The Paradoxes of Green Logistics: Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

The Paradoxes of Green Logistics

Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA. Brian Slack, Dept. of Geography, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Claude Comtois, Dept. of Geography, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Green+Logistics or Green/Logistics?

Green

Logistics

Evocative concepts Origins in the environmental movement


1990s the decade of the environment.

New market opportunities


Recycling. Transport of waste.

Environmental efficiency Recycling Compliance

Distributional Possible convergence? efficiency Save time / money

Convergence?

Reverse logistics

Suppliers

Management of reduction and disposal Reverse distribution


Collection of damaged or unsold products. Recycling of used products. The manufacturer takes responsibility for delivery as well as take-back.

Recycling / Reuse

Supply Chain

Two reverse channels


Recycling / reuse (back to the suppliers). Disposal (shipment of nonrecyclable waste).

Disposal

Customers

How green is the logistics industry?


Journal Intl. Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Spectrum Logistics Focus % environmental 1.7

Most important issues


Reducing packaging and waste. Hazardous waste disposal. Solid waste disposal. Internal costs.

1.2 4.8

Least important issues


Congestion. Land use. External costs.

Transportation

Land Use

Most important

Least important

THE PARADOXES OF LOGISTICS: costs

Driving down distribution costs


Benefits are realised by the users. 1990-2000 (manufacturing sector, % GDP):

Distribution costs declined by around 13%. Inventory costs declined by around 5%.

Environmental costs are externalized


The environment or society at large pay the indirect costs. The logistics industry has largely escaped governmental attempts to charge for externalities.

Numerous subsidies. Trucking is less regulated.

Some estimates put costs as twice the revenue generated by vehicle taxation.

Logistical Improvements, Manufacturing Sector, 1960-2000


20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s Logistics Costs Inventory Costs Cycle Time Requirements 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

% of GDP

Days

THE PARADOXES OF LOGISTICS: costs

Hubbing and the land take


Airports. Seaports. Distribution facilities.

Hubbing and local access


Road and rail connections. Channel deepening. High costs wholly or partially subsidized.

Feeder

Hub

Environmental Pressure

THE PARADOXES OF LOGISTICS: time/speed


% of Products Shipped for Just-inTime Manufacturing
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1990 1992 1995 2000

Logistics has given rise to two fundamental features of the contemporary economy:
Just-in-Time (JIT). Door-to-Door (DTD). Cycle time requirements down by 25% between 1990 and 2000.

Both favour use of the least energy efficient modes:


Trucking. Air.

THE PARADOXES OF LOGISTICS: reliability

Service reliability is at the heart of logistics


Delivery time. Delivery on-time. Breakage.

Modal reliability
Logistics systems use the modes perceived to be the most reliable:

Trucks and planes.

The most energy-efficient modes are perceived to be the least reliable:

Rail and ships.

LOGISTICS AND WAREHOUSING


Delivery units for parts

Inventory reduction:
1980: 50% of costs. 1990: 44% of costs. 1999: 36% of costs.

Moving storage units

While the manufacturers may achieve economies:


Inventories are in transit. More links are added to the production chain, with more traffic movements added overall. A form of externality.

Assembly and warehousing Delivery units for finished goods

Moving storage units

Logistics Costs, United States, 1980-1999 (in billions of $)


1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1980 1985 1990 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

Administrative Costs Transportation Costs Inventory Carrying Costs

LOGISTICS AND E-COMMERCE


Supply chain

E-commerce and supply chain management


Traditional marketing involves consumers going to shopping centres for their purchases. New systems require large distribution centres on the edge of cities from which small parcels are delivered to customers. The system uses the most polluting modes. Disaggregation of retailing can be expected to lead to more tons/km. Higher use of packaging, with concomitant increase in waste generation.

E-Retailer
Warehousing

Customers

Environmental Vicious Circle of Logistics

Application of logistics

Emphasis on trucking and air transportation

More ton-km transported

Activities less spatially constrained

Energy consumption Pollutant Emissions Congestion

Space consumption Pressure on marginal land

How will logistics become greener?

Top down government intervention


The industry claims that one of the fastest growing cost of warehousing is compliance with governmental regulations. Labor and health regulations (training). Environmental regulations, mainly concerning dangerous substances and fuels. Congestion pricing, road pricing (US) fair pricing (EU). Recent trends show an attempt by governments to internalize cots.

Diesel fuel: Sulfur to be reduced from 500 ppm to 15 ppm.

Outcomes uncertain
Policies may impact differentially on the modes. Contradictory policies between tiers.

How will logistics become greener?

Bottom-up, industry action


Technology will improve the situation (to a limit). Fleet management, vehicle efficiencies. Attitudes will change; greenness can become a marketing tool.

Composite solutions
Environmental management and audit systems (EMAS). Will the logistics industry adopt ISO 14000?

Paradoxical situation
Problems occur at all spatial scales, from the local through to the global, so a political response is inevitable. There are hopeful signs of greener attitudes in the industry.

You might also like