Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    Management Traineeship Segment - Ii: Host Organization:-"Gramin Vikas Trust"

    Uploaded by

    Akram Ul Hoque
    Agricultural inputs & produce market study for the tribal community of Jhabua & Meghnagar Block of Jhabua District

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Management Traineeship Segment - Ii: Host Organization:-"Gramin Vikas Trust"

    Uploaded by

    Akram Ul Hoque
    35 views23 pages
    Agricultural inputs & produce market study for the tribal community of Jhabua & Meghnagar Block of Jhabua District

    Original Title

    Akram MTS-II

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Agricultural inputs & produce market study for the tribal community of Jhabua & Meghnagar Block of Jhabua District

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    35 views23 pages

    Management Traineeship Segment - Ii: Host Organization:-"Gramin Vikas Trust"

    Uploaded by

    Akram Ul Hoque
    Agricultural inputs & produce market study for the tribal community of Jhabua & Meghnagar Block of Jhabua District

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 23

    MANAGEMENT TRAINEESHIP SEGMENT - II

    Host Organization:Gramin vikas trust

    Title of the project:Agricultural inputs & produce market study for the tribal community of Jhabua & Meghnagar Block of Jhabua District
    Study Area:- Jhabua District of MP

    Faculty guide Prof. Nandini Sen

    Presented By: Akramul Hoque (10201002)

    About Organization
    Gramin Vikas Trust (GVT), committed for development of the rural livelihoods was established by Krishak Bharti Co-operative Limited, with the support from Govt. of India and Department for International Development (DFID), U.K. The mission of GVT is to act as a catalyst involving and enabling the rural communities to improve their livelihoods in the resource poor areas. Mission To act as catalyst to enable the rural poor to improve their livelihoods by supporting productivity improvement programmes in agriculture and rural and rural non-farming sectors which : Are planned, implemented and evaluated jointly with beneficiaries Discriminate positively in favour of women and other disadvantaged groups Link effectively with the programmes of other governmental and nongovernmental organizations and Are sustainable in the long run without the intervention of any outside agency

    Vision
    To design and implement rural livelihood programmes in different parts of the country To develop appropriate participatory gender focused agricultural technologies for rain fed areas To offer research and consultancy services to government and NGOs and community based organizations in the field of participatory technology development, project management and participatory rural appraisals

    Objectives of GVT
    Improvement of livelihood of tribal and farming community. Gender and poverty focused participatory approaches and its implementation. Establishment of village based institutions. Capacity building of community by setting up training centers. Consultancy on Rural Development to different organizations/institutions and other organizations Research and other related activities on sustainable agriculture Sustainable links with government, non-government, Educational and Research Institution

    Objective
    The Objectives of the study are: To acquaint ourselves with present agricultural scenario viz. agricultural inputs, agricultural services used at target villages and average expenditure of the farmer on the same. To estimate the demand for agricultural inputs and other related services in the target villages. To assess the market condition of the agriculture inputs and services. To prepare a producer company model in the target villages.

    Limitations
    While conducting this study I faced the some of the limitations which could be enumerated below The total coverage area of the project was very vast and it was not possible to cover within the stipulated time. Visiting the area were completely unfamiliar for me, my visit was confined. The time period was not sufficient enough for studying the different. Poor transportation facility also delayed the data collection. The major limitations were faced during my field visit, as the facts of ground reality of agri-input concept not properly understand by the farmer.

    Methodology
    Phases

    Phase 1

    (Background Study)

    Phase 2

    (Field Work)

    Discussion With RPM Jabua

    Sample Design

    Questionnaire Development

    Data Collection

    Data Analysis

    Report Writing

    Sample size
    Marginal farmer:<1 ha Small farmer: 1.0 to 2.0 ha Semi medium farmer: 2.0 to 4.0 ha Medium farmer : 4.0 to 10 ha Large farmer : 10 ha>
    Sample size:-150 farmer

    Data Analysis
    Primary occupation
    service 4% business 1%

    House type
    concerate Thatched Mixed

    16%

    17%

    Agriculture 95%

    67%

    Secondary occupation
    other 9% agricultural 5%

    business 2% livestock 1%

    wage labour 83%

    Source: Questionnaire

    Migration
    Migrate Not Migrate

    21%

    79%

    Source: Questionnaire

    Irrigation Assets
    140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Series1

