Commons:Categories for discussion/Archive/2016/09
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Categories for discussion.
You can visit the most recent archive here.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2008 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2009 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2010 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2011 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2012 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2013 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2014 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2015 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2017 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2018 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2019 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2020 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2021 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2022 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2023 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 2024 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Archive September 2016
Category that has become empty by the movement of the file. To request the deletion.--M-sho-gun (talk) 03:14, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination A result of the search in the Commons, because the useful files belonging to this category is found, withdraw the deletion request.--M-sho-gun (talk) 03:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: No problem, kept without any action. --Achim (talk) 17:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Category:A manual of bird study, issued by the American Museum of Natural History - samples of bird plates available for color work by pupils in the New York City schools (1927)
editAccidentally created duplicate category of Category:To_accompany_A_manual_of_bird_study,_issued_by_the_American_Museum_of_Natural_History_(1927) Mvolz (talk) 16:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted. @Mvolz: In the future, feel free to fix this kind of uncontroversial mistake yourself using either {{Category redirect}} or {{Bad name}}. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion crap uploaded by sock puppet of User:Alex9777777. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Иван Сафранов. jdx Re: 09:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- He is playing games with us. --Achim (talk) 11:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted by A.Savin. --Achim (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete this category, I accidentally created it SecretName101 (talk) 21:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 14:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
prodej obrazů 37.188.231.202 03:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Google-translated: "Sale of paintings". --Achim (talk) 06:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Unclear request, kept without further action. --Achim (talk) 07:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Typo, please delete (*T*ransport) Liberaler Humanist (talk) 23:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- I've placed a {{Bad name}} template, so an admin will probably delete it soon. For future reference, the bad name template can be used in cases like this without the need for discussion here. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted by INC 8 September 2016. --Achim (talk) 07:36, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Deletion request: Category appears to be intended for the same person as the existing category "Hub van Doorne". This person's name is mostly spelt "Hub" and not "Huub". Zv0486~commonswiki (talk) 13:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed: Per d:Q729781, nl:wp and VIAF Hub van Doorne. --Achim (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Redirected to Category:Hub van Doorne. --Achim (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
This is a second (empty) category for the same person with a slightly different spelling. The main category for this person is Category:Stasys Eidrigevicius. The two categories should be merged. Zv0486~commonswiki (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Confirmed: Per d:Q2094584 all 7 wikis including lt:wp say Stasys Eidrigevičius, most authority control links list both spellings, LoC says Eidrigevicius. --Achim (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved to Category:Stasys Eidrigevičius and redirected thereto, linked to wikidata object. --Achim (talk) 20:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
No need of this category for just two files. These files were also part of Param Vir Chakra recipients Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 01:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Keep I see no problem with having a category for two files. Otherwise, the files have to be individually categorized in a lot of different categories. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Kept. --Achim (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Isn't the birth of Mary; is the birth of Jesus Heliodora90 (talk) 19:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Fixed the categorisation of 2 images, the subcat seems to be ok, so this cat should be kept now as it is. --Achim (talk) 19:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: No objections to keep it. --Achim (talk) 17:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
هل يمكنا ان اتعرف سبب قرش في بحر 105.137.50.169 11:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Kept: Seems to be a comment or a statement, nothing to do. --Achim (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
This catogory should be deleted, as the name contains an error. Hinnerk R (talk) 17:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted: Empty, author's request. --Achim (talk) 18:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete, it was an error to create this category with a singular name instead of the correct plural name category:Looped squares Karl432 (talk) 22:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted: Empty, requested by author,. --Achim (talk) 13:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of Category:Dům U Topičů Jklamo (talk) 21:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, but [1] and [2] and [3] say Topičův dům. --Achim (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi to all. Actually I've never heard of Dům U Topičů before. It's either Topičův dům or Topičův salon. Thanks, --Vítek 08:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- It is used as well ([4] [5]), but I have no strong opinion about name, so feel free to rename. But having two categories (and one as subcategory of second) on same building is nonsense. --Jklamo (talk) 07:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi to all. Actually I've never heard of Dům U Topičů before. It's either Topičův dům or Topičův salon. Thanks, --Vítek 08:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved to Category:Topičův dům via Commons Delinker. --Achim (talk) 17:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete: empty since 2014. Jahobr (talk) 19:31, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: When I created the category I also populated it with files. The more likely reason the category is currently empty is because the files it contained have been deleted. Mindmatrix 15:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Empty category. --INeverCry 21:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Name ändern. Der Name ist zu allgemein und kann zu Missverständnissen führen. Als neuer Name währe "Seebrücke (Lucerne)" besser. Hiddenhauser (talk) 08:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Support, allein in meiner näheren Umgebung gibt es mehrere "Seebrücken". Category:Seebrücke (Lucerne) entspricht auch den üblichen Namenskonventionen. --rimshottalk 22:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved Category:Seebrücke to Category:Seebrücke (Lucerne) leaving a disambiguation. --Achim (talk) 07:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Kategorie sollte gelöscht werden, da es unter category:Cultural heritage monuments in Sylt (Gemeinde), St. Martin (Morsum) schon gibt. Hiddenhauser (talk) 09:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Empty category Sakhalinio (talk) 16:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Empty category Sakhalinio (talk) 16:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
should probably be merged into Category:Buildings in Guilin Zv0486~commonswiki (talk) 14:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- I moved some things around in both categories, and I think it can be kept now. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Kept. Thanks to Auntof6 for cleaning up!. --Achim (talk) 18:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
not useful (brewery or monastery?) Mattes (talk) 10:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Well, that needed a closer look, I suggest the following changes:
- Category:Paulaner deals with the monastery, should be moved to Category:Paulaner monastery.
