Requests for deletions

Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata^connect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if the user is still active on Wikidata and the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

Do not blank items in anticipation of deletion. In particular, do not remove sitelinks, even if you have requested the deletion of the page in the sitelink's target wiki or if you think that sitelinks of this type should not have Wikidata items.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please read Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion and either contact the deleting admin or use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead.

More information

Add a new request

Translate this header box!

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/12/15.

Requests for deletions

high

_{~144 open requests for deletions.}

Pages tagged with `{{Delete}}`

None at the moment

Click here to purge if this list is out of date.

Requests

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.

Bulk deletion request: advertising items created by Jminot92

Q61727605 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q61786999 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q81275496 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q61787600 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q82240740 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q112116303 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Advertisement items, don't seem notable. William Graham (talk) 16:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Buyagift (Q61727605) Notable business, plenty of coverage online eg, https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2006/aug/09/shopping.consumerpages https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/moonpig-splashes-out-14m-on-gift-experience-firms-7q0mgmvwn https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-click-cbwhrws5q8p https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1478745/How-to-lord-it-over-your-friends-for-only-29.99.html/1000 Piecesofuk (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only inlink is the CEO Dan Mountain (Q125406405) who is also not notable (no inlinks or sitelinks) and should be deleted as well. So9q (talk) 06:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WD policy. HerderStop (talk) 13:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Altro Limited (Q61786999), has identifiers (but the product, Altro Whiterock White™ (Q81275496), is probably not notable). Buyagift (Q61727605) is probably notable because of coverage mentioned above. THE BODYWORK CENTRE LIMITED (Q61787600) I could find https://www.hexham-courant.co.uk/news/24523561.hexhams-bodyworks-centres-rise-psychological-therapy/ and https://www.hexham-courant.co.uk/news/23323554.bodywork-centre-hexham-holds-free-wellness-day/ - not notable for Wikipedia and not sure if it's enough for Wikidata. Sports Supplements Ltd (Q82240740) I thought could be notable but I could only find https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/anthony-joshua-backed-bulk-powders-21446819. CUT PLASTICS LIMITED (Q112116303) I couldn't find anything that looked like a good reference for Wikidata. I only looked at 1 or 2 pages of search results so it's possible there is more coverage. Peter James (talk) 18:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q113556524

Julia Burch (Q113556524): Canadian Internet influencer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2MM followers on instagram seems reasonable? BrokenSegue (talk) 17:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does. Infrastruktur (talk) 06:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did the number of followers result in coverage in serious sources? If not, then the number alone probably isn't enough to establish notability. --2A02:810B:580:11D4:409F:4EC:6E03:43FB 17:52, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Social media metrics like followers, views, or "likes" aren't an indicator of notability. (Particularly given that there's a whole cottage industry dedicated to falsifying these metrics.) Omphalographer (talk) 18:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this person is pretty notable with considerable social media following across almost all platforms. She also seems to have a Google knowledge graph. She is also verified across almost all platforms (although this can be paid for in a few ones now) but she is verified in the ones that cannot be paid for as well. She also seems to have a few articles like this one on okmagazine or this one on Dexterto. Structureddata (talk) 20:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only inlink is {{q|Q130455708}} which is also not notable (no inlinks). None of them have sitelinks. So9q (talk) 06:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has reliable sources. HerderStop (talk) 13:37, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : clearly meets WD:N#2. Referenced to publications such as OK! (Q130455601) and Dexerto (Q106149869). "No inlinks" is not a reason for deletion (even if it were true), as Wikidata is always a work in progress -Animalparty (talk) 00:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep over million followers on Instagram and over three million on TikTok. Kim Kelting (talk) 19:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Boowa & Kwala

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 10:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Boowa & Kwala (Q23906515) Notable pre-school animation series, eg see https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/2001/03/21/www-boowakwala-com_165091_1819218.html and https://www.awn.com/news/boowa-kwala-make-their-us-debut-dvd Piecesofuk (talk) 15:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you also keep all the other items or just the main one? --Dorades (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete none of them have sitelinks and they only seem to link to each other. So9q (talk) 06:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116907159

Marius Heinrich (Q116907159): German rapper, singer, and songwriter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N --Morneo06 (talk) 17:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The item's history confuses me. Was this item repurposed? Is one or all of the contributors paid (cf. User:InquisitiveMindset)? What happened to all the identifiers of the Marius Heinrich this item was representing in the beginning? Are they the same person? Why did a published computer scientist revoke his ORCID? --Dorades (talk) 19:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, this publication and another one are not peer-reviewed and seem to be self-published. --Dorades (talk) 19:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I have entered all the information on the page to the best of my knowledge and ability, based on the data I could find on the internet. However, I did not consider the possibility of a name conflict or that the information might overlap with that of other individuals. If the page does not meet the standards, or if I have made any mistakes, I kindly request its removal. Sorry InquisitiveMindset (talk) 19:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a connection to Q108520425. Could also be the same person as Q125622939. --Dorades (talk) 19:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only inlinks from items Marius Heinrich (Q116907159), Westfälisches Rap-Kollektiv (Q125100383) that in themselves are also not notable and have no inlinks and should be deleted. No sitelinks on any of them. So9q (talk) 08:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q33082483

Family Teamwork (Q33082483): 1946; Frith Films; C; Sd; 18:00;: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Might be notable, it appears to be a short documentary by Emily Benton Frith (Q76465655) https://archive.org/details/0786_Family_Teamwork_05_18_08_00 Piecesofuk (talk) 16:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WD:N, no inlinks, no sitelinks. So9q (talk) 08:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass WD:N in my opinion. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep , Piecesofuk has found a source satsifying WD:N #2 Jack4576 (talk) 23:34, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Internet Archive is not serious per se since everybody can upload everything there. --Dorades (talk) 21:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125676121

Rhys Southern (Q125676121): Australian Entrepreneur, Marketer and Public Speaker: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 06:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not finished with this one and have more referencing to add, but he seems to meet all of the notability requirements, though is not particularly famous - is that a policy? I cannot see it anywhere.

Not sure what the link is that I am seeing is to a dental practice in relation to this entity? ELdEL69 (talk) 10:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are referring to the notability requirements stated on WD:N, which ones does this item meet in your view? Being famous is not part of the criteria.

I don't get which link "to a dental practice" you mean? --Dorades (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to assume whatever you like, it has no bearing whatsoever on this conversation.

Is it not? So, then I guess that means that this guy meets the requirements then - just like every other entity on this planet, past/present and future - as he is clearly distinguishable from other entities. Or is there something I have missed about what an entity is and that Wikidata is about cataloguing them to help Wiki projects?

Specifically in the notability requirements it state "...to centralize interlanguage links across Wikimedia projects and to serve as a general knowledge base for the world at large'...if it meets at least one of the three criteria below..."

That means any entity is worth of inclusion, but meets notability for wikidata straight away if it has already been included on another wiki project - as you can see in the statements, I found an image of him on wikidata. ELdEL69 (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What a coincidence that you found an image on Commons that was uploaded two minutes before you added it here. I will refrain from explaining anything about WD:N to you since "it has no bearing whatsoever on this conversation". --Dorades (talk) 16:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This guy is in Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage - and I am pretty sure that trumps 99% of other references sources uses for notability in any Wikiproject. I had nothing to do with that image, and had not noticed the upload time or date. I can see it's been deleted though - just a co-incidence, is it? Like the two random comments below, made at the same time. That is more than a little suspicious and by the look of it, goes against the spirit of Wiki projects, doesn't it? ELdEL69 (talk) 23:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you source what's in the item that can be supported by Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 11:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 15:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't appear notable and I don't think that the distant relatives qualify for structural need. --William Graham (talk) 15:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep clearly notable, I found him in Debrett's ELdEL69 (talk) 01:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Greetings from Commons. I came here to nominate this for deletion as spam and saw it was already nominated. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This item should be kept because it meets Wikidata's notability criteria. It is linked to a significant topic with verifiable sources, and is mentioned in the Debrett's Baronetage and Peerage. Louissiebert (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, the sources you mention are not in themselves grounds for keeping an item. We don't want distant relatives of all humans mentioned in any Wikipedia. Their children and spouses are okay but not uncles, grandmothers, etc. So9q (talk) 08:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is pure spam and promotional especially for a non-notable subject. Fails WD:N. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124810095

Mayukh Mukherjee (Q124810095): Actor and Academic: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Article deleted from all wikipedia sites Ravensfire (talk) 20:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep checked them, one is a movie with 2 sitelinks. So9q (talk) 08:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinged the user asking them to add some references User_talk:DocWikipedian#Request_for_deletion_of_Mayukh_Mukherjee_(Q124810095), as currently the item in question has no sources, and the statement on the linked film Ek Nadir Galpo: Tale of a River (Q5350217) also has no reference... ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 15:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request

Spam from a banned user Benoît Prieur. Books not used on the Wiki projects Durifon (talk) 08:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pygame - Iníciese en el desarrollo de video juegos en Python (Q120000704) is a published book, so probably notable. Actually, it's more how we consider ENI editions (Q53343983) as a reliable editing house. Fralambert (talk) 02:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some may be borderline (eg. Q62662230) but most seems notable enough for Wikidata. @Fralambert: I don't see a problem ENI editions (Q53343983) ; I'm more concerned about Kindle Direct Publishing (Q15823534). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books published at ENI éditions should not be deleted IMO. Thibaut (talk) 09:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I would mark WPF : développez des applications structurées (MVVM, XAML...) (Q53925659), WPF : développez des applications structurées (MVVM, XAML...) (Q54278610), Programmation en C# : préparation aux certifications MCSA - Examen 70-483 (Q54762338), Informatique quantique : de la physique quantique à la programmation quantique en Q# (Q59910275), Pygame - Initiez-vous au développement de jeux vidéo en Python (Q66818167), Traitement automatique du langage naturel avec Python : Le NLP avec spaCy et NLTK (Q124364549) and Pygame - Iníciese en el desarrollo de video juegos en Python (Q120000704) as notable since they are published by ENI. Fralambert (talk) 11:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q112259721

Failed notability referenced, lost all links on Wikimedia sites. Lemonaka (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did write a book published by Lioncrest Publishing (Q125781254). [1]. Fralambert (talk) 16:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion from The Peerage

Q76189137 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q76189140 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q76189141 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q76189142 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q76189144 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Members of the same Ryan/Leahy family (linked to each others); all data is coming from The Peerage but the pages have been deleted from the source and the IDs have been reassigned. VIGNERON (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--VIGNERON (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It looks like something went wrong in the linking at The Peerage, we have two men married in the 1800s. I suspect that it was too difficult to untangle and The Peerage just deleted the people. I will try and fix the errors and supply identifiers for Familysearch and Findagrave. If I run into the same problem, that it is too difficult to untangle, I will change to delete for some of the people. --RAN (talk) 18:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )! (I did have a quick search but didn't found other sources, thanks a lot for finding them). I withdraw my request for these items but I still wonder if we should delete Margaret Ryan (Q76189137), you repurposed it but it feels very wrong (ironically, it's the exactly what The Peerage did that cause the problem that we want to avoid). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - When I looked at the tree in Ancestry and Familysearch and in the Australian birth and death index, all the information that had been "Thomas" was actually for "Margaret", there already was an entry for "Thomas" in Wikidata, he was listed as a child twice. We maintain a large list of Wikidata:WikiProject Authority control/The Peerage errors. It looks like these entries were created as part of a The Peerage project on the pioneer families of Australia. I can see why The Peerage gave up, it would have been easier to just delete and start over at some future time, it took me several hours to fix. It is a shame that Australia does not preserve their censuses, after collating the data, they destroy the originals with all the family information. The England census fully preserved goes back to 1841 and the first USA census to name all family members was in 1850 and is fully preserved. --RAN (talk) 16:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Note that The Peerage re-uses identifiers, if entries get merged. I think the marriage data was extracted (by me) a bit after the initial items were extracted. The result is that there are a few cases where the marriage, between people who had the identifiers when I extracted it, has been incorrectly added to the item for the person who previously had that identifier, rather than the person who now has that identifier (or rather, who had the identifier when I extracted the marriages). By checking back both bride and groom to the Peerage site, it is usually possible to identify who actually got married, and what their wikidata items are. Jheald (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111077196

Vincere (Q111077196): Software as a service: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111077449

ITD World (Q111077449): Coaching & Training center in Malaysia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116149665

Pierce Visual Works Vina (Q116149665): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q108440424

Hưng Thịnh (Q108440424): Vietnamese conglomerate: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Advertising. NewUniverse (talk) 05:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly advertisement. eunn (meta · phab) 05:56, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q49292210

Does not exist --JokiVatanen (talk) 04:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It exists according to de:Vachendorf#Gemeindegliederung where it is described as a parish village (Q1493533); it also contains a Rathaus (Q543654) so municipality seat (Q15303838) is correct. I improved the coordinates; the sources were originally not very precise. Peter James (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q47506301

Q47506301: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No wikilinks. See also (Wikipedia:Biểu quyết xoá bài/Đoàn Thị Thanh Mai). eunn (meta · phab) 13:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Looking at the original article https://web.archive.org/web/20220630153340/https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%90o%C3%A0n_Th%E1%BB%8B_Thanh_Mai she appears to appears to be a national politician and therefore passes Wikidata notability. Piecesofuk (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q18481161

Cartoon Network (Q18481161): Portuguese language feed of Cartoon Network Latin America: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The Brazilian feed for the CNLA channel article on English Wikipedia now redirects to the CNLA channel itself, also the CNBR channel is a feed of CNLA with different schedules despite sharing the same shows. --VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 02:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125967868

HEC Paris in Qatar Building (Q125967868): education organization in Doha, Qatar: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as Q59535271 which is the good one --2A01:CB00:420:B700:E120:B471:96EE:C99C 09:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No the same one is the building the other one the school. Fralambert (talk) 20:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123043694

Svitavka (Q123043694): stream in Česká Lípa District: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q245101 --VasekPav (talk) 15:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The identifier in DIBAVOD ID (P7227) is for a side stream (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82074010) - I don't know if it should be a separate item, an alternative would be to merge them but I'm unsure of the qualifiers to use on the identifiers. Peter James (talk) 20:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support @VasekPav, Peter James: delete; this side stream is probably not notable and the naming is very confusing. Alternatively, change to possibly invalid entry requiring further references (Q35779580).Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q100658686

The Great Mouse Detective universe (Q100658686): narrative universe of the eponymous 1986 Walt Disney Animation Studios film: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems entirely redundant to [ present in work] --> [The Great Mouse Detective]. No sources that a 'universe' exists. Created by an IP that went on a 'Universe' creating spree. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment For the history -- the item was created by a regular contributor, not by an IP user. --Wolverène (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. And in general "fictional universe" is a tortured ontology that rarely applies where it is used. William Graham (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Structural need--Trade (talk) 11:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's over-structuring, as for me, definitely redundant. Technically, every narrative work (short story, novel, film, TV series, etc.) has its own fictional universe, not necessary well described by reliable sources or even by its creator(s). Would be strange to create as many items for those universes as possible (at least, the vast majority is not unique). The item contains even no proof in the item that the Great Mouse Detective universe is really independent from other Disney film universes. --Wolverène (talk) 13:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is also no proof in the item that the Great Mouse Detective universe is independent from the Marvel Cinematic universe. Trade (talk) 18:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, there is none. Marvel was not a part of The Walt Disney Company in 1986. --Wolverène (talk) 04:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't mean they couldn't have been taking place in the same universe Trade (talk) 20:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are like an infinite number of Marvel universes Dronebogus (talk) 11:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. from narrative universe (P1080), fictional universe described in (P1445) and takes place in fictional universe (P1434) do not require there to be multiple works of fiction to justify a universe item. I personally do not see the value in creating one in order for it to be used on a single item, but this particular one has fictional character items as well. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A related discussion took place regarding "Disney fictional universes" (Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/06/28#Q101099318); my comments there generally apply to this entity as well. That Professor Ratigan (Q1622838) (for example) is a character appearing in The Great Mouse Detective can be described adequately using present in work (P1441); there's no need to invoke a "fictional universe" to describe that relationship. (User:Adamant1 also astutely mentions that the "fictional universe" of this film is essentially just "late 1800s London".) Omphalographer (talk) 22:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per User:Omphalographer. The movie takes place in London, which isn't a "universe." Otherwise any movie or location from one would qualify as a "universe." --Adamant1 (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Every creative work by it's very nature have a location that ot takes place in some location. Citing the existence of the narrative location as a reason for deleting the narrative universe is nonsensical.

The idea of a fictional universe and the temporal/spatial setting of a work are slightly different things. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 08:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, but there's also a lot of fictional works whose settings are so grounded in reality that it's impossible to justify a claim that they exist in a distinct "fictional universe". Consider The Catcher in the Rye, for instance - its setting is unambiguously New York City in the mid-20th century. It would be entirely unnecessary to divorce it from that reality by describing it and its characters as existing in a "Catcher in the Rye fictional universe". Omphalographer (talk) 01:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Valentina.Anitnelav:--Trade (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tend to agree with Xezbeth but I also see the concerns raised by other users. In general there is no use of a fictional universe item for a universe described by only one work (unless the universe itself is described in secondary sources, of course) but we don't require more than one work, either. I think we should make it clear (e.g. in Wikidata:WikiProject_Fictional_universes) that it is not necessary to create a fictional universe item just to link characters, (fictional) locations, etc. It is fine if a character does not have a statement from narrative universe (P1080) (I tend to blame tools like Recoin for rather excessive creations of fictional universe items as this tool suggests an item may be incomplete if it does not have statements like from narrative universe (P1080)).

I had a look at fictional universes described by only one work: query and there are 344 cases, currently. While some may be legit, others seem a bit much. Besides Romeo and Juliet universe (Q124215075) we have an own item for the 1996 adaption Romeo + Juliet (Romeo + Juliet universe (Q124325720)), for example. The same is the case for The Great Mouse Detective and the novel it is based on (Basil universe (Q124026015) and The Great Mouse Detective universe (Q100658686)). I don't doubt that film and literary work are set in different fictional universes, but this points into the direction of creating an own fictional universe for every work and I don't think that we want that. If we decide to delete one fictional universe item because it is of little use we should delete all of these items and make it clear on the relevant project pages that these are not wanted. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 08:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion about notability criteria for fictional universes here: Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_Fictional_universes#Notability_criteria_for_fictional_universes. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 18:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient sources provided showing it exists as a recognized concept Dronebogus (talk) 10:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable (probably doesn't even really exist) and isn't helpful, there is literally only one film. There is no need for the characters or the film to be linked with this. And as a mater of fact a lot of the character items should probably be deleted too.StarTrekker (talk) 18:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q126886436

No. 3 Middle School of Lingshan County (Q126886436): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax, see discussion on [2] Lemonaka (talk) 07:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep You will have to get the Wikipedia article deleted first. --RAN (talk) 15:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) All deleted per hoax. Please change your vote Lemonaka (talk) 03:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No.3 Middle School Of Lingshan it probably exists but the Wikipedia article was a hoax. Schools in the UK are notable for Wikidata, but many are not notable for Wikipedia - is it the same for schools in China? Peter James (talk) 19:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Peter James Public school are normally notable as they are easy to find in a database. But if this was a hoax on Wikipedia, I would probably delete it. Fralambert (talk) 01:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is an identifier but I'm unable to verify it - the link says the search has expired and when I search it says a password is required. There are also references in the English Wikipedia deletion discussion - are these valid sources or could these be part of the hoax? The information seems to have been corrected in Wikidata. Peter James (talk) 17:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is real. Midleading (talk) 14:51, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q81291303

Non-notable person Belbury (talk) 11:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Have a sitelink. Need to be deleted on tawiki first. Fralambert (talk) 12:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is just a subpage in the project namespace. --Ameisenigel (talk) 12:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q76304869

Thalassa Sophie de Burgh-Milne (Q76304869): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is my name and my personal information which I do not want online. I am currently in the process of having Google and other pages delete my information as well. Thank you. --Edward2024 (talk) 05:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Edward2024 Best ask a oversight to delete the item as stated in Wikidata:Living people. I highly doubt it will be deleted here. Fralambert (talk) 14:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is "an oversight" and how do I ask them to delete it please? Sorry, I have not used Wiki before. 148.252.132.30 19:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata:Oversight is the policy; the email is [email protected] (or contact one of the oversighters via a link on the policy page). Although I don't think the oversight feature is approved for this use, all oversighters are also administrators and can delete items according to other policies. Peter James (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Public figure, if they want we can reduce the birthday to as it appears in the gov record for their corporate position. There is no privacy for a corporate officers in the UK, for a reason. The gov wants accountability for corporate officers to prevent malfeasance. That is why they have to be registered. --RAN (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Peerage person ID (P4638) is not a reliable source and should only be used as an identifier in most cases. I opposed mass deletion of that data import but would have preferred deletion for some categories (e.g. any living person who is not a hereditary peer, life peer or baronet and does not have another reason for notability from another source or Wikipedia article). Companies House officer ID (P5297) is not an indication of notability; information may be available but that doesn't mean it should be made more visible by adding it to Wikidata where it is not maintained . Most people in that database are not public figures and there is no reason to add their information to Wikidata. One of the companies is currently notable as it has a Wikipedia article, but the article has been tagged for notability since 2016. We don't consistently have items for directors of FTSE 100 companies and where we do they are not always linked and are not watched for vandalism; the name of Q69580854, the CEO of Tesco, was changed in 2021 and it had not been reverted until today. I don't think it is private information, as it is from public sources and not the result of hacking or any breach of confidentiality, or even anything that was legitimately published but not intended to be widely available. The living people policy and the ability to maintain Wikidata are still reasons to delete. Peter James (talk) 11:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Peter James, this is my first time using this page so I don't really understand the comments above. It looks like someone is saying the page about me can't be deleted. How is that possible? I know I am on Companies House, but it doesn't mean I should be forced to have an additional page with my name on it - or have times changed so much that I have no control over pages online that mention me? I have managed to delete several pages already this week, but this Wiki page is confusing. Please let me know if there is anything I can do, thank you so much. 148.252.132.30 19:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It depends on the outcome of this discussion. Many requests to delete are not successful, but that is usually because there is structural need for an item, such as linking academic articles with their authors. Here the links are only genealogical and from items that are only exist from other genealogical items - and if that is notability, most people are notable. Peter James (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If someone wants to be a private person, they probably should not be giving interviews. See: https://www.goabroad.com/interviews/thalassa-de-burgh-milne-director-of-intern-madrid How is someone with the screenname "Edward" wanting to delete info on Thalassa Sophie de Burgh-Milne? They wrote: "my name and my personal information", but their screenname is Edward. --RAN (talk) 00:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm inclined to agree here. Clearly there is public information avalable for this person, and user hasn't really provided any evidence that they are indeed the person in question.StarTrekker (talk) 23:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q127406420

Fawzi Mesmar (Q127406420): Jordanian creative director and game designer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It does not meet standards and policies, and focuses only on promoting itself. He tried to write an article about himself on the Arabic Wikipedia, but it was deleted. — Osama Eid ^(talk) 13:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

مرحباً @Osps7 المشكلة انه محقق أحد شروط الملحوظية في ويكي بيانات بانه مرتبط بوصلة على ويكيبيديا الإنجليزية. Mohammed Qays (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q127605536

Mason Remaley (Q127605536): game developer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable individual. Marbletan (talk) 14:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Mason Remaley (Q127605536) I end up on Zig Software Foundation (Q105488367). From there, I also end up on Josh Wolfe (Q127605516) and Andrew Kelley (Q62470811). As far as I can tell this collection of items lives in its own little cluster, and all seem not very notable, only using self published sources such as ziglang.org, or people's personal sites.

I did manage to find one article covering Zig in general, not sure if it makes this quad reach notability? https://www.infoworld.com/article/2338081/meet-the-zig-programming-language.html ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 20:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q58746840

Terry Hazen at the 2011 DOE JGI User Meeting (Q58746840): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No references or apparent structural need; only identifier does not resolve Quesotiotyo (talk) 06:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The DOI links to the SciVee (Q7433407) website but the page is not found. There are 69 more items with the same DOI prefix and I checked a few and most are also not found, although at least one page Evolution - the Molecular Landscape Interviews with FRANCES ARNOLD & JACK SZOSTAK interviewed by RICHARD SEVER (Q59384138) is still there but displays "this plug-in isn't supported" as the site requires the Adobe Flash Player plug-in. Some were created with "invoked by SourceMD:ORCIDator" in the summary and the most recent addition to Wikidata, CUAHSI Cyberseminar: John Pomeroy, University of Saskatchewan, 9/17/2010 (Q122420406), is in ORCID but says "other", not "journal article" so the P31 statements are probably wrong. Also they are not cited anywhere and the titles suggest some of them were spam. List of items with the DOI prefix:

I don't know if all items should be deleted but the titles of Q56602129 Q57481124 Q58898689 Q61795274 Q61846806 Q63185263 Q63508157 Q118199286 suggest they are probably not relevant to science or to Wikidata. Peter James (talk) 09:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All of these entities should clearly be deleted; they don't identify real scientific articles. Having a DOI assigned does not automatically confer notability.

Most of the titles which resemble scientific articles are copied from real articles with different DOIs; for instance, New Nanostructured Li2S/Silicon Rechargeable Battery with High Specific Energy (Q59756425) (allegedly doi:10.4016/27363.01) is a doppelgänger of New nanostructured Li2S/silicon rechargeable battery with high specific energy (Q46233204) (doi:10.1021/nl100504q). Omphalographer (talk) 19:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is very problematic. Seems deliberate.StarTrekker (talk) 11:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q128210950

Samuel Joly (Q128210950): Drummer from Quebec, Canada: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Eligibility Rockpeterson (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes at least WDN3 as he is listed as the drummer for the band L'Oumigmag (Q126485481) in All About Jazz (Q1722580) https://www.allaboutjazz.com/musicians/loumigmag Piecesofuk (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q128123357

Baddies in Tech (Q128123357): An organization that provides a safe space for Black women in tech: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Eligibility Rockpeterson (talk) 15:59, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I respectfully disagree. See the reference URL provided in the item. Also see this article which I added as an additional reference. - Wil540 art (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Tech SEO Summit

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I spend quite some time adding popular online marketing podcasts (see my contribution list) that are all in talk show format, episodes, hosts, prominent talk show guests and background information and multiple of them now show inbound links from this deletion request. Seeing this is quite frustrating. I am quite new to wikidata and don't fully understand why you would want to delete this information. From what I understand some of my entries miss sitelinks to match the notability guidelines and I need to connect them e.g. add the podcasts e.g to the list of german podcasts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:German_podcasts) so they fullfill the notability guideline. I am willing to work on that.

I also want to make some points about the notability of some items of your deletion list:

Q127775949 - Michael King is the person that exposed one of the biggest leaks about the Google Algorithm from the last years, together with Rand Fishkin (https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Michael+King%22+google+leak)

Q127790498 - Roxana Stingu is quite a public figure in the women in tech movement.

Q125523927 - Audisto and it's CTO / CEO are quite known for their work regarding tech SEO with citation of work published by Audisto in the Wikipedia (https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awikipedia.org+audisto) going back to 2015. They are especially known for their detailed guides (https://audisto.com/guides/)

-- Q125397892 - This is the german version of an article originally published by Audisto and written by Tobias Schwarz (Q124868557) and Christian Müller (https://audisto.com/guides/canonical/), that is also cited in the English Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_link_element#cite_note-Audisto_GmbH-3)

Most of the other speakers listed at the Tech SEO Summit entry could also be connected to popular podcasts. I would also be willing to work on that. PodcastMage (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added multiple contributions and references from and to entities of the two batches indicating the affiliation with already existing entities within Wikidata and Wikipedia. For some of the entities there are citations of their work within Wikipedia, however I do not know if the citations should be changed to use the Cite_Q-Template (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_Q) in this case. PodcastMage (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Popularity on its own is not relevant for judging the notability of an item in the Wikidata sense. Linking items together that are not notable without these links is also not a good way to prove notability. Also, self published sources are usually not considered serious as demanded by WD:N #2. Can you add independent coverage from serious sources, e. g. from mainstream media etc.? --Dorades (talk) 19:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got the point. So with independent coverage from serious sources you mean this (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q127775949&diff=2222443545&oldid=2222044321), right? Is this the right spot to add these references and is this amount of references adequate (there are plenty more out there, but I only added the ones I considered most relevant to prove the point) or should there be more? Is this enough in terms of notability for you to keep Michael King and how about the fact that he talks about exactly the topic he got the news coverage for at the Tech SEO Summit? If this changes your opinion about some of the items, please update your batches to reflect that and I will see if similar references can be found for the remaining items. Note: First I was only interested in the podcasts and the corresponding items I added, but now you got me hooked to prove the point for more items of your deletion request because to me they are relevant background, but I totally get that they need to be considered relevant by other people e.g. you as well. PodcastMage (talk) 05:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added references (that are in my opinion serious sources) regarding the notability of Audisto (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q125523927&diff=2222723884&oldid=2212511540) and also it's CEO (https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q125187894&diff=2222541861&oldid=2222008770). PodcastMage (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, references should support a specific claim, e. g. when someone is called "SEO expert" the respective source should be used for the statement that someone has the occupation (P106): SEO specialist (Q4048723). There is no limit on how many sources can be added (as far as I know), but some contributors think that a handful of references is enough to support one single claim. Only considering the most relevant ones is a good approach in my opinion.

