PDF Fat Procedure Gresik

PT ANSI MEGA
Factory Acceptance Test

Procedure
System Metering Gas Orifice
Gresik Station
10” ANSI 300#
Pengadaan dan Kon st ru ksi Pem#angunan Pipa Transmisi

dari Gresik - Sem ar an g %
Pengadaan 1 0” & 1 6” Meter System
AJ
Revisio Date Description By Checked Approved
n By by
1. GENERAL
1.1. Scope
FAT Procedure Page 1 of 56

PT ANSI MEGA
This document represents the Factory Acceptance Test Procedures and Test Records for the Orifice Gas
Metering and Regulation System. Its completeness is dependent upon not only the carrying out and
recording of the schedule tests and results; it is reliant on the inclusion of all required documentation such as
calibration certificates. The document is written in such a way to make it usable for testing on simulation or
live signals.
The test procedures detailed in this document are designed to provide a level of confidence in the operation
of the Orifice G a s Metering and Regulation System integrated with the control panel. The detailed purpose
of this procedure is to verify that the instruments conform to specifications, are installed correctly, function
according to design, meet manufacturer's accuracy guarantees, and obtain a permanent record of the
results.
Individual test data record sheets are generated as a single item. These test sheets are to be duplicated as
required to repeat tests to the C O M P A N Y ' s satisfaction. The relevant details for the item of equipment under
test are to be entered prior to printing out the sheets.
Individual instrument loops will be checked prior to the full system tests. Procedure and Test Record Sheets
are provided in this document. Signed instrument test sheets shall be made available for inspection during
the systems test enabling functional checks only to be made.
Where possible the calculations are carried out, the calculations used will be provided for C O M P A N Y ' s
inspection.
1.2. Definitions and Abbreviations
COMPANY P E R T A M I N A G A S as the ultimate end user and owner
CONTRACTOR Party selected by C O M P A N Y to perform the survey, engineering, detailed

design, procurement, programming, installation, testing, pre-commissioning,
commissioning and trial operation of system supplied under P R O J E C T
VENDOR Party which supplies equipment/materials or services specified and

ordered by C O N T R A C T O R
MANUFACTURER Party which manufactures equipment/materials specified and ordered

by C O N T R A C T O R
INSTALLATION C H E C K O U T The quality control functions required to ensure that instrumentation are
according to specification and installed correctly, properly calibrated,
functionally operational, and ready for C O M P A N Y acceptance.
CALIBRATION A certain action performed on instruments and control devices requiring

testing and a djustment to ensure that they are of the proper range,
functioning correctly, and have certain accuracy a s guaranteed by
MANU FACTURER.
FUNCTIONAL L OOP CHECK The functional operation of a system to verify that each mechanical,
pneumatic, and electrical component operates according to the instrument
specification, loop drawing, datasheet, wiring diagram and the P&lDs. This
is normally done by introducing a simulated process input, observing the

PT ANSI MEGA
results at the various components, and observing the final element as

inputs are cycled through the operating conditions.
P R E S S U R E TESTING The quality control function required to prove the mechanical integrity of the
instrument pipe, valves, and fittings. The testing is intended to ensure that
there is no leakage occurs at mechanical junction.
PROJECT Pengadaan Pengembangan Meter Jawa Timur — KEI Gas Metering System
— Waru & Gresik Station
1.3. Codes and Standard
The publications listed below form part of this specification. Each publication shall be the latest revision and
addendum in effect on the date this Specification is issued for construction unless noted otherwise. Except
as modified by the requirements specified herein or the details of the drawings, Work included in this
Specification shall conform to the applicable provisions of these publications.
A G A 3/A P I 14.3 Orifice Metering of Natural G a s and Other Related Hydrocarbon Fluids
A G A Report #8 Compressibility Factors of Natural G a s and Other Related Hydrocarbon Gases
API R P 551 Process Measurement Instrumentation
API R P 554 Process Instrumentation and Control
API R P 555 Process Analyzers
G P A 2172 Calculation of Gross Heating Value, Relative Density and Compressibility Factor for
Natural Ga s Mixture from Compositional Analysis
G P A 2261 Analysis for Natural Gas and Similar Gaseous Mixture by Ga s Chromatography
1.4. Conflicting Requirements
In case of conflict between this Specification and its associated Specifications and the above Codes and
Standards, the Vendor shall bring the matter to the C O M P A N Y ' s attention for resolution and approval in
writing. However, the most stringent requirement shall apply.
Should any conflicts between this specification and other documents, the following order of precedence shall
govern:
• Scope of Work
• Data Sheets.
• This Specification
• Other C O M P A N Y Specifications
• Other Referenced Publications
• Approved for Construction Drawings
• Vendor's Code

