Microwave Link Design
Microwave Link Design
Microwave Link Design
com
Line-of-Sight Considerations
Microwave radio communication requires a clear line-of-sight (LOS) condition Under normal atmospheric conditions, the radio horizon is around 30 percent beyond the optical horizon Radio LOS takes into account the concept of Fresnel ellipsoids and their clearance criteria
Line-of-Sight Considerations
Fresnel Zone - Areas of constructive and destructive interference created when electromagnetic wave propagation in free space is reflected (multipath) or diffracted as the wave intersects obstacles. Fresnel zones are specified employing ordinal numbers that correspond to the number of half wavelength multiples that represent the difference in radio wave propagation path from the direct path The Fresnel Zone must be clear of all obstructions.
Micrwave Link Design 6
y R d=x+y
Line-of-Sight Considerations
Typically the first Fresnel zone (N=1) is used to determine obstruction loss The direct path between the transmitter and the receiver needs a clearance above ground of at least 60% of the radius of the first Fresnel zone to achieve free space propagation conditions Earth-radius factor k compensates the refraction in the atmosphere Clearance is described as any criterion to ensure sufficient antenna heights so that, in the worst case of refraction (for which k is minimum) the receiver antenna is not placed in the diffraction region
Micrwave Link Design 8
Effective Earths Radius = k * True Earths Radius True Earths radius= 6371 Km k=4/3=1.33, standard atmosphere with normally refracted path (this value should be used whenever local value is not provided)
Line-of-Sight Considerations
Clearance criteria to be satisfied under normal propagation conditions - Clearance of 60% or greater at the minimum k suggested for the certain path - Clearance of 100% or greater at k=4/3 - In case of space diversity, the antenna can have a 60% clearance at k=4/3 plus allowance for tree growth, buildings (usually 3 meter)
Micrwave Link Design 10
Frequency Planning
Rain attenuation Diffractionrefraction losses Multipath propagation
12
Link Budget
Fading Predictions
Other Losses
13
Propagation Losses
Free-space loss - when the transmitter and receiver have a clear, unobstructed line-ofsight Lfsl=92.45+20log(f)+20log(d) [dB] where f = frequency (GHz) d = LOS range between antennas (km) Vegetation attenuation (provision should be taken for 5 years of vegetation growth) L=0.2f 0.3R0.6(dB) f=frequency (MHz) R=depth of vegetation in meters (for R<400m)
Micrwave Link Design 15
Propagation Losses
Obstacle Loss also called Diffraction Loss or Diffraction Attenuation. One method of calculation is based on knife edge approximation. Having an obstacle free 60% of the Fresnel zone gives 0 dB loss
0 dB
0 dB
6dB
Micrwave Link Design
16dB
20dB
16
Propagation Losses
Gas absorption
Primarily due to the water vapor and oxygen in the atmosphere in the radio relay region.The absorption peaks are located around 23GHz for water molecules and 50 to 70 GHz for oxygen molecules.The specific attenuation (dB/Km)is strongly dependent on frequency, temperature and the absolute or relative humidity of the atmosphere.
Micrwave Link Design 17
50
18
Propagation Losses
Attenuation due to precipitation
Rain attenuation is the main contributor in the frequency range used by commercial radio links Rain attenuation increases exponentially with rain intensity The percentage of time for which a given rain intensity is attained or exceeded is available for 15 different rain zones covering the entire earths surface
Micrwave Link Design 19
Propagation Losses
The specific attenuation of rain is dependent on many parameters such as the form and size of distribution of the raindrops, polarization, rain intensity and frequency Horizontal polarization gives more rain attenuation than vertical polarization Rain attenuation increases with frequency and becomes a major contributor in the frequency bands above 10 GHz The contribution due to rain attenuation is not included in the link budget and is used only in the calculation of rain fading
Micrwave Link Design 20
Ground Reflection
Reflection on the Earths surface may give rise to multipath propagation The direct ray at the receiver may interfered with by the ground-reflected ray and the reflection loss can be significant Since the refraction properties of the atmosphere are constantly changing the reflection loss varies.
