications by colouring the eyes white and adding a smile does not mean that the editor now owns rights to the skin, thus they are not able to release the image under a free license. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Additonally, even if it were the sole authorship of the uploader on Gamepedia, the image is only licensed CC-BY-NC, which is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. The source has no mention of the GDFL license that you claimed when uploading the file. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Su questo ti posso dare una spiegazione, essendo che non esiste il Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) o perché non sono riuscito a trovarlo (probabilmente e stato nominato sotto un altro nome). Ho caricato immagine sotto la licenza che l’autore mia detto che era adeguata. Se mi stai dicendo che l’immagine come il colore della pelle e legata al copyright, l’immagine e composta da geometria semplice e colori che formano l’immagine non possono essere considerati come materiale protetto da copyright perché comuni a tutti, Non supera quindi la soglia di originalità. Inoltre cito il trademark.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


As the creator of File:Flag of Satigris.svg I do not object to its deletion. I don't even remember why I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons, to be honest. Bowwow828 (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations (including screenshots and derivative works) and out of scope uploads related to Minecraft. Copyright violations

Out of scope

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Herobrine.png

Previously {{copyvio|1=© Mojang Studios. The fact that they state that they are "quite relaxed about non-commercial things" is not enough per COM:Licensing – commercial reuse MUST be allowed for all files at Commons.}}, see User_talk:Herobrine303. The uploader removed the copyvio tag without starting a regular deletion request, so here we go.

This is a derivative work of the original default Minecraft Steve player skin (the old one, before he got a shave, low-res version of the original image here). Similar or identical files have been deleted repeatedly in the past (CTRL+F Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft for "herobrine.png"), so I don't think {{PD-ineligible}} applies. --El Grafo (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close: already deleted as noted above. Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are of a Minecraft Papercraft Chess board. The artwork on all the pieces is from the game Minecraft (by Mojang AB) and Pixel Papercraft may also arguably hold some copyright in the chess designs. These photos seem to exceed COM:DM, as the only purpose/value in the photos is to showcase the copyrighted artwork (i.e. blacking out the copyrighted parts would mean blocking out basically the entire photo). COM:DM Sweden would apply since Mojang AB is a Swedish company, and from the few examples listed on that page, it seems Sweden may have even stricter laws than the U.S., making it more likely these are not de minimis.

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope.

Leonel Sohns 15:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I've tagged a few of these for speedy deletion as clear copyvios, and the rest I agree are out of scope. –IagoQnsi (talk) 02:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Four of these were speedy deleted as copyright violations. The remainder aren't screenshots, so weren't speedy deleted, though I do agree with the deletion nomination. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png is lacking a bit of an explanation, but it could hypothetically be used in some sort of expert guide on how to select a volume using commands. Not sure on that none.  Delete all of the remaining ones as out of scope. Especially File:MoistMeter.pdf, which as far as I can tell is just made-up nonsense. --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is out of project scope as unused logo of non-notable organization. This is self-promotional user's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Also this is small photo without metadata, so it can be not own work, but copyright violation. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:20, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is out of project scope as unused text logo of non-notable company. Also, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution (others are either deleted or reverted). Taivo (talk) 07:27, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iran, but the sculptor/architect died in 2014. I suspect copyright violation. Permission from author's heirs is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think, that it is not logo of en:Bomba (band), because this is an Australian band, but the uploader is Russian and the word "bomba" has meaning "bomb" in Russian. Probably this is out of project scope as unused logo of non-notable band. Taivo (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iran. The sculptor died in 2014. I suspect copyright violation. Permission from sculptor's heirs is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist died in 2014. I suspect copyright violation. OTRS-permission from artist's heirs is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is own photo, but probably not own sculpture. I suspect copyright violation. Who is the sculptor and when did (s)he die? The sculptor (if dead, then heirs) must send OTRS-permission. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Trajan33

edit

Here are last contributions of Trajan33 (talk · contribs):

They are both out of project scope as unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Aadilmalik006

edit

Here are both contributions of Aadilmalik006 (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dakelmusic

edit

Here are both contributions of DakelMusic (talk · contribs):

Unused personal files are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dakelmusic (talk · contribs)

edit

personal images, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Julioreylagarto

edit

Julioreylagarto (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Consell Esportiu Baix Llobregat

edit

Consell Esportiu Baix Llobregat (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ArmyMan007

edit

ArmyMan007 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

They are out of project scope as unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ritzo Pérez

edit

Here are last remaining contributions of Ritzo Pérez (talk · contribs):