PT ANSI MEGA
2. COMMON PROCEDURE
1. Each transmitter should be calibrated prior to the loop test, since all transmitters are installed after workshop
calibration conducted. FAT cannot be commenced before workshop calibration conducted.
The final loop test shall be performed to ensure that the installed instrumentations are functionally
correct.
2. FAT sha l be witnessed and approved by all related parties as mentioned in approved ITP.
3. Adequate skilled manpower and technically/organizationally skilled supervision is required to provide

proper test and meet the time schedule of the job. In most instances C O M P A N Y and/or
C O N T R A C T O R representative will witness the entire test and countersign the test report.
4. Where interlock inputs have already been proven during loop tests, these inputs may be by pass. Input is
given to prove interlock function. All other inputs shall be proven at the sequence test.
5. Where interlock inputs and/or outputs are associated with electrical equipment such a s valves, the sequence
test shall be carried out in conjunction with the mechanical and electrical discipline to insure protection to
equipment.
6. Tests are essentially functional and if an inoperative or badly calibrated or otherwise unsatisfactory test
result is encountered, all results for that loop should be considered null and void. The relevant earlier tests
shall be repeated, as necessary, after rework, replacement or repair. The test shall then be completely
repeated for that particular loop.
3. CALIBRATION
Every single instrument shall be individually calibrated and all signed calibration sheets shall be compiled and
attached to FAT dossier. These sheets will be used for acceptance as being witnessed and prerequisite prior to
FAT activities. CONTRACTOR shall use calibration method according to oil and gas industry standard practice.
The following instruments must be put in highly attention e.g.:
1. Moisture Analyzer
2. G a s Chromatograph
3. Control Valve
4. Shutdown Valve
5. Pressure Safety Valve — 3rd party company appointed by M I G A S to witness the test
6. Transmitters

PT ANSI MEGA
4. INSTALLATION CHECKOUT
4.1 General
Installation checkout shall consist of a thorough inspection of components to ensure that they are according
to specification, installed correctly, calibrated, and functional. To ensure this status is achieved, the following
shall be performed:
1. Calibration: This should have been completed before start of final checkout. Records should be
available to verify that calibration is satisfactory.
2. Pressure Testing: This should have been completed before start of final checkout. Records should
be available to verify this function.
3. Continuity Testing, Resistance Testing, and Meggering: These should have been completed before
checkout. Records should be available to verify these functions
4. Piping Leakage Testing : This should have been completed before start of final checkout. Records
should be available to verify this function.
4.2 Scope of Activities
1. A check, using the P&lDs and the instrument data sheets, shall be made after installation to make sure
instruments are in place and according to specification.
2. Each instrument installation shall be checked against the instrument installation detail drawing for
correct and complete installation. Direction of flow through control valves, proper hook-up of flow
meters, and tubing of instruments should be checked.
3. Thermocouples shall be checked during loop check for type, length, polarity, shielding, and proper
identification. Each thermocouple shall be checked for continuity and grounds. Loop check will be
accomplished by applying a millivolt signal to the extension wires and observing the output on the
final elements. No calibration is required.
4. Orifice plates shall be visually checked for nameplate data and for an upstream sharp edge. Bore
should be callipered to check for compliance with specification. Orifice plate shall be checked to
ensure installation for correct orientation (upstream and downstream) with the process flow.
5. Control valve accessories such as position switches, handwheels, boosters, and relays shall be
visually checked.
6. Control valves and regulators shall be checked to ensure installation is in the correct orientation with
the process flow.
7. Top-works shall be checked for acceptable orientation. Valve stems shall be clean of objectionable
materials such as paint, concrete spatter, or protective tape. Limit and position switches and limit
stops, where required, shall have been installed and adjus ted. Lubricators shall be installed where
required.
8. Relief valves shall be checked against specifications and P&ID to ensure proper valve is in place.
They shall be checked to ensure no blinds or gags have been left in place.
9. Analyzers shall be visually inspected for proper installation.
a. Check availability of standard and calibration cylinders provided by CONTRACTOR.
b. Check carrier gas cylinders and manifolds for size, proper connection, pressure, and
tagging
c. Check the analyser housing for proper area classification. If the housing is purged, check
the purging system for proper operation, alarms, and shutdown if purge pressure is lost.
d. Check availability of required utilities. Check power co nections to the analyzer and A C
circuits to the distribution panel.
10. Panel instruments and panels shall be checked as follows:

PT ANSI MEGA
a. Nameplates, both front and rear, shall be checked for tag number, service, location, and
proper spelling.
b. Charts and scales shall be checked for range in accordance with the individual Instrument
Data sheets and shall be fitted to the respective instruments. Remove chart drive fuses to
avoid chart usage until ready to turn over to owner.
5. FUNCTIONAL LOOP CHECK
Competent personnel shall be provided to supervise a function check of instrument systems to ensure a
correct installation. This will include local control elements, inputs, outputs, and control room devices
including flow computer consoles and accessories.
1. Functional testing shall be done by simulation of process conditions at the instrument input.
2. The loop shall be functionally checked a s needed to verify that every component, mechanical and
electrical, is undamaged and functional, verify loop integrity with respect to signal ranges and
directions, and direction of action of final control elements. This shall be done by simulation of
process inputs and outputs by a pressure or electronic source at 0-25-50-75-100 percent up and
down scale.
3. Deviations from the correct operation of the system, a s determined by these tests, shall be
corrected.
4. Conflicting data encountered between calibration ranges of field devices and displayed or configured
ranges within the distributed control system shall be brought to the attention of C O M P A N Y for
resolution.
5. When the instrument loop has been verified by the functional loop check, the all parties should sign
the appropriate records for loop acceptance as being witnessed.
A punch-list shall be made and formally issued listing discrepant items.
C O M P A N Y will release acceptance of FAT, if the C O N T R A C T O R has completed all test proving that the
whole instruments have worked properly.

PT ANSI MEGA
LIST OF TEST AND INSPECTION
1. Inspection of Metering Skid Dimensional Detail

2. Inspection of Paint Work
3. Equipment Layout and Pipe Configuration
4. Inspection of Name Plates
5. Inspection of Junction Box, Cable and Cable Gland Installation
6. Panel Physical and Dimension Verification
7. Panel Visual Inspection
8. Panel Wiring Visual Inspection
9. List of Metering System Instrument / Equipment
10. Moisture Analyzer Test
11. Hidrocarbon Dew Point Analyzer Test
12. Simulation Test
13. G a s Chromatograph Verification
14. Interface to Gas Chromatograph Test
15. Supervisory Computer Operation Test
16. Flow Computer Test Record

PT ANSI MEGA
1.0 INSPECTION OF METERING SKID DIMENSIONAL DETAIL
The metering skid will be measured after assembly of all instruments. Dimensions shall be checked
against the approved drawings.
Actual dimensions measured shall be updated onto dimensional report and as-built drawings.
Dimensional Tolerance for inlet and outlet flanges shall be as follows:
1. Flange center height from skid base bottom : ± 6.0 mm

2. Inclination angle of inlet/outlet flange 1/2o
:
Linear dimensional tolerances shall be as follows:

Dimensional Classification Up to 1000 mm Up to 2000 mm Over 2000 mm
Tolerance ± 7.0 mm ± 11.0 mm ± 20.0 mm
2.0 INSPECTION OF PAINT WORK
The final and

the pipes assembled skid shall
skid structures be randomly
using calibratedchecked on the
Elcometer. paint dry
Damaged film
area or thickness (DFT)touch-up,
area requiring both on
shall be repaired as per painting repair procedure.
3.0 EQUIPMENT LAYOUT AND PIPE CONFIGURATION
The metering shall be checked for correct installation of the instrument against approved hook up
drawing. Scope of inspection shall include visual check on the piping, skid frame and instruments for
any physical damage, and functionality of the manual and actuated valves.
Metering skid piping work shall be checked against the approved P&ID for the correct size of piping,
fittings (reducers, blind flanges, etc.) used. Check will also ensure that proper position and
installation for all instruments against hook up drawing.
4.0 INSPECTION OF NAME PLATES
The final assembled skid shall be checked on nameplates used. Nameplates shall be represented
installed device.
5.0 INSPECTION OF JUNCTION BOX, CABLE AND CABLE GLAND INSTALLATION
This is to ensure that the metering skid is fabricated in accordance to the construction drawings and
adequate cable accessories' installed.

PT ANSI MEGA
1. Junction Box : Material, nameplate,

grounding, classification, certification, adequate terminal block,
wire marker, termination diagram installation, etc.
2. Cable : cable specification, correct cable installation,
cable number installation, cable fixing installation, cable way
installation, spared cable, etc.
3. Cable gland : Material, correct size, classification,
cable gland shroud, compound, etc
6.0 PANEL PHYSICAL AND DIMENSION VERIFICATION
This procedure ensures that the control panel is fabricated in accordance to the construction
drawings.
With reference to the Panel Layout and Wiring Diagram Drawing
1. Inspection Method
After an assembly of the equipment in the factory, the components as shown in the
approved drawing will be measured, with a vernier caliper, and/or a steel measuring tape.
2. Standard for Judgment
Confirm that the results are within the allowable tolerance as shown in the Dimensional
Examination Result Report.
3. Dimensional Examination Result Report
All the results are to be recorded in the Dimensional Examination Result Report
7.0 PANEL VISUAL INSPECTION
This procedure ensures that the control panels are installed in accordance to the construction
drawings.
After assembly of the equipment, the visual inspection is carried out. A s for the painting,
color tone and gloss will be visually inspected and confirm a wiring condition by the
watching.
Confirm that all the shapes and construction are corresponding to the approved drawings
(external views of equipment and panels) and that they are free from any deformation,
stains and dirt which may be harmful when it is used. Confirm that the painting is uniform in
free from any drops or stains, and the wiring is complete.

PT ANSI MEGA
3. Visual Inspection Result Report
All the results are to be recorded in the Visual Inspection Result Report
8.0 PANEL WIRING VISUAL INSPECTION
This procedure ensures that the wiring of the control panels are installed in accordance to the
construction drawings.
The type, color, size of the cable including cable duct shall be visually checked with the
specification and approval drawing. The cable marks shall be checked visually compared
with the terminal block assignment.
The grounding of the instrument cable shall also be checked and compared with the
approved drawing.
The type, color, size of the cable and conduit shall be satisfactory to requirements of the
specification and description of the approval drawing. The cable mark and connection shall
be complied with the approval drawing.
3. Visual Inspection Result Report
All the results are to be recorded in the Wiring Test Result Report
9.0 LIST OF METERING SYSTEM INSTRUMENT / EQUIPMENT
This procedure verifies that the equipment is installed properly in the control panel in accordance to
the Panel Layout drawing.

PT ANSI MEGA
1. MOISTURE ANALYZER TEST
2. Operational Functional Test Moisture Analyzer
1. Scope
This document describes the procedure by which a device shall be functionally tested to
determine its acceptability. This document also provides the vehicle for specifying,
documenting, and recording the testing requirement specific to each device.
2. Procedure
An Operational Function Requirement Data Sheet shall be prepared for each device to be
tested. The device shall be operated in accordance with the functional test requirements
and with manufacturers provided specification. The completed Operational Function Data
Sheet together with the Test Results, its supporting data and documents attached shall
become the Operational Function Test Report.
3. Application
This procedure is applicable to Operational Function Test requirements typical of the

following:
1. The application of power to confirm that motors rotate, switches work, electronics
are powered, etc.
2. The operation of controls to confirm that the particular control affects the correct
function and the particular switch controls the correct device.
3. The measurement of electrical signals to confirm that instrument outputs exist in
their proper form; i.e., milliamp or millivolts, the checking of alarms, their sense and
trip confirmation.
4. In the case of Process Analyzers, it shall be checked with a suitable test sample
certified by an authorized, acceptable authority and/or laboratory. This is to verify
that Manufacturer's original calibration is still valid. Analyzers shall not be re-
calibrated unless an obvious discrepancy is found and the re-calibration completely
documented.
5. Test methods and procedure will be attached for individual component
2. Calibration
1. Scope
This document describes the procedure by which the calibration of a device shall be tested
to determine its acceptability. This document also provides the vehicle for specifying,
documenting and recording the testing requirements specific to each device.
2. Procedure
A Calibration Requirements Data Sheet shall be prepared for each device to be tested. The
device shall be operated in accordance with the calibration test requirements. The

PT ANSI MEGA
completed Calibration Requirements Data Sheet, with the results recorded, supporting data
and documents attached shall become the Calibration Test Report.
10.2.3 Application
Calibration of each analyzer shall be in accordance with each Vendor's Calibration

Procedure. The Calibration Procedure to be provided by the tester to the Client upon receipt
from the Analyzer Vendor.
The following are calibration requirement data to be listed or tested if applicable:
1. Calibration Standards
2. Accuracy Tests
3. Repeatability Tests
4. Stability Tests
Acceptance Criteria
a. Accuracy is the degree of conformity of an indicated Value to a recognized,

accepted standard. The maximum positive and negative deviation observed in
testing an analyzer under specified conditions and by a specified procedure. It shall
be expressed as a percent of span.
b. Repeatability is the ability of the analyzer to produce the same output whenever
the same sample is introduced into the analyzer. The closeness of agreement
among a number of consecutive measurements of the output for the same value of
the input. It shall be expressed as a standard deviation.
c. Stability is to operate the analyzer continuously with the same sample for as
specified period of time. The maximum variation in output
1. SIMULATION TEST
This test is to ensure adequacy between field measurement and computer reading based on
specified allowable error.
With reference to the Datasheet, P&ID and Cable Termination Diagram
The Simulation Test Report shall be prepared for each device to be tested.
The Equivalent signal(s) shall be “set” to the relevant input parameter of the device.
Corresponding output/ display shall be recorded and compared with calculated value.

PT ANSI MEGA
Error shall be less than 1 M
3. Test Result Report
Results is to be recorded in the S imulation/C alibration Test Result

Report
12.0 GAS CHROMATOGRAPH VERIFICATION
The G a s Chromatograph will be verified using calibration gas as sample gas. The G C shall analyze
the calibration gas as a sample stream. Analysis reports shall be obtained, and the results shall be
tabulated and compared against the calibration ga s composition mentioned on the certificate
provided by gas manufacturer.
Test Procedure
1. On the G C and G C controller, force the running of calibration gas as sample stream.
2. Let the G C run for 6 consecutive analysis.
3. If the gas analysis of the calibration gas is within the tolerance, then the test is
4. completed.
If the analysis is out of the tolerance, then complete the calibration sheet and investigate the
cause of the non-compliance and repeat the test.
Average, standard deviation, and repeatability of heating value shall be calculated and documented.
1. INTERFACE TO GAS CHROMATOGRAPH TEST
This procedure confirms the availability of the data from G a s Chromatograph to metering panel and
also verification of the metering panel to ensure that the gas chromatograph real times data is
correctly transfer to flow computer.
Test Procedure
1. After interfacing with supervisory computer HMI, the visual inspection is carried out.
2. Navigate HMI graphic to compare data in gas chromatograph.
3. Confirm that all the data are correct.
14.0 SUPERVISORY COMPUTER OPERATION TEST
This procedure confirms the availability of all data of HMI on the Supervisory Computer, and also
verification of the HMI Graphics Pages to ensure that the HMI is developed in accordance to the
related P&ID and project standard.

PT ANSI MEGA
Test Procedure
1. After interfacing with supervisory computer HMI, the visual inspection is carried out.
2. Navigate HMI graphic page by page for verification
3. Confirm that all the color code, symbol and graphic layout are corresponding to related
P&ID
This procedure also confirms the capability of supervisory computer is having security code system
that controls and provides a limit access of personnel to the unit in accordance with their
responsibility and level authority.
15.0 FLOW COMPUTER TEST RECORD
Verify that all reports are archived on the F C hard drive. Select and print a report from the archive
and attach the document.
Check serial Modbus communication between gas chromatograph and flow computer via verification
of addresses and serial configuration.
A G A 8 Comparison between calculation and measurement shall also be conducted to ensure

inaccuracy is not exceed from specified value

PT ANSI MEGA
APPENDIX
REPORT FORMS

PT ANSI MEGA
Project Name : Pengembangan Meter Jawa Timur, Pengadaan 8 & 3 Meter System
Client : PT. Pertamina Gas
Skid No. : MET-1004 (KEI Waru Metering Skid 8”- ANSI 600#)
DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION REPORT (ASSEMBLED)
No Location Drawing Actual Deviation Judgment Remarks

Dim Dim
1 Skid Metering Section

Panjang 9379
Lebar 2166
Tinggi 890
2 Skid Regulating Section

Panjang 5032
Lebar 2166
Tinggi 890
3 Metering Upstream (A) 3513

4 Metering Downstream (A) 3513
5 Metering Upstream (B) 2056
6 Metering Downstream (B) 2056
7 Flange Inlet Regulator

5032
Section to Flange Outlet
8 Center bypass to center
1762
PCV
Performed By Performed By Witnessed By

PT. Surya Cipta Teknik PT. Handiyan Hottap Instrumen PT. Pertamina Gas
Date : Date : Date :
Witnessed By Witnessed By Witnessed By

Kangean Energy Indonesia Ltd. BPMIGAS Ditjen Migas

PT ANSI MEGA
INSPECTION OF PAINT WORK REPORT
No Finding Description Action Due Complete Sign Remarks

by Date Date
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18



PT ANSI MEGA
INSPECTION OF EQUIPMENT LAYOUT AND PIPE CONFIGURATION REPORT

by Date Date
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18


PT ANSI MEGA
INSPECTION OF NAME PLATES REPORT

by Date Date
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18



PT ANSI MEGA
INSPECTION OF JUNCTION BOX AND CABLE GLAND INSTALLATION REPORT

by Date Date
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18



PT ANSI MEGA
INSPECTION OF WIRE AND WIRE MARKERS INSTALLATION REPORT

by Date Date
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18



PT ANSI MEGA
DIMENSIONAL EXAMINATION RESULT REPORT
Unit: in mi!!imetres
Panel Name Drawing Size Measured Size

Tolerance
FC Panel W : 800 W:
D : 800 D :
H : 2000 H :
Judgment Panel Body Dimension Allowable Tolerance
Unit: in mm. 0N1000  5.0 mm.
1000N2000  7.0 mm.
2000N3000  10.0 mm.



