This document discusses legal and ethical issues related to employees' rights and duties. It covers topics like ethical issues in employee rights, equal employment opportunities and affirmative action, whistleblowing and loyalty, and employee participation in management. For equal employment opportunities and affirmative action, it describes the concepts of EEO, advantages and disadvantages of affirmative action, and issues around meritocracy and true achievement. For whistleblowing, it discusses employees' rights to report wrongdoing and employers' responsibility to protect whistleblowers from retaliation.
This document discusses legal and ethical issues related to employees' rights and duties. It covers topics like ethical issues in employee rights, equal employment opportunities and affirmative action, whistleblowing and loyalty, and employee participation in management. For equal employment opportunities and affirmative action, it describes the concepts of EEO, advantages and disadvantages of affirmative action, and issues around meritocracy and true achievement. For whistleblowing, it discusses employees' rights to report wrongdoing and employers' responsibility to protect whistleblowers from retaliation.
This document discusses legal and ethical issues related to employees' rights and duties. It covers topics like ethical issues in employee rights, equal employment opportunities and affirmative action, whistleblowing and loyalty, and employee participation in management. For equal employment opportunities and affirmative action, it describes the concepts of EEO, advantages and disadvantages of affirmative action, and issues around meritocracy and true achievement. For whistleblowing, it discusses employees' rights to report wrongdoing and employers' responsibility to protect whistleblowers from retaliation.
This document discusses legal and ethical issues related to employees' rights and duties. It covers topics like ethical issues in employee rights, equal employment opportunities and affirmative action, whistleblowing and loyalty, and employee participation in management. For equal employment opportunities and affirmative action, it describes the concepts of EEO, advantages and disadvantages of affirmative action, and issues around meritocracy and true achievement. For whistleblowing, it discusses employees' rights to report wrongdoing and employers' responsibility to protect whistleblowers from retaliation.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 31
Chapter Three
LEGAL ASPECTS AND ETHICAL ISSUES IN
EMPLOYEES’ RIGHTS AND DUTIES Chapter contents
3.1 Ethical Issues in the Rights of Employees
3.2 Equal employment Opportunities &
Affirmative Action
3.3 Whistle Blowing and Loyalty
3.4 Employee Participation in Management
3.5 The Right to Employment and Employment at Will Activity Questions What do you think are the common and critical Ethical Issues Organizations need to take account to address the Rights of Employees? Discuss for 5 minutes and report to the class. 3.1 Ethical Issues in the Rights of Employees
Organizations need to take account of the dignity
and rights of employees when taking employment decisions.
These include having:
• clear, fair terms and conditions of employment, • healthy and safe working conditions, • fair remuneration, promoting equal opportunities and employment diversity, • encouraging employees to develop their skills, and • not discriminating or harassing employees. Ethical issues pose fundamental questions about fairness, justice, truthfulness, and social responsibility.
Just complying with a wider range of requirements, laws, and
regulations cannot cover every ethical situation that executives, managers, HR professionals, and employees will face.
Having all the elements of an ethics program may not prevent
individual managers or executives from engaging in or failing to report unethical behavior.
HR staff members may be reluctant to report ethics concerns,
primarily because of fears that doing so may affect their current and future employment. Business Ethics and Management Consequences Examples of HR-Related Ethical Misconduct Activities 3.2 Equal employment Opportunities and Affirmative Action
Equal Employment Opportunities
• Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) is the idea
that everyone should be treated fairly when they are considered for various employment decisions (including hiring, promotion, compensation, termination, etc.).
• For example, anyone competing for a position at a
company should have the same chances of succeeding if they are right for the job. • In the legal sense of the EEO definition, equal opportunity means that employees cannot use certain characteristics as reasons to hire or reject candidates or make others employment decisions; they cannot discriminate against those characteristics. • In many countries, protected characteristics include: • Race/color • National origin/ethnicity • Religion • Age • Gender • Physical or mental disability • EEO doesn’t guarantee that people of underrepresented groups will get hired. • The purpose of EEO regulations is to make sure nobody will face rejection or difficulties because they are in a protected group. Affirmative Action • Affirmative action is a special case when considering specific protected characteristics. • Affirmative action is the conscious, proactive pursuit of gender balance and diversity in an organization by supporting protected groups who are traditionally discriminated against. • The idea of the affirmative action policy is for employers and educational institutions to take affirmative action and cease any sort of racial, religion-based, or gender- based discrimination in relation to making admission and employment decisions. • However, the policy comes into a controversial spotlight when disadvantaged groups are given preferential treatment. Affirmative Action - Advantages 1. Climbing the socioeconomic ladder
• An individual’s or family’s socioeconomic status is
typically divided into three levels: high, middle, and low, and is determined by their income, education, and occupational status.
• By giving minorities and disadvantaged groups an
equal opportunity to attain education and employment, the policy increases their chances of climbing up the socioeconomic ladder. 2. Boosting the education of disadvantaged students
• Disadvantaged families often fall into development
and poverty traps if they do not have access to higher education and/or if they cannot afford it.
• By providing grants and scholarships that are meant
for students from disadvantaged groups affirmative action boosts the education of the students – which has potentially positive future outcomes related to income, health, and socioeconomic status. 3. Promoting education and work on a communal level
• Affirmative action promotes education in society by
encouraging women and other oppressed groups to attend university and offering them equal opportunities and pay, regardless of gender or race.
• It results in the overall growth and development of
human capital in the economy, along with potentially higher standard of living and per capita income. Affirmative Action - Disadvantages 1. Reverse discrimination
• It is the notion that instead of promoting anti-
discrimination, affirmative action leads to discrimination against individuals and groups that come from non-disadvantaged backgrounds.
• Talented individuals may not be given equal
opportunities simply because they are not part of a minority group.
• It may also result in hatred between majority and
minority groups. 2. Lack of meritocracy
• Meritocracy aims to push more capable individuals
to places of higher education so that they may have the resources and knowledge required to make important changes in the world.
• By encouraging universities to admit more students
of gender, affirmative action may be discouraging meritocracy in educational institutions. 3. Demeaning true achievement
• Achievements by individuals from minority groups
and other disadvantaged groups may be considered a result of affirmative action rather than their own hard work, which can be demeaning to their true level of effort and confidence in their abilities. 3.3 Whistle Blowing and Loyalty • Individuals who report real or perceived wrongs committed by their employers are called whistle blowers. • Whistle blowing is the term used when a worker passes on information concerning wrongdoing witnessed at work. • Wrongdoings can fall into one or more of the following categories: • Criminal offences (e.g. fraud) • Failure to comply with an obligation set out in law • Failure of justice • Endangering of someone’s health and safety • Damage to the environment • Cover up wrongdoing in the above categories • The reasons why people report actions that they question vary and often are individual in nature. • Several government workers fill complaints because of actions by their bosses, which then have led to retaliations. • However, whistle blowers are less likely to lose their jobs in public employment than in private employment because most civil service systems follow rules protecting whistle blowers. • The culture of the organization often affects the degree to which employees report inappropriate or illegal actions internally or resort to using outside contacts. • Employers need to address two key questions regarding whistle blowing: 1. When do employees have the right to speak out with protection from revenge? 2. When do employees violate the confidentiality of their jobs by speaking out? • Even though the answers may be difficult to determine, retaliation against whistle blowers is clearly not allowed. • Whistle blowing can appear to show a lack of loyalty on the part of an employee, although that may not be a correct interpretation. Employer’s Responsibility regarding Whistle Blowing • As an employer, it is good practice to create an open, transparent and safe working environment where workers feel able to speak up. • Employer’s readiness in this regards can be demonstrated by the following: • Recognizing workers are valuable ears and eyes • Getting the right culture • Training and support • Being able to respond • Better control • Resolve the wrongdoing quickly 3.4 Employee Participation in Management
• Employee participation in management refers to
the participation of non-managerial employees in the decision making processes of the organization. • The participation of the employees in the functioning of the organization gives employees mental and psychological satisfaction. • They feel pleasurable and contented that their tasks are not just limited to the performance of their job duties, but they are participating in the activities and matters of the organization as well. • The participation of the employees in the management is regarded as the most accepted principle of industrial relations in modern industry. • Participation is referred to the mental and the emotional involvement of the individuals in a group situation. • The individuals get motivated to contribute towards the achievement of group goals and objectives and share responsibilities and work duties. • They need to ensure that they participate efficiently and it may prove to be advantageous to the organization • Employee participation is referred to as the system, where the employees obtain the rights to participate in the decision making processes regarding the issues, which are of concern to the employees. • These include, salaries and reimbursements, working environmental conditions, health and safety, well-being, job concerns, job responsibilities and rights and opportunities. • Employee participation is a matter of providing opportunities to all the members of the organization to contribute effectively towards promoting welfare and goodwill. • Better participation and greater responsibility in the decision making processes on the part of the employees will lead to development of loyalty, trust and confidence, and a sense of responsibility towards supervisors, managers and organization in general. • When the employees are participating in the decision making processes, they have to be moral, ethical and principled. Objectives of Employee Participation 1. To prevent the employees from being exploited by the superiors within the organization. 2. To have democracy in the organization. 3. To lead to effective growth and development of the workforce. 4. To resolve dissimilarities between management and the workforce. 5. To develop a sense of participation among workforce within the organization. 6. To encourage the employees to express their ideas and suggestions. 7. To make improvements in the overall working environmental conditions. 8. To promote better understanding among management and workforce in terms of various issues of the organization. 9. To generate awareness among the employees that they have an important role to play in the functioning of the organization. 10. To make provision of opportunities among the employees for self-expression leading to industrial peace, good relations and increased co- operation. Levels of Participation • Information participation level (giving and receiving information) • Associative participation level (the right to receive information, discuss and give suggestions on the general and economic conditions of the organization) • Consultative Participation Level (employees are consulted on the matters of employee welfare, such as, work, safety, health and training) • Administrative Participation Level (sharing of authority and responsibility of management functions). • Decisive Participation Level (employees are to participate in the decision-making processes) The Right to Employment and Employment at will The Right to Employment
• According to Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, United Nations General Assembly, Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favorable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. • African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Africa Unity, Every individual shall have the right to work under equitable and satisfactory conditions and shall receive equal pay for equal work. Employment At Will • “At-Will” employment is an employer’s ability to dismiss an employee for any reason, and without warning, if the reason is not illegal. • When an employee is acknowledged as being hired “at will”, courts deny the employee any claim for loss resulting from the dismissal. • The two primary benefits are the possibility of career advancement and freedom and flexibility to leave a position without reason or notice. • No matter how it is looked at, at-will employment is bad for employees and can jeopardize the reputation of a company. Chapter End