Unit IV - Dividend Policy
Unit IV - Dividend Policy
Unit IV - Dividend Policy
(Unit IV)
Dr.M.Velavan
Faculty
School of Management
SASTRA Deemed University
Thanjavur – 613 401
Chapter Overview:
1. Introduction:
The term dividend refers to that part of profits of a company which is
distributed by the company among its shareholders. It is the reward of the
shareholders for investments made by them in the shares of the company.
The investors are interested in earning the maximum return on their
investments and to maximize their wealth.
A company, on the other hand, needs to provide funds to finance its long-
term growth. If a company pays out as dividend most of what it earns, then
for business requirements and further expansion it will have to depend upon
outside resources such as issue of debt or new shares. Dividend policy of a
firm, thus affects both the long-term financing and the wealth of
shareholders
2. Meaning of Dividend:
The dividend is that part of the Profit After Tax (PAT) that is distributed to
the shareholders of the company. Further, the profit earned by a company
after paying taxes can be used for:
• Distribution of dividends, or
• Retaining as surplus for future growth
3. Forms of Dividend:
Generally, the dividend can be of the following forms (depending upon some
factors that will be discussed later):
• Cash dividend: It is the most common form of a dividend. Cash here
means cash, cheque, warrant, demand draft, pay order or directly through
Electronic Clearing Service (ECS) but not in kind.
• Stock dividend (Bonus Shares): It is a distribution of shares in lieu of a
cash dividend. When the company issues new shares to its existing
shareholders without any consideration it is called bonus shares. Such
shares are distributed proportionately thereby retaining proportionate
ownership of the company.
6. Dividend Decision and Valuation of Firm:
The value of the firm can be maximized if the shareholder’s wealth is
maximized. There are conflicting views regarding the impact of dividend
decisions on the valuation of the firm. According to one school of thought,
dividend decision does not affect the shareholder’s wealth and hence the
valuation of the firm. On the other hand, according to the other school of
thought, dividend decision materially affects the shareholders’ wealth and
also the valuation of the firm.
We have discussed below the views of the two schools of thought under two
Methods:
a. The Relevance Concept of Dividend or The Theory of Relevance
b. The Irrelevance Concept of Dividends or The Theory of Irrelevance
Theories/Methods of Dividend:
a) The Relevance Concept of Dividends:
According to this school of thought, dividends are relevant and the amount of
dividend affects the value of the firm. Walter, Gordon and others propounded
that dividend decisions are relevant in influencing the value of the firm.
Walter argues that the choices of dividend policies almost and always affect
the value of the enterprise.
1. Walter’s Model:
Walter’s model, one of the earlier theoretical models, clearly indicates that
the choice of appropriate dividend policy always affects the value of the
enterprise. Professor James E. Walter has very scholarly studied the
significance of the relationship between the firm’s internal rate of return (r)
(or actual capitalization rate) and its Cost of Equity Capital (Ke) (normal
capitalization rate) in determining such dividend policy as will maximize the
wealth of the stockholders.
The formula used by Walter to determine the market price per share is :
Where:
P = Market price per equity share,
D = Dividend per share,
E = Earnings per share,
r = Internal rate of return,
Ke = Cost of equity capital (Capitalization rate).
It may be noted that Walter’s formula has the same effect as the continuing
dividend growth formula. It seeks to measure the effect of dividends on
common stock value by comparing actual and normal capitalization rates.
Another feature of Walter’s formula is that it provides an added or reduced
Weight to the retained earnings portion of the capitalization earnings
formula. The factors ‘r’ and ‘k’ are placed in front of retained earnings to
change their weighted value under different situations as discussed below:
a) Growth Firms
b) Normal Firms
c) Declining Firms
a) Growth Firms:
In growth firms internal rate of return is greater than the normal rate (r > k).
Therefore, the r/k factor will be greater than 1. Such firms must reinvest
retained earnings since existing alternative investments offer a lower return
than the firm is able to secure. Each rupee of retained earnings will have a
higher weighting in Walter’s formula than a comparable rupee of dividends.
Thus, the large the firm retains, the higher the value of the firm. The
optimum dividend pay-out ratio for such a firm will be zero.
b) Normal Firms:
Normal firms comprise those firms whose internal rate of return is equal to
normal capitalization (r=k). These firms earn on their investments a rate of
return equal to the market rate of return. For such firms, dividend policy will
not affect the market value per share in Walter’s model. Accordingly, retained
earnings will have the same weighted value as dividends. In this case, the
market value per share is affected by the payout ratio.
Solved Problems:
P1. Following are the details regarding three companies A Ltd., B Ltd., and C
Ltd.:
A Ltd B Ltd C Ltd
r = 15% r = 5% r = 10%
Ke = 10% Ke = 10% Ke = 10%
E = Rs. 8 E = Rs. 8 E = Rs. 8
Where:
Po = Price of shares at the end of year 0
E1 = Earnings per share at the end of year 1
(1-b) = The fraction of earnings the firm distributes by way of dividends
b = The fraction of earnings the firm retains or Retention Ratio
K = Rate of return required by the shareholders or Cost of equity capital
br = Growth rate of earnings and dividend
P3. Following are the details regarding three companies A Ltd., B Ltd., and C
Ltd.:
A Ltd B Ltd C Ltd