DROM Implementation Framework
DROM Implementation Framework
DROM Implementation Framework
Indicative assessment of this parent project showed the need to further support the gains and
sustainability options in integrating CDD in the local development process.
The COVID-19 pandemic further necessitated policy support and additional
resources to strengthen the LGUs’ capacity to respond and manage not just the
pandemic, but also other disasters.
PROJECT DURATION
3 YEARS (2021-2023)
IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM
DISASTER RESPONSE OPERATIONS MODALITY
• Mechanism utilized by the KALAHI-CIDSS to accelerate program
implementation in times of proclamation of disaster.
(B) Helping the barangay LGUs to enhance their capacity to mobilize local response to
development challenges and future disasters through participatory local development
planning and investment programming.
Kalahi-CIDSS Core Principles
Congruence Between the BDP and the CEAC
Kalahi-CIDSS CEAC Process
Congruence Between the BDP and the CEAC
KC NCDDP’s CEAC Process and the BDP
Pre-formulation of the BDP
Social Preparation
Phase 1 - Harmonization
• Harmonized data gathering and analysis tools that are used by communities under the
KC-NCDDP including the RDANA with local planning tools used in the BDP.
• Utilization of the said tools to prepare and/or update the participatory situational
analysis and RDANA information.
• Adoption of the PSA and RDANA results to prepare the community priorities (sub-
projects) for the next three years (2021-2023).
• Integration of the PSA and RDANA result and the three-year priority list with the BDP
that is subject to updating this year and securing the necessary funding support for a)
barangays that cannot be prioritized in Year 2 due to the scaled down block grant
support and b) the full funding of sub-projects identified for Year 3; and,
• Completion of one round of implementation supported by the AF.
Process Adjustments
Phase 2 - Institutionalization
• Review of Year 1 experiences particularly on the harmonization of tools for planning and the result of
the updating of the BDP and identification of important lessons to enhance institutionalization of CDD
practices in Phase 2.
• Issuance of the DILG Guidelines on the Enhanced BDP process with inputs from the DSWD
particularly on the outcome of the harmonization conducted in Year 1.
• Completion/updating of profiling prepared in Year 1 and enhancement of inputs to the BDP in
preparation for the planning for 2023 using the Enhanced BDP.
• Training of incoming LGU officials and community volunteers on the Enhanced BDP in partnership
with the DILG.2 rounds of implementation.
• Year 2 will scale down allocation of NCDDP-AF grant to 50% and is expected to be matched by LGUs
with funding to support barangays that will not be prioritized because of the decreased grant allocation.
Year 3 will be fully funded by the LGU based on approved design of the NCDDP-AF by the oversight
agencies.
• Roll out of the Enhanced BDP using the guidelines issued by the DILG in 2023.
Allocation of Community Grants
• Eligible municipalities will receive a block grant allocation computed by multiplying
a fixed per capita allocation (with the amount adjusted for inflation) with the total
population of the municipality (2015 Census of Population).
Municipal Poverty Allocation per
Class Incidence Head (in PhP)
• If the disaster happens before all barangays have started SPI and have not used any
portion of the grant, the BDC/BDRRMC can use their allocation to fund a newly
identified SP.
• If the disaster occurs during sub-project implementation, the community may fund a
response sub-project using the remaining grants intended for their original sub-
project.
• All originally proposed and approved sub-projects MUST still be completed within
the project life.
THANK YOU!