Lecture 13 - Mining and Environment

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 30

MINING & ENVIRONMENT

Environmental Issues
in Mining
Environmental Issues in Mining
Waste Streams Generated

 Mine Water
 Waste rock
 Overburden
 Tailings
Environmental Issues in Mining

 Landscape alteration

 Ecological disturbance

 Change in groundwater regime

 Sedimentation of mountain streams

 Dust, including contaminated particles

 Surface and groundwater contamination


Environmental Issues in Mining

Surface and groundwater contamination

 Acid mine drainage (AMD): Hydrogen ion


releases in newly exposed sulfide minerals
overwhelm water buffering capacity and result
in acidification.

 Heavy metals: The exposure of metal bearing


rocks to oxygen and water also results in the
release of heavy metals into solution in water
Treatment of Contaminated Waste

Traditional approaches:

Solids: Generally intended to adjust pH, alter redox


conditions, or stabilize waste, but do not reduce the
toxicity of the waste:

 Relocation of waste causing contamination– Ex:


containment in lined pits
 Covering waste piles – Ex: Landscape adjustment

Water: Treatment facilities & diversion tactics – Ex: Diverting


surface runoff away from waste piles
Acid Mine Drainage in Colorado
AMD

Acid Generation and Metal


Mobilisation
Background
 Acid drainage is a low pH, iron and sulphate-
bearing water usually formed when rocks
containing sulphide minerals (eg. pyrite,
pyrrhotite etc) are
• exposed to the atmosphere or an oxidising
environment, and
• subsequently leached by water.
 Acid drainage is a major issue affecting the
metal mining and coal industry throughout the
world.
 Many old mining sites have a legacy of acid
drainage long after the completion of mining.
Formation of AMD

 The production of acid via iron sulphide (eg


pyrite) oxidation can be represented by the
following reaction:
 FeS2 + 3.75 O2 + 3.5 H2O = Fe(OH)3 (orange ppt) + 2SO42- + 4
H+ (1)
 (Iron sulphide + Oxygen + Water = Ferric Hydroxide +
Aqueous sulphuric acid)
Formation of AMD

 The following more detailed reactions


demonstrate the key steps in the acid forming
process, and highlight the importance of ferric
hydroxide (Fe(OH)3) precipitation in the
production of acidity:
 FeS2 + 3.5 O2 + H2O = Fe2+ + 2 SO42- +
2 H+ (2)
Formation of AMD
 Pyrite is exposed to air and decomposes into water
soluble components; acid is produced.
 Fe2+ + 0.25 O2 + H+ = Fe3+ + 0.5 H2O
(3)
 The relatively reduced water soluble components are
further oxidised; acid is consumed.
 Fe3+ + 3 H2O = Fe(OH)3 (orange precipitate) + 3
H+ (4)
 The formation of ferric iron in water results in the
precipitation of ferric hydroxide precipitate; acid is
produced.
Formation of AMD

 Ferric hydroxide will only precipitate from water


(above pH 3.3) after it has been sufficiently
aerated / oxidised to facilitate the conversion of
soluble ferrous iron to soluble ferric iron.
 As can be seen from reaction (4), this process is
a key acid producing stage.
 Once sulphides have been oxidised, it is
extremely difficult to avoid ferric hydroxide
precipitation.
Formation of AMD

 With the formation of soluble ferric iron (Fe3+) in


the presence of fresh iron sulphide, further
sulphide oxidation is accelerated, as
represented in the following reaction:
 FeS2 + 14 Fe3+ + 8 H2O = 15 Fe2+ + 2
SO42- + 16 H+ (5)
Formation of AMD
 Iron sulphides in geologic materials that are
located below the water table will remain
essentially stable, since the potential for
oxidation is limited.
 However, where sulphidic materials are exposed
to oxidising conditions (air) the iron sulphides
will react and water can move the reaction
products (eg. iron and sulphate) into surface
water and groundwater.
 As the acid water migrates, it further reacts with
other minerals and dissolves a broader range of
metals.
Formation of AMD
 Whilst pH is a measure of hydrogen ion concentration
(H+ in reactions (2) to (5)), “acidity” is a measure of both
hydrogen ion concentration and mineral (or latent)
acidity.
 Mineral or latent acidity includes the concentration of
hydrogen ions that could potentially be generated by the
precipitation of various metal hydroxides from any given
solution when titrated to a specific pH (eg. such as for
ferric hydroxide as shown in reaction (4) above).
 Commonly acid drainage solutions contain iron,
aluminium, manganese, copper, lead, zinc, cadmium
and other metals.
Formation of AMD

 Total Acidity (ie. existing + latent) is measured in


a laboratory by thoroughly oxidising a water
sample, and titrating it to a specific pH (eg.
commonly 8.3).
 Provided in units of mg/l CaCO3, this
measurement quantifies the ideal neutralisation
requirements of the water sample to the
specified pH.
 The concentration of dissolved oxygen in natural
waters is approximately 25,000 times lower than
found in the atmosphere.
Formation of AMD

 One thousand tonnes of material containing


0.5% sulphur as pyrite which completely
oxidises will require approximately 16 tonnes of
CaCO3 (used efficiently) to neutralise the
sulphuric acid generated.
Effects of AMD

What Problems are Created by Acid Drainage?