- Category:Paulaner should be kept as a disambiguation page
- Category:Paulaner-Brauerei deals with the brewery and should be moved to Category:Paulaner Brauerei (leaving a redirect) as that is its official (proper) name.
- Category:Paulaner, Munich might either be deleted or redirected to (then disambiguating) Category:Paulaner.
- --Achim (talk) 15:46, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: per above. --Achim (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
empty. useless Saqib (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Empty category. --Allforrous (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
misspelled 'Kannada', duplicate of correctly spelled category 47.150.68.26 04:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- I've put a {{Bad name}} template on it. An admin will probably delete it soon. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted by Taivo. --Achim (talk) 13:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
This category is redundant to Category:Companies of Yekaterinburg, so the content should be merged in and this cat deleted, as it does not, by its content, appear to be about a particular "Yekatarinburg Company". MSJapan (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Agree. --Achim (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Merged content to Category:Companies of Yekaterinburg and deleted Category:Yekaterinburg Company per dupe & out of naming scheme. --Achim (talk) 18:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
category should be renamed to Tickets of FIFA World Cup 173.55.239.44 02:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Why? That category exists already, and both are empty anyway. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Tickets of of FIFA World Cup is incorrect grammar, it's like saying the snowman hid in the the bush. Please fix grammar to Tickets of FIFA World Cup. --173.55.239.44 18:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved to Category:Tickets of FIFA World Cup. Cat is empty but carries a {{NoUploads}} warning. --Achim (talk) 17:56, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
This category does not actually contain anything that should be in a category about the tram line (the way the other categories in Category:Tram lines in Vienna are used).
It contains, as of now:
- one photo of a steam-powered tram with no line number, before the designation "360" had been invented for this route
- two photos (File:Mödling Bezirksmuseum 5920.JPG, File:Tramo kun pneŭoj.jpg) of fake/model trams that are decorated with the line number 360. Neither of them tell us anything interesting about the tram line
- the rest (including everything in the subcategory) are photos/diagrams of the tram track; all photos are actually from after its closure, showing merely where the tram track used to be)
But none of the other line categories in Vienna contain photos showing only the track – for good reason, because otherwise, if there are five tram lines on one track, we would need to categorize even photos showing only one tram of one line into all of their categories, which wouldn't be very useful to someone seeking to find photos about the tram line.
There is a category structure Category:Tram tracks in Vienna and so, in line with that, I propose that this be moved to Category:Tram track Rodaun–Mödling, which seems to have been the intention of most people who categorized in here. darkweasel94 17:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I have no problem to move the Category to Category:Tram track Rodaun–Mödling. Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!)
17:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I can only documentation, which the track like and not if this line was in Use. Because the line was adjusted on November 30 th 1967. I need some pictures, about the tracks for my project on regiowiki.at, an wikipedia similar Project only about Austria. Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 17:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nachdem da sowieso nur d-sprechende mitdiskutieren ;-): Für eine Umbenennung sehe ich kein Problem. Category:Tram track Rodaun–Mödling wäre auch entsprechender, denn der 360 fuhr nur ein kurzes Stück in Wien, der längere Teil befand sich zumindest in den letzten JAhren seines Bestehens in Niederösterreich. --K@rl (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Überprüfts bittschön noch die Kategorien. --Achim (talk) 19:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nachdem da sowieso nur d-sprechende mitdiskutieren ;-): Für eine Umbenennung sehe ich kein Problem. Category:Tram track Rodaun–Mödling wäre auch entsprechender, denn der 360 fuhr nur ein kurzes Stück in Wien, der längere Teil befand sich zumindest in den letzten JAhren seines Bestehens in Niederösterreich. --K@rl (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I can only documentation, which the track like and not if this line was in Use. Because the line was adjusted on November 30 th 1967. I need some pictures, about the tracks for my project on regiowiki.at, an wikipedia similar Project only about Austria. Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!)
Moved to Category:Tram track Rodaun–Mödling via CommonsDelinker per above consensus. --Achim (talk) 19:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Please rename the cat to Category:First Baptist Peddie Memorial Church. This is the official name. See also First Baptist Peddie Memorial Church. Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 22:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Confirmed per http://focus.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/72000774. --Achim (talk) 17:23, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Renamed via CommonsDelinker. --Achim (talk) 18:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
movimento futuro italia 195.94.166.218 16:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Nothing to do. --Achim (talk) 17:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
I think the Category:Santa Rosa should be a disambiguation page.
