Shortcut: WD:AN

Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Report concerning User:Ninijyo

[edit]

Ninijyo (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: ―呉野 (talk) 13:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

私は普段、日本語版Wikipediaで活動しており、Wikidataのことがわからないので、間違った場所に依頼していたらすみません。この利用者の編集は無根拠・間違い・差別的などの問題があり、保護されていない項目は私が修正しましたが、次の2つの項目は保護されており、修正ができませんでした。

この利用者は日本語版で無期限ブロックされていますが（Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/Ninijyo）、日本語版Wikipediaで指摘された問題行動を、Wikidataで引き続き行っています。Wikidataでもブロックした方がいいと思います。--呉野 (talk) 13:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Penn Station: could you please check this request?--S8321414 (talk) 13:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support to block, because this user stick on discrimination and uncertain informations. Kokage si (talk) 11:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support to block. I also checked situations on the Japanese Wikipedia and commons. This user shows some apologies when warned, but later repeats same mistakes. It seems that he/she puts his/her own obsession before the rules. I cannot hope for voluntary improvement from such persons, and I believe we have no choice but to force his/her to stop editing. 本日晴天 (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Kambaiyu75

[edit]

Item/lexeme creations and statements added by this user for the most part are nonsense. E.g. their last item Afan (Q131279322) has two statements that don't add up, and there's no other information based on which the item could be cleared up. In their lexemes like invalid ID (L1378339) all statements individually are nonsense. Hard to say if they deliberately enter nonsense or if they just have no understanding of what they are doing. Probably all their items/lexemes should be deleted and user should be blocked. 2001:7D0:81F8:9A80:EC43:3A7B:4AED:5ED7 09:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kambaiyu75 please explain what you are doing? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have partially blocked the user from the main namespace as a precaution. I will wait a little longer for an explanation before deleting those items/lexemes — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unless we get a response soon, I'm inclined to delete all of the lexemes as nonsense. Their items make a little more sense, but fail to establish notability. Bovlb (talk) 00:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please do. Apparently my block only applies to items and they are still creating new lexemes — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lexemes deleted and block extended to cover that namespace. Bovlb (talk) 16:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I note that they appear to be a member of the Tyap Wikimedians User Group, and they may be making these edits as part of a WMF-funded program. Bovlb (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MSGJ, Bovlb: It appears that the user has taken notice of the block. Mahir256 (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed contributions from some other participants in this datathon. I found a lot of items that had no indication of notability, several empty items, and a number of duplicate items. There's also a lot of lexemes, but I'm not really qualified to judge them. It looks like this program did not prepare its participants to contribute effectively. Bovlb (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I put a block template on their talk page. Bovlb (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I looked through the contributions of more participants of this event. I see many more new editors leaping straight into mass item creation without a strong grasp on notability, often creating empty items and duplicates. The editors don't seem to be responsive to feedback. I wish there was a way to ensure that such organized events started off with training that emphasized the importance of these points. Bovlb (talk) 04:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is rather concerning. I am pinging a few editors who are identified as "key people" of the user group: @Valtino44, @Friday musa, @Bello Lydia, @Zbobai — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many of them seem to be using mobile interfaces, so en:WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU may be in play. Bovlb (talk) 17:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like this one is set to disappear with no response. I for one am getting a little tired of these externally-imposed WMF-funded programs that result in bulk item creation with inadequate training, no respect for local policies and norms, and a failure to engage with the community. Is it time for us to consider something akin to en:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(WMF)/Archive_6#RfC_to_issue_a_non-binding_resolution_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation? Bovlb (talk) 03:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Omagol

[edit]

Omagol (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: in Q131349149 I have serious concerns about the quality of the data added, especially links to other projects. They seem to be totally false, unrelated to the topic. This editor has been creating oddities on Commons and on Wikisource, too ―Timtrent (talk) 15:48, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

single created item is waiting to be deleted Estopedist1 (talk) 07:19, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Estopedist1 Thank you for the response. I am not totally familiar with processes here. Does that flag the item formally somehow as awaiting deletion? Or is it sufficient that you are an admin here and have noted it? If it needs flagging I am not sure of the process, and will need guidance, please. The person the item describes has been created on enWiki as (self?) promotion, and has been scattered over several WMF sites. Timtrent (talk) 08:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:2400:4152:B41:4500:E155:5B78:3844:6439

[edit]

2400:4152:B41:4500:E155:5B78:3844:6439 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism ―Afaz (talk) 02:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

range-blocked, but edits are not patrolled Estopedist1 (talk) 07:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:193.54.27.129

[edit]