PT ANSI MEGA
PANEL VISUAL INSPECTION RESULT REPORT
Item Standard for Judgment Pass/Fail
FC Panel
1 Shapes and Construction of all components are identical with

those specified in the approved drawings; thickness, color
coating
2 Free from any deformation, stains or dirt, which may be harmful
when they are used
3 Water Proof Protection (certification must be attached)
4 General Condition Clean & Unblemished
5 Equipment Layout and dimension
6 Captive nuts with claws inside the swing-frame

Remark
s


PT ANSI MEGA
WIRING VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT
Item Standard for Judgment Pass/Fail
FC Panel
1 Cable type, color and siCe
2 Terminal & Cable marker & numbering
3 Labeling
4 Ground Cable & Ground System Connection
Remarks



PT ANSI MEGA
INVENTORY CHECK REPORT
1. Panel Hardware Bill of Materials
Item Model Number Description Q'ty Pass/Fail
1 Omni 6000 Flow computer 2
2. HMI Hardware & Software Bill of Materials
Item Manufacturer Description/Model Q'ty Pass/Fail
1 Dell PC Workstation 1
2 Epson Dot Matrix Printer LX-300 1

3



PT ANSI MEGA
ANALYZER PIPING AND TUBING LEAK TEST RECORD
AnalyCer Tag No. : MA-1004

Ref. Drawing :
Piping Description Tester Date Test Result Action Taken Remarks
Fast Loop Sample In
Fast Loop Sample Out
Sample to AnalyCer
Sample Return
Flare 4ent
Atmospheric 4ent
Utility (Purge N2)
Transport Line
Interconnection



PT ANSI MEGA
ANALYZER ELECTRICAL CONTINUITY & INSULATION TEST RECORD
AnalyCer Tag No. : MA-1004

Ref. Drawing :
Description Remarks
Tester Date
Test
Result
PowerAction Taken
1.
Ground Electrical Continuity Test
Signal
Alarm
2. Insulation Test (4oltage applied on Megger Meter 500 4)
Power
Ground
Alarm



PT ANSI MEGA
ANALYZER OPERATIONAL FUNCTION TEST RECORD
Analyzer Tag No. : MA-1004
Ref. Drawing :
Description Tester Date Test Result Action Remarks
Taken
Power
Ground
Signal
Alarm
Analyzer
Regulator Valves
Shut Off Valves
Pressure Regulators
Flowmeters
Pressure Gauges
Relief Valves
Check Valves



PT ANSI MEGA
ANALYZER CALIBRATION RECORD
Analyzer Tag No. : MA-1004
Ref. Drawing :
1. Analyzer Data
Tag No Model No
Analyzer Type Serial No
Manufacturer Range
2. Power Requirement
Supply Voltage
Supply Frequency
3. Calibration Method: Connect cylinder purified Nitrogen gas to the analyzer via the sampling
conditioning system. Introduced Moisture by activating the Moisture Generator within the analyzer.
Output of the analyzer is tie in to a chart recorder for 3 continuous cycle.
4. Calibration Standards
Component Name Range Measured Standard Value Phase



PT ANSI MEGA
5. Record of Testing
A Tag No S Cylinder No
N Service T Cylinder No
A A
Type Cylinder No
L N
Y Serial No D
Z Manufacturer A
E Application Portable R Manufacturer and
R D Date
Online X
D D
A Interlock A Specification/
Certification
T Alarm Hard SP T
* attachéd
A Soft SP A certificate
Remarks: Remarks:
Ambient Temperature : Accuracy: +/- of reading
Changes : +/- 1 degC
Date Standard Standard Value Analyzer % Deviation = Performed Remarks
Sample (X) Reading ((X-Y)/SPAN) by
(Y) x 100



PT ANSI MEGA
SIMULATION TEST RECORD
Tag No : PT-1004-1A
Engineering Unit : psig Low Scale: 0

Service : Process Line Pressure Meter #1 High Scale: 600
% I/P Current FC Reading HMI Reading Error of FS Pass/Fail

Expected
(psig) (psig) (FC-Exp)/FS
(mA)
25 (psig)
8.000 150
0
50 4.000
12.000 300 0
75 16.000 450
100 20.000 600
75 16.000 450
50 12.000 300
25 8.000 150
0 4.000 0
Allowable tolerance


FAT PLoceduLe Page 31 of 56

PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No PT-1004-1B
Engineering Unit : psig Low Scale: 0

