Upper Gi Bleed
Upper Gi Bleed
Upper Gi Bleed
• Treatment
• Complications
• Follow up
• Prognosis
• conclusion
INTRODUCTION
• The incidence is 2- fold greater in males but death rate is similar in both
sexes.
• Duodenal ulcer
• Gastric ulcer
• Stomal ulcer
AETIOLOGY (COMMON CAUSES)
2. Erosive gastritis,
esophagitis, duodenitis
15-30% of cases
10-20% of cases
• 5% of cases
• Characterized by longitudinal mucosal tear in the
cardioesophageal region.
• Result from repeated vomitting or retching.
• Common in male alcoholic patients
AETIOLOGY
• Gastric cancer
• Oesophageal cancer
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
Blood Loss,
Up to 750 750-1500 1500-2000 >2000
mL
Blood Loss,%
Up to 15% 15-30% 30-40% >40%
blood volume
Pulse Rate,
<100 >100 >120 >140
bpm
Blood
Normal Normal Decreased Decreased
Pressure
Respiratory Normal or
Decreased Decreased Decreased
Rate Increased
Urine
Output, 14-20 20-30 30-40 >35
mL/h
Fluid
Crystalloid Crystalloid
Replacement, Crystalloid Crystalloid
and blood and blood
3-for-1 rule
SPECIFIC MEASURES
Physical examination
• Upper GI endoscopy.
• Arteriography.
• Barium swallow
• Ultrasound
• Lab investigations
ENDOSCOPY
• CBC
• Electrolytes
• Glucose
• Coagulation studies
• Liver function studies
• Blood grouping and cross-match
LAB INVESTIGATIONS
propranolol)
4. Balloon tamponade: if above measures fail
• Mallory- weiss
observe
if persist, suture mucosal tear
• Esophagitis
Observe
• Benign gastric tumors
Excise
• Dieulafoy’s lesion
Endoscopic electrocoagulation, sclerotherapy
COMPLICATIONS
• Of presenting problem
• Of resuscitative measures
• Of underlying disease
• Of treatment
COMPLICATIONS OF
MASSIVE HEMORRHAGE
• Hemorrhagic shock
• Acute renal shut down
• MODS
• Death
COMPLICATIONS OF
RESUSCITATION
• Fluid overload
• Pulmonary edema
• CCF
• Blood transfusion reaction
• Cardiac arrest
• Hypothermia
• Esophageal perforation
COMPLICATIONS OF
UNDERLYING DISEASES
Depends upon
ROCKALL scoring system
this includes :
• The state / time of presentation of pt
• energetic resuscitation
• underlying disease
• Co morbidities
ROCKALL SCORING SYSTEM
ADVERSE PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
CONCLUSION