Production Planning and Control

Chapter 2: Scheduling

2022

1
 After viewing this presentation, you
should be able to:
 Explain why production scheduling must be done
by every organization whether it manufactures or
provides services.
 Discuss the application of the loading function.
 Draw a Gantt chart and explain its information
display.
 Describe the role of sequencing and how to apply
sequencing rules for one facility and for more than
one facility. 2
 After viewing this presentation, you
should be able to (continued)
 Classify scheduling problems according to
various criteria that are used in practice.
 Explain the purpose of priority sequencing rules.
 Describe various priority rules for sequencing.
 Apply Johnson’s rule to the 2-machine flow
shop problem.
 Analyze dynamic scheduling problems.
3
 Loading, Sequencing and Scheduling

The production-schedules are developed

by performing the following functions:
Loading
Sequencing
Scheduling

4
 Loading, Sequencing and Scheduling
(continued)

Loading: Which department is going to do what

work?

Sequencing: What is the order in which the work

will be done?

Scheduling: What are the start and finish times of

each job?

5
 Loading

Loading, also called shop loading assigns the work to various

facilities like divisions, departments, work centers, load centers,
stations, machines and people.

We will often use the term “machines” in this presentation

when we refer to a facility.

Loading is done for both manufacturing and services.

6
 Loading vs. Aggregate Planning

Aggregate planning is based on forecasts.

However, the loading function loads the real jobs

and not the forecast.

If the aggregate scheduling job was done well,

then the appropriate kinds and amounts of
resources will be available for loading.
7
 Loading Objectives

Each facility carries a backlog of work, which is its ‘‘load’’—hardly a case

of perfect just-in-time in which no waiting occurs.

The backlog is generally much larger than the work in process, which can
be seen on the shop floor.

The backlog translates into an inventory investment which is idle and

receiving no value-adding attention.

A major objective of loading is to spread the load so that waiting is

minimized, flow is smooth and rapid, and congestion is avoided.

8
 Sequencing

Sequencing models and methods follow the discussion of loading models and
methods.

Sequencing establishes the order for doing the jobs at each facility.

Sequencing reflects job priorities according to the way that jobs are arranged in
the queues.

Say that Jobs x, y, and z have been assigned to workstation 1 (through loading
function).

Jobs x, y, and z are in a queue (waiting line). Sequencing rules determine which
job should be first in line, which second, etc.
9
 Sequencing (continued)

A good sequence provides less waiting time, decreased delivery delays, and
better due date performance.

There are costs associated with waiting and delays.

There are many other costs associated with the various orderings of jobs, for
example, set up cost and in-process inventory costs.

The objective function can be to minimize system’s costs, or to minimize total

system’s time, or (if margin data are available) to maximize total system’s
profit.

We discuss several objective functions later in the presentation.

10
 Sequencing (continued)
Total savings from regularly sequencing the right way,
the first time, can accumulate to substantial sums.

Re-sequencing can be significantly more costly. When

there are many jobs and facilities, sequencing rules have
considerable economic importance.

Sequencing also involves shop floor control, which

consists of communicating the status of orders and the
productivity of workstations.
11
 Scheduling
A production schedule is the time table that
specifies the times at which the jobs in a
production department will be processed on
various machines.
.
The schedule gives the starting and ending times
of each job on the machines on which the job has
to be processed.
12
 Scheduling Example
Suppose there are three jobs in a production department that are to be
processed on four categories (types) of machines. We designate the jobs
as A, B, and C; and the machine types are designated as M1, M2, M3, and
M4.

The three jobs consist of 4, 3, and 4 operations respectively; and there are
four machines - one machine of each type. We designate them as M1, M2,
M3, and M4 based on their categories.

The operations for job A are designated as A1, A2, A3, and A4. The
operations of job B are designated as B1, B2, and B3. Similarly the four
operations of job C are designated as C1, C2, C3, and C4.

13
 Scheduling Example (continued)
Each job is characterized by its routing that specifies the information
about the number of operations to be performed, the sequence of these
operations, and the machines required for processing these operations.

The times required for processing these operations are also required for
developing a production schedule.