Micrwave Link Design 21
Ground Reflection
The loss due to reflection on the ground is dependent on the total reflection coefficient of the ground and the phase shift The highest value of signal strength is o and the obtained for a phase angle of 0 lowest value is for a phase angle of 180o The reflection coefficient is dependent on the frequency, grazing angle (angle between the ray beam and the horizontal plane), polarization and ground properties
Micrwave Link Design 22
Ground Reflection
The grazing angle of radio-relay paths is very small usually less than 1o It is recommended to avoid ground reflection by shielding the path against the indirect ray The contribution resulting from reflection loss is not automatically included in the link budget.When reflection cannot be avoided, the fade margin may be adjusted by including this contribution as additional loss in the link budget
Micrwave Link Design 23
Amin
0.2
Link Budget
The link budget is a calculation involving the gain and loss factors associated with the antennas, transmitters, transmission lines and propagation environment, to determine the maximum distance at which a transmitter and receiver can successfully operate
Micrwave Link Design 25
Link Budget
Receiver sensitivity threshold is the signal level at which the radio runs continuous errors at a specified bit rate System gain depends on the modulation used (2PSK, 4PSK, 8PSK, 16QAM, 32QAM, 64QAM,128QAM,256QAM) and on the design of the radio
26
Link Budget
The gains from the antenna at each end are added to the system gain (larger antennas provide a higher gain). The free space loss of the radio signal is subtracted. The longer the link the higher the loss These calculations give the fade margin In most cases since the same duplex radio setup is applied to both stations the calculation Micrwave Link Design of the received signal level is independent of 27
Link Budget
Receive Signal Level (RSL)
Link Budget
The fade margin is calculated with respect to the receiver threshold level for a given bit-error rate (BER).The radio can handle anything that affects the radio signal within the fade margin but if it is exceeded, then the link could go down and therefore become unavailable
Micrwave Link Design 29
Link Budget
The threshold level for BER=10-6 for microwave equipment used to be about 3dB higher than for BER=10-3. Consequently the fade margin was 3 dB -6 than BER=10-3. In larger for BER=10 new generation microwave radios with power forward error correction schemes this difference is 0.5 to 1.5 dB
Micrwave Link Design 30
Splitter Receiver 1
Branching Losses
Branching Losses
Fade Margin
Micrwave Link Design Receiver
threshold Value
31
33
34
Modern digital radios are very robust and immune to spectrum- distorting fade activity. Only a major error in path engineering (wrong antenna or misalignment) over the highclearance path could cause dispersive fading problems
Micrwave Link Design 38
42
Frequency planning
The objective of frequency planning is to assign frequencies to a network using as few frequencies as possible and in a manner such that the quality and availability of the radio link path is minimally affected by interference. The following aspects are the basic considerations involved in the assignment of radio frequencies
Micrwave Link Design 44
Frequency planning
Determining a frequency band that is suitable for the specific link (path length, site location, terrain topography and atmospheric effects) Prevention of mutual interference such as interference among radio frequency channels in the actual path, interference to and from other radio paths, interference to and from satellite communication systems Correct selection of a frequency band allows the required transmission capacity while efficiently utilizing the available radio frequency spectrum
Micrwave Link Design 45
Frequency planning
Assignment of a radio frequency or radio frequency channel is the authorization given by an administration for a radio station to use a radio frequency or radio frequency channel under specified conditions. It is created in accordance with the Series F recommendations given by the ITU-R. In India the authority is WPC (Wireless Planning & Coordination Wing)
Micrwave Link Design 46
Frequency planning
Frequency channel arrangements The available frequency band is subdivided into two halves, a lower (go) and an upper (return) duplex half. The duplex spacing is always sufficiently large so that the radio equipment can operate interference free under duplex operation. The width of each channel depends on the capacity of the radio link and the type of modulation used
Micrwave Link Design 47
Frequency planning
The most important goal of frequency planning is to allocate available channels to the different links in the network without exceeding the quality and availability objectives of the individual links because of radio interference.
Micrwave Link Design 48
Frequency planning
Frequency planning of a few paths can be carried out manually but, for larger networks, it is highly recommended to employ a software transmission design tool. One such vendor independent tool is Pathloss 4.0. This tool is probably one of the best tools for complex microwave design. It includes North American and ITU standards, different diversity schemes, diffraction and reflection (multipath) analysis, rain effects, interference analysis etc.
Micrwave Link Design 49
Chain/cascade configuration
f1 HP
f1 VP
f1 HP
50
Ring configuration
If the ring consisted of an odd number of sites there would be a conflict of duplex halves and changing the frequency band would be a reliable alternative
f1 HP U f1 VP U
L
f1 VP
f1 HP U f1 VP L
Micrwave Link Design
f1 VP
51
Star configuration
The link carrying the traffic out of the hub should use a frequency band other than the one employed inside the cluster
U
f1 HP L U f2 VP f1 HP f2 VP f1 HP U
Micrwave Link Design
U
52
57
59
A digital link is unavailable for service or performance prediction/verification after a ten consecutive BER> 1 x 10-3 SES outage period.
Micrwave Link Design 60
62
Diversity Improvement
Space Diversity Angle Diversity Frequency Diversity Crossband Diversity Route Diversity Hybrid Diversity Media Diversity
Micrwave Link Design 63
64
Basic Recommendations
Use higher frequency bands for shorter hops and lower frequency bands for longer hops Avoid lower frequency bands in urban areas Use star and hub configurations for smaller networks and ring configuration for larger networks In areas with heavy precipitation , if possible, use frequency bands below 10 GHz. Use protected systems (1+1) for all important and/or high-capacity links Leave enough spare capacity for future expansion of the system
Micrwave Link Design 65
Space diversity is a very expensive way of improving the performance of the microwave link and it should be used carefully and as a last resort The activities of microwave path planning and frequency planning preferably should be performed in parallel with line of sight activities and other network design activities for best efficiency. Use updated maps that are not more than a year old. The terrain itself can change drastically in a very short time period.Make sure everyone on the project is using the same maps, datums and coordinate systems.
66
Perform detailed path surveys on ALL microwave hops.Maps are used only for initial planning, as a first approximation. Below 10 GHz , multipath outage increases rapidly with path length.It also increases with frequency , climatic factors and average annual temperature.Multipath effect can be reduced with higher fade margin. If the path has excessive path outage the performance can be improved by using one of the diversity methods.
67
68
Thank you
69