Cliffor Jaso

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 32

Effective gluon propagator from

a Fourier transform of the cot


confinement potential
Cliffor Benjamín Compeán Jasso
UASLP

XII Mexican Workshop on Particles and Fields (November 2009)


Mazatlan, Sinaloa
Outline
1. Introduction
1. SO(4) symmetry in the baryonic spectra
2. Cornell potential and cot+csc2 potential
2. cot potential as angular function in S3
curved space
3. Transform from S3 to momentum
space
4. Gluon instantaneous effective
propagator
5. Summary
Description of light baryons in ground state wave function (QCD)

Spatial (L) Spin (S) Flavor (F) Color (c)


SO(3)L  u, d, s R, B, G
SU(2)S SU(3)F SU(3)c

Focus: |L>.
All radial potentials are SO(3)L
Specifying the potential the symmetry grow:
Examples:
Harmonic Oscillator SU(3)NL, L=N,N-2, … 0 ó 1.
Coulomb SO(4)KL, L=K,K-1, … 0
Natanson SO(2,2), etc.
The symmetry of a potential define the degenerations of the spectra.
Each potential show an specific spectra.
Description in light baryons spectra

SU(3)F SU(2)S SO(3)L

SU(3)F SU(2)S SO(4)KL


Flavor
factorization Lorentz group representations
(Ground state)

u, d, s

Mariana Kirchbach’s talk

SO(4)/SO(2,1)
Same degeneration and structure in N and  (isospin is factorized)
K
S31(2150) P33(----) D35(2350) F37(2390) G39(2400) H3,11(2420)
5 P31(----) D33(----) G37(2200) H39(2300)
F35(2000)

K = Parity partners
S31(1900) P33(1920) D35(1930) F37(1950)
3 P31(1910) D33(1940) F35(1905)

S31(1620) D33(1700)
1 P31(1750)

P33(1232)

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 l
Observation:
The quantum numbers in each grouping is a representation of SO(4) KL.

(K/2,K/2)((1/2,0)(0,1/2))
Same degeneration and structure in N and  (isospin is factorized)
K
S11(2090) P13(1900) D15(2200) F17(1990) G19(2250) H1,11(----)
5
P11(2100) D13(2080) F15(2000) G17(2190) H19(2220)

S11(1650) P13(1720) D15(1675) F17(----) K = Parity partners


3
P11(1710) D13(1700) F15(1680)

S11(1535) D13(1520)
1
P11(1440)

P11(939) Nucleon
0

0 1 2 3 4 5 l
Observation:
The quantum numbers in each grouping is a representation of SO(4) KL.

(K/2,K/2)((1/2,0)(0,1/2))
 The idea is find a potential that
reproduce the Nucleon and  spectra
and the level separation that respect
the SO(4) symmetry.
cot+csc2 potential

Cornell
Coulomb
(+lineal)

Perturbativ
+

regime
Infinite
-1/r
e
well

-cot(r/
d)
perturbative
regime

r
Non

Gluon flux tube (strings)

+
New
r d
Infinite well (finite range confinement scenario)
Our model Others
3 parameters
VS >30 parameters
Wave functions: Close form Wave functions: Numerical
= + +
QCD

Baryon = 3q + (3q + (qq)n) + (3q + gn)

A baryon is a many body system.


Many body system can be described in terms of two effective grades of freedom
(two body) in a curved space.

Our conjecture: The interactions between the grades of freedom of QCD


(q-g, q-q, g-g, …) in a baryon is changed by a q-qq system on a S 3 curved
space which has a cot kind interaction. In this way, the curvature codify the
QCD configurations.
 The Nucleon and  spectra was
described in term of the SO(4)
symmetry.
 There was described the

degeneration and level separations.


 Cot potential reproduce the Nucleon

and  spectra degeneration and the


level separation and respect the
SO(4) symmetry.
Mathematical aspects of S3
E4
 Our system is in E4 on the hyper-sphere, S3, of
R constant radius, R.

S3 : Second polar angle

Parameterization
Schrödinger equation on S3

Angular momentum operator on E4

Energy levels
Wave functions
(close form)
Wave functions on S3

||


Parameterizations of  in terms of r… (change of variable)
… for the purpose of obtaining the spatial part of the wave function (ordinary
position space) we need (r) depending on S3 parameterization
Robertson-Walker Quantum dots SUSY-QM

 = arcsin r/R  = arctan r/R  = r/R


0  r/R  1 0  r/R <  0  r/R  

E4 E4 r E3 E4 r
  
x4 R R
R
r E3

S3 S3 S3

All the spectra are same. But different phenomena. ………..


Cot potential under the Possibility for position
Robertson-Walker dependent masses
parameterizations

 = arcsin r/R
V() = -2Bcot 
= -2B x4/r
0  r/R  1
 = arcsin r/R

Warning: Position dependent


 masses appear if one wants to work 
in r space
Deconfinement
From “curved” cot potential
to “flat” Coulomb potential

Curvature parameter lets the description of


= 1/R2 deconfinement.

Binding states (flat space), came from the limit

Dispersion states (flat space) (K+1)2   k2/h for


 Robertson-Walker integration volume

 = arcsin r/R 0  r/R  1

E4

E3 integration volume x4
R
r E3

S3
Fourier transform

QCD - Physics in momentum space

E4
 Position Flat Momentum Flat
x4 Space Space
R
r E3 E3 E3

S3
Transformation from S3 to
momentum space

S3 Momentum space
Transform f(r) to momentum space Inverse transform

S3 - Robertson-Walker
E3
Instantaneous effective propagator
Instantaneous photon propagator
Transition amplitude

Virtual Instantaneous
photon Coulomb
Propagator Interaction

Born approximation on S3 (to the amount it is acceptable)


Instantaneous effective gluon
propagator
Needed for three body Faddeev calculations
cot potential on
Robertson-Walker
parameterization

Born Approximation
Instantaneous effective gluon propagator

Finite value q2=0


(QCD requirement for confinement)
Summary
 Cot potential reproduce the Nucleon and  mass spectra and
the level separation. Such potential respect the SO(4)
symmetry.
 The dynamical properties of cot-csc2 potential was analyzed
and its interpretation was justify as the exactly solvable
extension of Cornell potential.
 The quark and gluon dynamics of quarks and gluons of QCD
was related with our potential interacting with the cot
potential.
 In order to relate the curved space on S3 with the position
space there was study the Robetson-Walker parameterization.
 The transform of a function from S3 to momentum space was
given.
 The instantaneous effective gluon propagator was build and it
was taken as Bohr amplitude. The instantaneous effective
gluon propagator grow in the infrared region but is finite on the
infrared region in concordance with lasted Lattice QCD
predictions.
Proton electric form factor (E3)

Dipole

Our case, GE is equal to F1 because F2=0, non-spin interaction (technical


problem but non-conceptual problem)
Proton electric form factor (S3)
Proton electric form factor
(Our vs experiment)

Green line: Predicted with the nucleon spectra


parameters (mq=1/3 MN)
Blue line: Calculus obtained with the proton
charge radii <r2>
 Electric form factors of excited states

n=1 n=2 n=2


l=0 l=0 l=1

n=3 n=3 n=3


l=0 l=1 l=2
Curvature dependence of the
proton electric charge radius
1=0.104 fm-2 calculated to <r2>=0.87 fm
2 =0.187 fm-2 adjust to the spectra

Proton mean square charge radius


Summary (applications)
 We calculated the proton electric form
factor which is in concordance with
experimental data.
 We has electric form factors of excited

states.
 Proton charge radii <r^2>1/2 is a

function of curvature  from the hyper-


sphere S3.
Tank you

You might also like