    Open well 136

    Bore well 70

    Electric pump 118

    Diesel pump set 31

    Source: Questionnaire

    Cultivable land in Acre


    Wheat 20% gram 10%

    maize 36%

    soyabean 34%

    Source: Questionnaire

    Seed variety
    JS-9560 4%

    Soya bean seed variety

    Seed variety
    Breeder seed 12% Foundation 37% Certified 32% T.L 19%

    js335 32% Js9305 64%

    Wheat variety
    wh147 17% lok-1 28% sujata 10%

    Maize variety
    JVM-421 HYV

    HI-1418 45%

    41% 59%

    Source: Questionnaire

    Sources of labour
    Family labour our side of family labour

    Sources of power
    Tractor Draft of animal

    20% 44% 56%

    80%

    Source: Questionnaire

    Production Three different crop last three year:Production


    140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0

    production

    2008-09

    2008-09

    2009-10

    2010-11

    2008-09

    2009-10

    2010-11

    2009-10 Gram

    Wheat

    Maize

    2010-11 Source: Questionnaire

    Comparison of three different crops


    250000

    31%
    53% 47% 47%

    35% 31%

    200000
    150000 100000 50000 0 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2008-09 2009-10

    42% 45% 33% 2010-11 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

    sold
    own use production

    Wheat

    Maize

    Gram Source: Questionnaire

    Market Analysis
    Purchase seed from different market
    Local Market Dealear Co-operative KVK&GVT

    Agricultural produce sold at different markets


    Whole sale market, 39, 11% local market, 150, 44%

    34%

    weakly Haat, 150, 43% 56%

    9%

    co-operative, 6, 2%

    1%

    Source: Questionnaire

    Cost of per Acre. Wheat:3555/Soybean:- 3104/Gram:3388/Maize:2543/-

    Production per Acre.


    Wheat:- 5.63 Q Soybean:-5.05 Q Gram:- 1.94 Q Maize:-4.5 Q

    Gross Income:Wheat:- (5.63 Q*847.25)-3555= 1215/Soybean:-(5.05 Q*1891)-3104= 6445/Gram:-(1.94 Q*2374.44)-3388= 1218/Maize:-(4.5 Q*844.5)-2543= 1257/Source: Questionnaire

    Mode of transport:Mode of transport


    Tempo 18% Bullock cart 14%

    Tractor 68%

    Source: Questionnaire

    Existing models of movement of farm produce from farm to marketFarmer

    Village Market/ Weekly haat

    Wholesaler Market

    Consumer

    Demand analysis for agricultural input:Crop Soyabean Maize Gram Wheat Total Urea(q) 17.64 50.97 8.7 42.25 119.56 DAP(q) 67.4 60.3 28.55 48.95 3031.65 Seed(q) 76.55 16.53 14.66 65.9 173.64

    Source: Questionnaire

    Model of producer company

    Project Outcomes
    Economic Impact
    Per hectare production improved by 10% by end of project period Increase in net return to farmer (Inflation +10%)

    Social Impact
    Social capital built in the form of PC Improve gender relation & decision making of women farmers in PC given board member positions

    Increase in sub-sector development for


    agriculture Reduce gap in availability of inputs by 20-25% Increased food & nutritional security Market linkage for the backward and forward integration will be ensured with competitive market Additional employment generated due to increased intensity of farming Benchmark minimum wage rate for labor Reduction in Migration

    Institutional viability
    Increased bargaining power for input purchase and output marketing Reduce social conflicts and risks and enhance welfare at household level Improved food and nutritional value Leadership role of producers in technology absorption Positive health and nutrition impact on consumers Environment- carbon credit

    Recommendation

    To set up village knowledge centre to assess information need and collection of indigenous knowledge, which can be synthesized, with information from experts/ institution. Agricultural knowhow to provided to farmers in the cultivation of soybean, wheat, gram etc. Training of farmers on best practical post harvest and agronomic practices.

    Thank You

    You might also like