- Category:Santa Rosa, California
- Category:Santa Rosa, New Mexico
- Category:Santa Rosa (Aracruz)
- Category:Santa Rosa, Paraguay
- Category:Santa Rosa (Niterói)
- Category:Santa Rosa (Lara)
- Category:Santa Rosa (Rio Grande do Sul)
- Category:Santa Rosa, La Pampa
Additional Comment: The interwikilink to en.wikipedia is not effective. Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 20:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- That certainly seems reasonable to me. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Auntof6 (talk) 07:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Now a disambig page, thanks to Arnaud. --Achim (talk) 17:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Redundancy, we have Category:Cathedral of Talin, there is oly one Talin in Commons. Kareyac (talk) 17:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support merging into Category:Cathedral of Talin. --Achim (talk) 15:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved content to Category:Cathedral of Talin and left a redirect. --Achim (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
This category is very similar to "Category:Beauty pageant titleholders". Magnolia677 (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- They are similar. There are some cases where a titleholder didn't actually win a competition, but took over a title after the winner quit or was removed. An example is en:Suzette Charles, who took over as Miss America after Vanessa Williams resigned. English Wikipedia has both of them in the Miss America winners category, but Charles didn't initially win.
- It's also possible that there are or have been beauty pageants whose winners don't/didn't get an actual title; they would fit under winners, but not under titleholders. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks to Auntof6. I think a {{Cat see also}} should fit here. --Achim (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Kept, added {{Cat see also}} to both of them. --Achim (talk) 18:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
please delete. There existed already Untertor (Markdorf) Roland.h.bueb (talk) 17:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted, author's request. --Achim (talk) 17:12, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
unneccesary redirect Bossanoven (talk) 18:44, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted: Empty, author's request. --Achim (talk) 20:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Please delete. New Category is Category:Damaged bells of St. Michaelis-Kirche (Hamburg). Roland.h.bueb (talk) 18:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Roland.h.bueb: That category doesn't seem to exist. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Empty & bad name, replaced by Category:Damaged bells of St.-Michaelis-Kirche (Hamburg). --Achim (talk) 17:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
unneccesary redirect Bossanoven (talk) 23:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted, requested by author. --Achim (talk) 17:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
this conference is renamed "WikiConference North America", and I moved the 2014 and 2015 conference categories to the new name... Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:12, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: redirected. --Achim (talk) 20:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
lowercase n, not a proper name --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:49, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Moved to correct spelling. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. Thanks to Auntof6 for moving. --Achim (talk) 20:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
lower case n, not a proper name --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have moved it to the correct spelling. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 20:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete,self-made. Was already present under the name Category:Flags of municipalities of the Dominican Republic. Jos1950 (talk) 22:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- I moved all files to the correctly-named category and put a {{Bad name}} template on this one. (You could have done that, too, instead of creating this discussion.) An admin will probably delete the bad one soon. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- I did not know it existed and could only find the discussion tab. Thanks --Jos1950 (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted by INC 27 September 2016. --Achim (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
lower case e, not a proper name --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:06, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved to Category:French Scouting equipment. --Achim (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
n should be lower case, not a proper name, but should be plural, s at the end --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:38, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: via CommonsDelinker. --Achim (talk) 18:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Scouting is always capitalized in this sense in English, per Scouting WPMOS --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved to Category:Sculptures of Scouts via CommonsDelinker. --Achim (talk) 20:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
You mean Impatiens flanaganae. So delete the Category:Impatiens flanaganiae. Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 19:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted by Amada44. --Achim (talk) 19:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Contains almost all breeds of ponies and is obsolete after Commons:Categories for discussion/2016/04/Category:Ponies named horse. I suggest renaming to Ponies by breed and adding the handful of remaining breeds. rimshottalk 19:58, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Ping @Montanabw. --rimshottalk 20:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'd just delete it and upmerge contents to Category:Ponies. The distinction between horses and ponies is sometimes contentious (Icelandics and Minis are two examples where people fight quite strongly over the "horse or pony" question). To the extent we have "Horse by breed" we could maybe rename that one to "Horses and ponies by breed" and then everything will be able to fit in with less drama. Montanabw (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- I haven't a clue about horses nor ponies, so I moved the content one level up to Ponies. If someone likes to categorize the whole bunch by breed he might do so. --Achim (talk) 16:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted after having merged its content one level up. --Achim (talk) 16:39, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Mis-spelled title, moved to lilies Lobsterthermidor (talk) 14:55, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Lobsterthermidor: If you'd like this category deleted instead of redirected, you can use the {{Bad name}} template instead of {{Category redirect}}. The admins see those and take care of them. That can be done without discussion here. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't know that! Thanks, that will be very useful(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 18:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC))
- You're welcome. I saw that you tried to do that, but didn't get the syntax right so I fixed it. It should look like this when you use it:
{{bad name|Category:3 lilies of the Virgin Mary in heraldry}}
- --Auntof6 (talk) 20:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I saw that you tried to do that, but didn't get the syntax right so I fixed it. It should look like this when you use it:
- I didn't know that! Thanks, that will be very useful(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 18:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC))
Done: deleted. --lNeverCry 20:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Reasons for discussion request -Obsolete. This category was created to process a mass upload from RCE. It suggested labeling 15 files as "Sheddak", dutch for category:Sawtooth roofs. I moved all the files to that category.- — bertux 20:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Addition: All these RCE suggestions were lifted from the filenames and descriptions. Some were to the point, as the 49,963 (!) files in Category:Images from the Tropenmuseum proof. Other labels invite reactions like Thanks for the effort, like Vlag (Flag) and Kazerne (Barracks). What flag, what barracks?
