Essential Diagnostics of Oral Implants
Essential Diagnostics of Oral Implants
Essential Diagnostics of Oral Implants
PRESENTED BY,
Arunraj . D , PG IIIrd YEAR
GUIDED BY,
Dr. N. Gopichander, MDS
(PROFESSOR),
Dr. J.Rameshreddy, MDS (READER)
Diagnosis of oral implants
• Implant-based rehabilitation approach for an edentulous or partially dentulous
condition requires a series of decisions that are taken to determine whether the
patient is a reasonable candidate for implant therapy.
General assessment of the patient’s profile
Rathee, Manu & Bhoria, Mohaneesh. Basics of clinical diagnosis in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research
Organization.(2015)
Assessment of available space
• The implant should be at least 3 mm away from an adjacent implant,
and the diameter of the implant should be selected based on the tooth
to be replaced.
• Based on the above guidelines, for two 4-mm diameter dental implants,
a space of 17 mm is required.
• If three implants are planned, a total space of 24 mm is required.
Rathee, Manu & Bhoria, Mohaneesh. Basics of clinical diagnosis in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research
Organization.(2015)
Assessment of available space
• Clinical evaluation of the buccolingual space, at least 6 mm of bone buccolingually, is
required for the placement of a 4-mm diameter implant and 7 mm for a wider
diameter of 5-mm implant.
• Posterior mandibular dental implant should be planned so that the exit angle of the
screw access points toward the inner incline of the palatal cusp.
• Posterior maxillary implants should be placed so that the exit angle of the screw
access points toward the inner incline of the buccal cusp.
Rathee, Manu & Bhoria, Mohaneesh. Basics of clinical diagnosis in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research
Organization.(2015)
Clinical evaluation of available space
Assessment of available space
• Clinical evaluation of the occlusogingival space can be evaluated under crown height
space availability.
• On clinical examination, the space between the residual ridge and the opposing
occlusal plane should be evaluated.
• If replacing the premolar and molar teeth, a space of 10 mm must exist between
the residual ridge and the opposing occlusion.
• A 7-mm space would be considered the minimum space required.
Rathee, Manu & Bhoria, Mohaneesh. Basics of clinical diagnosis in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research
Organization.(2015)
Evaluation of the soft tissue ridge support
• soft tissue topography is determined by parameters such as contact point position,
crown dimensions, tooth implant distances, and implant diameter.
• Enough space between the implants is needed to allow interdental papilla
reconstruction or at least soft tissue preservation.
• When the space between the dental implants is too close, insufficient blood supply
may result in papilla collapse.
• when the dental implants are placed far apart, unsupported inter-implant papilla
may collapse.
Rathee, Manu & Bhoria, Mohaneesh. Basics of clinical diagnosis in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research
Organization.(2015)
RIDGE MAPPING RIDGE ANGULATION
BONE MAPPING
INTRA ORAL
BONE MAPPING
Rathee, Manu & Bhoria, Mohaneesh. Basics of clinical diagnosis in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research
Organization.(2015)
OCCLUSAL CONSIDERATIONS
• osseointegrated dental implants are without an intervening periodontal ligament
and the mean axial displacement is noted to be approximately 3-5 μ when
compared to 25-100 μ range of motion of teeth in the socket.
• The range of motion of osseointegrated implants has beenreported to show
deflection in a linear and elastic pattern and movement of the implant under the
load is dependent on the elastic deformation of the bone.
Rathee, Manu & Bhoria, Mohaneesh. Basics of clinical diagnosis in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research
Organization.(2015)
OCCLUSAL CONSIDERATIONS
• The occlusion should be evaluated and organized so that there is
anterior guidance and disclusion of the posterior teeth.
• There should be no contact of the posterior teeth with the nonworking
sides.
• If the canine is compromised, group function is acceptable.
Rathee, Manu & Bhoria, Mohaneesh. Basics of clinical diagnosis in implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research
Organization.(2015)
Diagnostic Imaging
•
The selection of a type of imaging
technique plays a major role in
achieving the required information
with the best dimensional accuracy.
❖
I: Pre-prosthetic implant imaging
❖
II: Surgical and interventional implant
❖
imaging III: Post- prosthetic implant
imaging.
Misch C. Dental implant prosthetics. St. Louis (Mo.): Elsevier
Mosby; 2015.
I : Pre-prosthetic implant imaging
The objectives of this phase of imaging include all
necessary surgical and prosthetic
information
• To determine the quantity, quality, and angulations
of bone;
• The relationship of critical structures to the
prospective implant sites;
• The presence or absence of disease at the
proposed surgery sites.
ANALOG DIGITAL
IMAGING
MODALITIES
TWO- THREE-
DIMENSION DIMENSION
AL AL
Imaging Modalities
Periapical radiography
Panoramic radiography
Occlusal radiography
Cephalometric radiography
Computed tomography
Periapical radiography
provides a high-
resolution planar image
of a limited region of the
jaws.
Periapical radiographs
may suffer from distortion
and magnification.