14
 Scheduling Example - Data
Operation Machine Processing Time
Job
The table on right hand side (RHS) gives the data for Number Number (Days)
this example. A A1 M1 5
A2 M3 3
The table gives the machine required for each A3 M4 7
A4 M2 4
operation of each job. For example, the first
operation of job A, A1, is processed on machine M1; B B1 M2 2
second operation, A2, is processed on machine M3 B2 M3 6
and so on. B3 M4 8

The operations of all jobs have to follow their C C1 M1 4

C2 M2 6
processing sequences. For example operation A3 of
C3 M3 8
job A can not be processed before operation A2.
C4 M4 2

The processing time for each operation is also given

in this table.

15
 Scheduling Example – Objective
Function

The objective is to schedule these jobs so as to

minimize the time to complete all jobs. This
time is called make-span or the schedule time.
We will use the term make-span in this
presentation.

16
Scheduling Example Solution – Gantt Chart

One of the schedules for this example is presented below in the form of a
Gantt Chart.
The Gantt chart, for each machine, shows the start and finish times of all
operations scheduled on that machine.

17
Scheduling Example - Alternative schedules
Several alternative schedules can be generated for this example.
The schedules differ in the order in which the jobs are processed on the four
machines. Three of these schedules are:

o The first schedule orders jobs as: A first, then B and then C (A-B-C).
o The second schedule orders jobs as: B first, then A, and then C (B-A-C).
o The third schedule orders jobs as: C first, then A, and then B (C-A-B).

The Gantt charts for these schedules are shown in next slide.

The values of make-span for these three schedules are 25, 27 and 30 days
respectively. Schedule A-B-C is the best of these three schedules.

18
Scheduling Example - Alternative
Schedules (continued)
Time (Days)
Sequence A-B-C
M1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 C1 C1 C1 C1 (Make-span = 25
M2 B1 B1 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 A4 A4 A4 A4 days)
M3 A2 A2 A2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3

M4 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 B3 B3 B3 B3 B3 B3 B3 B3 C4 C4

Sequence B-A-C
(Make-span = 27
days)

Time (Days)
Sequence C-A-B
M1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
C1 C1 C1 C1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
(Make-span = 30
M2 B1 B1 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 A4 A4 A4 A4
days)
M3 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 A2 A2 A2 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3 C3

M4 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 C4 C4 B3 B3 B3 B3 B3 B3 B3 B3

19
 Scheduling Example - Alternative
Schedules (continued)

Is sequence A-B-C the global optimal? Can we find a better

sequence than this? The scheduling techniques attempt to answer
these questions.

It should be mentioned that there are different effectiveness

measures of a schedule in different situations. Minimizing make-
span is only one of them. We will study other effectiveness
measures also.

20
 Scheduling Example - Assumptions

Once a job is started on a machine, its processing can not

be interrupted, that is, preemption is not allowed.

The machines are continuously available and will not

break down during the planning horizon. This assumption
is rather unrealistic but we make this assumption to avoid
complexity in discussing scheduling concepts.

A machine is not kept idle if a job is available to be

processed.

Also, each machine can process only one job at a time. 21

Classification of Scheduling Problems
The scheduling problems can be classified based on
the following criteria:

• Sequence of machines
• Number of machines
• Processing times
• Job arrival time
• Objective functions

22
 Sequence of Machines

The sequencing problems, based on the sequence

of machines, are classified as:

 Flow Shops
 Job Shops

23
 Flow Shop
In a flow-shop , processing of all jobs require machines in the same order.

The following table gives an example of a flow-shop in which three jobs,

A, B, and C are processed on four machines, M1, M2, M3, and M4.

The sequences of machines to process these jobs are same (M1-M3-M4-

M2).

Example of a Flow Shop

Operation Operation Operation Operation Machine for Machine for Machine for Machine for
Job
#1 #2 #3 #4 Operation # 1 Operation # 2 Operation # 3 Operation # 4

A A1 A2 A3 A4 M1 M3 M4 M2
B B1 B2 B3 B4 M1 M3 M4 M2
C C1 C2 C3 C4 M1 M3 M4 M2

24
 Job Shop
In a job shop the sequence of machines will be mixed,
that is, the jobs may require machines in different
sequences.