- Even after removal of such categories, searches for suggested labels, e.g. Sluiskolk or Sluiskolk rce will still return these uploads — bertux 06:24, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Bertus, thanks for notifying. What about Category:RCE suggested: Tropenmuseum Amsterdam? --Achim (talk) 20:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Same stuff. As far as I know, all these RCE suggestions were meant to be temporary and no one in their right mind would add new files to these categories. If we want to be absolutely sure, we could contact people who assisted the upload process, but I can't see how removal of these categories could do harm. I found some more: Category:RCE suggested: Waddenzee, Category:RCE suggested: Sluiskolk, Category:RCE suggested: Sieranker. Speedy deletion may well be appropriate — bertux 21:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- I also emptied Category:RCE suggested: Vlag — bertux 21:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- And I found Category:RCE suggested: Brielle to be empty — bertux 12:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Same stuff. As far as I know, all these RCE suggestions were meant to be temporary and no one in their right mind would add new files to these categories. If we want to be absolutely sure, we could contact people who assisted the upload process, but I can't see how removal of these categories could do harm. I found some more: Category:RCE suggested: Waddenzee, Category:RCE suggested: Sluiskolk, Category:RCE suggested: Sieranker. Speedy deletion may well be appropriate — bertux 21:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Я автор этой категории, на основании этого требую её удалить! Ssp 1.618 (talk) 15:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Empty, deletion requested by author. --Achim (talk) 15:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Too much overlap with Category:Gorsedd y Beirdd (potential parent category). Propose deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry (talk) 03:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
There are several notable people with this name. Bossanoven (talk) 00:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have changed it from a redirect to a disambiguation category. I found two categories that fit in it. Feel free to add any other categories that fit. --Auntof6 (talk) 00:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: now a dab. --INeverCry (talk) 03:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
neckerchief should be lower case as not a proper name --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have moved the cat to the correct name. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry (talk) 03:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
neckerchief should be lower case, not proper name --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:07, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Moved to correct spelling. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:47, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry (talk) 03:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
lower case n, not a proper name --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Moved to correct spelling. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: deleted. --INeverCry (talk) 03:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
There are several notable people with this name. Bossanoven (talk) 18:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have changed this to a dab category. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: now a dab. --INeverCry (talk) 03:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Several people with this name Bossanoven (talk) 18:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Disambiguate into:
- then. Are there any others? --rimshottalk 18:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have made this a dab cat. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: now a dab. --INeverCry (talk) 03:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
It has a river with same name in Macedonia, see Category:Turija River (Macedonia). Ehrlich91 (talk) 18:18, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Possible solutions are:
- Put a hat note on each to refer to the other
- Move this page to a qualified name, and make this a dab cat
- I prefer the second option, because it will prevent some accidental categorizing in the wrong one. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- I also 2nd the 2nd option. --Achim (talk) 21:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved to Category:Turija River (Ukraine) and made Category:Turija River disambig. --Achim (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
just created this, bad name, used another... Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 17:04, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
I moved everything to Category:Wiki Ed at UCSF in October 2015 Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
User:105.168.6.99 tried to nominate this, I only fixed their errors. Anyway, the table above the category contents looks messy, as if editors left their notes on top of the category. This is unsuitable for readers and needs a fix. — bertux 12:10, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Did some cleanup, I think can be kept now the way it is. --Achim (talk) 19:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
lower case n, not a proper name --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Moved as requested, also made name plural. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. Thanks to Auntof6. --Achim (talk) 19:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
capitalize N as a proper name --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Auntof6: can you please take a look at this?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Done. I moved it to the requested name. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Done: Deleted. --Achim (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
I think the Category:Arcadia should be a disambiguation page.
- Category:Arcadia, Florida
- Category:Arcadia, California
- Category:Arcadia, Queensland
- Category:Arcadia, Pretoria
- Category:Arcadia, Nebraska
- Category:Arcadia, Oklahoma
- Category:Arcadia, Ohio
- Category:Arcadia, Greece or Category:Arcadia, Peloponnese
- Category:Arcadia (Odessa)
- Category:Arcádia (Miguel Pereira)
- Category:Arcadia, Headingley (Tavern)
--Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 00:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Thanks to Arnaud. --Achim (talk) 20:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure this is really finished. One still has to correct the many many links from the different wikipedias relating to the Greek Arcadia (which by far is the primary topic) now pointing to this disambiguation page.--Phso2 (talk) 10:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Antoniucci Voltigero is dead in 1989. No FoP in France. Besides, the artist is better known by the name of Antoniucci Volti (this cat. should be renamed). Thanks. 82.124.57.179 21:40, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
The category has a nofop warning now, if it didn't before. Moving to Category:Antoniucci Volti to match all existing wikipedia articles. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:52, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Nerium coronarium is a synonym of Tabernaemontana divaricata. Please merge.
