[Elliott Carter] walked out of Orchestra Hall before the [Chicago Symphony's] 1984 performance of his Symphony of Three Orchestras because he objected to the seemingly flippant tone of conductor Leonard Slatkin's spoken introduction.
John von Rhein, "Composer Elliott Carter has chosen a difficult road",
Chicago Tribune, November 22, 1992.
I always like to talk about a difficult piece before I perform it. ... I meant no disrespect to Mr. Carter. Simply because I don't like a particular piece of music doesn't mean I can't lead a performance. I even recorded the Pachelbel canon.
... On the other hand, I still don't like Mr. Carter's symphony. ... I don't hear much in his work at all. It's just a series of mathematical gestures, piled on with needless complexity.
Conductor Leonard Slatkin speaking to Tim Page in "An American Conductor Succeeds at Home",
New York Times, May 20, 1984.
____________________________________
I take it as obvious that Leonard Slatkin's remarks in the above
New York Times interview are those of an arrogant asshole with a seriously underdeveloped musical mind and a grotesquely inflated sense of self-importance. What caught my eye in this interview, however, was not so much Slatkin's display of philistinism and rudeness - he isn't the only
baton-waving hack to have insulted Elliott Carter - as his bragging about having performed musical works he actively dislikes. Slatkin's musical masochism made me wonder if, aside from being irrational, it is
unethical for a musician to give public performances of music he actively dislikes and which he is not contractually obligated to perform.