26

I am trying to enable SSH in my Ubuntu running in WSL2 system:

sudo systemctl status ssh

I get this error:

System has not been booted with systemd as init system (PID 1). Can't operate.
Failed to connect to bus: Host is down

What does it mean and how can I enable ssh?

1
  • 2
    Since WSL does not use systemd you will need to launch the ssh as a service instead. sudo service ssh start.
    – Terrance
    Commented May 22, 2021 at 14:23

4 Answers 4

20

Update note #1: Systemd is now supported on WSL2. Please see this answer for details on how to enable it. Once Systemd is enabled, the SSH server can now be started automatically with sudo systemctl enable ssh and queried with sudo systemctl status ssh.

A few things to note when trying to use SSH on WSL2:

  • As others have mentioned, since WSL does not yet support the systemd init system and infrastructure, you'll need to rely on other methods. The WSL version of Ubuntu still provides the old init.d style scripts for most services. So sudo service ssh start (or restart, or status, or stop, etc.) is what you'll use.

In addition to enabling SSH, however, you likely want to be able to connect to it from a remote system. WSL2 runs in a VM with a virtual network interface that is NAT'd, so you won't be able to ssh into the WSL instance from any other machine on the network without additional effort. WSL does provide automatic localhost forwarding, though, so you can ssh in from Windows on the same machine, or from another WSL instance on the same machine.


Update note #2: The method below no longer works on recent WSL releases which are installed from the Microsoft Store. The Store version of WSL has a known limitation that does not allow it to be started from a remote SSH session. Leaving the answer here for now, but I'll update it soon with a different (less optimal, unfortunately, solution).

If you just need terminal access to WSL from a remote machine, then here's a far easier solution:

  • Install OpenSSH server in Windows (instructions).
  • Access your WSL instance remotely using ssh -t windows_user@windows_host wsl. That just connects to the Windows host, allocates a pseudo-terminal with -t, and runs the wsl command using that pseudo-terminal.

If, on the other hand, you need real SSH access to the WSL instance, then the "usual answer" is fairly complicated still. See this Github comment and thread and my summary of your general options for port forwarding here.

That's "in general" though. For ssh we can make it easier by using an ssh server in both the Windows host and the WSL instance. See a "short version" of this in my answer here and (far) more details if you need them in this answer.

The "far more details" answer also includes a solution to starting the ssh server remotely, since it won't automatically run at boot time under WSL.

3
  • 5
    This may have recently changed? I have just installed Debian WSL on Windows 10, ran sudo apt-get install openssh-server and sudo service ssh start. A Windows firewall dialog prompted me to permit access for a port and I was immediately able to ssh from a remote machine. It also was already enabled on restart!
    – blee
    Commented Jun 23, 2022 at 19:30
  • @blee Hmmm. Maybe? But I'm suspecting something else might be at play here. First, Get-Service |? { $_.Name -like "*ssh*" } from PowerShell - Is the Windows OpenSSH server running? Second, wsl.exe -l -v -- Is the WSL instance version 1 or 2? Version 1 won't have any issues with port forwarding. But if it really is WSL1, then I'd still be confused about why it's there on restart. Commented Jun 23, 2022 at 19:50
  • You're right about Debian openssh-server being there on restart, I must have tricked myself about that. Derp. PowerShell does not show any ssh server running and says my Debian WSL is version 1. Moreover, I think I'll follow your advice and install Windows ssh as I'd really like to be able to shut the machine off remotely anyway. Thanks!
    – blee
    Commented Jul 12, 2022 at 17:10
7

For WSL you'll want to use the correct syntax:

sudo service ssh status

This will give you what you're looking for:

● ssh.service - OpenBSD Secure Shell server
     Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/ssh.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
     Active: active (running) since Sat 2021-05-22 19:54:00 JST; 3h 25min ago
       Docs: man:sshd(8)
             man:sshd_config(5)
    Process: 2129 ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/sshd -t (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
   Main PID: 2137 (sshd)
      Tasks: 1 (limit: 9127)
     Memory: 1.8M
     CGroup: /system.slice/ssh.service
             └─2137 sshd: /usr/sbin/sshd -D [listener] 0 of 10-100 startups

 5月 22 19:54:00 Carbon systemd[1]: Starting OpenBSD Secure Shell server...
 5月 22 19:54:00 Carbon sshd[2137]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22.
 5月 22 19:54:00 Carbon sshd[2137]: Server listening on :: port 22.
 5月 22 19:54:00 Carbon systemd[1]: Started OpenBSD Secure Shell server.
2
  • 5
    While the command you cite is correct, the output is not what you will receive on WSL. On WSL, service ssh status uses the old init.d style scripts, so you'll just see * sshd is running or sshd is not running as the output of the command. Commented May 22, 2021 at 15:04
  • 1
    Late I know but this is exactly the output you get from WSL 2.
    – Ed Bishop
    Commented Jul 12, 2023 at 13:09
0

it seems that

ssh <WSLuserName>@localhost 

works for me

-1

You should enable dbus it's more like port forwarding

#enable dbus
sudo systemctl enable dbus
sudo /etc/init.d/dbus start

if the result is the same as the picture below then don't worry it's not a problem

the picture

and then

sudo service ssh restart
1
  • It's unclear to me how dbus will help in this case. AFAIK, the ssh service does not rely on it at all. Commented Dec 16, 2022 at 23:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .