The Paradoxes of Green Logistics: Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography
The Paradoxes of Green Logistics: Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography
The Paradoxes of Green Logistics: Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography
Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA. Brian Slack, Dept. of Geography, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Green+Logistics or Green/Logistics?
Green
Logistics
Convergence?
Reverse logistics
Suppliers
Recycling / Reuse
Supply Chain
Disposal
Customers
1.2 4.8
Transportation
Land Use
Most important
Least important
Distribution costs declined by around 13%. Inventory costs declined by around 5%.
Some estimates put costs as twice the revenue generated by vehicle taxation.
% of GDP
Days
Feeder
Hub
Environmental Pressure
Logistics has given rise to two fundamental features of the contemporary economy:
Just-in-Time (JIT). Door-to-Door (DTD). Cycle time requirements down by 25% between 1990 and 2000.
Modal reliability
Logistics systems use the modes perceived to be the most reliable:
Inventory reduction:
1980: 50% of costs. 1990: 44% of costs. 1999: 36% of costs.
E-Retailer
Warehousing
Customers
Application of logistics
Outcomes uncertain
Policies may impact differentially on the modes. Contradictory policies between tiers.
Composite solutions
Environmental management and audit systems (EMAS). Will the logistics industry adopt ISO 14000?
Paradoxical situation
Problems occur at all spatial scales, from the local through to the global, so a political response is inevitable. There are hopeful signs of greener attitudes in the industry.