references:
- http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-135173
- http://www.sunshine-seeds.de/Tabernaemontana-divaricata*-43114p.html
Done: empty, +syn taxon redirect. --Achim (talk) 20:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
rename to Category:Hungarian Scout Association in Slovakia per uploader Pe-Jocapital s, Scouting is always capitalized in this sense in English, per Scouting WPMOS (Documentation is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Scouting/MOS#Capitalization . It's like Rotary (the club)/rotary (the adjective), Lions (the club)/lions (the animal), Masons (the club)/masons (the job)...) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- The Hungarian Scout Association in Slovakia is a non-profit organization that is engaged in education of young people. Its target group is the Hungarian youth living in Slovakia, it has an educational programme worked out for them in the first place [6]Pe-Jo (talk) 06:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- I support rename to Category:Hungarian Scout Association in Slovakia per uploader.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved to Category:Hungarian Scout Association in Slovakia. --Achim (talk) 22:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
capital s, Scouting is always capitalized in this sense in English, per Scouting WPMOS --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Auntof6: is it okay?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about this one. "Scouting" can be used in lower case to have a general meaning. It's only when referring to certain scouting organizations that it requires an upper case "S". I can't tell if all the logos here are for those organizations, but the category name certainly doesn't specify that. (In fact, that's an issue with other scouting-related categories here.) Because of that, I'm going to leave this one alone. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Auntof6: Documentation is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Scouting/MOS#Capitalization . It's like Rotary (the club)/rotary (the adjective), Lions (the club)/lions (the animal), Masons (the club)/masons (the job)... Please don't leave this one alone! :) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- All the logos appear to belong to organisations that are part of the scouting movement so the category should be move to the capitalised version.Geni (talk) 14:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
Done: Moved to Category:Logos of Scouting organizations in Ukraine. --Achim (talk) 22:43, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
This name is also part of other persons Jos1950 (talk) 18:50, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Can we move to Category:Juan Fernández de Alarcon as per en:Juan Fernández de Alarcon? - Themightyquill (talk) 22:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Done. --Jos1950 (talk) 06:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Images moved to Category:Juan Fernández de Alarcon. Category:Juan Fernández converted to disambiguation category. - Themightyquill (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
See discussion in 2014 that never picked up as the nominator failed to follow the correct procedure — bertux 20:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted as per Commons:Categories for discussion/2014/11/Category:Military of the Islamic world - Themightyquill (talk) 23:03, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete it – I'm not notable, I didn't create it, I don't want it. Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Theoretically, the category is "hidden" so it's only for maintenance purposes, but if you don't want it, I don't see why it should be kept. KTo288, you created this - any reason to keep it against Michael's wishes? - Themightyquill (talk) 20:37, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry , for the late reply, I'm out in the bondooks with no wifi, and trying to nurse a teeny data allowance on my phone. If Michael is unhappy with this, I'm happy to uncreate it.--KTo288 (talk) 02:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't get the meaning of this category. IMO its content could be moved to Category:Khatchkars in Armenia (or subcats respectively). Achim (talk) 14:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- I think he ment in German Khatchkare auf einem Podest/Sockel or something like this. --Arnd (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hast recht, Arnd, ist bei manchen kaum zu sehen. Rename to Category:Khachkars on pedestals or merge to other categories? --Achim (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Content moved by bot, tagged 'bad name'.--Zoupan (talk) 10:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Done: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Single-member category that seems redundant to Category:Ashkenazi Jews. Ibadibam (talk) 20:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- Kept as a redirect because of en:Category:Ashkenazi Jews topics. I moved this page to Category:Ashkenazic Judaism and cleaned it up just like Category:Sephardic Judaism. --Achim (talk) 19:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Done: Moved per above. --Achim (talk) 19:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Grabs or Grab? > Grab (tool) Schofför (talk) 00:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Schofför, at Commons the categories listing objects are plural, see COM:CAT. --Ariadacapo (talk) 05:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Grabs. If English Wikipedia had a category for them, that name would be plural, too. Article names are singular, category names are plural. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- My request is directed to the category of political Commune Grabs (Category:Grabs (St. Gallen, Switzerland)). There is an article in 17 languages on the municipality Grabs. None of these versions require a lemma with staple. The English Wikipedia also does not need a brace. Therefore on Commons no Lemma should be used with clip for the Commune Grabs. --Schofför (talk) 09:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Names of articles on Wikipedia do not dictate the category structure over here — see en:Boat vs. Category:Boats for example. The cross-wiki links are maintained (thanks to Wikidata). Category:Grabs is a disambig because we want a long-term, maintenance-less solution to help people categorize images correctly (better being overly explicit than having to rely on volunteers to sort the mess afterwards). Ariadacapo (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- It makes sense that the category of Commons is the same as those in the language Wikis. Reference is made in each case under Wikilinks it. In addition, the files in the category „Grabs (tools)“ better in the categories Grapples (tools) or Grabbing tools would be sorted. --Schofför (talk) 23:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- It sounds like your argument is basically "I don’t like my pet category name having parenthesis in it" and then each time you try to find new arguments for it. If you want to discuss the Commons policy about category names please go to COM:CAT. Ariadacapo (talk) 06:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- I know my English