CNF 2nd Q W1 Critiquing Nonfiction
CNF 2nd Q W1 Critiquing Nonfiction
CNF 2nd Q W1 Critiquing Nonfiction
Nonfiction
When you critique, you evaluate. As a reader
and a critique, you ought not to judge to
point out failings, and condemn the writer.
Instead of condemning, recommend how to
make those failings a success. The aim of the
critique is to make the writing better.
Opposite of this is a critic who only points
out the weakness, but not the strength nor
does he/she give any suggestions for
improvement. Can you be a critique?
The most important guideline for a critique is to
give an honest, constructive, and polite
assessment of the writing. All comments should
be about the content being written, not about the
person writing them. Here are the steps to follow
when doing a thorough critique of nonfiction:
1. Overall Impressions:
Evaluate the total work. The critique must
consider the whole write-up, rather than just its
details or just portions of the work. Here are what
need to be evaluated:
a. Content: Does it open with something that
captures your attention and that makes you want
to keep on reading? Is the pace appropriate for
the type of information being covered? Can you
clearly identify the subject or main idea? Is the
main idea supported by evidence, anecdotes,
interviews, viewpoints, or some other method?
b. b. Audience: Is it clear who the target audience
is for the book, article, or essay? Is the tone,
language, and reading level appropriate for that
audience?
c. Format: Is it following standard
submission guidelines for that type of work,
or is it tailored towards guidelines of a
specific market? Is it organized logically, so
the reader can follow the development of the
topic or progression of the events?
2. The Mechanics: Evaluate the work for
structural strengths and weaknesses. Below
are the mechanics to consider:
a. Structure: Were paragraphs and sentences appropriate in
length for the type of information presented? Would varying their
length add interest or adjust the pace more effectively? Does the
choice of words feel appropriate? Is the information presented in
a way that the target audience will find easy to understand?
Does the conclusion summarize the main points effectively, or
bring the work to a satisfying end?
b. Grammar: Are there obvious mistakes in grammar and
spelling? Are there too many clichés in the narrative or dialog? c.
Extras: If there are sidebars, charts, graphs, pictures, or other
supporting documents, do they support the premise, theme,
arguments, or hypothesis? Are they formatted properly and
annotated in the body of the work?
Every written work has an argument or
point to make. Your critique must also
have a point. Write a 300-word critique
of the MEMOIR below based on the
elements discussed. Your critique must
support the argument. Use the
argument as the main title of your
critique with the title of the memoir as
the subtitle. Write this in your
notebook. But before writing, consider
4 3 2 1
FEATURES EXPERT ACCOMPLISHE CAPABLE BEGINNER
D
• Piece is • Piece is • Piece is a • Piece has no
written in an written in an little bit style • Gives
extraordinar y interesting style interesting no informati
Overall
style • Somewhat • Gives on and poorly
Impression • Very informative and some few organize d
s informative organized information
and well but poorly
organized organized
• Virtually no • Few spellings • A number • So many
spelling, and punctuatio of spelling, spelling,
punctuation n errors, minor punctuatio punctua tion
The
and grammatic al n, or and
Mechanics grammar errors grammatical grammatic-al
errors • Ideas are errors errors that it
• Ideas are somewhat • Ideas are interferes with