Evaluation in Education v2
Evaluation in Education v2
Evaluation in Education v2
Division of Antique
District of Culasi
FLORES INTEGRATED SCHOOL
D
Flores, Culasi, Antique
aily esson og L L
ENGLISH 9
By: DINAH GRACE A. VALENTE
Teacher I
Department of Education
Division of Antique
District of Culasi
FLORES INTEGRATED SCHOOL
W 5
Flores, Culasi, Antique
valuation in
DUCATION
Lester James A. Valente Dinah Grace A. Valente Luvelyn E. Yu Virginia Guillermo
Via Torres Leigh Jumauay Raymond Ubaldo Lorebelle Gonlivo
E valuation is a broader term than
‘test’. It includes all types and
examinations in it. Its purpose is
not only to check the knowledge
of the learner but all the aspects
of the learner.
• Continuity: Evaluation should be an ongoing process, integrated into the daily teaching and
learning activities.
• Comprehensiveness: Evaluation should consider all aspects of student development, including
academic, social, emotional, and physical domains.
• Objectives: Evaluation should be aligned with the specific learning objectives of the curriculum or
program.
• Learning Experience: Evaluation should take into account the student's learning experiences,
both inside and outside the classroom.
• Broadness: Evaluation should encompass a wide range of assessment methods and data
sources to provide a holistic picture of student learning.
• Child-Centeredness: The student should be at the center of the evaluation process, with their
needs and progress as the primary focus.
• Application: Evaluation should assess the student's ability to apply their knowledge and skills in
real-world situations.
T EACHER EVALUATION
• How do teachers teach?
• How to know that teachers are teaching well?
• Is the student’s success the teacher’s success?
W HY EVALUATE
TEACHER?
• Encourage and enable teachers and students to take co-responsibility for the
quality T/ L experience
• To create and sustain a responsive learning environment
• Ensure excellence in T/L that fosters holistic student success
• Encourages improvement through reflective practice
inah Grace A. Valente
B ENEFITS OF TEACHER
EVALUATION
• Improves teaching and learning experiences for all
concerned
• Promotes professional development
• Provides students with –
• Opportunity to make constructive criticism
• ‘Voice’ to develop and maintain effective curriculum
• Provides data to –
• Benchmark teaching & learning quality by the laid down standards
• Individual teacher for self improvement
• To make curricular decisions
• Evidence for teachers as indicators of good teaching
M ETHODS OF TEACHER
EVALUATION
• Ratings/ review by - Peers, students, parents, administrators,
community
• Reflections on -
• Advising & mentoring
• Classroom instruction
• Courses developed or re-designed.
• Instructional materials, course textbooks, etc.
• Innovative teaching.
• Pedagogical research.
• Self reflection/ ratings
• Analysis of agreed-on student learning evidence
T
YPES OF TEACHER EVALUATION
(USED ALSO FOR STUDENT
EVALUATION)
• Placement Evaluation:
To place the ✓ person in the ✓ place
• Formative Evaluation
• Diagnostic Evaluation
• Summative Evaluation
• Norm-Referenced and Criterion-Referenced Evaluation
T YPES OF EVALUATION
1. FORMATIVE EVALUATION
Formative assessment is a common evaluation method used in schools.
Teachers or educators conduct formative assessments multiple times in an academic year
to motivate students to learn better. Since the evaluation is conducted many time, you can
use this type to help students understand their weaknesses. You can conduct formative
assessment tests to understand how students have grasped a particular portion of the
curriculum. This would be a great methodology if you are trying to check for
understanding of the students.
2. SUMMATIVE EVALUATION
Summative evaluation tests occur at the end of an academic year or
a course. This evaluation plays a key role in a student’s academic career as
it determines the promotion of students into the next stage of their learning
journey. Students often receive certificates after the completion of
summative exams, and it would entail information about their scores in the
summative exam.
T
YPES OF EVALUATION
3. DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
1.SELF-REFERENCED
• You can refer to the performance of students in the previous tests and how
they have improved in the present. In this way, you will be able to assess the
progress of the students in their academic endeavors. This is an effective
technique to motivate students to perform better.
2. CRITERION-REFERENCED
• Any course would have learning objectives and you would expect their
students to achieve the objective by the time the course comes to
completion. In this type, you will analyze how students are progressing by
considering the learning outcomes. You assess whether the students are
able to achieve the objectives of the course and if they are progressing in
terms of the educational objectives of the course.
3.NORM-REFERENCED
• Through this type, you will analyze how the students perform in
comparison to the other students in the class. You can compare and
contrast how students’ performances differ and take necessary steps to
bring in changes that can alter the way they learn. This helps them to
find out the strategies that work best for them.
E FFECT OF COURSE EVALUATION ON
TEACHERS
• Too many variables in data - difficult to interpret
• Increased cost of paper based evaluation
• Lower response rates to online course evaluations lesser validity
• Explanation lacking in relation to many variables
• Not well understood by many students -
Leads to ‘dumbing down’ of educational stds.
Hence not to be used for faculty hires, retentions, promotions, and tenure
• Humiliating for instructors
• Demeaning to efforts for higher stds in general
U SES OF
EVALUATION
Placement Promotion
Remediation Instruction
Grouping Diagnosis
Administration Guidance
Development Research
Raymond Ubaldo
Lorebelle Gonlivo
U
Luvelyn E. Yu
nderstanding the Difference Between
PROJECT AND OUTCOME
EVALUATION
U NDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN PROJECT AND OUTCOME
EVALUATION
1. INTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS:
EDUCATION
D ecentralized education is a paradigm shift in how we
approach learning, moving away from traditional
centralized models towards a more distributed and
community-driven approach. This shift promises to
address many limitations of the current education
system, including accessibility, cost, and relevance.
While the concept is still evolving, several key steps are
emerging as essential for building a successful
decentralized education system.
K EY STEPS IN DECENTRALIZED
EDUCATION
1. DEFINING THE VISION AND PRINCIPLES
The first step is to clearly define the vision and principles of decentralized education.
This involves outlining the core values, goals, and objectives that will guide the
development and implementation of the system. Key considerations include:
Decentralized education requires innovative models of learning and assessment that are
aligned with the principles of flexibility, relevance, and community ownership. This includes:
• Project-Based Learning: Project-based learning encourages learners to apply their
knowledge and skills to real-world problems, fostering critical thinking, creativity, and
collaboration.
• Experiential Learning: Experiential learning emphasizes hands-on experiences and
practical application, allowing learners to learn by doing.
• Peer-to-Peer Assessment: Peer-to-peer assessment encourages learners to provide
feedback to each other, fostering critical thinking and self-reflection.
• Portfolio-Based Assessment: Portfolio-based assessment allows learners to showcase
their skills and achievements through a collection of work, demonstrating their progress
and growth.
K EY STEPS IN DECENTRALIZED
EDUCATION
5. ENSURING QUALITY AND STANDARDS
Maintaining quality and standards is crucial for the credibility and effectiveness of
decentralized education. This can be achieved through:
• Community-Driven Quality Control: Communities can establish quality assurance
mechanisms, such as peer review processes and reputation systems, to ensure the
reliability and validity of educational resources and learning experiences.
• Accreditation and Recognition: Decentralized education systems need to
establish mechanisms for accrediting learning outcomes and recognizing credentials,
ensuring that learners receive the recognition they deserve for their achievements.
• Continuous Improvement: Decentralized education should be a dynamic and
evolving system, with continuous improvement processes in place to adapt to
changing needs and emerging technologies.
R EFLECTION: