Teams in Organizations
Teams in Organizations
Teams in Organizations
TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS
Chapter Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
◦ Analyze the growing popularity of teams in organizations.
◦ Contrast groups and teams.
◦ Compare and contrast four types of teams.
◦ Identify the characteristics of effective teams.
◦ Show how organizations can create team players.
◦ Decide when to use individuals instead of teams.
◦ Show how our understanding of teams differs in a global context.
10-5
Types of Teams
Problem-Solving Teams
◦ Groups of 5 to 12 employees from the same
department who meet for a few hours each week to
discuss ways of improving quality, efficiency, and the
work environment. Quality Assurance Teams
Self-Managed Work Teams
◦ Groups of 10 to 15 people who take on the
responsibilities of their former supervisors
10-6
More Types of Teams
Cross-Functional Teams
◦ Employees from about the same hierarchical level, but from different work
areas, who come together to accomplish a task
◦ Very common
◦ Task forces
◦ Committees
10-8
A Team-Effectiveness Model
Caveat 1: This is a
general guide only.
10-9
Key Components of Effective Teams
Context
Composition
Work Design
Process Variables
Personality of Members
◦ Conscientiousness, openness to experience, and agreeableness all relate to team
performance
Allocating Roles and Diversity
◦ Many necessary roles must be filled
◦ Diversity can often lead to lower performance
Size of Team
◦ The smaller the better: 5 to 9 is optimal
10-13
Creating Effective Teams: Work Design
Freedom and Autonomy
◦ Ability to work independently
Skill Variety
◦ Ability to use different skills and talents
Task Identity
◦ Ability to complete a whole and identifiable task or product
Task Significance
◦ Working on a task or project that has a substantial impact on others
10-14
Creating Effective Teams: Process
Commitment to a Common Purpose
◦ Create a common purpose that provides direction
◦ Have reflexivity: willing to adjust plan if necessary
Establishment of Specific Team Goals
◦ Must be specific, measurable, realistic, and challenging
Team Efficacy
◦ Team believes in its ability to succeed
Mental Models
◦ Have an accurate and common mental map of how the work gets done
A Managed Level of Conflict
◦ Task conflicts are helpful; interpersonal conflicts are not
Minimized Social Loafing
◦ Team holds itself accountable both individually and as a team
10-15
Turning Individuals into Team Players
Selection
◦ Make team skills one of the interpersonal skills in the hiring process.
Training
Rewards
◦ Rework the reward system to encourage cooperative efforts rather than competitive
(individual) ones
◦ Continue to recognize individual contributions while still emphasizing the importance
of teamwork
10-16
Beware! Teams Aren’t Always the
Answer
Teams take more time and resources than does individual work.
Three tests to see if a team fits the situation:
1. Is the work complex and is there a need for different perspectives – will it
be better with the insights of more than one person?
2. Does the work create a common purpose or set of goals for the group
that is larger than the aggregate of the goals for individuals?
3. Are members of the group involved in interdependent tasks?
Self-Managed Teams
◦ Do not work well in countries with low tolerance for ambiguity and
uncertainty and a high power distance
Managers should modify the environment and select team-oriented individuals to increase the
chance of developing effective teams.
10-19