Chapter 6 - Perishable Items
Chapter 6 - Perishable Items
Chapter 6 - Perishable Items
¨Characteristics
¨Simplest Case: the unconstrained, single-item,
newsvendor problem
¨Single-period, Constrained, Multi-item Situation
1. Characteristics of style goods and
perishable items
A relatively short selling season.
There might be one or some chances for replenishment after the initial order is
placed.
When the demand in the season exceeds the stock made available, there are
associated underage costs.
When the demand in the season is less than the stock, overage costs result. The
value of items is reduced at a particular point in time.
Style goods products are often substitutable.
Sales of style goods are usually influenced by promotion activities and space
allocation in the store.
One-Time Decision
¨ Situation is common to retail and manufacturing environment
¨ Consider seasonal goods, which are in demand during short period only.
Product losses its value at the end of the season. The lead time can be longer
than the selling season if demand is higher than the original order, can not
rush order for additional products.
¨ Example
newspaper stand “newsvendor” model
Christmas ornament retailer or
Christmas tree
“Christmas tree” model
finished good inventory
3
2. Simplest case: the unconstrained, single
item, newsvendor problem
• Shortages = lost profit + lost of goodwill
• Overage = unit cost + cost of disposal of the overage
• Either ignore the purchase cost, because it does not impact the
optimal solution or implicitly consider it in the overage and underage
costs.
• Overage, co: Expected overage cost = co P(X < Q)= G(Q)co
Normal case:
N x , x
2
∗
𝑄 =𝑥
¯ + 𝑧 𝑝 − 𝑣+ 𝐵 ⋅ 𝜎 𝑥
𝑝 − 𝑔+ 𝐵
Example
Solution
¨ How to find Q* ?
8
Solution
Using NORMSINV to find z = 0.74,
with μ = 11.73 and σ = 4.74
Newsvendor has to
order 15 copies
every week.
9
B. Simplest Case: Discrete Distribution
Mrs. Kandell has been in the Christmas tree business for years. She
keeps track of sales volume each year and has made a table of the
demand for the Christmas trees and its probability (frequency
histogram).
Demand, Probability Solution:
X g(X) Q – order quantity; Q* - optimal
22 0.05 X – demand: random variable with
24 0.10 probability density function g(x)
G(x) – cumulative probability function:
26 0.15
G(x) = Pr (demand ≤ x)
28 0.20 co – cost per unit of positive inventory
30 0.20 cu – cost per unit of unsatisfied demand
32 0.15
34 0.10 Economics marginal analysis:
36 0.05 overage and underage costs are balanced
10
Example: Mrs. Kandell
Demand Probabilit Cum Mrs. Kandell estimates that
x y g(x) Probability if she buys more trees than
G(x) she can sell, it costs about
22 0.05 0.05 $40 for the tree and its
24 0.10 0.15 disposal. If demand is
26 0.15 0.30 higher than the number of
28 0.20 0.50 trees she orders, she looses
30 0.20 0.70 a profit of $40 per tree.
32 0.15 0.85
34 0.10 0.95
36 0.05 1.00
Q 28
11
Critical fractile for the newsvendor problem
C(Q+1)-C(Q)=(cu+ co)PX(Q) – cu ≥ 0
12
Example: Lively Lobsters
¨ Lively Lobsters (L.L.) receives a supply of fresh, live lobsters
from Maine every day. Lively earns a profit of $7.50 for every
lobster sold, but a day-old lobster is worth only $8.50. Each
lobster costs L.L. $14.50
¨ unit cost of a L.L. stockout
Cu = 7.50 = lost profit
¨ unit cost of having a left-over lobster
Co = 14.50 - 8.50 = cost – salvage value = 6
¨ target L.L. service level
CR = Cu/(Cu + Co) = 7.5 / (7.5 + 6) = .56
13
cu
Lively Lobsters Q * = min{Q : PX £ (Q ) ³
cu + co
}
29 0.05
14 … P(D < 29 )
¨ Step 3: Compare: Q v
i 1
i i vs. W
n
¨ If Q v
i 1
i i W
finish.
n
¨ If Q v W
i 1
i i return to step 2 with larger M
Example
¨Suppose the Ski Bum was faced with decisions
on 4 items. The manager accepts that in each
case total demand is normal distribution. The
relevant parameter values are estimated in the
following table. The manager has a budget of
$70,000 to allocate among these 4 items.
Solution
>70,000
>70,000
<70,000
70k
Practice