Understanding Sources 2
Understanding Sources 2
Understanding Sources 2
Sources
BY: NORIEL D. EBRONA, LPT,
M.ED.
Historical Sources
1. Primary Sources
• Produced at the same time as the event being studied
(Contemporary Accounts)
• Include documents or artifacts created by a witness or
participant of the event
• “Firsthand testimony”, “Eyewitness accounts”
• It may include diaries, letters, interviews, photographs,
newspapers
6 Points of inquiries to evaluate
Primary sources (Garragham, 1950):
1. Date- When was it produced?
2. Localization- Where did it originate?
3. Authorship- Who wrote it?
4. Analysis- What pre-existing material served as the
basis for its production?
5. Integrity - What was its original form?
6. Credibility - What is the evidential value of its content?
2. Secondary Sources
• Produced by authors who used and interpreted primary
sources
• Analyzed a scholarly question and often use primary
source as evidence.
• Include books, thesis, dissertations, journals, magazines,
knowledge of historians
• Written few years after the exact time of the event
Primary and Secondary sources should be
evaluated its validity and credibility by asking
these questions:
1. How did the author knows about the given
details? Was the author present at the event?
2. Where did the information come from? Is it a
personal experience, an eyewitness account etc.?
3. Did the author conclude based on a single or
multiple source?
In terms of historical reliability,
Primary Source:
• The closer the date of creation, the more
reliable one.
Secondary source:
• The more recent, the more reliable one.
HISTORICAL CRITICISM
1. EXTERNAL CRITICISM
•Verification of authenticity by
examining physical characteristics;
consistency with the historical
characteristics of the time when it
was produced, and materials used.
• We can ask the following questions:
- when it was written?
- where it was written?
- who was the author?
- why did it survive?
- what were the materials used?
- what words were being used those times?
2. INTERNAL CRITICISM
• Looks at the truthfulness and factuality of
the evidence by looking at the author of
the source, its context, the agenda behind
its creation
• It looks at the content of the source and
examines the circumstance of its
production
• We can ask the following questions:
- was it written by eyewitness or not?
- why was it written?
- is there consistency?
- what are the connotations?
- what is the literal meaning?
- what is the meaning of the context?
7 factors in evaluating through Internal Criticism
(Howell and Prevenier, 2001):
1. Genealogy of the document
2. Genesis of the document
3. Originality of the document
4. Interpretation of the document
5. Authorial authority of the document
6. Competence of the observer
7. Trustworthiness of the observer
Quiz: Identify
whether Primary
or Secondary
Source
1. “Batas Militar: Martial Law Under President
Ferdinand E. Marcos Full Documentary”
2. “La Revolucion Filipina” of Apolinario Mabini
3. National Historical Commission of the Philippines
YouTube Channel
4. Historical Data Papers from National Library of
the Philippines
5. “War Memoirs of Jose P. Laurel” by Jose P. Laurel
6. “Brains of the Nation” by Resil B. Mojares
7. “A Question of Heroes” by Nick Joaquin
8. “Anting-anting ni Manuel Quezon” at National
Museum of the Philippines-Museum of
Anthropology
9. “Veneration Without Understanding” by Renato
Constantino
10. Homo luzonensis ecofacts (fossils) unearthed
by UP Archaeological Studies Program
“ Walang SAYSAY,
kung walang
KASAYSAYAN.”
- Ser Yel