 Acid drainage can have extreme impacts on the ecology
of streams, affecting the beneficial use of waterways
downstream of mining operations. Acid conditions can:
 mobilise (bring into solution) metals to levels injurious to
aquatic ecosystems, riparian communities and possibly
human health (eg. zinc, cadmium, aluminium, copper);
 limit the downstream beneficial uses of the receiving
water (eg. stock, recreation, fishing, aquaculture,
irrigation);
 alter important life supporting balances in water
chemistry (eg. bicarbonate buffering system);
Effects of AMD

What Problems are Created by Acid Drainage?


 lead to the development of chemical precipitates (eg.
ferric hydroxide, aluminium hydroxide...etc) that can
smother aquatic habitat and reduce light penetration;
 impact on groundwater quality;
 lead to the installation of expensive control, treatment
and rehabilitation programs;
 create long term environmental liabilities; and
 limit the reuse of mine site water and exacerbate the
corrosion of site infrastructure and equipment.
Effects of AMD

What Problems are Created by Acid Drainage?


 Acid drainage can also cause revegetation and
rehabilitation difficulties.
 Acidity in soils can lead to significant excesses
and deficiencies of key elements for plant
growth and difficulties in stabilising mine wastes.

 Acid conditions in soils are at best a significant


limitation on the vegetation types that can be
used for rehabilitation and at worst the cause of
a failed rehabilitation programme.
Effects of AMD
What Problems are Created by Acid Drainage?
 A recent study assessing acid mine drainage in Australia
conservatively estimated that over 15 years, the total
cost of managing potentially acid generating mine
wastes from current mines is A$ 900 million.
 The cost of rehabilitating the Rum Jungle mine site, a
relatively small mine in the Northern Territory, from funds
provided by the Australian Government was A$ 18.6
million.
 Detailed studies of the Mount Lyell mining area in
Tasmania estimate expenditure exceeding A$ 10 million
in capital costs and A$ 2 million in yearly operating costs
to neutralise all acid drainage sources from the mine
area (Koehnken, 1997).
Effects of AMD
 Typical costs for rehabilitating potentially acid generating
wastes at historic abandoned mine sites has been
estimated as being in excess of $100,000 per ha.
 These costs do not include acid drainage treatment
costs of mine workings.
 In contrast, the cost of managing acid drainage at
existing mine sites is significantly less than this figure,
indicating that site recognition and on-going
management of acid drainage is an important long term
cost saving.
 Experience has shown that acid drainage, if not properly
managed has the potential to be a long term liability for
mine operators, regulators and the community.
What makes up AMD

Factors Influencing Acid Drainage from Sulphides


The following factors can enhance the
production of acid drainage from iron sulphides:
 the ready availability of
• oxygen and
• water;
 physical characteristics of geologic materials
which encourage rapid oxidation
• high surface area /
• small grainsize iron sulphides);
What makes up AMD

Factors Influencing Acid Drainage from Sulphides


 water with a low pH;
 elevated water temperatures;
 high soluble Fe3+/Fe2+ ratios;
 the presence of micro-organisms (bacteria, eg.
Thiobacillus thiooxidans and T. ferrooxidans) which can
act as a catalyst by utilising iron sulphide as an energy
source, thereby oxidising the sulphide mineral;
 the absence of neutralising materials (eg. calcium
carbonate); and
 warm, wet climates
Control / mitigation of AMD

Best Practice Management and Control of Acid Drainage


Best practice management of acid drainage is routinely
pre-emptive and can usually be summarised by the
following:
 Understanding the site mechanisms for acid generation,
predicting the acid generating potential and incorporating
this information into mine design and management (eg.
location of waste dumps, blending of wastes, dump
design and management procedures, water
management plans...etc).
 Development of suitable minimisation and control
strategies.
Control / mitigation of AMD

Best Practice Management and Control of Acid Drainage


 Monitoring to seek warning signs of the early
development of acid drainage, and later to quantify the
effectiveness of minimisation and control strategies.
 Treatment where minimisation and control strategies are
not totally effective or where costs of treatment are less
than the costs of minimisation and control
 More specific detail on measures to implement best
practice management of acid drainage follow.
Identification & Prediction of AMD
 Accurate prediction of acid drainage requires a
knowledge of the mineralogy and chemistry of geologic
materials, site hydrology and the distribution of key rock
types.
 It is important to understand which lithologies are acid
generating, non-acid generating or geochemically
ambiguous, and how rapidly sulphidic minerals
decompose in the presence of oxygen.
 To identify the potential implications of acid drainage for
a site detailed assessment is required of the following
issues:
 A baseline or the background receiving water quality
conditions of the site / area?
Identification & Prediction of AMD
 The presence of sulphide minerals or other acid forming
components in the ore or waste rock material.
 If present, detailed materials characterisation (eg. acid-
base accounting, kinetic tests).
 Acid budget for the site, possibly incorporating a site
water balance.
 Requirements for site water discharge. How often, how
much, when, and what are the water quality parameters
to be achieved?
 Various types of both static and kinetic tests have been
developed to assist with the characterisation of acid
generation potential.
SUMMARY ON AMD IN AQUATIC LIFE

 Mine drainage effects on aquatic life vary widely,


from elimination of all but the few most tolerant
• algae,
• macroinvertebrates, and
• fish.
 The most severe effects are caused by
 high volume,
 low pH discharges with
 high concentrations of dissolved metals that
drain into lightly buffered streams and produce
accumulations of precipitated iron or aluminum.
SUMMARY ON AMD IN AQUATIC LIFE

 Little or no effect may occur from low volume or


alkaline discharges with relatively low
concentrations of metals that drain into
moderate or highly buffered streams

 END

You might also like