- Semiotics draws heavily on concepts from linguistics due to the influence of Saussure, who saw linguistics as a branch of the general science of semiology.
- Structuralism applied linguistic analysis to other sign systems beyond language. Many semioticians view media like television and film as sign systems similar to languages.
- While some have argued semiology is a branch of linguistics, most semioticians accept Saussure's view of linguistics as within semiotics, exploring how signs construct social realities.
- Semiotics draws heavily on concepts from linguistics due to the influence of Saussure, who saw linguistics as a branch of the general science of semiology.
- Structuralism applied linguistic analysis to other sign systems beyond language. Many semioticians view media like television and film as sign systems similar to languages.
- While some have argued semiology is a branch of linguistics, most semioticians accept Saussure's view of linguistics as within semiotics, exploring how signs construct social realities.
- Semiotics draws heavily on concepts from linguistics due to the influence of Saussure, who saw linguistics as a branch of the general science of semiology.
- Structuralism applied linguistic analysis to other sign systems beyond language. Many semioticians view media like television and film as sign systems similar to languages.
- While some have argued semiology is a branch of linguistics, most semioticians accept Saussure's view of linguistics as within semiotics, exploring how signs construct social realities.
- Semiotics draws heavily on concepts from linguistics due to the influence of Saussure, who saw linguistics as a branch of the general science of semiology.
- Structuralism applied linguistic analysis to other sign systems beyond language. Many semioticians view media like television and film as sign systems similar to languages.
- While some have argued semiology is a branch of linguistics, most semioticians accept Saussure's view of linguistics as within semiotics, exploring how signs construct social realities.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
RELATION TO LINGUISTICS
It is difficult to disentangle European semiotics from structuralism in its
origins. Linguistic structuralism derived primarily from Saussure, Hjelmslev and Jakobson. It was Jakobson who first coined the term ‘structuralism’ in 1929 (Jakobson 1990, 6). Structuralism is an analytical method which involves the application of the linguistic model to a much wider range of social phenomena. Jakobson wrote that ‘Language is . . . a purely semiotic system . . . The study of signs, however, . . . must take into consideration also applied semiotic structures, as for instance, architecture, dress, or cuisine . . . Saussure argued that ‘nothing is more appropriate than the study of languages to bring out the nature of the semiological problem’ (Saussure 1983, 16). Semiotics draws heavily on linguistic concepts, partly because of his influence, and also because linguistics is a more established discipline than the study of other sign-systems. Saussure saw linguistics as a branch of ‘semiology’ Linguistics is only one branch of this general science [of semiology]. The laws which semiology will discover will be laws applicable in linguistics . . . As far as we are concerned . . . the linguistic problem is first and foremost semiological . . . If one wishes to discover the true nature of language systems, one must first consider what they have in common with all other systems of the same kind . . . In this way, light will be thrown not only upon the linguistic problem. By considering rites, customs etc. as signs, it will be possible, we believe, to see them in a new perspective. The need will be felt to consider them as semiological phenomena and to explain them in terms of the laws of semiology. While Roland Barthes (1967b, xi) declared that ‘perhaps we must invert Saussure’s formulation and assert that semiology is a branch of linguistics’, most of those who call themselves semioticians at least implicitly accept Saussure’s location of linguistics within semiotics. The linguist and semiotician Roman Jakobson was in no doubt that ‘language is a system of signs, and linguistics is part and parcel of the science of signs or semiotics’ (Jakobson 1949a, 50; cf. 1970, 454). However, even if we theoretically locate linguistics within semiotics it is difficult to avoid adopting the linguistic model in exploring other sign-systems. The American linguist Leonard Bloomfield asserted that ‘linguistics is the chief contributor to semiotics’ (Bloomfield 1939, 55). Jakobson defined semiotics as ‘the general science of signs which has as its basic discipline linguistics, the science of verbal signs’ (Jakobson 1963e, 289). Semioticians commonly refer to films, television and radio programmes, advertising posters and so on as ‘texts’, and to ‘reading television’ (Fiske and Hartley 1978). Media such as television and film are regarded by some semioticians as being in some respects like languages. WHY STUDY SEMIOTICS? While Saussure may be hailed as a founder of semiotics, semiotics has become increasingly less Saussurean since the 1970s. While the current account of semiotics focuses primarily on its structuralist forms. studying semiotics can assist us to become more aware of the mediating role of signs and of the roles played by ourselves and others in constructing social realities. It can make us less likely to take reality for granted as something which is wholly independent of human interpretation. exploring semiotic perspectives, we may come to realize that information or meaning is not ‘contained’ in the world or in books, computers or audio- visual media. Meaning is not ‘transmitted’ to us – we actively create it according to a complex interplay of codes or conventions of which we are normally unaware. Such a study involves investigating the construction and maintenance of reality by particular social groups. To decline the study of signs is to leave to others the control of the world of meanings which we inhabit.