is not good. I can unfortunately not be expressed more clearly. Also I do not want to invest more time on this problem. Best regards --Schofför (talk) 07:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- It sounds like your argument is basically "I don’t like my pet category name having parenthesis in it" and then each time you try to find new arguments for it. If you want to discuss the Commons policy about category names please go to COM:CAT. Ariadacapo (talk) 06:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- It makes sense that the category of Commons is the same as those in the language Wikis. Reference is made in each case under Wikilinks it. In addition, the files in the category „Grabs (tools)“ better in the categories Grapples (tools) or Grabbing tools would be sorted. --Schofför (talk) 23:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Names of articles on Wikipedia do not dictate the category structure over here — see en:Boat vs. Category:Boats for example. The cross-wiki links are maintained (thanks to Wikidata). Category:Grabs is a disambig because we want a long-term, maintenance-less solution to help people categorize images correctly (better being overly explicit than having to rely on volunteers to sort the mess afterwards). Ariadacapo (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- My request is directed to the category of political Commune Grabs (Category:Grabs (St. Gallen, Switzerland)). There is an article in 17 languages on the municipality Grabs. None of these versions require a lemma with staple. The English Wikipedia also does not need a brace. Therefore on Commons no Lemma should be used with clip for the Commune Grabs. --Schofför (talk) 09:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
No consensus to move. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
There is no real difference between Bodie and Bodie State Historical Park; in fact, the latter is a redirect to the former on Wikipedia. Therefore there is no reason for this category to exist, so it should be merged into Category:Bodie, California to stop confusing people as to which category to use. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- If this is done, can we please 1) leave this cat as a redirect and 2) make sure the appropriate state park category is put on Category:Bodie, California? --Auntof6 (talk) 04:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:57, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Redirected to Category:Bodie, California. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Appears redundant, as the image is included in the more appropriate Category:Bishops of the Episcopal Diocese of Albany, which is itself a sub-category of Category:Episcopal Church in the United States. Drbones1950 (talk) 20:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- How is that redundant? This category is for an individual person. The Bishops category is for a position, and contains other categories for individuals. If your reason were that a category isn't needed for a single file, I'd support that, but I don't see a redundancy. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
You're right, now that I review my suggestion it seems that I thought I found this image under the parent category (Category:Episcopal Church in the United States) as well as Category:Bishops of the Episcopal Diocese of Albany. I don't now see that particular redundancy. And, I'm sure that I can find other pictures of Bishop Love, as I am a member of the diocese, so I'm not suggesting that the category be eliminated, either. By the way, I am looking at the Episcopal Church categories right now, would it be appropriate to address any other categorization questions to your talk page, Auntof6? Thanks, Drbones1950 (talk) 16:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Well, I'd be glad to give you my thoughts on things, but I'm not an expert in that area (churches and bishops). --Auntof6 (talk) 16:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Drbones1950 (talk) 16:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Problem resolved - Themightyquill (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
I think the contents here should be merged up to Category:Glaciers by type. This cat is defined as a metacat, but the only sorting criterion in the name is "type", and "Glaciers by type" is a separate category. If not merged, can we at least give this a better name? Auntof6 (talk) 04:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Category:Glaciers by type would be ok in my opinion.Reykholt (talk) 13:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Moved content to Category:Glaciers by type and deleted Category:Types of glaciers. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. This category means nothing. The images here and the parent and sub categories are all unrelated to a clear topic. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Problem of self-parent category, template use mistake, and other confusion solved.
Category does not need discussion any more.
Contains only one image, apparently a sports team of some kind, but I doubt it was called "Club Florida". Even the Spanish "Equipo Florida" doesn't necessarily mean that was the name of the group. I think the image should be in more generic categories unless we can identify it better. Auntof6 (talk) 07:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Florida does indeed seem to be name of that club, see es:Asociación_Cruceña_de_Fútbol. The single image will quite certainly be deleted for lack of copyright information, however. The category can then be deleted as empty. --rimshottalk 08:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: empty and badly named category. Ruthven (msg) 10:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Category:Tax by country and Category:Taxation by country are quite similar categories, I suggest to merge them into one. Also, take a note that Category:Taxation by country is preferred in the English Wikipedia. Russian Rocky (talk) 18:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Taxation by country certainly sounds better to me. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support merge into 'taxation', leave redirect.--Zoupan (talk) 10:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: Do you feel like taking a crack a this using bots? Thanks. Merge or rename as needed, depending on what's already in Category:Taxation by country? - Themightyquill (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Done: Merged in Category:Taxation by country. Ruthven (msg) 09:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
No obvious difference to Category:Thioacids (both have some comparable diagrams of the functional groups). Propose merge, and then subcats for Category:Thiocarbonates vs thiocarboxylic variants. DMacks (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable. For the record, the original rationale for having separate categories was:
- a thioacid is a sulfur analogue of an oxoacid
- a thioic acid is a sulfur analogue of a carboxylic acid (what you call a thiocarboxylic acid)
- By 'analogue', I mean replacement of one or more of the oxygen atoms by sulfur atoms.
- If you consider carboxylic acids to be oxoacids, then "thioic acids" (or "thiocarboxylic acids") would be a subcategory of "thioacids".
