360 Degree Feedback
360 Degree Feedback
360 Degree Feedback
Definition
360 degree has been defined by ward(1997) as the systematic collection and feedback of performance data on an individual or a group derived from a number of the stakeholders in their performance . Also known as multisource assessment, multirater feedback, multi level feedback.
Meaning
360 refers to 360 in a circle.The feedback comes from the subordinates ,peers and managers in the organisational hierarchy as well as self assessment. It is the employee develpoment feedback that comes from all round the employee.
Multirater feedback
CHANGED BEHAVIOUR
BRIEFING
ACTION PLAN
QUESTIONAIRE COMPLETION
REFLECTION
REPORT PROCESSING
FEEDBACK
How it is conducted?
Define objectives Decide on recipients Decide who will give the feedback Decide areas of work and behavior Decide method of conducting data Plan an initial implementation program Plan and implement full program Monitor and evaluate
ADVANTAGES
To the Individual
Self awareness Assessment competence Confirmed strengths
DISADVANTAGES
People are not giving frank or honest feedback. People being put under stress in receiving or giving feedback. Lack of action following feedback. Over reliance on technology. Too much bureaucracy.
NIIT introduced the formal 360 degree survey in 1995. The primary objectives were to: 1)Provide multiple source feedback as input to enhance interpersonal competence. 2)Promote core NIIT values and attributes among all staff. 3)Foster a non hierarchial culture through multiple role senstivity.
FEATURES OF IEF
It is based on questionnaire which has five key values and 25 key behavioural attributes on which every NIITian gives or recieves feedback. A feedback team is formed around each NIITian comprising his/her peers , team members, and the supervisor. The questionnaire is administerd once ayear a liitle ahead of the formal annual appraisal.
All the filled in survey instruments are collected centrally and analysed. A consolidated scorecard is produced for each individual and given to him/her well in time for discussion with supervisor along with annual appraisal. The system is administered by HR function. The chairman and the directors personally participate and display their own scorecards openly on their office desks and invite inputs for using the feedback to improve themselves.
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Performance Management Michael Armstrong and Angela Baron. 360 Degree Feedback- Peter Ward. Performance Management and Appraisal Systems-T.V. Rao. www.wikipedia.com.