A solar tracking system is a device that moves photovoltaic (PV) modules to continuously face the sun, maximizing the amount of sunlight received by the PV array. It is composed of three main components: the mechanism to move the modules, driving motors, and a tracking controller. There are two main types of trackers - single-axis trackers that rotate around one axis, and dual-axis trackers that have total freedom of movement to always face the sun. Electric motors are commonly used to power the movement, with AC motors being more widely used than DC. Solar trackers generate more electricity than fixed panels and optimize land usage, but are also more complex and expensive to install and maintain.
A solar tracking system is a device that moves photovoltaic (PV) modules to continuously face the sun, maximizing the amount of sunlight received by the PV array. It is composed of three main components: the mechanism to move the modules, driving motors, and a tracking controller. There are two main types of trackers - single-axis trackers that rotate around one axis, and dual-axis trackers that have total freedom of movement to always face the sun. Electric motors are commonly used to power the movement, with AC motors being more widely used than DC. Solar trackers generate more electricity than fixed panels and optimize land usage, but are also more complex and expensive to install and maintain.
A solar tracking system is a device that moves photovoltaic (PV) modules to continuously face the sun, maximizing the amount of sunlight received by the PV array. It is composed of three main components: the mechanism to move the modules, driving motors, and a tracking controller. There are two main types of trackers - single-axis trackers that rotate around one axis, and dual-axis trackers that have total freedom of movement to always face the sun. Electric motors are commonly used to power the movement, with AC motors being more widely used than DC. Solar trackers generate more electricity than fixed panels and optimize land usage, but are also more complex and expensive to install and maintain.
A solar tracking system is a device that moves photovoltaic (PV) modules to continuously face the sun, maximizing the amount of sunlight received by the PV array. It is composed of three main components: the mechanism to move the modules, driving motors, and a tracking controller. There are two main types of trackers - single-axis trackers that rotate around one axis, and dual-axis trackers that have total freedom of movement to always face the sun. Electric motors are commonly used to power the movement, with AC motors being more widely used than DC. Solar trackers generate more electricity than fixed panels and optimize land usage, but are also more complex and expensive to install and maintain.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15
Solar Tracking System
A solar tracking system is a specific device intended to move the PV
modules in such a way that they continuously face the sun with the aim of maximizing the irradiation received by the PV array. Solar Tracking Systems A solar tracking system is a specific device intended to move the PV modules in such a way that they continuously face the sun with the aim of maximizing the irradiation received by the PV array. A solar tracking system is composed of three well-differentiated components: the mechanism, the driving motors, and the tracking controller. Single-Axis Tracker Because solar tracking implies moving parts and control systems that tend to be expensive, single-axis tracking systems seem to be the best solution for small PV power plants. A single-axis solar tracking system uses a tilted PV panel mount and one electric motor to move the panel on an approximate trajectory relative to the Sun's position. The rotation axis can be horizontal, vertical, or oblique. Fig. 9.7 shows a general scheme of a one-axis tracker showing both the rotation axis (unit vector e) and the collector plane (unit vector normal to the collector plane). The angle between these two unit vectors is usually kept constant in this type of tracker. DUAL-Axis Trackers Using two-axis trackers, maximum energy collection can be achieved because, due to its total freedom of movement (north–south and east–west), the tracker can face the sun's rays throughout the day (Fig. 9.12). Driving Motor Depending on the driving mechanism, solar trackers can be classified into active or passive solar trackers. Active driving mechanism can be based on electric motors (DC or AC) or hydraulic systems, whereas passive ones are based on gravitational systems. The most common driving mechanism is an electric motor because it allows a simpler and precise control of the movement. AC electric motors are more widely used than DC ones. For one-axis trackers, only one motor is required, whereas for two-axis trackers, two motors are needed. Advantages: 1.Trackers generate more electricity than their stationary counterparts due to increased direct exposure to solar rays. This increase can be as much as 10 to 25% depending on the geographic location of the tracking system. 2.There are many different kinds of solar trackers, such as single-axis and dual-axis trackers, all of which can be the perfect fit for a unique jobsite. Installation size, local weather, degree of latitude and electrical requirements are all important considerations that can influence the type of solar tracker best suited for a specific solar installation. 3. Solar trackers generate more electricity in roughly the same amount of space needed for fixed-tilt systems, making them ideal for optimizing land usage. 4.In certain states, some utilities offer Time of Use (TOU) rate plans for solar power, which means the utility will purchase the power generated during the peak time of the day at a higher rate. In this case, it is beneficial to generate a greater amount of electricity during these peak times of the day. Using a tracking system helps maximize the energy gains during these peak time periods. 5. Advancements in technology and reliability in electronics and mechanics have drastically reduced long-term maintenance concerns for tracking systems. Disadvantages: 1. Solar trackers are slightly more expensive than their stationary counterparts, due to the more complex technology and moving parts necessary for their operation.. 2.Even with the advancements in reliability, there is generally more maintenance required than a traditional fixed rack, though the quality of the solar tracker can play a role in how much and how often this maintenance is needed. 3.Trackers are a more complex system than fixed racking. This means that typically more site preparation is needed, including additional trenching for wiring and some additional grading. 4.Single-axis tracker projects also require an additional focus on company stability and bankability. When it comes to getting projects financed, these systems are more complex and thus are seen as a higher risk from a financier’s viewpoint. 5.Solar trackers are generally designed for climates with little to no snow making them a more viable solution in warmer climates. Fixed racking accommodates harsher environmental conditions more easily than tracking systems. 6.Fixed tracking systems offer more field adjustability than single-axis tracking systems. Fixed systems can generally accommodate up to 20% slopes in the E/W direction while tracking systems typically offer less of a slope accommodation usually around 10% in the N/S direction. A solar tracker is a device that orients a payload toward the Sun. Payloads are usually solar panels, parabolic troughs, fresnel reflectors, lenses or the mirrors of a heliostat. For flat-panel photovoltaic systems, trackers are used to minimize the angle of incidence between the incoming sunlight and a photovoltaic panel, sometimes known as the cosine error. Reducing this angle increases the amount of energy produced from a fixed amount of installed power generating capacity. In standard photovoltaic applications, it was predicted in 2008-2009 that trackers could be used in at least 85% of commercial installations greater than one megawatt from 2009 to 2012