- Happy to help with the changes. --Ben (talk) 11:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- @DMacks: Would you like to respond? --Leyo 14:28, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
It's been nearly a year, and there doesn't appear to be any contentious issues here. Contributors to this discussion are welcome to be bold and proceed as they see fit. Ed (Edgar181) 14:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
The naming scheme for similar categories for Kellergassen is Kellergasse <name> <village> (or Kellergasse <village> for unnamed Kellergassen), which would result in Kellergasse Obere Kellergasse Bockfließ in this case. Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Ja, kann man machen... --Hubertl 05:27, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: no oppose. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Content moved to Category:AGN of Colombia because each country has a national archive. Jos1950 (talk) 15:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose I really don't like acronyms in/as categories. Can we have Category:Archivo General de la Nación, Colombia and Category:Archivo General de la Nación, Dominican Republic instead? - Themightyquill (talk) 22:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Converted to a disambig cat. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Due to an egregious error on my part, all but one of the images (the photograph) are still covered by copyright and need to be deleted. WQUlrich (talk) 18:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- The issue was with the photographs, not the category itself, unless you think it really needs to be deleted because it only has one photo. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:29, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Not done: not a category issue. --ƏXPLICIT 05:27, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
In spite of the scientific-sounding name, most of the subcats here appear to be someone's personal porn collection. Can we either:
- Move all the files to more generic categories
- Rename to reflect what's actually here (for example, many of the subcats could be called something like "genitals of anonymous human male subject xx")
- Delete this cat and most of what's under it
Many of these offer nothing that we don't already have plenty of, and since the people are anonymous, there's little value in seeing which parts go with which other parts. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Sexual content aside, there's no reason to keep photos of different body parts of anonymous people together. Even if it was just a photo of a hand and a photo of a foot, why would anyone care that they belong to the same person? Make sure the images are in the right body part categories, and delete this category and its subs. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Done: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Should this be called "Writers by Indian language"? A person doesn't have to be from India to write in these languages. Of course, we'd have to take out the English one if we rename this way. Auntof6 (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep without renaming, for the reasons that:
- many, many "Writers from India" also write and publish their works in English – Mishtra, Nair, Roy, Rushdie – among others;
- for the other hand, English is also one of the around 30 official languages in India;
- that's why it was named "...from India by language" ;-) Roland zh (talk) 17:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- But a person doesn't have to be from India to write in these languages. The subcategories aren't called "People of India who write in <language>". They're called "<language> writers", which could be people from anywhere. It doesn't matter that these are all official languages in India. It matters that this cat implies that everyone in it is from India, but most if the subcats don't require that. If they did require it, they'd be named "<language>-language writers from India", like the English one. I guess I didn't make the point about the subcats before. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete There's only one sub-category for writers from India by language (Category:English-language writers from India) the rest are just categorizing writers by language, not language and state, and don't belong here. If you want to group them all in Category:Writers in Indian languages, fine. - Themightyquill (talk) 22:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- But a person doesn't have to be from India to write in these languages. The subcategories aren't called "People of India who write in <language>". They're called "<language> writers", which could be people from anywhere. It doesn't matter that these are all official languages in India. It matters that this cat implies that everyone in it is from India, but most if the subcats don't require that. If they did require it, they'd be named "<language>-language writers from India", like the English one. I guess I didn't make the point about the subcats before. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Stale discussion. Some new subcategories are created (eg "Bengali-language writers from India"). By the way, if you see respective en:Category:Indian writers by language and its subcategories, you see that there are also categories like "Punjabi-language writers" or "Odia-language writers"--Estopedist1 (talk) 22:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1: Good point. So then we keep both this category as is, but either remove "X-language writers" sub-categories or move them to Category:Writers in Indian languages? -- Themightyquill (talk) 13:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Closed as Kept. There are now multiple subcategories, used. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Merge category with Category:Photographs by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have no strong views. Based on most Flickrstream uploads using the 'Photographs by photographer' format, there is a case for harmonization by merging this way around. --Fæ (talk) 08:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, as we have accumulated many thousands more USFWS images by now, Category:United States Fish and Wildlife Service is being split into the 8 USFWS regions (which can be found at USFWS.) For example, Category:United States Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region. Some of these regions have their own Flickr streams. So I think it is reasonable to have both the region and Flickr stream as subcategories, for example, Category:Files from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region Flickr stream can be a category of Category:United States Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Southwest Region, which can be one of 8 region categories in Category:United States Fish and Wildlife Service. This really works for me as I try to categorize tens of thousands of these images. Thank you Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:43, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- seems to be Keep (ie not merging). @Fæ: Objections?--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- seems to be
Not done: kept. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be a dupe of or redundant to Category:Visitor attractions in Armenia. Achim (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- It does seem to be, but the two "top sights" gallery pages make me wonder if some traval publication or organization made a list of what they thought were the top sights. If so, and if that's considered worth identifying here (not likely, in my opinion), we could keep this, but there should be a description of who picked the sights. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Auntof6, agree, but for more than one year the creator's behavior again and again leads to cat issues, see User talk:Soghomon Matevosyan. --Achim (talk) 20:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Category:Sights_of_Austria
- Category:Sights_of_Copenhagen
- Category:Sights_of_Miskolc
- Category:Sights_of_Salzburg_(state)
- Category:Sights_of_Samarkand
- Category:Sights_of_Vienna
--Estopedist1 (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
No justification offered for keeping in several years. -- Themightyquill (talk) 22:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete this, all daughter categories, and Category:BP House as bad names and overcategorization.
- There is no such entity as the "Malaysian Scouting Association." On the English Wikipedia, we use w:Persekutuan Pengakap Malaysia or Scout Association of Malaysia.
- The district and subentity categories are completely unnecessary, and not done in similar Scouting by country categories with so few files.
- Category:BP House is a bad name, there are B-P Houses throughout the world, and again completely unnecessary in a Scouting by country category with so few files.
--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC) I am not against an enhancement of the categories and perhaps this was your intention, but how you did, it was pure vandalism.
- It is bad behaviour to remove a specific category and substitute it with a general category. Especially as this was killing the location categories.
- You removed regional category (Scouting in Sabah) which is not justified by any means. Regional subcategories are necessary to get them closer attached to the region (see e.g. Category:Scouting in the United States by state)
- The name for the scout house in KK is "Rumah BP", which, as category names should be in English, translates to "BP House".
