Rational Use of Abx-ICU
Rational Use of Abx-ICU
Rational Use of Abx-ICU
1
Presentation outline
• Treatment strategies
• Methods: data collected from 471 million individual records or isolates and
7585 study-location-years from 2014 countries in 2019
• Result
• There were an estimated 4·95 million (3·62–6·57) deaths associated with
bacterial AMR in 2019
• 3rd G cephalosporin-resistant E coli and K pneumoniae,carbapenem-resistant A
baumannii, and K pneumonia and fluoroquinolone-resistant E coli are major
MDR pathogens
• Highest in western sub-Saharan Africa, at 27·3 deaths per 100000
AMR in ICU
• More than 75% of critically ill patients receive at least one antibiotic during their
stay in the hospital.
• Increasingly AMR necessity to create local antibiograms specific for each hospital
& even ward, annually.
• Development need local microbiology data of targeted infections & other relevant
determinants in the local context.
Method :
• Experimental study done to test impact of locally developed CPG for
empirical antibiotic therapy of common infections in the hospitals
Result
• 808 patient in pre- and 836 in post-implementation periods were compared.
• Significant reductions in mean durations ICU stay, ventilator use & overall favorable
clinical outcomes
• Conclusion :the locally developed CPG implementation is feasible and effective in
improving patient outcomes and reducing ATB consumption.
Do we have quality antimicrobial data for CPG development in
our ICU ?
• Method: A total of 12 AMR reviews with 312 original studies were included in this
overview and the quality of each included AMR review was assessed (AMSTAR 2).
• Result and conclusion. 75% of the review had low and below methodologic quality, and
none had a high-quality score using the AMSTAR 2 tool. This highlights the need to
improve the methodologic quality to provide the best available evidence for clinical
decision-making and curb the ongoing AMR in Ethiopia
Rapid diagnostics in Microbiology lab to guide antibiotics treatment
and monitoring ?
Effect of Gram Stain–Guided Initial Antibiotic Therapy on Clinical Response in
Patients With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Finding:
• 103 patients in Gram stain–guided group & 103 in guideline-based group were
compared .
• Clinical response 76.7% Vs 71.8%),reduced use of antipseudomonal agents and
anti-MRSA and 28-day incidence of mortality (13.6% 17.5%) showed in the
Gram stain–guided group vs in the guideline-based group
Conclusion:
• Gram stain–guided treatment was non-inferior to guideline-based treatment and
significantly reduced the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients with
VAP
• Methods:
• Compared PCT group (761) vs to standard-of-care (785)
• Antibiotics discontinue if PCT concentration decreased by 80% or more of its peak
value or to 0·5 μg/L or lower & in the standard-of-care group, patients were treated
according to local antibiotic protocols
• Result:
• Procalcitonin guidance stimulates the reduction of the duration of treatment and
daily defined doses in critically ill patients with a presumed bacterial infection. This
reduction was associated with a significant decrease in mortality
Guidelines Recommendations
Surviving Sepsis • Not recommend using procalcitonin to decide when to start
Campaign: 2021 antimicrobials
• Recommend using of procalcitonin to decide when to
discontinue antimicrobials over clinical evaluation alone
IDSA:HAP/VAP 2016 • Not recommended to use PCT alone to decide to Initiate
Antibiotic Therapy?
• Recommend using of procalcitonin to decide when to
discontinue antimicrobials over clinical evaluation alone
ERS/ESICM/ESCMID • They do not recommend the routine measurement of serial
HAP/VAP-2017 serum PCT levels to reduce duration of the antibiotic course
India 2019:ICU Abx • Recommend using procalcitonin to decide when to
prescription discontinue antimicrobials over clinical evaluation alone,
the duration of therapy is >5-7 days in SCAP and HAP/VAP
Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic dose optimization
• Adequate drug concentrations at the infection site are needed to optimize clinical
outcomes.
• Many factors influence the PK of antibiotics in critically ill patients and may
contribute to subtherapeutic exposures.
• Move away from the “one dose fits all” toward individualized to the physiology of the
patient being treated
• Time-dependent and concentration-dependent killing
• Concentration-dependent antibiotics
• Hydrophilic
• Extracellular distribution
• Renal execration
• Loading important
• Lipophilic
• Intracellular distribution
• Hepatic execration
• 22 studies (1876 patients) were
included in the MA
26
Method: 11 studies were included in the MA to compare the efficacy and safety of CIV
and IIV.
