Ravi zacharias

Discover Pinterest’s best ideas and inspiration for Ravi zacharias. Get inspired and try out new things.
131 people searched this
·
Last updated 3d
Renowned Christian Evangelist And Defender Of Faith Ravi Zacharias Promoted To Glory | FaithPot Erick Erickson, Passion City Church, Samaritan’s Purse, Louie Giglio, Ravi Zacharias, Christine Caine, Bible College, Tim Tebow, Latest Books

Tributes are pouring in from around the world as news of the passing away of beloved Christian apologist Ravi Zacharias spread on social media. Louie Giglio, founding pastor of Passion City Church in Atlanta wrote, “I join the thunderous applause of Heaven,” in a tribute to the late apologist. The…

1
Ravi Zacharias Quotes, Ravi Zacharias, Salt Light, 30 Quotes, Rare Quote, Salt And Light, 25th Quotes, Henry David Thoreau, Influential People

All religions, plainly and simply, cannot be true. Some beliefs are false, and we know them to be false. So it does no good to put a halo on the notion of tolerance as if everything could be equally true. To deem all beliefs equally true is sheer nonsense for the simple reason that to deny that statement would also, then, be true. But if the denial of the statement is also true, then all religions are not true.

4
When you say there's too much evil in this world you assume there's good. When you assume there's good, you assume there's such a thing as a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil. But if you assume a moral law, you must posit a moral Law Giver, but that's Who you're trying to disprove and not prove. Because if there's no moral Law Giver, there's no moral law. If there's no moral law, there's no good. If there's no good, there's no evil. What is your question? Ravi Zacharias Quotes, Missionary Quotes, Ravi Zacharias, 5 Solas, Reformed Theology, What’s Going On, Quotable Quotes, Christian Life, A Quote

When you say there's too much evil in this world you assume there's good. When you assume there's good, you assume there's such a thing as a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil. But if you assume a moral law, you must posit a moral Law Giver, but that's Who you're trying to disprove and not prove. Because if there's no moral Law Giver, there's no moral law. If there's no moral law, there's no good. If there's no good, there's no evil. What is your question?

313
Ravi zacharias and more

Explore related boards

Related interests