They are unused .pdf-files, probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ncognateaux

edit

Here are last contributions of Ncognateaux (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jthomsan

edit

Here are last remaining contributions of Jthomsan (talk · contribs):

Two unused personal photos, one book cover. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 11:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Liebesland

edit

Liebesland (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

The first of them is copyright violation, two lasts are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of VICTORIA BRIGGS

edit

Here are all contributions of VICTORIA BRIGGS (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be Own work.    FDMS  4    11:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlaaBalaa

edit

Here are last remaining contributions of Alaa8alaa (talk · contribs):

They are small unused logos. Companys' notability is questionable, own work dubious. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Soukarsha Dutta

edit

Here are last remaining contributions of Soukarsha Dutta (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Elvenpath666

edit

Here are last remaining contributions of Elvenpath666 (talk · contribs):

They are small photos without metadata and I suspect copyright violation. The uploader is indefinitely blocked for uploading copyvios. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Cronista

edit

Cronista (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

They are small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. The uploader is indefinitely blocked. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jipjoy1939

edit

Here are all contributions of Jipjoy1939 (talk · contribs):

You bought the paintings, but you did not buy their copyright. OTRS-permission from heirs of artist is needed (artist died in 2014). Taivo (talk) 12:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of EDventure Intl

edit

Here are last remaining contributions of EDventure Intl (talk · contribs):

They are small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Oemoemenoe

edit

Oemoemenoe (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

These are anonymous works from 1940. Some of them are published under license "author is dead over 70 years", but how do you know that, if the author is unknown? If author lived only 5 years more, then they are not in public domain. Some of them are published under Creative Commons license, which did not exist in 1940. Explanation is needed, how this is possible. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked KOLROX photography. Confirmation that the uploader (who is likely the subject) is the copyright holder should be sent to COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:49, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by User:Ezarate as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:09, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ok !

edit

ok pas de problème si elle vous semble pas assez propre, a l'occase je mettrais une autre.


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aslot (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Essentially a text PDF, not permitted per COM:SCOPE Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There may be copyright issues with this image Richard Avery (talk) 14:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add for deletion Manga.afternoon (talk · contribs)'s all other photos. None of them has EXIF data. Strange and different watermarks, different photographers. An explanation is needed, maybe OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heyula91 (talk · contribs)

edit

Non-trivial logos.

Juggler2005 (talk) 15:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work, false license claims.

Juggler2005 (talk) 15:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work, small res, no EXIF.

Juggler2005 (talk) 15:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heyula91 (talk · contribs)

edit

Derivative works. Even the one really large photo contains pictures of pictures.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Souradip Ghosh Muna (talk · contribs)

edit

Self-promotion, out of project scope.

Aftab (talk) 15:50, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal vanity photo. Out of scope.  Delete --Moheen Reeyad (talk) 06:34, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not used, out of scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan eines CD-Covers, der Hochlader ist nicht erkennbar der Urheber des Bildes Alnilam (talk) 19:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional, see description, some homepage material Motopark (talk) 19:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

К сожалению, на памятники пока не распространяется свобода панорамы. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia. Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cesarcarrera (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, 2 files - per exif - attributed to photographer & copyrights "Miguel Angel Fernandez Melendez". File:Jack Queralt.jpg needs permission from http://www.cesarcarrera.com/esp/actores/jack.html = = http://www.cesarcarrera.com/images/fotos/actores/jack/jack-300-1.jpg (last modified: 02.2014, see also Facebook).

Gunnex (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image: arabic.cri.cn Alexf (talk) 22:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, non-free software visible ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free artwork on the bus. Because the image would be useless without the artwork, de minimis does not apply. RJaguar3 (talk) 03:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright protected Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения разрешения правообладателя на размещение фото и статьи на Викискладе Dogad75 (talk) 06:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright protected Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a picture for deleted page on Arabic Wikipedia. Personal picture Ziad (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope - only edit of this user Cholo 3 (talk) 07:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, cropped from the fifth image at http://impmagination.com/people/dt.html John of Reading (talk) 07:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Building by Santiago Calatrava Valls. There is no Freedom of panorama in France.
Cette œuvre de Santiago Calatrava Valls ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement explicite de l'auteur, a fortiori pour une publication sous licence libre (pas de liberté de panorama). Trizek from FR 08:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no FoP in France Ymblanter (talk) 18:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Susanne Purviance is still alive and no permission is available Eingangskontrolle (talk) 08:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 18:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Qantas A380 in Dallas from User:Baseball Watcher

edit

These images have been uploaded with the following licensing information:

"Given permission by author via to share image on Qantas Flight 7 and 8 Wikipedia article"

They have not been been tagged with a license. --AHeneen (talk) 01:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free artwork on the bus; as the design of the bus is the entire point of having the image, it is not de minimis. RJaguar3 (talk) 03:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free artwork on the bus and trailer. Because the image would be useless without the artwork, de minimis does not apply. RJaguar3 (talk) 03:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed a watermark on it so I have nothing to add in this matter. --Goran tek-en (talk) 17:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The visual identification of this bus depends on its non-free artwork. Copyright protected; bus cannot be visually identified using a free image. --SethAllen623 (discussion) 19:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt the authenticity of the "own work" statement: small size, no EXIF/IPTC, uncropped versions of the image are present on the web (http://vk.com/biankareal). Eusebius (talk) 07:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" statement. Relatively small size, no EXIF/IPTC, larger versions found on the web ([1]) and in particular on mtv.ru ([2]). Eusebius (talk) 19:42, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 00:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Alexander (обсуждение) 08:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although it can be claimed it's a "simple" logotype, it's far from comprising simple or trivial geometrical shapes. IMO the artwork goes beyond the threshold of originality and therefore subject to copyright

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 09:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of the TV show community Ballofstring (talk) 09:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paulomedford (talk · contribs)

edit

After today identifying around 15 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different blogs, news sites, skyscrapercity etc., now 35 tags on his User talk:Paulomedford) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. All files related to Brazilian municipality pt:Feira de Santana. Files with exif "Fujifilm FinePix JX280" are most likely his own works and are not nominated.

Additional info:

Related:


Gunnex (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:05, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paulomedford (talk · contribs)

edit

2nd nomination (see above). After already having identified around 15 uploads as copyvio in 10.2013 (grabbed from different blogs, news sites, skyscrapercity etc., now 39 tags on his User talk:Paulomedford) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user ("serial copyright violator") uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Mostly all files related to Brazilian municipality pt:Feira de Santana. Files with exif "Fujifilm FinePix JX280" are most likely his own works and are not nominated.

Additional info:

Related (already closed DRs):


Gunnex (talk) 10:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 23:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material, out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 15:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the resort is notable, but 1) own work is dubious, 2) if you choose to delete, then delete also file:COSTA CHICA BANDERA 3.jpg. Taivo (talk) 17:08, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 23:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building pictured here has been designed by Renzo Piano, an architect who is still alive. This work is protect as an architectural work of art and can't be freely shared, as there's no freedom of panorama in France. Pymouss Let’s talk - 15:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 23:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is not a free site or OTRS compatible. Yanguas (talk) 15:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is not a free site or OTRS compatible. Yanguas (talk) 15:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as "own work" but I doubt this. It is a photographic representation of a three-dimensional (not two-dimensional) object. It belongs to the Museum and there's no indication of permission, which they appear to require (see http://www.carnavalet.paris.fr/en/professional/all-pr-s-pp-s-and-visual-boards/reproduction-orders where procedures for arranging photography are given.) Quite the opposite: you can see the reflection of the lights, indicating an amateurish (possibly clandestine) photograph rather than a properly set up session. (Permission to photograph is not the same as copyright, but lack of permission to photograph is a data point.)

Do not know Copyright law of France but photographer has possibly made the decision on lighting, angle, and how much to include, so this is probably not a purely mechanical reproduction, which in most jurisdictions does not transfer copyright. Herostratus (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 16:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably not own works: small size, no EXIF data.