The notability for Michael King (Q127775949) seems borderline to me, based on the references you added. But for me it's enough to mark my RFD for Michael King (Q127775949) as

Withdrawn. I can't judge the reliability of Website Boosting (Q120468799), thus I am also marking Audisto (Q125523927) as

Withdrawn. I am not convinced by the references for Sören Bendig (Q125187894). In the end, it's not up to me to decide to keep or to delete these items, but to the admins. --Dorades (talk) 15:05, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification, this helps me a lot! From my understanding adding the founders and the CEO of a company would be considered "structural need", as it completes important information about a company and therefore makes it more useful, right? With the same intention I added individual episodes to podcasts where persons that I consider important or that already had Wikidata entries appeared. Regarding Sören Bendig (Q125187894): I also added the information that he was deputy chairman and later chairman of one of the committies of the German Association for the Digital Economy (Q1008864), a association where large companies like Deutsche Telekom, ProSiebenSat.1 Media and RTL Deutschland are members (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Q1008864). Regarding Michael King (Q127775949): I will try to add more references about him in the future to address your doubts. Regarding Website Boosting (Q120468799): It is a well known magazine in the German online marketing szene since 2010 and with 17,500 copies printed every two months. In addition the editor in chief is a well known professor who founded two degree programs at the FH Würzburg - University of Applied Sciences. I will also try to add more references about him in the future. Hopefully I find some time at the weekend. PodcastMage (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When working on the references for Michael King (Q127775949): I discovered that he is also known as a rapper and there is another Wikidata entry for him Mic King (Q112819455). I think those two entries should be merged. I added some of his music profiles to the first entity. PodcastMage (talk) 11:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I merged the two entities of Michael King. In addition I added references for both, René Dhemant (Q127776614) and Tobias Schwarz (Q124868557). René Dhemant is a lecturer at the AFS Academy, which was launched in 2012 as the first state-approved training course for search engine optimization (https://www.websiteboosting.com/fileadmin/user_upload/2013/_19/PDF/028-029_afs_website_boosting_019.pdf) in Germany. Tobias Schwarz was also a lecturer there in the early days of the academy, as the article shows. I have added the relevant references. I have also added further references for René Dhermant, such as his participation in podcasts, and also some for Tobias Schwarz. I will work on the remaining profiles as soon as I find a little more time, as this is all quite time consuming. PodcastMage (talk) 11:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I finished my work adding references and background to the main entries of this deletion request and my opinion is to keep the entries as most of them refer to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references. I consider the rest of the entries to fulfill a structural need as they are all clearly connected to other entries that are not marked for deletion and make these entries more valuable. All statements I found in the entries were valid and understandable to me. Most of the persons within this deletion request are well known conference speakers, have appearances as experts in their field of work in multiple podcasts (all listed within the linked podchaser profiles; not all of them are present at Wikidata), are lecturers or have demonstrably held positions in organizations that are already present on Wikidata. If individual entries are still considered not notable, I would welcome separate deletion requests being made for these entries instead of continuing to pursue this bulk deletion request. My work is done here and I'll move on to work on other things now. I consider the state of this ready for a decision by the admins. PodcastMage (talk) 08:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone added a hashtag to the entry, which allowed me to add 4 more references that show that the event actually took place. A follow up event seems to be planned for 2025. PodcastMage (talk) 17:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124150929

enVVeno Medical Corporation (Q124150929): Medical Company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Yann (talk) 12:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q105698122

COST Conference (Q105698122): conference series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wild mixture of various irrelevant events without clear contunitiy MGChecker (talk) 12:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q10508087

Granhammar (Q10508087): farm in Upplands-Bro Municipality, Sweden: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It was never a human settlement (Q486972) it was always manor estate (Q2116450) as described in Granhammar Castle (Q5595755). Maundwiki (talk) 20:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC) --Maundwiki (talk) 20:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that one is the building and the other is the land (estate). You can merge if you do not want them apart. We often do this, there may have been multiple building in the history of the land/estate. --RAN (talk) 03:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q7233428

possible carcinogen (Q7233428): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item that is linked only to en.wiki redirect, no links from other WD items Wostr (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We have about a dozen scientific articles with this name or a synonym in the title. --RAN (talk) 23:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Currently this item has no real links. I think "possible carcinogen" is the wrong way to model substances. In principle, a given substance either is or isn't a carcinogen (Q187661), even if we don't currently know which. It would be better to say instance of (P31) carcinogen (Q187661) with qualifier possibly (Q30230067). 73.223.72.200 04:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q127592033

Huw Rowlands (Q127592033): geographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Created around the same time as Q127592004 so probably related. Xezbeth (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notable and linked to notable thesis item (Scenarios of Encounter: Place, Performance, and Commemoration in Tūranganui-a-Kiwa and London (Q127592736) 178.37.233.37 00:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can consider this one withdrawn, it's been improved since the RfD started. I probably shouldn't have assumed it was connected to other, less notable items either. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124693233

Mohammad Sabeti Monfared (Q124693233): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q27987555

Q27987555: church building in Gorla Minore, Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-existent building Yiyi .... (talk!) 08:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yiyi Are you saying this is a made-up building? It's in heritage registers... Ping @Nvitucci the creator of this item. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vojtěch Dostál It could be a church with a different name, but in Gorla Minore there aren't buildings with this name AND all the other churches in Gorla Minore are yet on Wikidata. I live nearby and I also did some research: definitely it doesn't exist. Yiyi .... (talk!) 12:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What if it existed but was demolished? Then it would still deserve to have an item... Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 14:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vojtěch Dostál I think Q116943131 could be the same church. I have no informations about churches demolished in Gorla Minore. Yiyi .... (talk!) 08:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an erroneous duplicate of the preceeding QID Q27987554 Uschoen (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111243654

Voorhees (Q111243654): male given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a real given name. --StarTrekker (talk) 10:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I was able to find 16 people on Wikidata with this given name (though admittedly, none with it as the first or primary given name). --Quesotiotyo (talk) 14:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Quesotiotyo: Are you sure these are actual given names, not just someone having two or more surnames?StarTrekker (talk) 14:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@StarTrekker Yes, as the family names for these people were all clearly evident (and only one was a married woman, otherwise they likely would not have more than one surname).

--Quesotiotyo (talk) 14:47, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Quesotiotyo: That is very untrue, it's not unusual at all for people to have more than one surname, in several cultures it's even the standard. Even among English speakers it's not unusul for persons to have both a paternal and a maternal family name before marriage.StarTrekker (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Quesotiotyo: you labeled Abram Voorhees Stout (Q116933137) who was born to Jacob VanDoren Stout and Helen (Voorhees) Stout as having the given name Voorhees.

Richard Voorhees Risley (Q56702133) was born to Mary Coraline Voorhees Risley and John Ewing Risley and you also labeled him as having it as a given name. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, as those are middle names (second given names). The family names come from their fathers, not their mothers. --Quesotiotyo (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, they seem very obviously to be cases of family name inherited from mother (Q25918333).StarTrekker (talk) 01:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: 277 Systematic internaliser (SI) items

query

Se background below for what a Systematic internaliser is.

These are the reasons:

1) These SIs can change over time and I have not seen anyone interested in keeping this information updated since the import was done.
2) they are a role on an existing firm and should never have been imported as separate items IMO. This import was probably not sufficiently discussed before it was done.
3) The level of detail in the SI system is not relevant for Wikidata or the WMF projects. It is similar to importing every bench in every protected area in Sweden into Wikidata as an item. That does not make much sense to keep in Wikidata.

If anyone would like to keep this data I suggest they create a financial Wikibase and model the whole thing there based on the companies/markets in Wikidata.

I understand a lot of time and work has gone into this import. I suggest to the importer that they discuss imports more before forging ahead to avoid deletions in the future.

Here is the background: "[...] investment firms can choose to become an SI in a given financial instrument or group of financial instruments. As of 1 September 2018, investment firms will be mandatorily classified as an SI in those financial instruments which they have traded frequently, systematically and substantially. The SI status will be evaluated continuously in terms of business needs and regulatory requirements." source

So SI is a status of a company in a certain market. It was introduced by regulatory bodies in 2018 AFAIK.

It would be a lot of work to to keep this information up to date. Take a look at the products the SI-status apply, see [3] for an example (there are a total of 24 products listed there)

Notifying users which have discussed the import before @BrokenSegue, @Vladimir Alexiev @User:Nataliya Keberle --So9q (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The number of possible items with MIC market code (P7534) is unlikely to be close to "every bench in every protected area in Sweden" (unless Sweden has very few benches). There is also an identifier for them, which is why the items were created; benches are unlikely to be registered with a central authority. I agree they should probably not be separate items, but the identifiers should be moved to existing items or new items. Peter James (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am firmly against deletion. If MIC found them important enough to issue a MIC ID, then they should be important enough for WD as well.

"they are a role on an existing firm and should never have been imported as separate items"
- Let's take Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Bank (Q806189) as an example. You claim that Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A - Systematic Internaliser (Q93359236) should be merged to it. But are you sure that it's the same company and not a subsidiary?
- Eg consider Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. - UK - Systematic Internaliser (Q114587067), it surely is a subsidiary (separate company) since it's in a separate country.
- By your reasoning, Fundación BBVA (Q30296991) could also be merged: it "only" has a "foundation" status in some jurisdiction ;-)
- This said, if you know that the SI function of BBVA is done by BBVA itself and not a subsidiary, please do the merge (which will move the type "SI" and the MIC to the BBVA item)
"not seen anyone interested in keeping this information updated": We've updated MIC import 3x. And can you point to any WD subset of over 1k entities that is completely up to date with its source data?
"SI is a status of a company in a certain market": That's not true. SIs are a specific sort of stock exchange or market. Many financial institutions perform various services, including specific kinds of exchanges and markets. "SI" is an important role to warrant its own type, just like "stock exchange" or "pension fund"
"The level of detail in the SI system is not relevant for Wikidata": Do you also argue that "there are too many exchanges", thus they are not interesting?
"I suggest they create a financial Wikibase": this is just discrimination! Why would you be the person to decide how much financial info is appropriate for WD?

Cheers! -- Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 12:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

even if they are different companies, they still don't seem relevant to have in WD (from my perspective).
the first example you mention is interesting. I found the scope of the BBVA when acting as a SI. Reading that it is clear that SI is a role that is chosen by the entity:

BBVA has voluntarily decided to act as SI for certain bonds and other forms of securitised debt and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts, in accordance with article 18 of MiFIR.

So a SI is not a company per se. It is a role and that role ONLY applies to certain products and services. They differ between SIs.

IF we were to keep this information a data consumer would DEFINITELY want to know which type of products this entity acts as SI for. In the case of Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Bank (Q806189) the import was done from a database that did not contain links between the bank and the SI role (voluntarily chosen by the bank). Without this information I would consider this a good example of a bad import. That is an import that inflates the number of items in Wikidata but fails to connect them to other items in a way that makes good sense to keep over time.

I invite others to judge whether these role-items are worth having or if they could be better reduced to a single statement like so on the entity that takes on that role according to some source like the one I provided above:

role -> systematic interalizer -> start time = x, applies to = product x, applies to = service y, MIC market code = BBVA, etc.

Please note that it is much easier to polute a database with half-ass imports than it is to find a good source and add statements like the above for each SI in the database. IMO this should have been discussed in a WikiProject Finance (does not exist yet) or WikiProject Economics, but I assume it has not, please correct me if I'm wrong and provide a link to the discussion about modeling in that case.

I suggest we delete these garbage items and use this an example of how not to do an import. So9q (talk) 09:06, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125573888

Athostvz (Q125573888): Brazilian musician, DJ and record producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promo Yann (talk) 19:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold Currently notable due to etwiki link, but there's a DR there, so awaiting that decision. Only incoming link is video clip by the artist, so that can be ignored to establish notability. Mbch331 (talk) 08:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q50375445

Ago Endre (Q50375445): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Bot-created Estopedist1 (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May be mentioned in Kes on kes? Eesti 2000 (an Estonian biographical dictionary? see the reference for P31), I am not sure I am able to check if he was mentioned, but if there is an article about him he has to be notable. --Wolverène (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notable as linked to Sirje Endre (Q12375095) and sourced per above (in Sirje Endre (Q12375095) item father (P22) statement). 178.37.233.37 00:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123951724

Zhabokrek (Q123951724): street in Sofia, Bulgaria: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Mistake in OSM, meged in Q123949594 Nk (talk) 16:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123951730

Iztochna tangenta blvd. (Q123951730): street in Sofia, Bulgaria: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

~~Notability - this is a proposed reorganization of Q123951730 Nk (talk) 16:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

Notability - this is a proposed reorganization of Q123946927 Nk --Nk (talk) 16:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q89206661

The Adventures of BoOzy’ OS (Q89206661): French animated television series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No such "television series" appears to exist. References all appear to describe BoOzy’ OS and the Cristal Gem (Q17622139), which is a single animated short, not a series. Omphalographer (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130210987

Heather Novak-Peterson (Q130210987): artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added due to adding OpenStreetMap node with her public artwork on a parking garage near me:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12147972009

https://imgur.com/artwork-Aqpo3TE

https://imgur.com/artwork-cFtMBiU Cfeast (talk) 22:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there journalistic coverage, e. g. articles in newspapers? --Dorades (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a news article about her that mentions the artwork in question:

https://hconews.com/2019/11/26/heather-novak-peterson/ Cfeast (talk) 22:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another article about her:

https://canvasrebel.com/meet-heather-novak-peterson/ Cfeast (talk) 22:08, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those two links look like sponsored content and a republished press release. I'm not sure they're especially serious. William Graham (talk) 23:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q129175828

Hamed Atefi (Q129175828): Iranian football player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now it is (transfermarkt id) 178.37.233.37 23:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130238784

Statistical Decision Functions. (Q130238784): book review published in March 1951: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is a review of the book, not the book itself so worthless for us to store So9q (talk) 05:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the merits of your argument. But if we're going to have an entry on everything that was published in academic journals - and from what I can tell, "was published in an academic journal" is a criterion for inclusion - then that includes the book reviews. We have a lot of book reviews. If you want to delete the book reviews, you'll have to bring that up on project chat. DS (talk) 15:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q105966767

Playa Chiquita (Q105966767): beach in Costa Rica: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don't think this really fits within the scope of the project. There are many, many beaches in Costa Rica. DS (talk) 14:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's mentioned in travel guides, and notable enough for Wikidata (and possibly useful for Commons). Peter James (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My comment was based on this being Playa Chiquita, but the original label was "beach, COSTA RICA" and it's possible the beach depicted is Playa Punta Uva, not Playa Chiquita. Peter James (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should stay, the gps data from the camera shows it at the new name. --RAN (talk) 01:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130234847

Someone claiming to be Dr Younis requested this entry's deletion, but didn't do it properly. This is just a procedural correction; I'll add her reasoning in a moment. DS (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I would be grateful if this page could be removed about me (see above)

I was alerted that it was just added.