193.54.27.129 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:48, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ✓ Done I blocked the /24 for LTA. There seemed to be ok contributions in the /16 so I went with a narrow block this time. Feel free to adjust the block netmask if you have reason to believe if is insufficient or otherwise. Infrastruktur (talk) 17:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Stage amd

[edit]

Stage amd (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: IP hopping disruptive editor that I have previously reported (Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2024/08#Disruptive editing and Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2024/11#User:125.204.92.240 and other IPs) is now back with an account making the exact same high-volume, disruptive edits. Their edits for now mostly consist of making items for non-existent disambiguation pages, making incorrect changes to Japanese labels, disruptively moving or removing properties and sitelinks, and moving commons categories and links to different items for no discernable reason. This editor has never communicated, nor have they ever acknowledged my reversions of their edits or the previous two times I reported them here. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC) ―Xezbeth (talk) 05:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Estopedist1 I notice that you recently blocked Special:Contributions/2400:4152:B41:4500:0:0:0:0/64. I was wondering why they would suddenly use an account. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Xezbeth They appear to making a mixture of good edits and some that are likely bad, and you appear to be reverting them wholesale. Can you please explain that? Also, please give a link to where you have tried to communicate with them, as I can't seem to find it. Thanks, Bovlb (talk) 05:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This has been going on for months with thousands of edits across dozens of IPs, I have said in both previous reports that some of their edits were ok. I am now less inclined to care about preserving their edits as cleaning up after them is a massive waste of my time. See User_talk:125.204.92.240 for one vain attempt at communicating. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disruption continues on their main account and now 114.184.210.173 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) as well. —Xezbeth (talk) 15:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another 100+ edits, most of which need reverting. I'm just going to leave them to it. —Xezbeth (talk) 04:57, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disruption ramping up, continuing on logged in account and now also 118.18.190.19 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)). Why is nothing happening? This isn't even ambiguous disruption, it's a pain to clean up. —Xezbeth (talk) 04:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Haubi F

[edit]

Haubi F (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. „Systempartei“ and „Linksextremistisch“ in German are pejorative terms. For the parties edited by the user – at least judging from the linked German Wikipedia articles – there's no basis for such changes, especially not for reintroducing them after having been reverted. --Nw520 (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

user is warned Estopedist1 (talk) 09:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and continues Ankermast (talk) 12:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Blocked 1 week. --Lymantria (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GratarGratar

[edit]

User:GratarGratar is edit-warring at Q5021363. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tgeorgescu is supporting a claim the person within the article (Călin Georgescu) didn't make. On contrary, he clearly says he's an ORTHODOX (on his youtube channel 18:27, being together with his wife, she says "Religia noastră creștin-ortodoxă" - engl. "Our orthodox faith...").
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lctvzaN7j1s&ab_channel=C%C4%83linGeorgescu-CanalulOficial
I propose Tgeorgescu to be blocked from further editing the article. Thanks. GratarGratar (talk) 22:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would understand it if the mainstream media just spilled the beans about Georgescu's secret religious allegiance. But his public declarations are rife with New Age ideology. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you have no respect for reliable sources, don't expect to last long at this project. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:48, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
E.g., most members of the Anthroposophical Society from Romania self-identify as Eastern-Orthodox. In fact, they believe in reincarnation and that God consists of seven Elohim. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:56, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have cited 5 (five) different media outlets which all confirm he is a New Age Christian. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So: who are going the admins to believe? Me? Not! You? Not! They are going to believe reliable sources. That's how the whole Wikimedia system operates: based upon reliable sources. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do note that I have absolutely no objection to also stating that he self-identifies as Eastern-Orthodox. Both should be stated: his self-identification as Eastern-Orthodox, and that he is a New Age believer according to several journalists and professors. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those would be 7 or 8 journalists and 3 professors. The genie is out of the bottle, you cannot put it back. Tgeorgescu (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be more clear: subjective identification does matter. But objective identification also matters. It is ridiculous to say that only the subjective identification should be believed, while the objective identification should be rejected. See w:emic and etic. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a living person. We have policies on this. Per en.wp and other Wikipedia wikis, "Categories regarding religious beliefs (or lack of such) or sexual orientation should not be used unless the subject has publicly self-identified with the belief (or lack of such) or orientation in question," and "These principles apply equally to lists, navigation templates, and {{Infobox}} statements". Wikidata statements are mostly used on Wikipedia as infobox statements. As such, we have our own Wikidata:Living people policy, where religion or worldview (P140) is listed among Wikidata properties that may violate privacy. So please exercise care: do not add religions that are not accepted by the person in question. If religious leaders and/or scholars question their allegiance to the religion that the person declared, then there is the deprecated rank that can be applied to the statement.
I'm not saying that in this case we should do that. I think the best way to go is to not specify anything there.
Yes, subjective identification is key to someone's identity and identity should be respected.  —Andreitalk 08:51, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I still have to figure out how stating that he is New Age is offensive, but allegations of bribery and corruption aren't. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One thing is about what you are, the other is about what you do.  —Andreitalk 14:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrei Stroe: May I suggest changing the removal into a deprecated rank statement? It has the same effect. We don't normally remove statements with reasonable sources. The statement can also get a "statement is disputed by" (subject) qualifier to make it clear. Infrastruktur (talk) 14:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrastruktur true, this works.  —Andreitalk 14:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:240F:7A:DD40:1:0:0:0:0/64

