Hisgot sa Gumagamit:ŠJů

Vandalizing an article is not the best way to point out alleged errors. Argue your case instead. Continued vandalism will get you blocked. Lsj (talk) 20:18, 13 Agosto 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lsj: To remove a completely nonsensical text from an article is not a vandalizing. To renew the nonsensical text regardless of the warning is a real vangalising. I wonder you are so offensive toward me, instead of investigation how is possible that such a confused article can be created and uploaded by some defective bot here and that it survived here 2 years without appropriate review and reaction of real editors. Please use your intellect, if possible. Thank You. --ŠJů (talk) 20:31, 13 Agosto 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bad manners is not helping your case. You are still not arguing constructively, still not explaining what you think is nonsensical about the article. Continued personal attacks will also get you blocked. Final warning. Lsj (talk) 20:55, 13 Agosto 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at different language versions of the article, I can see that they have different coordinates. English is in one place, French, Spanish and Dutch in another, and Cebuano in a third place. At least two languages are wrong. Is that what you are so upset about? Are you going to vandalize the English article too? Lsj (talk) 21:13, 13 Agosto 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(past edit-conflict) Lsj: "nonsenses, Dolní Pohleď is not Pohled" (from the edit summary) is a constructive and factual argument, even though brief. Did you verify why your Lsjbot commited such a fatal mistake? All what I discover is that the same mistake caused Lsjbot also at sv:wiki. However, I'm not able to explain in Cebuano that an obvious mistake is an obvious mistake. You should rather explain how your bot came to the thesis that Dolní Pohleď in Kutná Hora District of Central Bohemian Region should be identical with Pohled in Havlíčkův Brod District of Vysočina Region. If some mistake can be understandable, it can be confusion of Pohled and Pohleď, which are both in Havlíčkův Brod District and the distintion between letter d and ď can be overlooked (and e.g. transliteration to Serbian cyrilic writing is not able to express the distinction). Your repeated groundless threats are really not a constructive way of collaboration, especially when you didn't answer to the factual core of the problem. If somebody, first the faulty bots producing nonsenses should be immediately blocked. You should worry about the problem with your bot primarily. A bit commical is that you should block me at ceb.wiki and acused me from vandalising even though you damaged the project more them I could do. --ŠJů (talk) 21:22, 13 Agosto 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lsj: You are right, since 2009, the English article Dolní Pohleď contained completely wrong coordinates, belonging to Pohleď (not to Pohled) and moreover very inaccurate, even though Wikidata contain correct coordinates. Wikidata contained wrong coordinates since 4th August 2013 to 26 January 2015. However, to correct the mistakes and to remove the mistaken data or text is really not a vandalism. Thank you for your report of the mistaken coordinates at en:wiki. --ŠJů (talk) 21:50, 13 Agosto 2018 (UTC)[reply]