I am no longer a comedian and no longer a surgeon either and would be grateful if the page could be deleted. I am working full time in the NHS and such pages existing will be considered a breach of professionalism and may result in NHS disciplinary action against me. I don’t know who added the page but would be grateful if it could be taken down as soon as possible. Many thanks

Jenan Younis <email deleted>" DS (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per this interview, Dr. Younis is "a BBC New Voices Competition winner and Funny Women finalist", and a search of Google News shows enough media coverage that she might even meet notability criteria for enwiki. I also note the apparent contradiction between "no longer a surgeon" and "working full time in the NHS". If there is indeed a "breach in professionalism" such that it could result in "disciplinary action", surely it was when she began performing standup, or when she organized and launched a MENA-themed comedy festival; our documentation is only a minimal component thereof. DS (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the contradiction you stated - there are many other professions other than surgeon within the nhs. It’s not unheard of to change specialties/departments. Therefore it’s possible to work full time in the nhs and no longer be a surgeon. I’m sure you can appreciate that I’d rather not share private documentation that would be prove the issue with professionalism/potential disciplinary action that would be lodged against me. If you search online you can see I have no future gigs planned and haven’t had any scheduled for quite some time. I would be most grateful if the entry on me would be deleted. 2.26.231.49 00:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see anything that would "be considered a breach of professionalism". --RAN (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It’s also very presumptuous if you to assume you know what consists of a breach of professionalism. This entry is about me and I have asked politely if you could remove it as it poses a risk to my current employment and income on grounds of professionalism. As I explained I am no longer a surgeon nor a comedian so the content of the page itself is also inaccurate. I would be grateful if you would delete it please. I do not want to have to escalate the matter to a legal team. 2.26.231.49 08:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sources are out there. Are you going to ask the BBC and the Guardian to take down their coverage of you? DS (talk) 17:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Some IP address just posted a comment at Talk:Q130234847. Samoasambia ✎ 19:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While we should certainly remove any information that is private or unverifiable, it seems like this person is notable. Jamie7687 (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If there are sources about this person available on the internet, we should keep this one, unless the aforementioned sources have been taken down. David Osipov (talk) 07:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130239214

Abcence C&T Corporation (Q130239214): Indian construction and engineering company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, advertisement Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130262936

Erik Laurentz Hogh Pihl (Q130262936): (1925-1998): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Only reference is his memorial service in a local newspaper. A search using the name or his alias doesn't give anything relevant. Dying doesn't make a person notable. Günther Frager (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While English Wikipedia may only be for people that have achieved some sort of fame, Wikidata allows anyone that can be described by serious and public sources to have an entry, so long as they are not involved in self-promotion. A "local newspaper" is both serious and public, and dead people are not involved in self-promotion, because they are dead. There is also a structural need as a descendant of Sophus Pihl, who does have a biography in Wikipedia. See for example: w:Lincoln family where people can use our resources to educate themselves about family relationships. --RAN (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just in the US more than 3,000,000 people die per year. There is no point in having every single person that die or all graduates from Harvard or all the descendants of Gengis Khan.None of them are notable just because they belong to one of these groups. Günther Frager (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Findagrave is able to manage 226 million human entries and 564,000 cemetery entries that I can search in a few seconds and find the one I am looking for. Wikidata:Notability: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." Is your argument that an obituary is not "serious" or not "publicly available"? Just because 3,000,000 die each year that doesn't mean that someone will take the time to create those entries. It would take 5.7 years to create 3,000,000 entries at one a minute, working 24 hours a day. Please stick to Wikidata rules on notability. The entry also has a Findagrave identifier which shows the person's grave marker that confirms the data in the entry. The entry also has a Familysearch identifier which links to 13 documents that confirm the data in the entry. The FamilySearch database has over 1 billion unique human entries, and again I was able to find the entry for Pihl in a few seconds. --RAN (talk) 19:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The necrology section of a newspaper is not journalism. The family or the funeral service writes it and pays for its publication. It is the same as someone that pays for a classified advertisement, or someone that writes a blog post about their deceased grandmother. I'm not arguing that we just include all of them before include this particular entry, I'm arguing that we should not add random entries of entities that have no relevance. It is the same as adding an entry about a random company just because it appears in https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/ or because they appeared in a public notice indexed by https://www.masspublicnotices.org/. Günther Frager (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You mentioned "relevance", since you can't read people's minds or predict what people will be searching for in the future, how do you know what people find relevant? Wikidata does not care what type of "journalism" is involved, it just must be a "serious" and "publicly available" reference. It doesn't matter whether it was written by a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, or the funeral director, or the person's child. Even if it contains an error, we still use that fact and deprecate it. A public notice or a telephone directory would only give one or two data points. We have a dozen facts about this dead person. If you want to lobby for changing the Notability rules for Wikidata, the way to do that is at Village Pump, not deleting one entry that you do not like. You are also using the strawman argument about companies, this is not about companies. Companies are deleted if they are self promotion or paid promotion. Companies are also registered that may never exist, they are just shell companies. People actually exist and are referenced in "serious" and "publicly available" media. --RAN (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop being rude claiming that I'm nominating something because "I don't like it". The example with companies is not strawman it is a "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". Now you are assuming that people are more "notable" than companies even though they are referenced in the same (or more if we consider the French government) "serious" and "publicly available" media. Günther Frager (talk) 22:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you have completely demolished any argument for keeping all entries on every possible company. Yet, we are talking about an entry on a person, not a company, which is what makes it a strawman argument. --RAN (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the distinction between them in WD:N, could you quote the place where there is different treatment between people and companies in the policy? Günther Frager (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A directory, whether of companies or of people is not information dense, it gives just two data points, not enough for a full entry. This entry up for deletion is information dense, not just a name and a telephone number. I think most people would agree that an entry for any human where we only have a name and telephone number or only a company name and a street address would be deleted. --RAN (talk) 04:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I asked for the policy, not for your opinions or conjetures. Günther Frager (talk) 06:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wikidata is for collecting databases, this person has links to databases (which are not social media) so I'm inclined to think they pass WD notability.StarTrekker (talk) 21:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Wikidata is not Wikipedia. I'd support @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) and @StarTrekker arguments here David Osipov (talk) 07:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130215613

Rudolf Skowroński (Q130215613): (born 1951): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This person does not seem to meet WD notability criteria: no sitelink, no external id... Wostr (talk) 01:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Multiple sitelinks. --RAN (talk) 01:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no external-id, about almost everyone one can find a few sources on the Internet, but those not mean an item should be created. Citing #2 criterion here is only possible with a very inclusionist interpretation of that point, which I am opposed to. Wostr (talk) 12:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Insufficient justification, failing to show why the sources are not "serious and publicly available references" (2nd citerion). Wikidata isn't Wikipedia. Someone can have 5 identifiers: profile x, instragram profile, facebook profile etc. - and that doesn't make the item "notable". If there are no external identifiers, statements like described by source (P1343) or described at URL (P973) are sufficient.

I don't know why I have to explain this to an admin of another wiki project, but okay, let's go.
Sources used in this item:
https://polskiemiesiace.ipn.gov.pl/mie/form/r93778,Skowronski-Rudolf-Jacek.html - website-project made by Institute of National Remembrance (Q705173) - Polish government-affiliated research institute with lustration prerogatives and prosecution powers.

https://i.pl/rudolf-skowronski-najdrozszy-polski-zaginiony/ar/724953 - leading polish news portal from Polska Press (Q11822473), former "Polska The Times" (author of this article is notable journalist https://oko.press/autor/witoldglowacki).

https://polskieradio24.pl/artykul/2195076,rudolf-skowronski-to-od-lat-poszukiwany-polski-oligarcha - from Polskie Radio 24 (Q21523269), polish public radio station.

https://rejestr.io/osoby/1349163/rudolf-skowronski - a reliable service that presents data from the state and public National Court Register (Q16569346).

https://centrumedu.ipn.gov.pl/ph/archiwum-1/2019/7345,Tajemnice-bezpieki-23-stycznia.html - also IPN - see first source.

https://www.policja.pl/pol/aktualnosci/3352,Rudolf-Skowronski-na-policyjnej-top-liscie.html - official web page of Policja (Q622532).
There is no doubt that the above sources are publicly available and serious.

Please do not make requests like this in the future, but read rules and other requests (even if some of them are wrong) first. 178.37.233.37 21:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know WD notability guidelines and this item does not meet these criteria. That's all from me. Wostr (talk) 22:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No one cares that you think something about a topic until you justify it. You don't justify it, which is incompatible with the dignity of a project administrator. 87.205.166.75 14:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before starting deletion request like this, please read first WD:N. 178.37.233.37 10:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The item's sources suggest that he is notable: "Rudolf Skowroński has been a wanted Polish oligarch for years.", eg https://polskieradio24.pl/artykul/2195076,rudolf-skowronski-to-od-lat-poszukiwany-polski-oligarcha and https://polskiemiesiace.ipn.gov.pl/mie/form/r93778,Skowronski-Rudolf-Jacek.html Piecesofuk (talk) 14:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being a wanted criminal does not automatically make someone notable. About a large part of society "something" can be found on the Internet, but it does not automatically make a person notable. As here, we only have a few links and nothing more, not an article in the Wikimedia project, not even a reference to any database/website for which we have a property. The existence of a few links in the item does not exhaust #2 of the guidelines in my opinion. Wostr (talk) 15:09, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - apart from above, he is mentioned in multiple books (Google Books quick search) and other sources:

Gang, Artur Górski · 2021

... Rudolf Skowroński, a well-known businessman, owner of a company that has houses in Mikołajki. In 2002, Bogdan G. was his employee. Now the businessman is wanted on an arrest warrant. »Klepacki wanted to collect protection money in Mikołajki ...

Provocation - dictators, politicians, agents

By Piotr Gajdziński · 2002

was included in the (in)famous politician's Andrzej Lepper's list, here:

Andrzej Lepper · 2002 · ‎No preview

Mentioned in Polish Wikipedia as a side character (e.g. here: 18 times in one article only)

Mentioned at least once in the English Wikipedia.

Is the sole topic of the discussions organized by the governmental institutions.. . Zezen (talk) 15:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Could possibly even pass Wikipedia GNG.StarTrekker (talk) 18:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q129005532

Mario Kleff: Without Fear (Q129005532): Biography of Mario Kleff, authored by Colin Roberts.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Self promotional items created by User:Designer Mario Kleff

Dubiously notable architect. Created a huge number of items of dubiously notable builds and other personal projects (art writing etc). Related items Q129005532 Q130260444 nominated separately by another user. William Graham (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Q130238815 that was created by the same user prior to registration. William Graham (talk) 23:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q25583573

Nematollah Akbar (Q25583573): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam/promotional Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 13:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q129586023

person with an activity (Q129586023): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Almost empty and useless item with no meaningful usage. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 14:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (WD:N #3) as it's currently necessary for worker (Q327055) and amateur (Q455595) and useful for fictional person with an activity (Q129586487); I don't know if the uses can be replaced with another item. Peter James (talk) 00:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130306434

Rossella Agresti (Q130306434): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability policy --Corgilover365 (talk) 10:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WD:N, since it has serious sources SBN author ID=LIAV097588, Pontifical University of Salamanca ID=543548 Eduard Ungern (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130311244

Jun Higaki (Q130311244): Japanese immigrant: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Theoretically has a child with Q232307, who did recently have a child, but I see no reliable public sources that even name him; notability, verifiability, privacy, and/or BLP issues Jamie7687 (talk) 00:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit group OR/9eae4bfdedc

Summary	The documentation used to create 273 monument items has been revised, resulting in a new resolution. Since the current items have errors that are difficult to identify, the best solution would be to delete them and recreate them based on the new resolution.	Author	LBelo (WMB)
Number of edits	273 (more statistics)	Example edit	Q130296435

The documentation that served as a reference for the creation of these 273 monument items is available at this link. However, we have discovered that this documentation has been revised and a new resolution has been published, as can be seen at this link. The 273 items created have errors that would be difficult to identify, so the best course of action would be to delete them and create new items based on the new resolution. LBelo (WMB) (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Errors" is vague, it seems to be an updated list and many of the items in the original list are missing (one of them, Q130296435, is used as the example in the deletion request). If the old version was valid, the items should not be deleted, as it would be possible to add end time (P582) as a qualifier to the heritage designation (P1435) of anything not in the new list. Another option is to create new items and merge any duplicates. Peter James (talk) 11:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LBelo (WMB): Could you comment on this, please? --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Peter James, thank you for your comment! I will identify the monuments with errors and correct them. LBelo (WMB) (talk) 21:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125968926

Forough Amjadi (Q125968926): Iranian actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable --HeminKurdistan (talk) 05:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125451999

Esther Ninsiima Nyinamwiru (Q125451999): Product Manager/Project manager: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123749750

Liip AG (Q123749750): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q19342429

14th-century Sienese Painting, room 3 (Q19342429): exhibition hall in the Uffizi, Florence: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability, now unused, new organisation, now Q117113015 --Oursana (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601678

Elisheva Jakobovits (Q75601678): (born 1966): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. This goes for all those nominated below by the same person. --RAN (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC) --RAN (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously this is a promotion, a bored kid created items on all his family members, none of the items are needed. אייל (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @אייל: No. These are the descendents of en:Immanuel Jakobovits, Baron Jakobovits, former chief rabbi of the UK, admired by Margaret Thatcher, and made a peer in the House of Lords of the UK Government -- an extremely significant figure.

The items are not the creation of a "bored kid" importing "all his family members". The items were created as part of a systematic import of entries from The Peerage (Q21401824), populating property The Peerage person ID (P4638). The information here is in turn sourced to Burke's Peerage (Q1016410), a standard UK reference work, part of the reference collection in every UK main public library. The view was taken that because significant people in public life are so often connected to people listed in this book, it made sense to import the whole website, to make it possible to analyse that connectedness at scale.

As the stats at Property_talk:P4638#Progress indicate, all but about 500 items from that import are still in the system, so it has indeed tended to be kept by the community (and of the 500 items out of 700,000 that have disappeared from the total count, that is largely due to mergers, rather than deletions).

Therefore

Keep for all of them., unless there are specific reasons to delete any of these individuals.

(Note that, given their listing in Burke's Peerage, WD:LP is probably not at issue here, at least as regards existence, names, and family relationship). Jheald (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Peerage (Q21401824) is a self-published source and some entries only cite "E-mail message" as a source. Those items should be deleted (unless there is another reason to keep), but the items listed here cite Burke's Peerage. Peter James (talk) 14:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for all of these items per Peter James since they all seem to referenced to a personal genealogical website and Wikidata isn't a personal database of someone's non-notable family members. I don't buy the idea that these items should be kept simply because they created as part of an import either. Imports don't get a special pass from the notability guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The items here are sourced to a personal website but a better source is cited there and that could probably be used. I agree some items from this import should be deleted, but not the items listed here. Peter James (talk) 00:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further Jakobovits descendents

The following should all probably be considered together, unless there are particular issues relevant to any particular single entry. Jheald (talk) 18:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601683

Isaac Aryeh Homburger (Q75601683): (born 1992): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601680

Pinchos Jacob Homburger (Q75601680): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601685

Avigail Esther Homburger (Q75601685): (born 1987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601679

Meir Homburger (Q75601679): (born 1986): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601677

Sam Eli Homburger (Q75601677): Peerage person ID=237165: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601682

Yehoshua Homburger (Q75601682): (born 1990): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601664

Aviva Jakobovits (Q75601664): (born 1958): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601663

Joseph Samuel Adler (Q75601663): Peerage person ID=237156: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601667

Pierre Adler (Q75601667): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601668

Nathan Adler (Q75601668): (born 1980): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601672

Ann Adler (Q75601672): (born 1982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601673

Tzippora Adler (Q75601673): (born 1983): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601675

Gila Adler (Q75601675): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601669

Abraham Adler (Q75601669): (born 1989): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601671

Tobi Adler (Q75601671): (born 1992): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601652

Jeanette Jakobovits (Q75601652): (born 1956): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601654

Norman David Turner (Q75601654): Peerage person ID=237149: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601656

Ezriel Turner (Q75601656): (born 1978): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601660

Hadassa Turner (Q75601660): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601657

Yehuda Turner (Q75601657): (born 1981): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601658

Elie Turner (Q75601658): (born 1983): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601661

Ayala Turner (Q75601661): (born 1987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75632216

Raphael Turner (Q75632216): (born 1995): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601660

Hadassa Turner (Q75601660): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601662

Simcha Turner (Q75601662): (born 1994): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601640

Esther Jakobovits (Q75601640): (born 1953): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601641

Chaim Zundel Pearlman (Q75601641): Rabbi: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601643

Eliezer Pearlman (Q75601643): (born 1974): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601645

Ephraim Pearlman (Q75601645): (born 1978): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601646

Eliyohu Pearlman (Q75601646): (born 1982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601651

Sarah Pearlman (Q75601651): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601642

Yehuda Pearlman (Q75601642): (born 1972): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601650

Adina Pearlman (Q75601650): (born 1980): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601647

Daniel Pearlman (Q75601647): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601648

Zipporah Pearlman (Q75601648): (born 1976): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:45, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601632

Samuel Jakobovits (Q75601632): (born 1951): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601636

Shraga Feitel Jakobovits (Q75601636): (born 1975): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How does this pass WD:N? Is notability inherited from other family members and a link? _{Kind regards,}Aafi ^(talk) 19:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601635

Yaacov Jakobovits (Q75601635): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601639

Yehudit Jakobovits (Q75601639): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601639

Yehudit Jakobovits (Q75601639): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601634

Ester Gitel Kahana (Q75601634): Peerage person ID=237133: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601638

Zipora Jakobovits (Q75601638): (born 1977): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601620

Julian Jakobovits (Q75601620): (born 1950): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601621

Michelle Tauber (Q75601621): Peerage person ID=237123: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601622

Nechemya Jakobovits (Q75601622): (born 1974): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601624

Nathan Jakobovits (Q75601624): (born 1977): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601625

Elie Jakobovits (Q75601625): (born 1982): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601631

Sima Jakobovits (Q75601631): (born 1988): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601629

Penina Jakobovits (Q75601629): (born 1979): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601630

Tzippora Jakobovits (Q75601630): (born 1981): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 18:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601626

Jeremy Jakobovits (Q75601626): (born 1985): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. This goes for all those nominated above by the same person. --RAN (talk) 23:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75601623

David Jakobovits (Q75601623): (born 1975): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no fundamental importance אייל (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Peerage import with a structural need to other family members. There is no "fundamental importance" rule, only that they can be described by a "serious and public" source, and not involved in self promotion. This goes for all those nominated above by the same person. --RAN (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q62089827

Farhad Garashov (Q62089827): politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. All Wikipedia articles got deleted. --Yousiphh (talk) 21:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116455411

International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature (Q116455411): code of scientific nomenclature (plant communities): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of "International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature" Q64152139 --JSoos (talk) 19:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Edition and series are distinct. William Graham (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editions are different because the problem described in the next section ("4th edition" vs "4th ed. Russian translation", see next section "Q116454942") Please look after the topic. There could be only one legal "Code" exist, no more! The latest was accepted by the 4th edition. It is like the "International Code of Zoological Nomenclature" Q13011. there is only one. The difference is that this is part of the botanical (algae, fungi, plants) code Q693148. JSoos (talk) 18:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q116454942

International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th ed. (Russian translation) (Q116454942): Russian translation of the original English article, published on 5 december 2022: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of "International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th edition" Q116454846 --JSoos (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See previous section (Q116455411), if that is deleted, no link! JSoos (talk) 22:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Edition and series are distinct. William Graham (talk) 20:50, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that is true, it is the Russian translation of the original. I tried to link it to Q116454846, but I am not sure I made it properly. Anyhow, 4th edition became vakid since 1 January 2021, so this Russian article should not be listed the same way as the 3rd and 4th editions. That is why element in previous sections has distinct edition list, JSoos (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q38240542

Austin Pool (Q38240542): Canadian actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WD:N since it has seriuos sources
- Film.ru person ID austin-pool
- IMDb ID nm0690778
- Kinobox person ID 360759
- TMDB person ID 124355 Eduard Ungern (talk) 21:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC) -- @Infovarius: film.ru person to be removed? Eduard Ungern (talk) 22:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you consider user-generated content serious? --Dorades (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is Wikidata and Wikipedia and Wikisource and Wikiquote serious? They are all user-generated, yet Wikidata itself is used by the Library of Congress and the Virtual International Authority File people as an Identifier. User-generated is not a synonym for unreliable or not-serious. Wikipedia is user-generated and had fewer errors than Encyclopedia Britannica. --RAN (talk) 23:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, neither Wikidata nor any other Wikimedia project is "serious". That's why we remove references to Wikipedia if there are other references present. That Wikidata is used by other institutions that we consider serious is nice for us. We also link to user-generated content, e.g. social media accounts, which does not mean that this content is "serious".

On a side note: The investigation of error rates in Wikipedia vs. Britannica (got the link from your user page) says otherwise: "The result: 2.9 errors per article for Encyclopaedia Britannica versus 3.9 errors per article in Wikipedia.". --Dorades (talk) 17:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q38240324

Jared Cook (Q38240324): American actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WD:N since it has serious sources
- Film.ru person ID jared-cook
- IMDb ID nm0177084
- Kinobox person ID 176164 Eduard Ungern (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2024 (UTC) -- @Infovarius: film.ru person to be removed? Eduard Ungern (talk) 22:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you consider user-generated content serious? --Dorades (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or even bot-generated, in cases of Film.ru and Kinobox which are often take data from IMDb. These are online catalogues which just mention everyone who worked on a film. They do not normally imply notability. They are not enough. --Wolverène (talk) 06:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is Wikidata serious? It is user-generated and used by the Library of Congress and the Virtual International Authority File people. User-generated is not a synonym for unreliable or not-serious. Wikipedia is user-generated and had fewer errors than Encyclopedia Britannica. --RAN (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For my answer, please see above on the RfD for Q38240542. --Dorades (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Played a role in Billy Madison (Q372299), so notable by the criterion 3. We only need to connect the item from Q372299. --Wolverène (talk) 06:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not watched this movie, but are roles like this ("Ernie (Grade 3)") enough for WD:N #3? His other two roles read similar. --Dorades (talk) 17:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not either. There are no contradictions with the policy, especially if it was not a non-credited appearance (which may have a chance to be faked in the catalogues). The criteron 3 does not imply the estimation of a value number in properties, or an importance of values for the subject. Of course, I just would not like the mass creation of items about minor role performers but that is another story. --Wolverène (talk) 02:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, WD:N #3 does not weigh the importance of an item. But in my reading of this criterion, and I may be wrong in this, "structural need" means that the item linking to a item in question benefits from this link. Now I wonder: is it useful (and how?) to have the actor of "Ernie (Grade 3)" listed there? Is this link indeed "needed" and makes "statements made in other items more useful"? --Dorades (talk) 09:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q120356339

Marc D. Lewis (Q120356339): American executive search professional: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:15, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WD:N#2 since it has serious sources Eduard Ungern (talk) 23:39, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the sources do you consider serious? I only see self-published content. --Dorades (talk) 17:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I created this item while trying to disambiguate the many authors named Marc Lewis or Mark Lewis. I have made some improvements to the item, and in particular I would highlight that the subject has appeared as a commentator on mainstream television shows, eg. CNBC's Squawk on the Street (Q3473030)[4]. Daask (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Anthony family

Q125507550 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q125507583 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q58459461

Kristín E. Jónsdóttir (Q58459461): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No information beyond name and nationality - far insufficient to specify a person Andre Engels (talk) 14:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Andre Engels There’s a whole bunch of similar items the same user. But in this case, it’s probably fair to assume that this lady is meant. --Emu (talk) 14:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q113455499

Anthony Cecere Jr. (Q113455499): American musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q97477564

Category:French horn players (Q97477564): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could be easily merged into Q7645843, but the Wikimedia Commons has the duplication: m:commons:Category:Horn players from France & m:commons:Category:French horn players. --Wolverène (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolverène c:Category:French horn players is for people (from any country) who play the w:en:French horn. c:Category:Horn players from France is for people who are French and play a horn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q124262156

Halo Granberry (Q124262156): American actor, rapper and singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Glover family

Q119917892 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q119912349 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to delete, as the 2 linked items are themselves not notable based on what is presented on the items.

Both items are used in statements on Corey Glover (Q2166120) so arguably could fulfil point 3 of WD:N, however, those statements in turn are unreferenced.

The items were created by an IPV6 used, so I likely can't reach out to ask them to add referenced to those statements.

I guess I'll leave this open for a bit and see if these statements get referenced? ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 12:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130298415

Self-promotion '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:58, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @DeltaBot

I humbly request that my Wikidata page not be deleted as I have also put through original research I have published into Wikidata, and the cited work to that research as well.

Research in Wikidata:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q130384751

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q130385150

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q130385157 Athreya Buddhavarapu But if it still should be deleted that's okay as well.

Athreya Buddhavarapu ABuddhavarapu (talk) 02:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep clearly meets WD:N; and in use. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Pigsonthewing for your insightful response. Athreya Buddhavarapu ABuddhavarapu (talk) 12:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While Athreya Buddhavarapu (Q130298415) should be notable because of A comparison of three‐film analysis software for stereotactic radiotherapy patient‐specific quality assurance (Q130384751) (peer-reviewed paper), I think Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150) (poster) and A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157) (preprint) should be deleted. --Dorades (talk) 21:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC) rephrased, --Dorades (talk) 19:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dorades: On what basis? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:36, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand, basis for what? The paper A comparison of three‐film analysis software for stereotactic radiotherapy patient‐specific quality assurance (Q130384751) is in my view notable because we consider scientific papers that are approved by a serious journal notable (WD:N #2), thus the author Athreya Buddhavarapu (Q130298415) is notable, too (WD:N #3). I don't think that a poster (usually neither peer-reviewed nor published by an editor) (Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150)) nor a preprint (often not peer-reviewed or accepted by a journal) (A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157)) fulfills our notability criteria. --Dorades (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Pigsonthewing.

@Dorades please be informed that (Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150)) has been peer reviewed by EPSM 2021 (conference) editors.

Also the preprint (A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157)) has been peer reviewed by PESM editors.

Both these articles could not have been published unless peer reviewed. 2001:8004:45E0:619C:15DE:378C:2885:D876 20:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150) been published anywhere else than on ResearchGate? Why is A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157) marked as "Under Review" ("This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal") on Research Square? --Dorades (talk) 20:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dosimetric Evaluation of Dual Energy Computer Tomography for Bilateral Pelvic Hip Prothesis has been published by Springer after peer review and is also available here (P010): https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01094-z

A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance was posted as a preprint on Research Square after passing the 'Research Square Prescreen’ and Springer’s ‘Quality Control Checks’. I think some of those checks include confirming that the research topic is sufficiently novel.

I think both articles are valuable and should not be deleted. Thanks, Wikipedia team. 86.38.70.190 08:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, so A Comparison of Film Analysis Software for Radiotherapy Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (Q130385157) is not peer-reviewed at this moment, thus not notable in my view.

The abstract of Dosimetric evaluation of dual energy computer tomography with iterative metal artefact reduction for radiotherapy planning with bilateral pelvic hip prosthesis (Q130385150) was published in the conference proceedings, so probably notable. --Dorades (talk) 16:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q107024467

Gloria Camila (Q107024467): given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not appear to be a real double name. --StarTrekker (talk) 11:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request regarding Big News Network

Q65068562 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130341147 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Along with Q130532881. --Dorades (talk) 19:50, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. ISSN indexing is a "serious and publicly available reference". -Animalparty (talk) 20:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ISSN is a service you pay for, cf. https://portal.issn.org/faq8: "8.2.3. How to pay my registration fee?" and "8.4.1. What is an ISSN credit? Publishers are requested to pay a fee for ISSN assignment." etc. --Dorades (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Big News Network (Q65068562) is described in-depth by a report from the NGO EU DisinfoLab (Q131098307), a report given further legitimacy by the BBC. It is also discussed by Editor & Publisher. WD:N#2 is clearly satisfied. -Animalparty (talk) 01:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think the item should be updated accordingly. --Dorades (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130211432

Antonio Santos Pérez Roldán Gonzalez (Q130211432): Spanish Entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110918424

CSI universe (Q110918424): narrative universe of the CSI televesion shows and media franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "CSI universe." The franchise takes place in the United States and there's already Q264198 which this seems to be a duplicate of. So this item should be deleted as an unsourced, made up concept. Adamant1 (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q110940895

NCIS universe (Q110940895): narrative universe of the NCIS television shows and media franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "NCIS universe." The franchise takes place in the United States and there's already Q17182743 which this seems to be a duplicate of. So this item should be deleted as an unsourced, made up concept. Adamant1 (talk) 20:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q64861227

Family Guy universe (Q64861227): fictional universe of the animated television show Family Guy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Family Guy takes place in Quahog, Rhode Island and there is no "Family Guy universe" which is why this item is unreferenced. Plus the franchise is already being covered by Q55012102. So this item should be deleted as an unreferenced, made up concept. Adamant1 (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Family Guy, American Dad and The Cleveland Show all take place in the same shared universe. Maybe it shoulnd't be called the "Family Guy universe", but a shared universe between these franchises certainly exists.StarTrekker (talk) 18:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@StarTrekker: If there is a fictional universe here I'd say it's the "fictional universe of Quahog, Rhode Island as featured in cartoons created by Seth MacFarlane." Otherwise the whole thing is just circular and makes zero sense. Like what makes The Cleveland Show or American Dad take place in the "Family Guy universe" to begin with and not the other way around? For all we know the universe is "American Dad universe" and Family Guy actually takes place in it or they both take place in "The Cleveland Show universe." Or maybe their separate fictional universes that take place in the fictional universe of each other and it's all just fictional universe inception? --Adamant1 (talk) 20:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamant1: Unless given a unique name fictional universes are generally named after it's initial media, but as I said it probably doesn't need to be named the "Family Guy universe", maybe Seth McFarlene universe or something similar.StarTrekker (talk) 20:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@StarTrekker: At that point your just talking about the Family Guy franchise. Which again there's already Q55012102 for. Per Family Guy (franchise) "Family Guy is an American animated comedy franchise created by Seth MacFarlane and originally developed for Fox. Consisting of two television series: Family Guy (1999–present) and The Cleveland Show." I'd also include American Dad in that, but regardless your just coming up with random synonyms for the Family Guy franchise at this point. "Seth Macfarlane universe" wouldn't work anyway because it insinuates anything and everything created by him takes place in the same universe and he also wrote The Orville, which obviously doesn't take place in the fictional town of Quahog, Rhode Island as depicted in the Family Guy franchise. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, a franchise is not identical to a fictional universe. That's an idea that you're trying to push but I don't think the majority agree on.StarTrekker (talk) 21:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@StarTrekker: I don't see how I'm trying to push anything when I literally quoted Wikipedia and that's what it says. Regardless, if I look up "Family Guy universe" there's literally no results for it on Google Search. There are a few results for "Seth MacFarlane Universe" but both of them are from Fandom. So if anything your the one trying to push their opinion, at least in this case.