[edit]

240F:7A:DD40:1:0:0:0:0/64 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Controversial editing about living people. ―Kokage si (talk) 09:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Range-blocked for three months Estopedist1 (talk) 10:11, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Ntulibsys

[edit]

Ntulibsys (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―Cookai1205 (talk) 03:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike that bad faith vandalism, because the user says "National Taiwan University Library Wikidata account". However, Chinese-language specific. Could you help @S8321414? Estopedist1 (talk) 07:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is more like editing dispute for me, not pure vandalism. I will suggest WD:PC for this case.--S8321414 (talk) 08:03, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:210.170.160.9

[edit]

210.170.160.9 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Controversial editing about living people. ―Kokage si (talk) 11:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Blocked for 1 year.--S8321414 (talk) 12:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:2607.FEA8.4A5C.7600.A4D9.1E54.3FAE.8BE6

[edit]

2607.FEA8.4A5C.7600.A4D9.1E54.3FAE.8BE6 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―XXBlackburnXx (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Blocked by Mahir256 and global locked.--S8321414 (talk) 05:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mahir256: please don't block only specific IP, but IP ranges, if you are dealing with IPv6 stuff Estopedist1 (talk) 08:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Estopedist1 I'll note that this account is not actually an IPv6 anon user, but instead a user who has registered a username meant to resemble an IPv6 address. The same LTA has also created multiple similar accounts resembling both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. William Graham (talk) 17:19, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:113.150.225.116

[edit]

113.150.225.116 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism ―Afaz (talk) 06:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, globally blocked. Cheers, Hoo man (talk) 07:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Wikikoenatau

[edit]

Wikikoenatau (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Sock account of Eiskrahablo as of Duck Test, see the previous sock contributions in Q2071325 sudah as removal of "Austronesia" and re-adding of wikiquote entry, previously made and added by the sock, see 1 and 2 as reference Nyilvoskt (talk) 06:51, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, globally locked. Cheers, Hoo man (talk) 07:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:2001:448A:50E1:2354:0:0:0:0/64

[edit]

2001:448A:50E1:2354:0:0:0:0/64 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. ―Kokage si (talk) 15:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Blocked —Andreitalk 15:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:2A02:2F0B:840B:BD00:D1B8:5CA:2826:4C5E

[edit]

2A02:2F0B:840B:BD00:D1B8:5CA:2826:4C5E (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. LTA on Romanian language Wikipedia XReport ―--Paloi Sciurala (talk｜contribs) 15:34, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done for a month Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Sanphangutc

[edit]

Sanphangutc (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 05:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Already globally locked. --Lymantria (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Noelwentworth

[edit]

Noelwentworth (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 06:14, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Indeffed. --Lymantria (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Dental-hut

[edit]

Dental-hut (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 06:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Indeffed. --Lymantria (talk) 06:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:Universityofafrica12

[edit]

Universityofafrica12 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Indeffed. --Lymantria (talk) 06:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:2001:448A:50E1:0:0:0:0:0/48

[edit]

2001:448A:50E1:0:0:0:0:0/48 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism. Wider range of 2001:448A:50E1:2354:0:0:0:0/64 and second time for this range. ―Kokage si (talk) 09:29, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Ameisenigel (talk) 10:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit rights on requested page

[edit]

Could someone please provide me the following?

Thank you! Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you don't have "autoconfirmed", but I have granted "confirmed", which should resolve at least some of the issue. Bovlb (talk) 18:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Bovlb but I still can't edit that entry. Is there some cascading protection? New users were editing up until a few days ago. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything. I have toggled the protection on that page just in case that makes a difference. What's the exact problem you see when trying to edit? Can you edit, say, PAW Patrol (Q15106029)? Bovlb (talk) 19:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh. I was looking for an "edit" button like on other wikis. I forgot that's not how it works here. Carry on. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Our pages are really just JSON documents, so we don't let anyone edit them directly. Bovlb (talk) 19:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report concerning User:138.121.113.37

[edit]

138.121.113.37 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―Pólux (talk) 19:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done for a week. Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=2284215414"