Titus Oyedele
A Paediatric Dentist with interest in research and clinical management of developmental defects of the enamel
Supervisors: Advisor/Supervisors
Supervisors: Advisor/Supervisors
less
Related Authors
Morenike Folayan
Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife
Katherine Kula
Indiana University Indianapolis
Hanny Calache
La Trobe University
InterestsView All (7)
Uploads
Papers by Titus Oyedele
disease process, usually of odontogenic origin. The outcome of the management
of these conditions is to a large extent affected by the duration of the disease and
extent of spread prior to presentation in the hospital. Mediastinitis, pleuritis,
cerebral abscess and meningitis are documented complications secondary to
spreading odontogenic infections. Odontogenic infections should therefore, be
handled as an urgency to prevent acute emergency situations. Methods: We
present two cases of severe orofacial infections that were seen and managed at
our center. Findings: Apart from the advanced age of the case 2, there was no
systemic co-morbidity that usually predispose to severe orofacial infection, and
while normal oral flora was found in case 1, microscopy culture and sensitivity did
not yield any growth in case 2. Successful management of the two cases was,
however, achieved with aggressive serial surgical debridement. Conclusion:
successful management of these patients through serial surgical debridement
further lends credence to the importance of less dependence on waiting to know
the microbiology and its potentially harmful sensitive medications in the
management of severe orofacial infections.
Methods: This was a cross sectional study involving 8- to 10- year-old children in schooling in suburban Nigeria. Information was collected on the child's age, sex and socioeconomic status. Intraoral examination was conducted to determine the presence of HSPM, MIH, caries and the oral hygiene status of study participants. The severity of HSPM was also determined. The prevalence of HSPM, the association between HSPM, sex and socioeconomic status of study participants, the difference in the prevalence of caries and poor oral hygiene in children with and without HSPM, and the prevalence of HSPM and MIH co-morbidity were determined.
Results: Twenty seven of the 469 children examined (5.8 %) had HSPM. The tooth prevalence of HSPM was 3.9 %. There was no significant sex (p = 0.06), age (p = 0.41), and socioeconomic status (p = 0.67) differences between children with HSPM and without HSPM. More children with HSPM had caries (p ≤ 0.001) and poor oral hygiene (p = 0.01). Children with HSPM have increased odds having dental caries (AOR: 6.34; CI: 2.78–14.46; p = <0.001) and reduced odds of having good oral hygiene (AOR: 0.32; CI: 0.13–0.78; p = 0.01) when compare with children without HSPM. Also 77.8 % of children with HSPM also had MIH.
Conclusion: The prevalence of HSPM in the study population is significantly high. The large number of children with HSPM and MIH also suggests that HSPM is a predisposing factor for MIH. The significantly higher proportion of children with HSPM who had caries and poor oral hygiene makes it imperative to institute screening programmes for HSPM/MIH in the study population.
This study determined the prevalence of digit sucking and gingivitis, and the association between age, gender, socioeconomic status, presence of digit sucking habits, oral hygiene status and gingivitis among a group of Nigerian children.
METHODS:
The data of 992 children 1 to 12 years recruited through a household survey conducted in Osun State, Nigeria was analyzed. Information on age, gender, and socioeconomic status and history of digit-sucking habits were collected. Children were assessed for oral hygiene status and the severity of gingivitis using the Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified and the Gingival Index respectively. The predictors of presence of gingivitis and poor oral hygiene were determined using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS:
Twelve (2.7%) and 383 (78.3%) children aged 1-5 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis respectively. Also, 11 (2.4%) and 432 (87.4) children aged 6-12 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis respectively. The odds of having poor oral hygiene (AOR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.20-0.35; p <0.001) and gingivitis (AOR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.14 - 0.31; p<0.001) was significantly reduced for children aged 1-5 years. The odds of having gingivitis was increased in children with low socioeconomic status (AOR: 2.09; 9% CI: 1.32 - 3.31; p=0.002). There was no significant relationship between gender, digit sucking, oral hygiene status and presence of gingivitis.
CONCLUSIONS:
Digit-sucking habit did not increase the chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis. Increasing age and low socio-economic status were factors that significantly increased the chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted. All practicing dentists in the institution were eligible to participate in the study. A questionnaire that assessed oral health practices
and knowledge was administered. Respondents were expected to select the most appropriate responses that reflected their knowledge of oral health practices and caries prevention practices. Questions included assessment of knowledge and practice of tooth brushing, flossing, refined carbohydrate intake, and dental service utilization. Participants’ responses were scored and dichotomized to poor and good knowledge, and poor and good practices, using the median scores. Bivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with good and poor oral health practices, and good and poor knowledge.
Results: Fifty-two eligible study participants were accessible at the time of questionnaire administration. Only 46 respondents returned the filled questionnaire giving a response rate of
88.5%. The age of respondents ranged between 25 and 48 years. The majority of respondents had good oral health practices (65.2%) and good oral health knowledge (85%). However, few respondents had good caries prevention practices: 39.2% brushed at least twice daily, 45.7% took refined carbohydrate less than once daily, 36.9% used dental floss at least once daily, and 60.9% undertook preventive dental care. The correlation between the dentists’ oral health knowledge score and oral health practices score was insignificant (0.90; P = 0.55).
Conclusion: A large number of dentists practicing in the tertiary hospital had good oral health practices and good oral health knowledge. However, the proportion of dentists with good caries
prevention practices was low.
To determine the association between use of recommended oral self-care (ROSC) caries prevention tools and presence of dental caries in children resident in suburban Nigeria.
METHODOLOGY:
Secondary analysis was conducted for a dataset generated for 1-12 years old children recruited through a household survey. Information on use of ROSC caries prevention tools (brushing more than once a day, use of fluoridated toothpaste always, and eating sugary snacks between main meals less than once a day), use of oral health adjuncts (dental floss, mouth rinses, other tooth cleansing agents) and presence of caries were extracted. The odds of having caries when ROSC caries prevention tools were used singly or in combination, were determined using multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age and sex.
RESULTS:
The single or combined use of ROSC caries prevention tools had no statistically significant association with presence of caries. Brushing more than once a day reduced the odds of having caries while consumption of sugar between meals once a day or more increased the odds of having caries after adjusting for age and gender. The use of two ROSC caries prevention tools reduced the risk for caries (AOR 0.28; 95 % CI 0.05-1.53) when adjusted for age. The converse was observed when adjusted for gender (AOR 1.15; 95 % CI 0.38-3.45). The largest effect size was observed when sugary snacks were taken once a day or more between meals after adjusting for age (AOR 5.74; 95 % CI 0.34-96.11).
CONCLUSION:
The use of a combination of fluoridated toothpaste and twice-daily tooth brushing had the largest effect on reducing the chance for caries in children resident in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
disease process, usually of odontogenic origin. The outcome of the management
of these conditions is to a large extent affected by the duration of the disease and
extent of spread prior to presentation in the hospital. Mediastinitis, pleuritis,
cerebral abscess and meningitis are documented complications secondary to
spreading odontogenic infections. Odontogenic infections should therefore, be
handled as an urgency to prevent acute emergency situations. Methods: We
present two cases of severe orofacial infections that were seen and managed at
our center. Findings: Apart from the advanced age of the case 2, there was no
systemic co-morbidity that usually predispose to severe orofacial infection, and
while normal oral flora was found in case 1, microscopy culture and sensitivity did
not yield any growth in case 2. Successful management of the two cases was,
however, achieved with aggressive serial surgical debridement. Conclusion:
successful management of these patients through serial surgical debridement
further lends credence to the importance of less dependence on waiting to know
the microbiology and its potentially harmful sensitive medications in the
management of severe orofacial infections.
Methods: This was a cross sectional study involving 8- to 10- year-old children in schooling in suburban Nigeria. Information was collected on the child's age, sex and socioeconomic status. Intraoral examination was conducted to determine the presence of HSPM, MIH, caries and the oral hygiene status of study participants. The severity of HSPM was also determined. The prevalence of HSPM, the association between HSPM, sex and socioeconomic status of study participants, the difference in the prevalence of caries and poor oral hygiene in children with and without HSPM, and the prevalence of HSPM and MIH co-morbidity were determined.
Results: Twenty seven of the 469 children examined (5.8 %) had HSPM. The tooth prevalence of HSPM was 3.9 %. There was no significant sex (p = 0.06), age (p = 0.41), and socioeconomic status (p = 0.67) differences between children with HSPM and without HSPM. More children with HSPM had caries (p ≤ 0.001) and poor oral hygiene (p = 0.01). Children with HSPM have increased odds having dental caries (AOR: 6.34; CI: 2.78–14.46; p = <0.001) and reduced odds of having good oral hygiene (AOR: 0.32; CI: 0.13–0.78; p = 0.01) when compare with children without HSPM. Also 77.8 % of children with HSPM also had MIH.
Conclusion: The prevalence of HSPM in the study population is significantly high. The large number of children with HSPM and MIH also suggests that HSPM is a predisposing factor for MIH. The significantly higher proportion of children with HSPM who had caries and poor oral hygiene makes it imperative to institute screening programmes for HSPM/MIH in the study population.
This study determined the prevalence of digit sucking and gingivitis, and the association between age, gender, socioeconomic status, presence of digit sucking habits, oral hygiene status and gingivitis among a group of Nigerian children.
METHODS:
The data of 992 children 1 to 12 years recruited through a household survey conducted in Osun State, Nigeria was analyzed. Information on age, gender, and socioeconomic status and history of digit-sucking habits were collected. Children were assessed for oral hygiene status and the severity of gingivitis using the Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified and the Gingival Index respectively. The predictors of presence of gingivitis and poor oral hygiene were determined using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS:
Twelve (2.7%) and 383 (78.3%) children aged 1-5 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis respectively. Also, 11 (2.4%) and 432 (87.4) children aged 6-12 years had poor oral hygiene and mild gingivitis respectively. The odds of having poor oral hygiene (AOR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.20-0.35; p <0.001) and gingivitis (AOR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.14 - 0.31; p<0.001) was significantly reduced for children aged 1-5 years. The odds of having gingivitis was increased in children with low socioeconomic status (AOR: 2.09; 9% CI: 1.32 - 3.31; p=0.002). There was no significant relationship between gender, digit sucking, oral hygiene status and presence of gingivitis.
CONCLUSIONS:
Digit-sucking habit did not increase the chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis. Increasing age and low socio-economic status were factors that significantly increased the chances of having poor oral hygiene and gingivitis.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted. All practicing dentists in the institution were eligible to participate in the study. A questionnaire that assessed oral health practices
and knowledge was administered. Respondents were expected to select the most appropriate responses that reflected their knowledge of oral health practices and caries prevention practices. Questions included assessment of knowledge and practice of tooth brushing, flossing, refined carbohydrate intake, and dental service utilization. Participants’ responses were scored and dichotomized to poor and good knowledge, and poor and good practices, using the median scores. Bivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with good and poor oral health practices, and good and poor knowledge.
Results: Fifty-two eligible study participants were accessible at the time of questionnaire administration. Only 46 respondents returned the filled questionnaire giving a response rate of
88.5%. The age of respondents ranged between 25 and 48 years. The majority of respondents had good oral health practices (65.2%) and good oral health knowledge (85%). However, few respondents had good caries prevention practices: 39.2% brushed at least twice daily, 45.7% took refined carbohydrate less than once daily, 36.9% used dental floss at least once daily, and 60.9% undertook preventive dental care. The correlation between the dentists’ oral health knowledge score and oral health practices score was insignificant (0.90; P = 0.55).
Conclusion: A large number of dentists practicing in the tertiary hospital had good oral health practices and good oral health knowledge. However, the proportion of dentists with good caries
prevention practices was low.
To determine the association between use of recommended oral self-care (ROSC) caries prevention tools and presence of dental caries in children resident in suburban Nigeria.
METHODOLOGY:
Secondary analysis was conducted for a dataset generated for 1-12 years old children recruited through a household survey. Information on use of ROSC caries prevention tools (brushing more than once a day, use of fluoridated toothpaste always, and eating sugary snacks between main meals less than once a day), use of oral health adjuncts (dental floss, mouth rinses, other tooth cleansing agents) and presence of caries were extracted. The odds of having caries when ROSC caries prevention tools were used singly or in combination, were determined using multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age and sex.
RESULTS:
The single or combined use of ROSC caries prevention tools had no statistically significant association with presence of caries. Brushing more than once a day reduced the odds of having caries while consumption of sugar between meals once a day or more increased the odds of having caries after adjusting for age and gender. The use of two ROSC caries prevention tools reduced the risk for caries (AOR 0.28; 95 % CI 0.05-1.53) when adjusted for age. The converse was observed when adjusted for gender (AOR 1.15; 95 % CI 0.38-3.45). The largest effect size was observed when sugary snacks were taken once a day or more between meals after adjusting for age (AOR 5.74; 95 % CI 0.34-96.11).
CONCLUSION:
The use of a combination of fluoridated toothpaste and twice-daily tooth brushing had the largest effect on reducing the chance for caries in children resident in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.