Service : Process Line Pressure Meter #2 High Scale: 600
% I/P Current FC Reading HMI Reading Error of FS Pass/Fail

Expected
(psig) (psig) (FC-Exp)/FS
(mA)
(psig)
0 4.000 0
25 8.000 150
50 12.000 300
75 16.000 450
100
50 20.000
12.000 300600
75
25 16.000
8.000 150 450
0 4.000 0
Allowable tolerance



PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No : TT-1004-1A
Engineering Unit : deg F Low Scale: 0

Service : Process Line Temperature Meter #1 High Scale: 200
% I/P Current Expected FC Reading HMI Reading Error of FS Pass/Fail
(mA) (deg F) (deg F) (deg F) (FC-Exp)/FS
0 4.000 0
25 8.000 50
50 12.000 100
75 16.000 150
100 20.000 200
75 16.000 150
50 12.000 100
25 8.000 50
0 4.000 0
Allowable tolerance



PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No : TT-1004-1B
Engineering Unit : deg F Low Scale: 0

Service : Process Line Temperature Meter #2 High Scale: 200
(mA) (deg F) (deg F) (deg F) (FC-Exp)/FS
0 4.000 0
25 8.000 50
50 12.000 100
75 16.000 150
100 20.000 200
75 16.000 150
50 12.000 100
25 8.000 50
0 4.000 0
Allowable tolerance



PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No : DPT-1004-2A-L
Engineering Unit : in H2O Low Scale: 0
Service Differential Pressure Low Case at Meter #1 High Scale: 50
(mA) (in H2O) (in (in H2O) (FC-Exp)/FS
H2O)
0 4.000 0
25 8.000 12.5
50 12.000 25
75 16.000 37.5
100 20.000 50
75 16.000 37.5
50 12.000 25
25 8.000 12.5
0 4.000 0 Allowable tolerance



PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No : DPT-1004-2B-L

Service : Differential Pressure Low Case at Meter #2 High Scale: 50
H2O)
0 4.000 0
25 8.000 12.5
50 12.000 25
75 16.000 37.5
100 20.000 50
75 50 12.000
16.000 25 37.5
25 8.000 12.5
0 4.000 0
Allowable tolerance



PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No : DPT-1004-2A-H

Service Differential Pressure High Case at Meter #1 High Scale: 200
H2O)
0 4.000 0
25 8.000 50
50 12.000 100
75 16.000 150
100 20.000 200
75 50 12.000
16.000 100 150
25 8.000 50
0 4.000 0
Allowable tolerance



PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No : DPT-1004-2B-H

Service Differential Pressure High Case at Meter #2 High Scale: 200
H2O)
0 25 8.0004.000 50 0
50 12.000 100
75 16.000 150
100 20.000 200
75 16.000 150
50 12.000 100
25 8.000 50
0 4.000 0
Allowable tolerance



PT ANSI MEGA
FUNCTION TEST RECORD
Tag No : FCR-1004-1A
Engineering Unit : in H2O (Diff. Pressure) Low Scale: 0 High Scale: 200
Engineering Unit : psig (Pressure) Low Scale: 0 High Scale: 750
Engineering Unit : deg F (Temperature) Low Scale: 0 High Scale: 200
Service : FCR at Meter #1
Diff PLess(%) 0 25 50 75 100 75 50 25 0

Expected 0 50 100 150 200 150 100 50 0
RecoLded
Pass/Fail
Static PLess 0 25 50 75 100 75 50 25 0

(%)
Expected 0 162,5 325 487,5 750 487,5 325 162,5 0
RecoLded
Pass/Fail
Temp (%) 0 25 50 75 100 75 50 25 0

Expected 0 50 100 150 200 150 100 50 0
RecoLded
Pass/Fail



PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No : FCR-1004-1B
Engineering Unit : in H2O (Diff. Pressure) Low Scale: 0 High Scale: 200
Engineering Unit : psig (Pressure) Low Scale: 0 High Scale: 750
Engineering Unit : deg F (Temperature) Low Scale: 0 High Scale: 200
Service : FCR at Meter #2
Diff PLess (%) 0 25 50 75 100 75 50 25 0

Expected 0 50 100 150 200 150 100 50 0
RecoLded
Pass/Fail
Static PLess 0 25 50 75 100 75 50 25 0

(%)
Expected 0 162,5 325 487,5 750 487,5 325 162,5 0
RecoLded
Pass/Fail
Temp (%) 0 25 50 75 100 75 50 25 0

Expected 0 50 100 150 200 150 100 50 0
RecoLded
Pass/Fail



PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No : DPT-1004-1A
Engineering Unit : mBar Low Scale: 0