Example of a Job Shop

Operation Operation Operation Operation Machine for Machine for Machine for Machine for
Job
#1 #2 #3 #4 Operation # 1 Operation # 2 Operation # 3 Operation # 4

A A1 A2 A3 A4 M1 M3 M4 M2
B B1 B2 B3 M2 M3 M4
C C1 C2 C3 C4 M1 M2 M3 M4

25
 Number of Machines
Based on the number of machines, the
scheduling problems are classified as:

 Single machine problems

 Two-machine problems
 Multiple (3 or more) machine problems

26
 Processing Times
 Deterministic: If processing times of all jobs
are known and constant the scheduling
problem is called a deterministic problem.

 Probabilistic: The scheduling problem is

called probabilistic (or stochastic) if the
processing times are not fixed; i.e., the
processing times must be represented by a
probability distribution.
27
 Job Arrival Times
Based on this criterion, scheduling problems are classified as
static and dynamic problems.

 Static: In the case of static problems the number of jobs is

fixed and will not change until the current set of jobs has
been processed.

 Dynamic: In the case of dynamic problems, new jobs enter

the system and become part of the current set of
unprocessed jobs. The arrival rate of jobs is given in the
case of dynamic problems.
28
 Objective Functions
Scheduling researchers have studied a large variety of objective
functions. In this presentation, we will focus on the following
objectives.

 Minimize make-span
 Minimize average flow time (or job completion time)
 Average number of jobs in the system
 Minimize average tardiness
 Minimize maximum tardiness
 Minimize number of tardy jobs

29
 Objective Functions (continued)
Minimizing make span is relevant for two or more machines.

In this presentation we will discuss the scheduling rule for static and deterministic
flow shop problems consisting of two machines where the objective is to minimize
make-span.

The other five objectives can be used for any number of machines, both deterministic
and probabilistic processing times, and for static as well as dynamic problems.

However, we will study these objective functions for a single machine, deterministic
and static problems.

The scheduling rule for job shops and for more than three machines are complex and
beyond the scope of this presentation.

30
 Example: 2-Machines Flow Shop
Consider a problem with five jobs (A, B, C, D, and E); and two
machines designated as M1 and M2.

All five jobs consist of two operations each. The first operation of
each job is processed on machine M1; and the second operation is
processed on machine M2.

The next slide gives the machines required for each job; and the
processing times for each operation of each job.

31
Data for a 2-Machine Flow Shop

Data for a 5-Job 2-Machine Flow Shop Problem

Time for Time for

Operation Operation Machine for Machine for
Job Operation # 1 Operation #
#1 #2 Operation # 1 Operation # 2
(Days) 2 (Days)
A A1 A2 M1 M2 8 3
B B1 B2 M1 M2 5 7
C C1 C2 M1 M2 6 9
D D1 D2 M1 M2 7 1
E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 6

32
 Scheduling Objective
The scheduling objective is to find an optimal sequence that gives the order in
which the five jobs will be processed on the two machines.

Once we know a sequence, the time to complete all jobs can be determined. This time
is called the schedule time, or the make-span. The optimal sequence is the one that
minimizes make-span.

For example, A-B-C-D-E is a sequence order that tells us that A is the first job to be
processed; B is the second job and so on. E is the last job to be processed. Is it
optimal?

Another sequence could be B-C-A-E-D. Is it optimal?

What is the optimal sequence?

33
 Number of Sequences
For this 5-job problem there are 120 (5!) different sequences. For
a six-job problem, the number of sequences will be 720 (6!).

In general, for a “n” job problem there are n! (n-factorial)

sequences.

Our goal is to find the best sequence that minimizes make-span.

Let us find the make-span for one of these sequences, say A-B-
C-D-E. We will draw a Gantt chart to find make-span.

34
 Gantt Chart
Sequence A-B-C-D-E
The Gantt chart for the sequence A-B-C-D-E is given below. We are assuming
that the sequence is the same on both machines.

The value of make-span (time to complete all jobs) is 36 days.

Our objective is to identify the sequence that minimizes the value of make-span.

