Client Interview and Counselling
Client Interview and Counselling
Client Interview and Counselling
and Counseling
Client Interviewing
– Primary objective of interview between lawyer
and client is that the lawyer should obtain the
necessary facts from the client. Also under the
legal goals from the client.
– This objective cannot be achieved unless the
lawyer establishes the right relationship with the
client, so that the client has confidence in the
lawyer
– Client interviewing involves: Listening and
questioning
• Ensure that client feel comfortable to share
the problem with you
– Breaking the ice: Greeting the client and engaging
in short small-talk is a usual good practice.
• Information sharing to the client
– Inform the client that all the information shared
during the interview process would be kept
confidential
– Gaining the trust of the client
• Rule 17 of the ‘Bar Council of India Rules’,
regarding standards of professional conduct
and etiquette puts obligation upon the
advocate to protect attorney-client
communication as confidential.
• Conflict of interest:
– Proactively inform that client that in the event of
having any interest in the clients matter
– or you are lawyer for any person involved in that
matter, it will not be possible for you to accept the
case
– Also bound to do so by way of Advocate’s Duty to the
Client prescribed by the Bar Council of India Rules
– “An advocate shall at the commencement of his
engagement and during the continuance thereof,
make all such full and frank disclosure to his client
relating to his connection with the parties and any
interest in or about the controversy as are likely to
affect his client’s judgment in either engaging him
or continuing the engagement.” Rule 14 of
Standards of Professional Conduct and Etiquette,
Bar Council of India Rules
• Conveying fees to the client:
• Convey the usual range of fees charged. It is
understood as a best practice.
• Important aspect to be noted as part of ethical
conduct.
• Rule 20 Bar Council of India Rules, regarding
standards of professional conduct and etiquette,
“An advocate shall not stipulate for a fee
contingent on the results of litigation or agree to
share the proceeds thereof”
• Information Gathering:
– Listening to and Understanding the Client’s Story
• Three stage approach to the interviewing
could be adopted:
– Preliminary problem identification
– Chronological overview
– Theory Development and Verification
• Preliminary Problem Identification
– In this stage the client is asked for basic reason for
meeting the lawyer
– For example, Ms. Swati and her father has come to
meet lawyer Adv.Raju
– Adv.Raju after the preliminary steps, ask the what
the reason Ms. Swati has come to meet the lawyer
– Ms.Swati informs Adv.Raju that she has issues due
to domestic violence from her husband
– Crux of the conflict would be brought out in the
first stage
– Lawyer could understand the problem is relating
to matrimonial dispute.
• Chronological overview
• In this stage, lawyer ask the client to narrate the
case in a chronological manner
– Lawyer should tell clients to try to remember as
many of the events as possible and lawyer should
not interrupt client while they are going through
the events
– Ms.Swati narrates the entire incidents of physical
violence against her by the husband through the 1
year of their marriage
– Ms. Swati mentioned about 6-8 instances of the
physical violence against her by husband due to dowry
demands.
– Summarizing the facts back to the client to fill in the
gaps and verify
– An opportunity for the lawyer to get an overview of
the entire set of events before making any
determinations of possible claims or defenses.
• Theory Development and Verification
– Lawyer tries to map the various legal principles
that could be applicable
– Lawyer now would need to get more deep into the
facts to ensure that the various legal principles
could be applied
– For this, lawyers usually ask questions regarding
Facts leading up to the event(s), facts during the
event(s), facts subsequent to the event(s)
– When client narrates the case, usually it is only
from the client’s biased perspective.
– Lawyer should try to elicit more information by
way probing questions
– Now, in case of Ms.Swati, the lawyer is planning
to apply the anti-dowry and domestic violence
legislation
– Lawyer wanted more information about the
demand for dowry. Hence ask questions probing
the dowry demand
– Lawyer also wants to know whether it is only the
husband who had inflicted violence against
Ms.Swati or whether in-laws and other relatives of
husband was also involved
– Lawyer further would ask for documents relating
to marriage, relationship and other issues
pertaining to the facts.
– Another important step is understanding the goal
of the client- what client want out of legal
process?
– Ms. Swati is ready to continue with marriage
provided there is no more violence and dowry
claim
– Ms. Swati feels that it is because of her in-laws
husband commit domestic violence
– She wants to live away separately from the in-laws
– But Ms.Swati’s father want them to be punished
Certain Important Skills and Good Practices