Yann (talk) 15:18, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, File:Gaga.jpg appeared in Daily Mirror before the uploader uploaded it here. Some (most) files appear in a forum http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?p=21412686#21412686 transcluded from gagaimages.org example in much larger size. --Martin H. (talk) 05:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add all his other contributions also for deletion due to same reason. Sergei Kutyi continued uploading copyright violations and I blocked him for a week. Two photos have EXIF data, but camera is different. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 23:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (4 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.6.207 16:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work without metadata https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/i-wish-you-peace/id340600345 37.5.6.207 17:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:46, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joady Lohr has requested that this photo of her be deleted from Commons. ALantz (WMF) (talk) 17:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Good photo, I'd like to decline the request. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused staff personal pic - no reason to decline a courtesy request in this case. INeverCry 23:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work", but without metadata. Yanguas (talk) 17:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Windalis operating system is not really operating system; it is fake. All Wikipedia pages about Windalis were deleted. DrSauron (talk) 19:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That case file:WEirDesktop.png and file:Logo WPHP.png should also be deleted. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 23:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве (см. http://www.rzpribor.aaanet.ru/images/LogoB.png), нет подтверждения авторских прав (http://www.rzpribor.aaanet.ru/). Dogad75 (talk) 21:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear indication of being in-scope. Ubcule (talk) 22:42, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no FoP in Russia for scupltures Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC) La Fédération de Russie Panneau d'avertissement[reply]

Cet ouvrage contient une image d'une œuvre d'architecture, d'art visuel ou photographique, qui est installé dans un lieu public en Russie et est protégé par le droit d'auteur . Selon la quatrième partie du Code civil de la Fédération de Russie № 230-FZ du 18 Décembre 2006:ur __________________________ Bonjour :Ymblanter, je ne savais pas que cette statue, qui est installée dans un lieu public en Russie était protégée par le droit d'auteur.. Bien cordialement --P.A.- Leclercq (talk) 20:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de problemes. Je suis desolé.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image, not realistically usable. Fry1989 eh? 03:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In use does not make something usable. There is of course also the copyright status that is not determinable. Fry1989 eh? 05:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Being in use proves that something is usable. Commons is not the editorial board of all other Wikimedia projects. The projects decide on their own what they consider to be usable content. Simply by using it. It's not on us to override their decision. --Rotkraut (talk) 20:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No it most certainly does not! That's a ridiculous oversimplification that suggests I can upload File:Smiley face with no title.svg and insert it on an article about physics and that makes it useful. The resolution of this image is so poor that it is unusable, whether it has been inserted somewhere ore not. You also have no addressed the copyright status. Fry1989 eh? 21:50, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fry1989, we have policies here in Commons. Deletion requests must have a reason. Valid reasons for deletions are listed in COM:DG. The only valid reason to delete a file that comes halfway close to your not usable would be Out of scope. What is in project scope is defined in COM:SCOPE. This document clearly states that "A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose".
On the copyright status, you have by now not given any hint on what issue you see here. --Rotkraut (talk) 05:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The file is very small (60×63), but it is used in en.wiki and so automatically in scope. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Unless the copyright status it determined, I will renominate on the basis of an invalid keep. Just making that clear for the both of you who so far have completely chosen to ignore that question. Fry1989 eh? 17:56, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 20:50, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made it clear I would renominate this if the copyright status is not addressed. There is every reason to believe the Tri-Service Badge of the Pakistan Armed Forces is copyrighted. Unless there is evidence it is not, the "in use" excuse means nothing, it must go. Fry1989 eh? 22:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I see here a ring, which is divided into 3 equal sectors. Sectors have different colors. This does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then you are deliberately ignoring the truth, as each sector clearly contains the coat of arms/badge of the three services in the Pakistan Armed Forces, that of the Navy, Air Force and Army. The resolution does not change the copyright status. Fry1989 eh? 18:00, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Fry1989: If there are multiple reasons to delete a file, please put them all into the original deletion request. Thank you. --Krd 14:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. --Krd 14:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality picture, the angle is good however it is not very clear EurovisionNim 05:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

 Delete There is 38 photos in category:Honda CR-V (4th generation), mostly very similar, and this is worst of them. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Poor quality, not used. Yann (talk) 20:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License template doesn't fit the context. Stamps are not exempt from copyright. —Andrei S. Talk 05:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 20:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama for 2-dimensional works in Thailand. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - This looks to me like a photo of big signs that are set up at ancient monument sites by the Thai Tourism Department. I doubt that this is a copyright violation. If yes, there are many many other photos of similar signs in WikimediaCommons. --hdamm (talk) 10:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If there are many other photos of similar signs in Commons, then a lot of them should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 18:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Far from comprising simple geometrical forms. IMO this logotype goes beyong the threshold of originality Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 09:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's licence do not come from "simple forms". It was uploaded by the official Doha Stadium account at Flickr with this type of licence. Was it was intentional? - that's another question. ARvєδuι + 12:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I am afraid that is not correct. The Flickr account is not owned by the entity responsible for Doha 2020. It is owned by a magazine. The first line on the Flickr home page https://www.flickr.com/people/66463488@N06 is
"We are Qatar's exclusive sports magazine!"
That is also clear at its web page, http://www.dohastadiumplusqatar.com/. The Flickr account has many images licensed as CC-BY for which it is completely clear that the magazine does not own the copyright -- massive Flickrwashing -- so there is no reason to believe that the Flickr account has any right to license the Doha 2020 logo. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:35, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The left hand blurred composition is far from comprising simple or trivial geometrical shapes Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 09:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by user Biviosion (talk · contributions · Statistics)in 08.2014 the photo was previously published via http://www.rightlivelihood.org/herren_pictures.html (© Right Livelihood Award Foundation.) = http://www.rightlivelihood.org/typo3temp/pics/ca70f4f5be.jpg (last modified: 01.2014), given credits to "Credit: Wolfgang Schmidt)". rightlivelihood.org is the official site for en:Right Livelihood Award, the "Alternative Nobel Prize", in German "Alternativer Nobelpreis" (see file title).

See also http://www.rightlivelihood.org/36.html ("Legal Notice & Terms of Use"): "Texts, photos and other contents not marked with a copyright notice may be freely copied and distributed unless otherwise indicated. (...) Photos that must not be reposted without prior permission by the rightsholder are marked with a copyright notice holding the photographer's name or contact information.". Considering the credit "Wolfgang Schmidt", permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 10:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally nominating:

which, considering exif-infos, was taken by photographer "Corinne Corradi". Per https://www.facebook.com/corinne.corradi.9 "Corinne Corradi" was "Project Coordination Officer at Biovision Foundation", so a relation with "Biovision" might be possible. Nevertheless a permission may be appropriate. Gunnex (talk) 10:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of しゅんしゅん

edit

しゅんしゅん (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Japan for 2-dimensional works. OTRS-permission from author is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These cases are very different. The linked case was about 3-dimensional object, but we are discussing here 2-dimensional object. In the linked case it was decided, that the object is de minimis, in the photos here this does not apply. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to Commons:De minimis "Copyrighted work X is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work, so that the larger work cannot easily be shown without showing X. X is a part of the larger work, and its inclusion is unavoidable." I think that the part of the picture is included to photograph the whole view of this gate anyhow. According to Japan "Some buildings like the Tower of the Sun can be regarded as artistic works." I do not see this gate is artistic work.--Y.haruo (talk) 15:50, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per Taivo. Not covered by FoP-Japan. Yann (talk) 20:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is nothing but a mixture of a photo of a mountain goat and a photo of a red fox. This is certainly derivative work. Also, goats and foxes are not alike. Dahus do not have foxes' features. Scottishwildcat12 (talk) 14:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Derioative art. Just a mountain goat and fox combined together. Dahus do not have foxes' features. Scottishwildcat12 (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rendering from the architect which has no premssion for usage Jerchel (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: No permission. Yann (talk) 21:00, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused private image - out of scope (I cannot think of any value for storage documentation) Cholo 3 (talk) 12:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Borderline case ... Is it possible to use this for illustrating "Do not store anything in unsigned cans! Sign everything!"? But the file is not categorized. I'm not sure, how to categorize it. Taivo (talk) 14:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, low quality replaceable image Krd 14:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Edustus (talk) 10:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 11:00, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 11:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 11:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 11:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 11:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect license, it cannot be used for commercial purposes Esv (talk) 11:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC BY-NC-SA license Green Giant (talk) 19:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file was uploaded by me but I need to delete it to have a redirect of an updated image. Best, AJona1992 (talk) 16:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of userpage file. Green Giant (talk) 18:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing permission Lady Lotus (talk) 16:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission (OTRS) from author A. Carle. 217.186.200.253 19:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NIE ISTNIEJE means "does not exist" according to Bing – there is no need to upload such images for monuments we don't have photos of …    FDMS  4    00:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file can be used in multiple ways. I recategorized it. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, if you think so.    FDMS  4    11:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Skyline_Dortmund.jpg#file DortmunderWestfront (talk) 07:27, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bitte um Löschung dieser Datei auch wenn sie bereits seit 2007 unter der freien Lizenz auf wikipedia genutzt wird. Ursprung der Datei ist nicht eindeutig und rechtlich nachvollziehbar.

Danke! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DortmunderWestfront (talk • contribs) 2014-10-01T07:29:21‎ (UTC)

Google Translate: "I beg to delete this file even if it is being used since 2007 under the free license on wikipedia. Origin of the file is not unique and legally traceable."
But it is possible to trace the origin - you are the uploader and claim that this is your own work? And apparently CNN found the photo useful. Thuresson (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
License is not revokable. If you are not the creator of this image, please explain in detail why you uploaded it as own work. --Krd 13:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above Krd 13:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. User:Anceranana didn't receive a permission from Arthur Tsutsiev, the original author of this map. This map was taken from Arthur Tsutsiev's Atlas of The Ethnopolitical History of The Caucasus. 2. User:Anceranana on purpose changed the original map. Currently nominated-for-deletion map shows incorrect and never existed borders. Please compare the borders of the city of Vladikavkaz (Владикавказ) on the original map and the one uploaded by the User:Anceranana. -Taamu (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Newpicturecj (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Newpicturecj: I contributed these photos of a public figure, former award winning adult actress Aurora Snow, that I took myself. She is a good friend and I was displeased with the poor quality images on her wikipedia page. Please do not delete these photos, as they are superior images compared to what is currently available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newpicturecj (talk • contribs)
 Keep The subject is notable (look category). The photos are big and they have EXIF data. I see no reason for deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Yes the subject is notable, but did you check to see what camera was used in the EXIF? Here's what I see:
  • Aurora Snow fairytale.JPG - Sony DSC-F828
  • Aurora Snow girl with glasses.jpg- Canon EOS REBEL T3i
  • Aurora Snow on set.JPG - Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL
  • Aurora Snow sex kitten.jpg - Sony CYBERSHOT
  • Aurora Snow all American cutie.jpg - Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
  • Aurora Snow fuzzy hat.jpg - Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
The remainder (Aurora Snow in Missouri.jpg, Aurora Snow with fiance C.J. Johnson.jpg and Aurora Snow Pismo Beach.jpg) either don't have EXIF data or don't mention the camera in it. So six shots and 5 different cameras?? Methinks someone has some 'splaining to as to why they shouldn't all be cleared away as probable copyvios. Especially since one of the images (Aurora Snow Pismo Beach) can be found elsewhere here. Tabercil (talk) 14:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Uploader may actually be CJ Johnson. Did a google search of all the images and they only point to the commons. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am Aurora Snow's fiance C.J. Johnson, and although I am new to Wikimedia I was hoping to contribute new photos for her page that are superior to the one's currently available. These are all photos either I took, or Aurora had me take with one of her cameras. Between us we have nine cameras, including the camera that took the Aurora Snow Pismo Beach.jpg (a Panasonic GH4, only that is actually a screen grab -- from my iMac -- from a 4K video I shot on the beach that day. It is part of a documentary I am working on about her.) That particular photo was shared by Aurora publicly, which is why it is appearing on someone's blog. I would appreciate it if the nomination for deletion was removed on the images, but if you must delete them please instruct me on how to prove that I took images in the future, and what the correct method is for uploading superior images to her Wikimedia. Also, that pic of her that is up on her Wikipedia page is NOT AT ALL what she looks like now. That was taken in 2009 when she was heavy after her brother's accident -- she wasn't going to the gym because she was by her brother's and nephew's side most of the time. She just had our son Quentin in December of 2013 and has since lost all of the baby weight. I am happy to upload a series of photos of her, holding a sign or something, proving this is all true and that we own the copyrights. Thank you for your time. Newpicturecj (talk) 20:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If you are the copyright holder, please see COM:OTRS Krd 11:00, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Daulethan

edit

Here are all contributions of Daulethan (talk · contribs):

There is no freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan, but they all seem to me modern buildings. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep files File:Вид 3 астана.jpg and File:Вид4 астана.jpg and File:Вид астаны.jpg and File:Фонтан вид2.jpg and File:Хан шатыр из далека.jpg as they show street panorama, specific buildings are not the main object and File:Монета на фоне хан шатыра.jpg shows a coin.--Avala (talk) 13:02, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom and I disagree with Avalan's analasys Natuur12 (talk) 11:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]