- The Malaysian name of the single districts in Sabah is for example "Persekutuan Pencakap Malaysia Cawangan Sabah Daerah Kudat", see e.g. File:Kudat_Sabah_Malaysian-Scouting-Association-District-Kudat-01.jpg, which translates to "Malaysian Scouting Association, District Kudat"
- WikiCommons aims to have a categorisation as specific as possible. This is facilitating the search for the correct files. Also, if there are administrative entities available, there should be also a category for the entitiy, even when there is only a single file. Your explanation "completely unnecessary in a Scouting by country category with so few files." is not meeting the good practice in Commons.
- Conclusion: If you think there is a misspelling in the English translation of the Malaysian names, then replace the categories with a correct spelled category and keep the category structure. Refrain from vandalising photos and categories from just taking away mother categories and adding superficial categories.
--CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 04:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sigh. You're not listening. Category:BP House is a bad name, there are B-P Houses throughout the world. If you are so gung-ho on the categories, the names should be in Malaysian as they are incorrect in English. Speaking of bad practice, you should be very careful who you accuse of vandalism. Shame on you.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- As I said, enhance the category by better spelling: Using "B-P House, Kuala Lumpur" would be as fine as "Rumah BP, Kuala Lumpur". But it is no-go to just replace it with the superficial category "Scouting in Malaysia" and destroying by that the location category. However, as there is a rule for categorization, that English should be the preferred language, I refrained from using Rumah BP when creating the category (and yes, it is Rumah BP without "-"). So now, I am waiting for your proposals of better spellings or better translations. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please have a look to photo File:Kuala_Lumpur_Malaysia_The-Scouts-Association-of-Malaysia-BP-House-02.jpg where you can see the inscription Rumah BP. Formerly, there was an inspcription BP House on the same place. While it might be your own wish, that there should be a minus between the B and the P, it is obviously different in Malaysia. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:26, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Further evidences for "BP House": [7], [8] and section "OB The Scouts Association of Malaysia; Vision and Mission" at the official website of pengakapmalaysia.org (pse use cache [9] as website is offline at the moment) --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- As I said, enhance the category by better spelling: Using "B-P House, Kuala Lumpur" would be as fine as "Rumah BP, Kuala Lumpur". But it is no-go to just replace it with the superficial category "Scouting in Malaysia" and destroying by that the location category. However, as there is a rule for categorization, that English should be the preferred language, I refrained from using Rumah BP when creating the category (and yes, it is Rumah BP without "-"). So now, I am waiting for your proposals of better spellings or better translations. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sigh. You're not listening. Category:BP House is a bad name, there are B-P Houses throughout the world. If you are so gung-ho on the categories, the names should be in Malaysian as they are incorrect in English. Speaking of bad practice, you should be very careful who you accuse of vandalism. Shame on you.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:55, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Might I additionally draw your attention to the fact, that the Sabah Branch of the Scouts Association of Malaysia is naming the Rumah BP in KK as "B.P. House" with two dots, see [10]. Might I also draw your further attention to the official website [11] where you can see the administrative divisions of he branch. I hope you see, that your removal of the category Category:Scouting in Sabah was not founded. I am now still waiting to your proposals, how we can make the categories better instead of deleting them. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:04, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Alright, as you fail to resolve the request, here are my proposals:
- Renaming Category:BP House to Category:BP House, Kuala Lumpur to respect the historical name but also considering, that there are Houses of similar name worldwide.
- Renaming Category:Malaysian Scouting Association to Category:Scouts Association of Malaysia as referred to in the Scouts Association of Malaysia (Incorporation) Act 1968 [Act 409] (please notice that Scouts is plural)
- Renaming Category:Malaysian Scouting Association, Sabah Branch to Category:Scouts Association of Malaysia Sabah Branch
- Renaming Category:Malaysian Scouting Association, District Kudat to Category:Scouts Association of Malaysia Sabah Branch, District Kudat according to official districts, see also File:Kudat Sabah Malaysian-Scouting-Association-District-Kudat-01.jpg (other districts respectively)
- Keep Category:Scouting in Sabah as as subcategory; see also [12]
- On renaming the categories, keep the appropriate localisation overcategories
--CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't "fail" anything, my purpose here is to delete your bad categories, not to save them in any form. And you still owe me an apology over the accusation of vandalism.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- This is a discussion page which seeks for solutions to enhance Commons. On carefully reading the template you attached to the category, you will notice the sentence They may, however, be recategorized. So now it is the time to leave your shell and look for a consent. If you are not familiar with the process you started, please refer to Commons:Categories for discussion. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- It does indeed say "may", not "must", please familiarize yourself with the difference between the two terms.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- I already understood that you are not interested in solutions. Too bad, I expected better from someone who allegedly is part of the Scout Movement. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- It does indeed say "may", not "must", please familiarize yourself with the difference between the two terms.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:23, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- This is a discussion page which seeks for solutions to enhance Commons. On carefully reading the template you attached to the category, you will notice the sentence They may, however, be recategorized. So now it is the time to leave your shell and look for a consent. If you are not familiar with the process you started, please refer to Commons:Categories for discussion. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Discussion has been over for many years and now two categories exist: Category:Malaysian Scouting Association and Category:Scouts Association of Malaysia. I will redirect the former into the latter and close this discussion. Clay (talk) 10:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)