Result :Patients treated with CIV had a significantly lower incidence of nephrotoxicity
compared with patients receiving IIV (RR) = 0.61). Mortality between patients receiving
CIV and patients receiving IIV was similar (RR = 1.15).
Conclusion : MA showed that CIV had superior safety compared with IIV, whilst the
clinical efficacy was not significantly different.
• Prospective auditing and formulary restriction
Methods:
• Intervention phase (707 intervention): weekly audits and immediate feedback
sessions on antibiotic prescriptions of patients admitted and post-intervention phase
(402 post-intervention): audited antibiotic prescriptions but provided no feedback to
the treating teams
Finding:
• Team recommended to discontinue antibiotic therapy in 54% of cases during the
intervention period. Once the intervention ceased, total antimicrobial use increased by
51.6% & mean duration of treatment by 4.1 days/patient.
Method:
• Baseline (B)(194): no audit was performed, Model 1 (M1,415): ID physician evaluated
patients &a critical care pharmacist communicated recommendations to the treating team
and Model 2 (M2,83), ID physician directly participated in interdisciplinary rounds with the
medical ICU team.
Results:
• M1 and M2 were associated with appropriate antimicrobial selection (B, 70%; M1, 78%;
M2, 82%; P ¼ .042) and with lower rates of resistance (B, 31%; M1, 25%; M2, 17%; P
¼ .033).
• Conclusion :Audit and feedback were independently associated with appropriate
antimicrobial selection and prevention of resistance
Antimicrobial de-escalation in the ICU
• Many clinicians still are reluctant to modify initial broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens
even when the practice is supported clinically and by microbiologic testing
Study type Study Finding
Ines Lakbar 2020 SR and MA of 20 ADE is associated with lower mortality 0.71
observational study (95% CI 0.63 to 0.80)
• Early intravenous to the oral transition of antibiotics reduces hospital length of stay
and cost of care.
• There is no increase in mortality or other adverse events when this is done after
assessing as to which patients can be safely transitioned to oral therapy.
• Hemodynamically stable,
• Short antibiotic courses (< 7 days) are sufficient for most infections in critically ill
patients, with a few exceptions when source controlled
• Empirical therapy
• It most often used when antibiotics are given to a patient before the specific
microorganism causing an infection is known.
• When determining empiric treatment for a given patient, clinicians should also
consider:
HAP • Selection based on the risk factors for MRSA(high risk, no risk)
• Cefepimed/ceftazidimed 2 g IV q8h/Meropenemd 1 g IV q8h/Amikacin
15–20 mg/kg IV daily Plus Vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV q8–12h/Linezolid
600 mg IV q12h
VAP • Cover MRSA,P.aeruginosa & other GNB in all empiric regimens
• Vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV q8–12h or Linezolid 600 mg IV q12h Plus
Cefepime 2 g IV q8h/Ceftazidime 2 g IV q8h/Meropenem 1 g IV q8h
Plus Ciprofloxacin 400 mg IV q8h/Amikacin 15–20 mg/kg IV
q24h/Gentamicin 5–7 mg/kg IV q24h/Polymyxins
Sepsis and • High risk of MRSA, use empiric antimicrobials with MRSA coverage
septic shock • High risk for MDR organisms, we suggest using two antimicrobials with
gram-negative coverage for empiric treatment over one gram-negative
agent
Treatment of MDR bacteria in ICU patients
• local microbiological epidemiology remain critical for defining the baseline risk of
MDR-GNB infections and firmly guiding empirical treatment choices
• Results
• Fifty-three patients treated with TMP/SMX and 83 matched patients treated
with colistin or AMP/SUL were included.
• All-cause 30-day mortality was lower with TMP/SMX compared with the
comparator antibiotics among all patients (24.5%, 13 of 53 vs. 38.6%, 32 of
83, P = 0.09)
• Treatment failure rates were not significantly different overall (34%, 18 of 53
vs. 42.4%, 35 of 83, P = 0.339)
• Time to clinical stability and hospitalization duration were significantly
shorter with TMP/SMX.
In summary
Reference