Goaz PW, White SC ,Oral radiology: principles and interpretation,2nd ed. St Louis (MO):
Mosby
Goaz PW, White SC, Oral radiology: principles and interpretation,2nd ed. St Louis (MO):
Mosby
Occlusal Radiography
Truhlar RS, Morris HF, Ochi S. A Review of panoramic radiography and its potential use in implant dentistry.
Implant Dent 1993;2:122-30.
Panoramic radiography
Advantages:
Limitations:
•Easy identification of opposing landmarks
• Initial assessment of vertical height of • Distortions inherent in the panoramic
bone system
• Errors in patient positioning
•Convenience, ease, and speed in
• Does not demonstrate bone quality
performance in most dental • Misleading quantitate because of
offices magnification and no third dimension
•Evaluation of gross anatomy of the jaws • No spatial relationship between
and any related pathologic findings structures
Truhlar RS, Morris HF, Ochi S. A Review of panoramic radiography and its potential use in implant dentistry. Implant Dent
1993;2:122-30.
Tomography
‘Tomos’- Section- Generation of narrow sections through
an object.
Conventional Tomography is a method that obtains
clearer image of the structures lying within a plane
of interest.
Lindh C, Petersson A. Radiologic examination for location of the mandibular canal: A comparison between panoramic radiography and
conventional tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:249-53.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Principle
Paul.C.Lauterbur in
1972
Advantages
• No Radiation
• Vital structures are easily
seen
Limitation
s
• Cost
• Technique
• Sensitive
Availability
Uses
• Evaluation of vital structures when
computed tomography is not
• conclusive Evaluation of
infection(osteomyelitis)
Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW,et al. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry. ClinOral Implants Res
2003;14:18–27.
Computed Tomography
Godfrey
Housfield
Bon D D D D D
e 1 2 3 4 5
Hounsfeil
>1250 850- 350- 150- <15
d unit HU 1250 850 350 0
Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac
Radiol 2010;39:323–35.
Denta Scan
Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: The International Congress of
Oral Implantologists consensus report.Implant Dent.2012;21:78–86.
FOV (Field of View)
The dimensions of the field of view (FOV) or scan volume able to be covered
primarily depend on the detector size and shape, the beam projection
geometry, and the ability to collimate the beam.
Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: The International Congress of
Oral Implantologists consensus report.Implant Dent.2012;21:78–86.
Interactive CT (ICT)
Ritter L, Reiz SD, Rothamel D, et al. Registration accuracy of three-dimensional surface and cone beam computed
tomography data for virtual implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:447–52.
Galileos Implant Software
The ideal implant placement can be determined based on bone quantity and
quality, critical anatomical structures and prosthetic needs. NobelClinician
warns you when implants are placed too close to annotated nerves or tooth roots.
Spector L. Computer-aided dental implant planning. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:761-75.
Radiographic Templates and Visualisation
Radiographic templates are typically fabricated by duplicating the existing
or proposed restoration or waxing on a dental cast, duplicating the
diagnostic cast, and fabricating a separate template based on the wax-up.
A stent which mimics the desired tooth setup is constructed and radiographic markers usually made of
gutta percha or another radio-opaque material placed within it
Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:611–
5.
Materials for Radiographic stent
•
•
•
•
•
• To determine the accuracy and effectiveness of digital panoramic radiographs for pre-
operative assessment of dental implants.
• 86 patients (221 implants) and calculated the length of the planned implant based on the
distance between a selection of critical anatomical structures and the alveolar crest using the
scaling tools provided in the digital analysed the magnification rate.
RESULTS:
Magnification rate of the width and length of the inserted implants, seen in the
digital panoramic radiographs, was 127.28 ± 13.47% and 128.22 ± 4.17%,
respectively.
The magnification rate of the implant width was largest in the mandibular anterior part
and there was a significant difference in the magnification rate of the length of implants
between the maxilla and the mandible
There is no significant difference between the planned implant length and actual
inserted implant length according to the clarity of anatomical structures (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:
An implant proximity more than 1 mm to the mandibular canal is safe and predictable for
dental implant planning in mandibular posterior region on panoramic radiographs.
RECENT ADVANCES
Double Scan Protocol
Alejandro Lanis, Miguel Padial-Molina, Rami Gamil, Orlando Alvarez del Canto, Computer-guided implant surgery and immediate loading
with a modifiable radiographic template in a patient with partial edentulism: A clinical report, In The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,
Volume 114, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 328-334,
Double Scan Protocol
Chan H-L, Wang H-L, Fowlkes JB, Giannobile WV, Kripfgans OD. Non-ionizing real-time ultrasonography in implant and oral surgery: a
feasibility study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 00, 2016; 1–7
Radiation Safety
Selection Of A Radiographic Method
Indications for the most frequently used imaging modalities in implant dentistry
are proposed based on clinical need and biologic risk for the
patient.
SUMMARY
• Proper evaluation of bone and the soft tissue- success in implant dentistry
• Selection of an appropriate imaging modality should be made based on the
type and number of implants, location of the implant, and surrounding
anatomy.
• As in the case of all imaging techniques, appropriate selection criteria must
be applied before selecting one which is most suitable for each patient.
THANK YOU..!!