Gantt Chart for Sequence A-B-C-D-E

Time (Days)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

M1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 D1 D1 D1 D1 D1 D1 D1 E1 E1 E1 E1

M2 A2 A2 A2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 D2 E2 E2 E2 E2 E2 E2

35
 Identifying the best sequence
There may be multiple optimal sequences.
We will study Johnson’s rule that identifies one of these
optimal sequence.

There are five sequence positions 1 through 5.

Johnson’s rule assigns each job to one of these positions
in an optimal manner.

Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 Position 4 Position 5

36
 Johnson’s Rule
to Minimize Make-span
We use the following four step process to find
the optimal sequence.

Step 1: Find the minimum processing time

considering times on both machines.

Step 2: Identify the corresponding job and the

corresponding machine for the minimum
time identified at Step 1.
37
 Johnson’s Rule (continued)
Step 3: Scheduling Rule
(a) If the machine identified in Step 2 is machine M1
then the job identified in Step 2 will be scheduled in the first
available schedule position.
(b) If the machine identified in Step 2 is machine M2
then the job identified in Step 2 will be scheduled in the last
available schedule position.

Step 4: Remove the job from consideration whose position has

been fixed in Step 3; and go to Step 1.
Continue this process until all jobs have been scheduled.

38
 Johnson’s Rule (continued)
Johnson’s rule makes the following assumptions:

 The same optimal sequence is used on both

machines.

 Preemption is not allowed, that is, once a job is

started it is not interrupted.

39
 Iteration 1

Step 1: The minimum time is 1.

Machine for Operation # 1

Machine for Operation # 2

Time for Operation # 1

Time for Operation # 2

Step 2: The job is D and the machine is

Operation # 1

Operation # 2
M2.

(Days)

(Days)
Job
Step 3: Since the machine identified at
Step 2 is machine M2, job D will be
assigned to the last available sequence A A1 A2 M1 M2 8 3
position which is position 5; and the B B1 B2 M1 M2 5 7
C C1 C2 M1 M2 6 9
resulting partial sequence is given D D1 D2 M1 M2 7 1
below.
Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 Position 4 D
E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 6

Step 4: Delete job D from consideration.

40
 Iteration 2
Step 1: The next minimum time is

Machine for Operation # 1

Machine for Operation # 2

Time for Operation # 1

Time for Operation # 2

3.

Operation # 1

Operation # 2
Step 2: The job is A and the

(Days)

(Days)
Job
machine is M2.
Step 3: The job A will be assigned
to the last available schedule
position, which is position 4. After A
B
A1
B1
A2
B2
M1
M1
M2
M2
8
5
3
7
assigning job A to position 4, the C C1 C2 M1 M2 6 9
D D1 D2 M1 M2 7 1
partial sequence is given below.
Scheduled

E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 6

Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 A D

Step 4: Delete job A from

consideration.

41
 Iteration 3
Step 1: The minimum time is 4.

Machine for Operation # 1

Machine for Operation # 2

Time for Operation # 1

Time for Operation # 2

Step 2: The job is E and the

Operation # 1

Operation # 2
machine is M1.

(Days)

(Days)
Job
Step 3: The job E will be assigned
to the first available schedule
position, which is position 1. The
partial sequence after assigning job A
B
A1
B1
A2
B2
M1
M1
M2
M2
8
5
3
7
Scheduled

E to position 1 is given below. C C1 C2 M1 M2 6 9

D D1 D2 M1 M2 7 1 Scheduled

E Position 2 Position 3 A D E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 6

Step 4: Delete job E from

consideration

42
 Iteration 4
Step 1: The minimum time is 5.

Machine for Operation # 1

Machine for Operation # 2

Time for Operation # 1

Time for Operation # 2

Step 2: The job is B and the

Operation # 1

Operation # 2
machine is M1.

(Days)

(Days)
Job
Step 3: The job B will be assigned
to the first available schedule
position, which is position 2. The
partial sequence after assigning job A
B
A1
B1
A2
B2
M1
M1
M2
M2
8
5
3
7
Scheduled

B to position 2 is given below. C C1 C2 M1 M2 6 9

D D1 D2 M1 M2 7 1 Scheduled
E B Position 3 A D E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 6 Scheduled

Step 4: Delete job B from

consideration

43
 Iteration 5
The only unscheduled job at this

Machine for Operation # 1

Machine for Operation # 2

Time for Operation # 1

Time for Operation # 2

stage is C and; it will be assigned to

Operation # 1

Operation # 2
the remaining unassigned position

(Days)

(Days)
Job
3.

The final sequence is given below. A A1 A2 M1 M2 8 3 Scheduled

The value of make-span for this B B1 B2 M1 M2 5 7 Scheduled

sequence will be determined by C

D
C1
D1
C2
D2
M1
M1
M2
M2
6
7
9
1 Scheduled

drawing the Gantt chart. E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 6 Scheduled

E B C A D

44
 Finding Make-span
The sequence E-B-C-A-D identified by Johnson’s
rule guarantees the minimum value of make-
span.
However, Johnson’s rule does not give the value of
make-span. It only identifies the best sequence.
The value of make-span is obtained either by
drawing the Gantt chart or a computerized
algorithm can be developed.
The Gantt chart for this optimal sequence is given
in the next slide.
45
 Sequence E-B-C-A-D
The Gantt chart for the sequence E-B-C-A-D
is given below. The value of make-span is 31
days.

The optimal (minimum) value of make-span

for this problem is therefore, 31 days.
Gantt Chart for Sequence E-B-C-A-D

Time (Days)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

M1 E1 E1 E1 E1 B1 B1 B1 B1 B1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 C1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 D1 D1 D1 D1 D1 D1 D1

M2 E2 E2 E2 E2 E2 E2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 C2 A2 A2 A2 D2

46
 Multiple Sequences
It may be noted that multiple optimal
sequences are possible for a given problem. It
means that several sequences can have the
same minimum value of make-span.
For example, for the problem studied in
previous slides, the sequence E-C-B-A-D also
gives a make-span of 31 days. TRY IT.
However, Johnson’s rule identifies only one of
these sequences.
47
 Breaking Ties
It might happen at Step 1, that there are more than one
minimum times. In such a situation, which job should be
picked up for assignment.
We will discuss three different cases of these ties.
Case 1: Minimum time is on both machines but for different
jobs.
Case2: Minimum time is on the same machine but for different
jobs.
Case 3: Minimum time is on both machines but for the same
job.

48
 Ties: Case 1 - Data
Consider the problem given below. The minimum time is 1 but occurs at two
places – Job A at M1 and Job D at M2.

Time for
Machine for Machine for Time for
Operation Operation Operatio
Job Operation # Operation # Operation #
#1 #2 n#2
1 2 1 (Days)
(Days)
A A1 A2 M1 M2 1 3
B B1 B2 M1 M2 5 7
C C1 C2 M1 M2 6 9
D D1 D2 M1 M2 7 1
E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 6

49
 .

Ties: Case 1 - Solution

The ties are broken at random.

A may be selected before D or D may be selected before A.

In either case, the resulting partial sequence after both A and D are scheduled, is
given below.

The scheduling algorithm continues until all jobs are scheduled. The final
sequence is also shown below.

Partial scequence after scheduling A and D

A Position 2 Position 3 Position 4 D
Final sequence
A E B C D

50
 Ties: Case 2 - Data
Consider the problem given below. The minimum time is 1 but occurs at two places – Job B at
M2 and Job D at M2.

Time for
Machine for Machine for Time for
Operation Operation Operatio
Job Operation # Operation # Operation #
#1 #2 n#2
1 2 1 (Days)
(Days)
A A1 A2 M1 M2 8 3
B B1 B2 M1 M2 5 1
C C1 C2 M1 M2 6 9
D D1 D2 M1 M2 7 1
E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 6

51
 Ties: Case 2 – Solution
The ties are broken at random.

B may be selected before D or D may be selected before B.

In this case, two different partial sequences will result based on which job is
selected first. These partial sequences are shown below.

The scheduling algorithm continues until all jobs are scheduled.

The two final sequences are also shown below.

Partial Sequence if B is selected first and then D
Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 D B
Final sequence if B is selected first and then D
E C A D B

Partial Sequence D is selected first and then B

Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 B D
Final sequence if D is selected first and then B
E C A B D
52
 Ties: Case 3 - Data
Consider the problem given below. The minimum time is 2 but occurs at
two places – Job C at M1 and also Job C at M2.

Time for
Machine for Machine for Time for
Operation Operation Operatio
Job Operation # Operation # Operation #
#1 #2 n#2
1 2 1 (Days)
(Days)
A A1 A2 M1 M2 8 3
B B1 B2 M1 M2 5 7
C C1 C2 M1 M2 2 2
D D1 D2 M1 M2 7 9
E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 6

53
 Ties: Case 3 - Solution
The ties are broken at random.

Job C at M1 may be selected before Job C at M2 or vice versa.

In this case, two different partial sequences will result based on which
combination is selected first. These partial sequences are shown below.

The scheduling algorithm continues until all jobs are scheduled.

The two final sequences are also shown below.
Note: C can be the first job or the last job in the optimal sequence

Partial Sequence if C on M1 is selected first

C Position 2 Position 3 Position 4 Position 5
Final sequence if C on M1 is selected first
C E B D A

Partial Sequence if C on M2 is selected first

Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 Position 4 C
Final sequence if C on M2 is selected first
E B D A C

54
 Comments About Ties
In general all three cases of ties may exist in a given problem.

The examples that we considered show ties in the first iteration.

However, the ties may occur during any iteration.

The general rule is to break the ties at random. However, we will

break the ties in the alpha order, that is A before B etc. For case 3,
the ties will be broken by the rule machine M1 before machine M2.

All resulting sequences, irrespective of the tie breaking rule, will

give the same minimum value of the make-span.

55
 Example with Multiple Ties

Consider the problem given below.

Johnson’s rule will give four different sequences for this problem because of various ties.

This problem is included on students’ website.

TRY IT.

Time for
Machine for Machine for Time for
Operation Operation Operatio
Job Operation # Operation # Operation #
#1 #2 n#2
1 2 1 (Days)
(Days)
A A1 A2 M1 M2 2 3
B B1 B2 M1 M2 5 7
C C1 C2 M1 M2 2 2
D D1 D2 M1 M2 8 9
E E1 E2 M1 M2 4 2

56
 Single Machine Scheduling

There is one machine on which several jobs have to be

processed.

The order in which these jobs will be processed needs

to be specified. This schedule will not be changed
until all jobs have been processed. This is the “static”
version of the problem.

In the “dynamic” version, the schedule can be altered.

The dynamic version is studied later in this
presentation.
57
57
 Scheduling Rules

There are several rules that can be used to find

the order of processing. We will study the
following three rules.

 First Come First Served (FCFS)

 Shortest Processing Time (SPT). This is also

called as Shortest Operation Time.

 Earliest (shortest) Due Date (EDD)

58
58
 Objective Functions

There are several objective functions that can be minimized in a

single machine problem. We will study the following objective
functions.

Minimize average completion (flow) time.

Minimize average number of jobs in the system.
Minimize average tardiness.
Minimize maximum tardiness
Minimize number of tardy jobs.

Note: A job is tardy if it is not completed by its due date.

59
59
 Example

Consider the example given on the

RHS. Days
Due
Job Time
There are five jobs A, B, C, D, and E. A Date
is the first job that arrived in the A 17 45
production department. B,C, D, and E B 12 35

followed A in this order. C 22 27

D 18 54
E 26 47
The processing times and due dates of
all jobs are also given.

The order in which these jobs have to

be processed needs to be specified.

60
60
 First Come First Served (FCFS)
The table on RHS gives answers by First Come First Served
using the FCFS rule. The order of Completion
Job Time Due Date Tardiness
processing is A, B, C, D, and E. Time
A 17 45 17 0
B 12 35 29 0
A is the first job to be processed and C 22 27 51 24
will be completed at time 17. Its due D 18 54 69 15
E 26 47 95 48
date is 45. So job A is not late (tardy);
tardiness is zero.
Tardiness = Completion Time – Due Date
Job B starts after job A, and is Make it zero if you get a negative value.

completed at time 29 (17+12). This is

also not tardy.

In this way the completion time and

tardiness of all jobs are completed.

