Chap 001
Chap 001
Chap 001
Chapter 1
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Employees Views
Managers Views
1-2
Compensation: Definition
Employees
Major source of financial security Return in an exchange between employer and themselves Entitlement for being an employee of the company Reward for a job well done
1-3
Society
Pay as a measure of justice
Gender pay gap in U.S., after adjusting for differences in education, experience, occupation, has narrowed from 36 percent in 1980 to 13 percent in 2006
Job losses (or gains) attributed to differences in compensation (see Ex. 1.1) Belief that pay increases lead to price increases
1-4
Exhibit 1.1 update: Hourly Compensation Costs for Production Workers (2007 data)
United States Brazil Canada Mexico Australia Hong Kong Japan South Korea Singapore Sri Lanka Taiwan $24.59 5.96 28.91 2.92 30.17 5.78 19.75 16.02 ($8.23 in 2000) 8.35 0.61* (comparable to China?) 6.58 Ireland Italy Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 2009. Denmark Finland France Germany Hungary Austria Belgium Czech Republic 35.33 35.45 8.20 ($2.83 in 2000) 42.29 34.18 28.57 37.66 7.91 ($2.79 in 2000) 29.04 28.23 34.07 48.56 6.17 8.27 20.98 36.03 32.88 29.73
Hourly compensation costs include (1) hourly direct pay and (2) employer social insurance expenditures and other labor 1-5 taxes.
Stockholders
Linking executive pay to company performance theoretically increases stockholders' returns (see Ex. 1.2)
Managers
A major expense (labor expense can account for 50+% of total costs) Used to influence employee behaviors and to improve the organization's performance (see Ex. 1.3)
Grocery store clerk pay (2005):
Industry average: $12.28/hr Costco: $16 Whole Foods $12.50 Sams Club $12 Wal-Mart $9.68 Labor costs as % of total costs for grocery stores historically 15-18%; today norm is 9-12%; warehouse stores 4-6%; Whole Foods 25%
1-6
1-7
What Is Compensation?
Compensation refers to all forms of financial returns and tangible services and benefits employees receive as part of an employment relationship
1-8
1-9
Forms Of Pay
Relational returns
Psychological in nature
Total compensation
Cash Compensation/ transactional
Base wages
Difference between wage and salary
Benefits
Income protection (some are legally required)
ALIGNMENT
COMPETITIVENESS
Policy lines
PAY STRUCTURE
CONTRIBUTORS
Seniority based
Performance based
Merit guidelines
INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
COMPLIANCE
MANAGEMENT
Costs Communication Change EVALUATION
1-12
1-13
Focus - Comparisons among jobs or skill levels inside a single organization Pay relationships within an organization affect employee decisions to:
Stay with the organization Become more flexible by investing in additional training Seek greater responsibility
External
Focus - Compensation relationships external to the organization: comparison with competitors Pay is market driven
1-14
competitiveness
Employee contributions
Focus - Relative emphasis placed on employee performance
Performance based pay affects fairness
Management
Focus - Policies ensuring the right people get the right pay for achieving the right objectives in the right way
1-15
Dollar impact of hiring and keeping top performers vs. average ones in mission-critical jobs
Evidence-based HR Decision-making
Assumption that correlation implies causation pervades decision making in human resources and pay plan design.
Inferential issue: "The CEO drank Wild Turkey; the company performed well; ergo, all CEOs should drink more Wild Turkey. The company uses individual incentives; the company performs well; ergo all companies should use more incentives.
"The first step is to know what the evidence says. Know the research literature that pertains to your business. Diffusion and persistence do not prove effectiveness. The goal is to transform human resources into the R&D department for the human system, which is the most important system in almost all organizations.
"In R&D, you go into the laboratory, you experiment and you keep up with the research that others do. Can you imagine walking into the R&D lab at a pharmaceutical company, asking the chief chemist about an important new study and having him respond that they don't keep up with the literature in chemistry?
Jeffrey Pfeffer, Stanford University, in Workforce Management, 11/3/08
1-17