Regardless, I don't think I've said anywhere that "fictional universes" don't exist as a concept. All I've said is that there has to be evidence that there's a fictional universe separate from the franchise for specific media franchises and there clearly isn't any in this case. Otherwise be my guest and provide some evidence that there's a Seth MacFarlane or whatever "universe" separate from the Family Guy franchise. The last time I checked Fandom isn't a valid reference and that's all I could find though. "Universes exist so everything's a universe as long as I say it is!!" Right. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a link above that already confirms that the shared universe exists for McFarlanes animated shows. And you don't need to keep going on about how the name isn't "Family Guy universe", I already talked about that. I'm not pushing any idea, it provably does exist.StarTrekker (talk) 10:29, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@StarTrekker: Yeah well, and to quote the article "The Cleveland Show is the first true spinoff of Family Guy. The creators have dropped hints that American Dad! and Family Guy exist in the same universe. But 'crossovers have been limited to the hypothetical scenario played out in the Stewie Kills Lois” episode. I don't think that proves anything. You have to admit that a hypothetical scenario in a single episode of a show is pretty spurious evidence. At that point you could justify creating a "fictional universe" item for just about anything. You clearly have zero standards though. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is over 10 years old, there has been further crossovers since then.StarTrekker (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Clearly ten year old references are only valid when they support your argument. I'd ask for more recent ones but I'm sure you'd find an excuse to dismiss them to when it turns out they aren't any better. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've been making nonsensical and uncivil claims this whole discussion. The article can not possibly mention something that had not happened yet, your claim that that shows that there isn't a universe does not hold, nor that I'm "dismissing" the source.StarTrekker (talk) 20:33, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article can not possibly mention something that had not happened yet Yeah sure, but then your the one who provided that source as evidence that there's a "fictional universe" for Family Guy. So....Anyway, I'm just asking for a source saying there's a fictional universe for Family Guy. That's it and I don't really see why you can't provide one if it's really a thing. Apparently it's nonsensical and uncivil to ask for sources though and you clearly aren't going to provide any. So I think I'm done here. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what your problem is, the source does say that a shared universe exists, you have just decided that it's not good enough because it operated under the assumptions of it's time.StarTrekker (talk) 20:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per StarTrekker. media franchise (Q196600) and fictional universe (Q559618) are distinct concepts. We even have two distinct properties (media franchise (P8345) and from narrative universe (P1080)) for this! Also, an inaccurate (or even wrong) label is not a valid reason for deletion. Just look for a more suited one. --Horcrux (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horcrux The problem is that whatever label we go with can't be made up and so far no one has proposed one that doesn't purely come from user generated websites. I guess the label could just be empty, but that kind of defeats the purpose of the whole thing. And BTW, just because "fictional universes" are a distinct concept that doesn't mean everything is a fictional universe or that it has anything to do with if that thing warrants an item on Wikidata. Otherwise your just making a totally baseless, circular argument for keeping the item. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Fictional Universe and Media Franchise are distinct concepts, the latter more to do with the business than where the fiction takes place. The Family Guy wikipedia article refers to the "Family Guy universe" but it's referred to as the "MacFarlane Universe" in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_universes_in_animation_and_comics Piecesofuk (talk) 12:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q101199114

South Park universe (Q101199114): fictional universe of the animated television series South Park: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "South Park universe." Although the show takes place in the fictional town of fictional town of South Park, Colorado. But that's already covered by Q650733 and the South Park franchise as a whole is covered by Q54622175. So this item should be deleted as an unreferenced, made up duplicate of exiting items. Adamant1 (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q98539264

Dexter universe (Q98539264): narrative universe of the television series Dexter and it's spin-offs: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "Dexter Universe" which is why this item is unreferenced and there's already Q98538809 for the media franchise. So this item should be deleted as an unreferenced pointless duplicate of an exiting item. Adamant1 (talk) 21:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would

Keep. The Dexter universe clearly exists, Wikipedia refers to it: the first line of the English Wikipedia article of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_Morgan states that: "Dexter Morgan, also known by the in-universe moniker The Bay Harbor Butcher, is a fictional character introduced as the antihero protagonist of the Dexter book series" and the info box is headed "In-universe information". Also multiple sources refer to the "Dexter universe", eg https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/dexter-resurrection-series-showtime-michael-c-hall-1235959604/ "Showtime is expanding the Dexter universe with a new series, Dexter: Resurrection", https://deadline.com/2024/07/michael-c-hall-returning-dexter-resurrection-original-sin-series-1236024240/ "Michael C. Hall Returning To ‘Dexter’ Universe For New Series ‘Resurrection’ & ‘Original Sin’ – Comic-Con" Piecesofuk (talk) 09:19, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q91628201

Neon Genesis Evangelion universe (Q91628201): fictional universe of the anime television series and media franchise: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no "Neon Genesis Evangelion universe" and the media franchise in general is already covered by Q66834583. So this item should be deleted as a pointless duplicate of Q66834583. Adamant1 (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Do you have a reason to keep making seperate DRs if the reasoning is going to be an exact copy anyways? Otherwise it's kind of cluttering up the page--Trade (talk) 02:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: I guess there's no technical reason they can't be combined. Except maybe that they have different links to the items for the franchises. But whatever. I just not sure how to create a bulk deletion request and there's no option for it in the "more options" drop down menu. I have no problem with you or anyone else combining them into a single request though. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions&action=edit&section=new&preload=Wikidata:Requests%20for%20deletions/Preload_2&editintro=Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Editintro_2&nosummary=1 Trade (talk) 03:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130234028

Joseph Weaver (Q130234028): (1798-?): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This person existed and was related to other people somehow. That's about it. Run of the mill people that existed at one point in the history. Fails notability. --Graywalls (talk) 23:46, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For me this would be a borderline keep/delete as he is stated to be the father of Angelina Annetta Weaver (Q95690565) (listed above) However, as she doesn't seem to pass WDN1 or WDN2 (only WDN3) then perhaps he probably shouldn't pass WDN3. But the Wikidata notability guidelines are pretty unclear on this. Piecesofuk (talk) 11:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's WDN1, 2 3 etc? Graywalls (talk) 05:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Graywalls These are the three notability criteria as defined in WD:N

1. It contains at least one valid sitelink to a page on Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikisource, Wikiquote, Wikinews, Wikibooks, Wikidata, Wikispecies, Wikiversity, or Wikimedia Commons.

2. It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.

3. It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful. Piecesofuk (talk) 08:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Since the item is only referenced to user generated websites. There should really be more authoritative sources for biographical items outside of user generated content. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q55201066

Got Funk (Q55201066): song by Kevin MacLeod: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q66661018 Prototyperspective (talk) 21:46, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q57521465

New Friendly (Q57521465): song by Kevin MacLeod: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Merge with Q66804652 Prototyperspective (talk) 21:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111508854

Rosy McMichael (Q111508854): American beauty vlogger: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable vlogger --2A02:810B:581:C300:D871:768A:48C8:79 18:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q92413654

Shōta Nishizawa (Q92413654): Japanese Baseball player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Nokkiman2024 (talk) 21:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I searched on NPB website and Japanese Wikipedia, any information didn't turn up on this person. 本日晴天 (talk) 11:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q6735600

Maija DiGiorgio (Q6735600): American stand-up comedian, actress, and film director: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maija_DiGiorgio&action=edit&redlink=1Expired PROD, concern was: Non-notable, article created and maintained by COI-violating paid editors) WT20 (talk) 03:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable. Passes at least WDN3 as writer and director of Bitter Jester (Q4919009) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitter_Jester Piecesofuk (talk) 07:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation lexemes

- (L1371592): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
- (L1315093): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I'm not convinced that we need lexemes for purely punctuation marks (much less ones restricted to a single language) Mahir256 (talk) 19:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I doubt that the hyphen is an individual lexeme in Danish. --Wolverène (talk) 19:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Fnielsen: (the item's creator). --Wolverène (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I created the item. I have a problem when describing certain Danish words. There are Danish words where the dash is necessary to have. For instance, it is called IT-afdeling or it-afdeling ('IT department'). It would be odd and not according to authorized spelling to write itafdeling (and Google's results provided few or none examples of itafdeling except for hashtags). The dash is not usually by itself listed in Danish dictionaries, but that should not mean that it is relevant for us to have. Note we also have - (L1315093). — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 13:20, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fnielsen: The "problem" you describe is solved very simply: by including the hyphen in the lemmata and form representations of the lexemes in question—which I see has already been done. And thank you for pointing out the Russian hyphen, which I've added to the nomination above (@Infovarius:). Mahir256 (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q111697679

SMDOT/Contemporary Art (Q111697679): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy --Gmidun (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Required by Marco Cadioli (Q116472553) it seems. It looks like that would need to go for this one to go. ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 20:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125629530

Sacha Duperret (Q125629530): French student and political-associative actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not respect the notability rules. The article about this person was deleted on the French wikipedia. @Cevpu2024: --Zandr4 (talk) 22:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need some cleaning, but a president of a notable association (Conférence nationale des étudiants vice-présidents d'université (Q2992919) [5]. So he is probably notable by WD:N #3. Fralambert (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Fralambert:, do you mean "It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful." ? This would kind of make sense, but I am still unsure. I am not very familiar with how things work here, but that's the opportunity to learn : is notability transitive with any "field", or is there a restricted list ? For instance, if he has a brother who is completely unknown to the world, one may create an item about his brother, and they would be mutually "significant person", and so his brother would also be covered by this rule ? Zandr4 (talk) 14:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Zandr4 When a item is liked to a notable item there is no problem, but there is still a debate of how far we can streatch it, expecially in genealogy. I personnally don't think his sibbling would be notable. Fralambert (talk) 02:01, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130358048

first cousin once removed (Q130358048): type of kinship: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It shall never be used. One of these two shall be used instead: "first cousin once removed ascending" (Q19901274) or "first cousin once removed descending" (Q19901611). --Svensson1 (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could first cousin once removed descending (Q19901611) and first cousin once removed ascending (Q19901274) be subclasses of Q130358048? Peter James (talk) 01:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, Q130358048 is wrong and shall never be used to anything. Svensson1 (talk) 14:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "first cousin once removed" is a commonly-used phrase; "first cousin once removed descending" (or ascending) is not. If external sources are trying to match their data to ours, "first cousin once removed" is useful. If the item should not be used with kinship to subject (P1039), the way to do that is with a none-of constraint (Q52558054) constraint on the property, with a replacement value (P9729) hint = Q19901274, Q19901611. This is better than deleting the item, because it helps people find the items we would prefer them to use. A Wikidata usage instructions (P2559) note can also be added to the item. Jheald (talk) 20:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If a user writes "first cousin once removed" in the search box, six valid types of kinships are shown and the user can read more about each of them. They are "first cousin once removed ascending" and the sub types "second uncle" and "second aunt". And also "first cousin once removed descending" and the sub types "second nephew" and "second niece". To also show an invalid type of kinship in that search result list, that doesn't tell how one person is related to another, will not help anyone. It will result in a mess if we start adding invalid types of kinships in addition to all the very many valid ones. This invalid item, Q130358048, was created by misstake a few days ago. DeltaBot says the item is linked, but there are no links beside from a list that is periodically updated by a bot, so there is no reason to put this delete request on hold. Svensson1 (talk) 23:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q97070029

Célestin Soucy (Q97070029): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lucie Paradis was boorn 2000 - its impossible to have grandchildren at this age Bahnmoeller (talk) 16:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lucie Paradis (Q97070031) was probably born in the 19th century, but a sitelink had been added which was an article about another person with the same name born in 2000. I removed everything that was added based on that link. I'm not sure of the notability of the family, but I would have to check the links between the items, and deletion of individual items would make this more difficult. If the information is correct they are related to at least one notable person Roch Voisine (Q1600132). genealogics.org person ID (P1819) says it does not imply notability, so I'm not sure how it was decided which should be imported. Peter James (talk) 15:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I went at least 15 items through the tree without finding a notable one, and without reaching Roch Voisine (Q1600132).

Starting at Roch Voisine (Q1600132) that is certainly notable, and I imagine mother and father should remain then, and likely the rest should be deleted? (At least that seems to be the general consnsus around family trees etc) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 21:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q1600132#P22 links to Q97070029 via Q97070006#P22, Q97070008#P25 and Q97070028#P22. Others in the same tree link to Jack Kerouac (Q160534) and Céline Dion (Q5105) via other families. I don't know if they should be deleted, but there are many more and the imports continue. Peter James (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130339596

Paul Kekai Manansala (Q130339596): Author and blogger: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Clearly self-promotional, same name as main editor. Is it notable? -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 23:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I wouldn't check on notability when cross-wiki spamming is apparent. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Paul Kekai Manansala. _{Kind regards,}Aafi ^(talk) 16:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aafi Having interwiki links is useful to admins at individual Wikis when making decisions about whether or not to delete item, so notability checks are still important.

@Wd-Ryan When it comes to deleting the item, it's heavily interlinked and as such it makes sense look at more than just the individual item. Maybe, Manansala Family (Q130418991) and all the members of that family should be deleted. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 15:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed this too. Here are the items of interest:

Q130339596 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130538697 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130526815 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130491476 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130479894 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130476238 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130427691 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130418991 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130397648 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130396641 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130396463 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130393859 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130393814 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130388104 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130387937 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB) -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 16:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They're all created by the same account, except for Paul Kekai Manansala (Q130339596) which wasn't registered. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 16:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The external identifiers suggest that he's notable, eg items with a Library of Congress identifier are usually kept https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n89298057.html Piecesofuk (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123871785

Annisa Fathinah Dwi Handifa (Q123871785): Indonesian politician (born 2001): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, no trusted publication reference. HA (talk) 03:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete haven't found other authoritative sources for this entry, so vote to remove David Osipov (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sense that the 500+ items linking to list of permanent candidates for DPRD Province 2024 (Q123738477) might also end up in the same grouping as this item and RFD. Some do have Wikipedia articles, some such as the one we are discussing does not. Poked for an actualy link to the list that this item has come from at User_talk:Kpu2024#list_of_permanent_candidates_for_DPRD_Province_2024_(Q123738477) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 07:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user itself seem (to pretend?) to represent Indonesian Commission for General Election (General Elections Commission (Q14917369)), for election year 2024. But from it talk pages, there already complaints that their contribution is not constructive and meaningful. Otherwise, its hard to delete all of them since some of it had valid references and linked into Wikipedia article. HA (talk) 10:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q21474039

น่าหฺลัก (Q21474039): Wikimedia multilingual project main page in Southern Thai: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Effectively empty item - sole page was redirected and Southern Thai isn't even recognized as a language code * Pppery * _{... ...} 02:18, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Thai has it's own ISO code https://iso639-3.sil.org/code/sou. I don't know about other aspects of this entry, so will not vote for now. David Osipov (talk) 03:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By that I meant that it's not recognized as a language code by MediaWiki. * Pppery * _{... ...} 16:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe MediaWiki itself can be expanded, but there isn’t currently anyone to accomplish it. I’d still keep it, as the language is authentic. In the future, someone interested in implementing support for this language in MediaWiki might be found. David Osipov (talk) 08:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These pages are only a hack to work around Wikimedia main page (Q5296) not being able to link multiple pages on a single wiki. Ideally they wouldn't exist, so if they don't have any (non-redirecting) sitelinks, there's no need to keep them. Most multilingual projects use a single translatable main page these days instead anyway. - Nikki (talk) 07:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be inclined to

Delete, ultimately I can't see the reason to have these 2 items differentiated from each other, meaning the item suggested to be deleted, and Main page/th (Q21451010).

Can the page really be written in both `Thai` and `Southern Thai`? Same question re the language code. Other than those 2 statements, there isn't much of substance. ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 21:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q9107232

Category:Russy (Q9107232): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 15:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:20, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree a separate item for the category is not neccessary, as de:Kategorie:Russy FR was deleted. The Commons sitelink can be moved to Russy (Q70299). Peter James (talk) 08:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see a reason to preemptively delete the Category item and move the commons site link to Russy (Q70299) (item with Wikipedia site link). Category items with single site links are not uncommon for various reasons that are reasonable. I don't think we need to be hyper vigilant about doing deletions with site link moves like this. Not saying we should preemptively create categories items either, but we all know that the normal churn of category creation and deletion on other projects creates situations like this. William Graham (talk) 12:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated this item because I stumbled upon it and according to WD:N #1,4: "Category items with a sitelink only to Wikimedia Commons are not permitted, unless either a) there is a corresponding main item which has a sitelink to a Commons gallery or b) the item is used in a Commons-related statement, such as category for pictures taken with this camera (P2033)." The category on de.wp was deleted in 2016 and since then no new sitelink has been added. You probably are aware of this, I just wanted to mention it here for everybody else. --Dorades (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125390830

Una Fairy (Q125390830): Russian pornographic actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 14:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Featured in multiple film from notable companies --Trade (talk) 13:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130722134

Achille Bruni (Q130722134): Italian actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional YoaR (talk) 08:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no longer has links YoaR (talk) 09:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request

Items were repurposed. Peter James (talk) 16:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q16119549 - subject before repurposing was Khirbat Al-Jawfa (Q6765502), new subject moved to 1829 in Uruguay (Q130751610)
Q16517913 - subject before repurposing was Bikol (Q26233325), new subject moved to 1830 in Uruguay (Q130751599)
Q16580230 - subject before repurposing was It's the Falling in Love (Q12318671), new subject moved to 1831 in Uruguay (Q130751587)
Q16919868 - subject before repurposing was Chiquitano people (Q3312501), new subject moved to 1832 in Uruguay (Q130751578)
Q17158213 - subject before repurposing was Alberto (Q1223226), new subject moved to 1833 in Uruguay (Q130751566)
Q17303781 - subject before repurposing was Category:50-99-meter-tall buildings (Q8750770), new subject moved to 1834 in Uruguay (Q130751552)
Q17405077 - subject before repurposing was Howard (Q2876863), new subject moved to 1835 in Uruguay (Q130751539)
Q17423391 - subject before repurposing was Category:Reptiles of Bhutan (Q9964057), new subject moved to 1836 in Uruguay (Q130751534)
Q17444356 - subject before repurposing was Adventkerk (Q15616427), new subject moved to 1837 in Uruguay (Q130751466)
Q17451594 - subject before repurposing was Q9804480, new subject moved to 1838 in Uruguay (Q130751462)
Q17570019 - subject before repurposing was Market Cross (Q2680369), new subject moved to 1839 in Uruguay (Q130751455)
Q17570978 - subject before repurposing was Bridge of Oich (Q913654), new subject moved to 1840 in Uruguay (Q130751474)
Q17580276 - subject before repurposing was Mary Miller (Q14932594), new subject moved to 1841 in Uruguay (Q130751471)
Q17588945 - subject before repurposing was Almadrava Cove (Q28119474), new subject moved to 1842 in Uruguay (Q130751515)
Q17616561 - subject before repurposing was Category:Lakes of Tibet (Q5648367), new subject moved to 1843 in Uruguay (Q130751521)
Q17957625 - subject before repurposing was Q3322969, new subject moved to 1844 in Uruguay (Q130751528)

Peter James (talk) 16:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q29333089

Q29333089: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant with Q3140615 K-trivial (talk) 21:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q94369459

Răḣman Mustafai̐ev (Q94369459): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The same as Q30605051. --Yousiphh (talk) 16:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate items are merged, not deleted. The nominated item appears to be a conflation of two separate individuals. Deletion of the item is not the solution, neither is the removal of sourced statements and external identifiers. The item was previously nominated for deletion and not done. Please see Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/10/09#Q94369459. — Dcflyer (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130742156

Patti Negri (Q130742156): American writer, television personality and podcaster: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If an entity has a notable work or part of a notable work, its make the entity notable also. well, i may be wrong tho

but i will improve the item by adding identifiers or Property:P973 in case any admin review it and think it doesn't meet wd:n Dunjhoye (talk) 10:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously doubt that we should consider items A Little Late with Lilly Singh (Q65082890) (a late-night talk show where she appeared in one episode) to be her own work. notable work (P800) is not intended to be used like this. --Dorades (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The question "Notability?" by serial deletionist Dorades can be answered by WD:N criteria #2 and #3. Multiple television and podcast appearances indicate that more complex links and connections are possible, even if none are currently made. Wikidata is always a work in progress. You can't build a database if others are constantly knocking out data. -Animalparty (talk) 00:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer to remain objective and discuss the issue. Thank you.

This site is meant to be used for discussions about the notability of items. That's exactly why I questioned the notability for this specific item. There are no sitelinks (WD:N #1) and it does not fulfill a structural need (WD:N #3, except for The Witching Hour with Patti Negri (Q130899326) which is not notable in its current state). For WD:N #2, there are several identifiers, most are Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320) and I don't see any which make her definitely notable. Then there is an interview and some kind of profile of her, which are usually not considered notable. She appeared in some podcasts and TV shows and these might be indicators of notability. To determine if this is enough or not, I put this item here for discussion. --Dorades (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has published works that may be added in the future. Iamcarbon (talk) 02:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how our notability criteria works. "Might become notable in the future" is not a criterion for inclusion. Either this item is notable and it's demonstrated how or it's not. --Dorades (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request for Noble Group Colleges

Q87194381 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q87194377 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q87194383 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q87194386 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Former independent colleges; now either dissolved after the formation of Noble University (Q126935014) or (maybe renamed and) converted as its constitute colleges. Unclear current status and not notable enough either way. -- CptViraj (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The institutions existed according to the nominator's rational. Update items to show their dissolution and relationship to the successor institution(s). William Graham (talk) 21:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first three are in the source (the third one has "Course" changed to "Programme"); I added the AISHE code (P6392). The fourth is probably Noble Pharmacy College (C-365) as it was established in the same year; all are colleges of the type "Constituent / University College". The items just need updating; they don't become not notable just because they are now constituent colleges of a university. Peter James (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q95736393

Grete Jelinek (Q95736393): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Conflation. Item created for Grete Jelinek (Q124632907): no description later changed to Margaret Jelinek (Q130899278): Austrian painter and drawer. --Kolja21 (talk) 23:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q122165699

GMTV with Lorraine (Q122165699): American TV show: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q110552510

The Morning Program (Q110552510): CBS morning television show: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Keep: Meets WD:N criterion 2. A distinct TV program with distinct title and cast, that lasted for 9 months, as covered in legitimate sources, e.g. Los Angeles Times, New York Times. Note this and the several nearby unsigned nominations were proposed by the now-blocked IP 2601:8c:4182:9ab0:43f:8187:f997:bd46 (talk • contribs • logs) circa Nov. 6. The IP uer appears to have a history of unwise mergers and conflations. -Animalparty (talk) 19:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q106531563

Early Start With Christine Romans and Dave Briggs (Q106531563): Television series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q106531620

Early Start With Christine Romans and Laura Jarrett (Q106531620): American television series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q106531426

Early Start With John Berman and Christine Romans (Q106531426): Television series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q84361571

Person has never been elected. She was only a candidate. That isn't enough to make her notable. Mbch331 (talk) 19:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is simply not true. Being part of the set of people that were candidates in multiple elections is an excellent reason to have a Wikidata item. 1Veertje (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toren100: Please discuss the issue here instead of blanking the item. Samoasambia ✎ 11:36, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a poltician. I am not even member of this political organisation. I do not want my personal information be publiced on internet. So please can you delete this information about me? It giives a wrong impression of who I am. Toren100 (talk) 10:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Annet Slijkhuis is partijvoorzitter van D66 in Houten." [6] . That proves you're lying. Infrastruktur (talk) 21:34, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q105652196

Category:Conalep Ing. Bernardo Quintana Arrioja (Q105652196): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Commons-only category Quesotiotyo (talk) 19:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130712384

Ezoy (Q130712384): Italian film director, musician and actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Cross-wiki spam by well known LTA Superspritz (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q96657596

William Little Brown (Q96657596): (1845-1874): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable. The person has a family member for whom a en.wiki entry exists, which was created by another distant extended family member. --Graywalls (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q125972760

Q125972760: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This campus no longer exists. No pages linked to this item. --WKPDA3 (talk) 11:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But it did, historically, exist, yes? DS (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131150179

Bernardino Paredes Martínez (Q131150179): Peruvian artist specializing in portraiture (born in 1886 in La Libertad, Peru and died in 1961 in Lima, Peru): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable and promotional. Ovruni (talk) 04:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although I'd argue with the notion of this entry being promotional, as it is for someone who died in 1961, I cannot find any proper sources regarding this individual DS (talk) 04:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: Non-notable YouTubers

Q131149103 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131140163 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131137012 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q111145138 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130303473 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131110877 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131108690 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131159849 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131101086 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131100781 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability, social-media identifiers only Haansn08 (talk) 03:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clint Laidlaw (Q131137012) have written scholar article [7] so he is probably notable. Fralambert (talk) 02:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q2413616

(R)-penam (Q2413616): chemical compound: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It makes no sense to have an item called (R)-penam, since (S)-penam by definition does not exist. I corrected the human-edited item Q82329450 to contain only data about Penam and not anymore about other substances, that are not to be namen Penam according to SciFinder. Kreuz Elf (talk) 14:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q2413616 was originally "Penam", I don't know why the label was changed. If they are the same they should be merged. Peter James (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q117326045

Aristo International Hotel (Q117326045): hotel in Lao Cai, Vietnam: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:12, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Additional identifiers and references added. How is Wikidata made better by removing a real place? Is the nominator fluent in Vietnamese sources? -Animalparty (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The one identifier that you added is a Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320) like the other identifiers present on this item. The article in the Khmer Times doesn't say much about the hotel, definitely not enough to make it notable. Same for the Forbes article (1 mentioning). Why should it be relevant if I speak Vietnamese or not? --Dorades (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion for potentially usefulness in Wikivoyage listings.--GZWDer (talk) 16:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, basically every entity might be notable in the future, even something I made up this moment. --Dorades (talk) 19:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This hotel is not in your imagination. It is a real place, a place where significant events can occur (meetings, deaths, etc.). Its basic existence, history, and ownership is already verified in "serious sources", even if there's no academic monograph documenting the size, layout and color scheme of every room. If this item is deleted, and next week a notable event happens there, the item will need to be recreated, which wastes time and energy. -Animalparty (talk) 02:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote above, I don't think the references and identifiers present on this item make it notable. Can you show me where any kind of consensus was reached regarding items that might become notable in the future? --Dorades (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130241374

Not notable. Masai giraffe

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

Keep: a few seconds of GOOGLING finds several sources. [8], [9], [10] satisfying WD:N #2. A clearly identifiable person, verifiable, that can be described using serious sources (i.e. newspapers & magazines). -Animalparty (talk) 01:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Animalparty please assume good faith and avoid sarcasm and derision in your discussion. William Graham (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep At least per #3 for connecting two notable people.--GZWDer (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q80579024

Carl Zeiss jena camera lens (Q80579024): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently there's a lot of coverage about the Jena model of camera lens from Carl Zeiss, so...? DS (talk) 04:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That may be the case, right now this item seems to be modeled to represent the Commons category which would not be notable according to WD:N. --Dorades (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK, "Jena" is not a model, it's part of the company name: Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH (Q13521884). So the Commons category should be renamed for proper capitalization. --2A02:810B:581:C300:551D:5078:3FD3:855 09:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q102217072

Q102217072: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not existing object JAn Dudík (talk) 20:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is https://en.mapy.cz/zakladni?source=base&id=2286529&gallery=1&sourcep=foto&idp=3298798&x=14.3957198&y=48.9785816&z=19 from 2021, or is that somewhere else? Google street view from 2011, 2012, 2019 and 2023 shows what appears to be the base without a cross attached, so it could be a temporary structure on the same base. Peter James (talk) 13:12, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q13196202

Francesco Mirko Velardi (Q13196202): Italian association football player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted scn page, unrelevant male, promo, out of scope GiovanniPen (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since it has FootballDatabase.eu person ID (P3537) and Transfermarkt player ID (P2446) it is within the scope. 94.40.72.241 11:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q106957769

Jeh Cyrus Vandrevala (Q106957769): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only reference geni, where it is marked as private profile, no given name Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 04:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this item and Cyrus Vandrevala (Q106957771) are notable by criteria 3 (spouse and son of Priya Niranjan Hiranandani (Q106957770)) - yona b (talk) 08:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence provided that it is about a son of "Priya Niranjan Hiranandani" and that the person in Geni has the name stored in the label in Wikidata. Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that "Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454" is now globally locked. Bovlb (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q106619290

Kuok Meng Jun (Q106619290): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Only reference geni, where it is marked as private profile, no given name Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 04:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q75253495

Isabella Tennant (Q75253495): born 1964; elder sister of model Stella Tennant: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

For personal reasons Isabella Tennant would like the names of her children and spouse removed from the entry --86.24.224.165 12:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it is present on The Peerage website, it is impossible. I can't find it on source websites, but there is archived wersion, which clearly states this data: https://web.archive.org/web/20100719121735/http://www.thepeerage.com/p42972.htm#i429720 94.40.72.241 17:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131341947

paternal niece (Q131341947): daughter of a sibling of the father: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This seems a more specific concept than we really need, and the description doesn't seem to reflect the actual concept. Am I missing something? Bovlb (talk) 17:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By clicking on "edit" I managed to change the description and changed it to "daughter of a sibling of the father". Since when is a wrong description a reason for deletion? Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The new description is a cousin, not a niece. Bovlb (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bovlb These are terms used in Spanish, the opposite of maternal uncle or aunt (Q12446468) and paternal uncle or aunt (Q28017566). Madamebiblio (talk) 20:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So should it be "daughter of a brother"? That would make more sense than either of the offered descriptions. Bovlb (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The usage here is on relative (P1038) with the kinship to subject (P1039) qualifier as a more specific variant of niece (Q3403377). If we can decide what the meaning actually is, then I guess that makes sense, although I can't see a useful application of that sort of specificity. Why not just reify the sibling?

Since when is a wrong description a reason for deletion? Not being able to determine what underlying concept an item refers to is definitely a reason for deletion. Bovlb (talk) 20:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you not able? Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454 (talk) 00:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original creator gave the description "daughter of one's sister", which sounds more like a maternal niece.
You changed the description to "daughter of a sibling of the father" which is a type of cousin.
Madamebiblio suggested "daughter of father's brother", which is a more specific type of cousin.
You later changed the description to "daughter of one's brother", which matches my guess of what the term might mean.

So there doesn't seem to be a clear consensus on what the team means, even according to you. And no-one has addressed my other point. Bovlb (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both points in your first sentence of the request have been addressed. Rahul Varun Q113589827 (talk) 02:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

daughter of father's brother Madamebiblio (talk) 20:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So a cousin and (in most families) not a niece at all. I don't see any agreement here on what this term refers to. Bovlb (talk) 20:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The item had a clear original meaning - although it can be clarified or explained better. However, the reason given is "This seems a more specific concept than we really need" but it's a (maybe involuntarily) ethnocentric reason. Please see en:Kinship_terminology#Six_basic_patterns_of_kinship. In a lot of languages and cultures "daughter of one's father" is a different concept from "daughter of one's mother", although in English both are just female cousins (and "daughter of one's brother" and "daughter of one's sister" are also different concepts for what in English would just be "nieces"). Therefore, this item should be keep and cleaned as needed to clarify its meaning (and settle in one meaning) unless the same meaning already exists in other item and they could be merged.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this was just a typo, but I reject the idea that either "daughter of one's father" or "daughter of one's mother" would be considered to be cousins (in most families).

I originally said that "This seems a more specific concept than we really need", and it seems that I need to clarify what I mean by that. This item appears to be intended for use as a qualifier value on relative (P1038)/kinship to subject (P1039), While is is useful to provide meaningful distinctions, there is literally no limit to the number of possible relationships that could be reified, both in distance from the subject and in qualities of the intermediate individuals. This means that we have to draw the line somewhere.

It was suggested above that this term is commonly used in Spanish (and perhaps elsewhere). That's certainly a consideration, but it is not determinative. We should not be reifying every phrase that is commonly used in some language or culture. Such linguistic or ethnocentric bias is not a useful ontological principle. In particular, we should be asking questions like: Will using this representation help us to answer useful questions that we could otherwise not answer? Will using this representation made it harder to write common queries correctly? To what extent is it possible to represent the meaning of this concept ontologically, distinguishing it from its peers?

Looking at the talk page for P1039, there is a long discussion of how specific the qualifiers should be, considering age- and gender-specificity. Interestingly the discussion there seems to favour concepts like maternal cousin (Q42301620) and paternal cousin (Q42301631). Indeed we currently have 9 sub-types of first cousin, and 5 sub-types of niece. This seems to favour retaining this term, but I note that the meaning of "paternal" in "paternal cousin" and "paternal niece" is very different, a point which is reflected in some of the confused definitions that have been offered. Bovlb (talk) 18:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that precise and well defined concepts should be used, and this one has room for improvement.

However, if we want to avoid ethnocentrism we should aim for the maximum possible granularity. Some cultures use the same word for children of one's brother and children of one's sister while other cultures have the same word for children of one's siblings and for one's own children. Saying that the former distinction is unimportant (so we don't need distinct elements "one's brothers child" and "one's sister's child") but we need different elements for niece and child (son/daughter) is an (undestandable and involuntary) ethnocentric bias. Pere prlpz (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming that you mean the finest possible granularity here.

I don't think that's a reasonable goal, as there is no end to the potential qualification. The discussion I linked to supports the idea of coarser granularity. Personally I would be happy to merge "niece" and "nephew"; not all languages make that distinction, and there is a nascent effort to eliminate it in English (see niece or nephew (Q76477)). It's a cultural assumption that you need to verify everyone's gender just to describe a familial relation. Bovlb (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that "Child of Hoplamazian Q106967454", whom I suspect may have been the original IP who created this item, has now been globally locked. Bovlb (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q54933467

Non-notable individual. Marbletan (talk) 15:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130736822

Still Heroes (Q130736822): Interactive fiction by Exaheva: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable software/game/digital comic book. William Graham (talk) 16:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be merged with Still Heroes (Q111726552)? Piecesofuk (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q120325124

denpa geisha (Q120325124): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Kokage si (talk) 03:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131148224

Lankey Lukey (Q131148224): Tiktok Star: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Tiktoker that doesn't appear notable. William Graham (talk) 04:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q130719275

Big Ste Official (Q130719275): British Tiktok Star: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Tiktoker that doesn't appear notable. William Graham (talk) 04:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131311144

Bigga Boys Food Reviews (Q131311144): Social Media Influencer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Tiktoker that doesn't appear notable. William Graham (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q25136887

Template:Telemundo-stub (Q25136887): Wikimedia template: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N HouseBlaster (talk) 06:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131367044

Korey Kormick (Q131367044): United States Chess Federation Representative who supports L-bekKastle 2000 but not 2100 Justified Rating Floor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vandalism, created by a banned user Leonidlednev (talk) 08:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131360642

Direcani (Q131360642): Nigerian record producer, rapper and singer from Benue: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Cross-wiki self-promotion of non-notable invidual. Marbletan (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also from the same user:

9 Swing Wings (Q131361009)
Exotic Crew Oasis (Q131361229) (also nominated separately below)

Marbletan (talk) 13:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131361229

Exotic Crew Oasis (Q131361229): Nigerian record label: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertising Yann (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:41, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The linked item is also nominated for deletion above. Self-promotion of a non-notable individual. Marbletan (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131366791

single father (Q131366791): Type of family in which one man starts a family on her own: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This concept seems incoherent: Is it a type of father or a type of family? Do we need to divide single parent families into a gender binary? Bovlb (talk) 18:28, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's no less incoherent than single mother (Q20987265). Both items need cleanup and focused attention, not deletion. -Animalparty (talk) 02:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, there is no shortage of scholarly literature on the subject, e.g. Single Fathers Rearing Children (Q126969660), Single Fathers (Q131373096), Single Fathers: A Growing Minority in America (Q58268438), Single fathers: neglected, growing, and important (Q88006926), Premature mortality in single fathers (Q87812813), etc. -Animalparty (talk) 02:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like all of those links are about a type of father, not a type of family. Bovlb (talk) 05:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And yet are you nominating single mother (Q20987265) for deletion which has the same issues? single father (Q131366791) may well be mergeable to single father (Q66372681) - both have external identifiers. Wikidata items will probably never be as granular or 1-1 congruent with every external identifier or cataloguing scheme. But it's pretty clear that 'single parent families' and 'single parents' are different conceptual entities, and that there are recognized gender distinctions between each of them (to the above single father articles, add: Determinants of household expenditure in single-parent families : A comparison between single-mother families and single-father families (Q127755257), Single mothers, poverty and depression (Q34423620), Single mothers' perceptions of their newborns (Q69827399) Reexamining the effects of family structure on children's access to care: the single-father family (Q36570353), Children in single-father families in demographic perspective (Q77127161), Single-mother families in Canada (Q75442993), etc. etc.). If more items are needed to better describe reality, so be it. If existing items need to be clarified, and incoming links reallocated, then by all means, clarify and reallocate! -Animalparty (talk) 03:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131312304

Imtiaz Ahmed (actor) (Q131312304): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No articles on any wikipedia site Ravensfire (talk) 04:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Played a role in Q7550353, seems it was not really a bit-part role. WD:N criterion 3? --Wolverène (talk) 21:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q120186854

Chiranjiv Makwana (Q120186854): Indian screenwriter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable, vandalism, spam. --Zukku (talk) 10:07, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:11, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All of that was clear vandalism, spam and cross wiki abuse, the creator of the item

is a blocked user.

Zukku (talk) 10:22, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q18234173

Sora Nagata (Q18234173): Japanese actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. jawiki article has been deleted. Kokage si (talk) 11:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131375515

Q131375515: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Erroneusly created the item Q131375515 before realising an object of this type already exists. Sorry, no idea what went wrong in the paragraph above. Thanks! --Graefestrasse (talk) 12:13, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request: items created by User:Brycegonorth

Q131370061 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131370122 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131370160 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131370218 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Items created by User:Brycegonorth about themself, a self identified public agent relation. None of these items seem notable. William Graham (talk) 15:08, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk deletion request Muktee1494

@ Muktee1494

Muktee1494 (talk • contribs • logs)

I'd like a second opinion on the contributions of this user. A small handful have some decent references and sources, but most are sourced only to Google search links. Many have coordinates, which I consider to be a weak identifier. Descriptions are very promotional. User is not responsive to feedback.

Examples:

Q131314694 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131314387 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131314214 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131314157 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q130493016 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131324160 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131324167 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131324172 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131339713 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q131341959 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

little indication of notability Bovlb (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bovlb (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I watch some of their creation and I'm would go personnally to nuke them. Any oposition? Fralambert (talk) 01:58, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bovlb I deleted most of the hospitels and people. I did keep the books, most of them seem government work or academic publication, seem at least notable. Fralambert (talk) 05:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131376723

Shirley Ann Griffen (Q131376723): wife of Jon Brower Minnoch: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:07, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She was, for about a year, married to Jon Brower Minnoch. Is that enough? DS (talk) 21:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q30279428

dictionary page in Wikisource (Q30279428): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Invalid item, created without discussion. This cause mass misunderstanding (d:Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#Cancellation of unconsensus mass edits, had to cancel about 100k edits, when the property was set on dictionary entries of printed books.).

Wikisource only allows printing of dictionary and encyclopedia articles that were published in book sources. In the vast majority of cases (99.99%) they are licensed as Public domain. Subclasses of the new property: a) subclass wiki page (Q111279923) explicitly define that they are not compatible with articles of book dictionaries and encyclopedias in "different from (P1889) = encyclopedia article (Q13433827)"; b) subclass Wikimedia article page (Q15138389) replace the Public domain license with open content (Q1293664)/"open licenses" (CC-BY-SA, GNU), what directly violates the law; c) property defines pages as part of (P361) "Wikisource", published - yes but not "part", this is a dubious statement which may violate the copyright of the authors-compilers of book publications. d) Wikisource pages authored by Wikisource users, as requested by this item, cannot contain dictionary pages, see the rules of w:ru:Help:What Wikisource contains, s:en:Wikisource:What Wikisource includes. Such pages are only allowed in Wiktionary. Vladis13 (talk) 21:22, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q20088085

dictionary page in Wikipedia (Q20088085): MediaWiki page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A) Wikipedia articles cannot be dictionary pages, otherwise they violate the w:en:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a dictionary rule. b) Subclass wiki page (Q111279923) explicitly define "different from (P1889) = encyclopedia article (Q13433827)", that are not compatible with "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia" rule. Vladis13 (talk) 22:12, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131378062

‎AniSearch character ID (Q131378062): ID for a character at AniSearch: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

私はプロパティを作りたかったですけれども、条件を誤解致しました。項目の代わりにプロパティ作成をお願い申し上げております。 --Z. Patterson (talk) 02:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Z. Patterson: プロパティの提案はこちらに正しくございます。削除するべくものはQ131378062です。 Z. Patterson (talk) 02:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q68419912

??? (Q68419912): 1959 journal article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably notable, but requires further research: The SIMBAD reference indicates the item is an article in a 1959 issue of Mitteilungen ueber Veraenderliche Sterne (Q106466689). Possibly the original title has been lost in translation or database maintenance, or the ADS record was corrupted. Someone who reads German and has access to a library holding the journal should be able to investigate and clarify the reference. And note there are similar enigmatic/incomplete bibliographic items such as ??? (Q68666745). -Animalparty (talk) 03:05, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

??? (Q68666745) has the same volume and page number as An objective-prism spectral survey of early-type stars in a region of Cassiopeia (Q68461151), and the articles linking to it have the description "star in the constellation Cassiopeia" or no description, so it's probably a duplicate and one of the years is wrong - other articles in volume 66 are said to have been published in 1989. I couldn't find anything that looked like a duplicate of ??? (Q68419912). Peter James (talk) 03:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131294508

Imilchil Marriage Festival (Q131294508): celebrates love, family and community: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Lymantria (talk) 06:38, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Looks to be notable enough for Wikidata, it's described in Wikipedia at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imilchil#Marriage_festival and there are plenty of sources that cover it online, eg https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2014/10/31/in-pictures-imilchil-marriage-festival Piecesofuk (talk) 17:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q19958240

Jaz Graham (Q19958240): American singer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Conflated item. I can't determine who the article was originally about because it was created based on a enwiki article in 2015 that was either moved or deleted. Current enwiki article only has a creation date of 2021 and is a different person. I have moved all identifiers that are actually another person to the item of that person, mostly Q6168029. William Graham (talk) 04:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article was redirected to an article about another person (Q105873475) - the version before the redirect was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jaz_(musician)&oldid=1137644318 - the non-deprecated statements are now correct (if https://hoodcriticmagazine.com/2015/01/21/jaz-kicks-off-her-debut-single-bout-that/ https://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwmusic/article/Urban-Pop-Singer-Jaz-Graham-Launches-New-Single-Distance-Love-20170504 https://vegas2la.com/miss-black-california-usa/ are the same person). Peter James (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this item has been conflated for so long it might make sense to split off Jaz Graham into a new item and delete this one. William Graham (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that Jaz Graham is notable, then please go for it. I'm having trouble finding any good references. Bovlb (talk) 17:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q121833637

Al Anesa Farah – Music from the Original TV Series (Q121833637): 2019 soundtrack album by Adel Hakki: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The IP has a hang-up on Miss Farah and keeps creating made up items, I'm tired of trying to help them Moebeus (talk) 17:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123342306

Al Farah (Ya Bakhta Biya) (Q123342306): 2020 vocal track by Asmaa Abulyazeid and Mohamed Al Kilany from the television series "Miss Farah"; original soundtrack recording: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The IP has a hang-up on Miss Farah and keeps creating made up items Moebeus (talk) 17:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q123415549

Matthias Laurenz (Gräff) in Dutch costume (Q123415549): painting by Helmuth Gräff: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N. WD entry created to promote the author itself. A09 (talk) 08:39, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by "author" here, but the painter has five Wikipedia articles, several of which use an image of this picture. I added a reference, albeit a very weak one. Bovlb (talk) 17:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131410307

Ronnie Frydenlund Hansen (Q131410307): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a notable person --2A01:799:D6A:9C00:19E5:C91E:B00F:C51C 01:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unmarried partner of an athlete who has five Wikipedia articles. I think this qualifies under N3. The relationship is referenced to a single source that appears to support it. (According to Google Translate, he is her "partner" in a context that preclude any business interpretation. It's a passing reference, but my inference is that this suggests it is an established and well-known relationship.) Bovlb (talk) 17:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q74574448

Category:James Pellentz (Q74574448): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability requirement for Commons categories (see Wikidata:Notability #1.4) Quesotiotyo (talk) 00:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q108518526

Kyle Lai-Fatt (Q108518526): Chinese Jamaican-American project manager and software engineer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam/promotion Renvoy (talk) 21:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Item has fake references, which is a classic spammer sign. Unfortunately, it has a Commons category link, so satisfies N1. Bovlb (talk) 03:33, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete KLF off of Wikidata like many times done in past. Kyle Lai-Fatt is well respected in the NBA 2K world and we want 2 honour and cherish him by creating a page of him. do not delete him off of this site. We Lai-Fattheads are here to see him succeed even at 50 yrs old so keep kyle up and we wont annoy u anymore. thanks you Milana Lai-Fatthead (talk) 08:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q11444342

Q11444342: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. jawiki article has been deleted. Kokage si (talk) 03:25, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131430579

Q131430579: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional; no site links Omphalographer (talk) 06:41, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q131447444

Q131447444: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test page --George13lol2 (talk) 09:59, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lexeme:L1400288

invalid ID (L1400288): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test page --George13lol2 (talk) 10:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Q11869705

Kansankokous (Q11869705): Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This seems no longer a necessary item, the Finnish article was turned into a sort of proto-article Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 10:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata:Requests for deletions

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}

Requests

Bulk deletion request: advertising items created by Jminot92

Bulk deletion request regarding Boowa & Kwala

Bulk deletion request

Bulk deletion from The Peerage

Bulk deletion request regarding Tech SEO Summit

Bulk deletion request: 277 Systematic internaliser (SI) items

Bulk deletion request: Self promotional items created by User:Designer Mario Kleff

Edit group OR/9eae4bfdedc

Further Jakobovits descendents

Bulk deletion request regarding Anthony family

Bulk deletion request regarding Glover family

Bulk deletion request regarding Big News Network

Punctuation lexemes

Bulk deletion request

Bulk deletion request for Noble Group Colleges

Bulk deletion request: Non-notable YouTubers

Pages tagged with `{{Delete}}`