61
 FCFS: Calculation of Objective
Functions
Average Completion Time: Add completion
times of all jobs and divide by the number of
jobs (261/5). It is 52.5.

Average Number of Jobs in the System: This is

obtained by dividing the total of completion
times of all jobs by the completion time of the
last job (261/95). It is 2.75.

Average Tardiness : This is obtained by adding

the tardiness of all jobs and dividing it by the
number of jobs (87/5). It is 17.4.

Maximum Tardiness: This is the maximum of

all tardiness values, It is 48.

Number of Tardy Jobs: Count the number of

jobs that are tardy. Three jobs (C, D, and E)
are tardy for this problem. It is 3.

62
62
 Shortest Processing Time (SPT)

The jobs are processed in the Shortest Processing Time

Completion
increasing order of their Job Time Due Date
Time
Tardiness
processing times. B 12 35 12 0
A 17 45 29 0
D 18 54 47 0
The job with the minimum C 22 27 69 42
processing time (B) is processed E 26 47 95 48
first. B is followed by A, D, C, and Total 252 90

E. Average Completion Time 50.4

Average Number of Jobs in System 2.65
Average Tardiness 18
The calculations of the objective Maximum Tardiness 48
functions follow the same Number of Tardy Jobs 2
procedure as for the FCFS rule.

63
63
 Earliest Due Date (EDD)

The jobs are processed in the Earliest Due Date

Completion
increasing order of their due dates. Job Time Due Date Tardiness
Time
C 22 27 22 0
The job with the minimum due B 12 35 34 0
date (C) is processed first; and is A 17 45 51 6
E 26 47 77 30
followed by B, A, E, and D. D 18 54 95 41
Total 279 77
The calculations of the objective
Average Completion Time 55.8
functions follow the same Average Number of Jobs in System 2.94
procedure as for the FCFS rule Average Tardiness 15.4
Maximum Tardiness 41
Number of Tardy Jobs 3

64
64
 Dynamic Scheduling Problems

A scheduling problem is classified as a dynamic problem if the number of jobs

is not fixed.

The examples include new production orders, customers in a bank, shoppers

in a store, and cars at a gas station etc.

The new jobs (production orders, customers, cars etc.) keep on coming into
the system; and the schedule needs to integrate the new arrivals when an
updated schedule is prepared.

A new schedule is prepared every time a job is completed.

65
65
 Example – Dynamic Scheduling
Problem
Consider a single machine problem for which
the data are given on RHS. Data for Dynamic Problem
There are five jobs A, B, C, D, and E that are Job Time (Days)
waiting to be processed.
A 17
Suppose Shortest Processing Time (SPT) rule B 12
is being used. C 22
D 18
SPT sequence is given on RHS.
E 26
B is the first job to be processed. SPT Sequence

When B is being processed, suppose two new Job Time (Days)

jobs F and G arrive.
B 12
A 17
F arrives on the 5th day and G arrives on the
10th day. Also assume that the processing time D 18
of job F is 8 days and that of G is 20 days. C 22
E 26

66
66
 Example – Dynamic Scheduling Problem
(continued)

After job B has been processed, there are six jobs (A,
C, D, E, F, and G) that are waiting to be processed.

Since the scheduling rule is SPT, the job with the SPT Sequence - New
minimum processing time from among the jobs that
are waiting to be processed will be scheduled next. Job Time (Days)
Table 3 gives the schedule at this time.
F 8
The next job is F. This will be completed at time 20
A 17
(12+8) where 12 is the completion time of job B. If
more jobs arrive in the system while F is being D 18
processed, they will be integrated with the current G 20
jobs and a new schedule will be developed.
C 22
These are called dynamic problems since the schedule E 26
is continuously updated. Dynamic situations are faced
in multiple machines problems also.

67
67
Objective Functions – Dynamic Scheduling
Problems
Objective functions for dynamic problems are defined in the same way as for
single machine static problems.

 Minimize average completion (flow) time.

 Minimize average number of jobs in the system.
 Minimize number of late (tardy) jobs.
 Minimize average lateness (tardiness).

The values of completion time and tardiness of each job are recorded; and
the values of the objective functions can be calculated at any time based on
the number of jobs completed at that time.

68
68
Thank you.

69