Service : Differential Pressure at Filter Meter #1 High Scale: 1000
% I/P Current Expected HMI Reading Pass / Fail
(mA) (mBar) (mBar)
0 4.000 0
25 8.000 250
50 12.000 500
75 16.000 750
100 20.000 1000
75 16.000 750
50 12.000 500
25 8.000 250
0 4.000 0



PT ANSI MEGA
Tag No : DPT-1004-2A
Engineering Unit : mBar Low Scale: 0

Service : Differential Pressure at Filter Meter #2 High Scale: 1000
% I/P Current Expected HMI Reading Pass / Fail
(mA) (mBar) (mBar)
0 4.000 0
25 8.000 250
50 12.000 500
75 16.000 750
100 20.000 1000
75 16.000 750
50 12.000 500
25 8.000 250
0 4.000 0



PT ANSI MEGA
Skid No. : MET-1004 (KEI Waru Metering Skid 8”- AN SI 600#)
GAS CHROMATOGRAPH REPEATABILITY TEST
(6 TIMES CONSECUTIVE TESTS)
Analyzer Tag No. GC-1004

:
Ref. Drawing :
Test No :
Calibration Gas Certified Gas Chromatograph Difference ASTM D 1945 Pass/Fail

Composition Analysis Criteria
Test No. :
Component Mole % Mole % Mole % Mole %
C1
C2
C3
iC4
nC4
iC5
nC5
C6
C7+
CO2
H2S
N2
Tables
below
Component
provide Repeatability
Mole %
the given %
0 to 0.1
repeatabilit 0.01
y 0.1 to 1.0 0.04
tolerances
1.0 to 5.0 0.07
based5.0 onto 10 0.08
A S T MOver 10 0. 0.10
D1945
.


PT ANSI MEGA
GPA 2172 HEATING VALUE CALCULATION (6 TIMES CONSECUTIVE TESTS)
Analyzer Tag No. : GC - MET-1004 Base Temperature : 60 deg F
Ref. Drawing : Base Pressure : 14.7 psia
Component GHV/fraction mole % mole GHV

C1
C2
C3
iC4
nC4
iC5
nC5
C6
C7+
CO2
H2S
N2
TOTAL
Parameters Flow Computer Error (%)

Calculation
Ideal Heatinp Value (btu/scf)
Zbase (calculated fLom AGA8)
Actual Heatinp Value (btu/scf)
Wobbe Index



PT ANSI MEGA
REPEATABILITY RESULT
Calibration gas heating value (btu/scf) = ISO 6976 – 1995 (Kelton)
No Actual Heating Value Error (%) Pass/Fail
Expressed in M) relative to the value of the heating value : M G Hv  100 * 2√2 * (δ G Hv / avg. GHv)
Therefore)
Standard Deviation
Average
Repeatability



PT ANSI MEGA
AGA 8 CALCULATION
Analyzer Tag No. : G C - 1004 Base Temperture 60 deg F

Ref. Drawing : 14.7 psia
:
Line Temperature :
Base Pressure
Line Pressure :
:
Component Fraction mole Component Fraction mole
C1 nC5
C2 C6
C3 C7+
iC4 CO2
nC4 H2S
iC5 N2
AGA 8 OUTPUT COMPARISON
Parameters Calculation Flow Computer Error (%)
StandaLd density (lb/ft3)

Flowinp density (lb/ft3)
Base compLessibility FactoL (Zb)
Flowinp compLessibility FactoL (Zf)
Gas MoleculaL Weipht (ML)
Air Molecular Weight (Mr-air)
Air base compressibility factor (Zb-
air)
Specific GLavity / Relative Density



PT ANSI MEGA
GAS CHROMATOGRAPH COMMUNICATION TEST RECORD
Analyzer Tag No. GC-1004

:
Ref. Drawing :
Component Gas standard GC local FC Reading HMI Reading Error (%) Pass/Fail
(% mole) reading
(% mole) (% mole)
(% mole)
C1
C2
C3
iC4
nC4
iC5
nC5
C6
C7+
CO2
H2S
N2
Tables
below
provide
Component Repeatability
the given
Mole % %
repeatabi
lity 0 to 0.1 0.01
0.1 to 1.0
tolerance 0.04
s based
1.0 to 5.0 0.07
on
5.0 to 10 0.08
ASTM
D1945
Over 10 0. 0.10
.


PT ANSI MEGA

SUPERVISORY COMPUTER OPERATION TEST RECORD
Description Remarks
Pass/Fail
Communication supervisory computer to Ethernet
switch with 10 Base T-Ethernet or Modbus TCP
Software system setup for MMI
Layout process template as per P<ID
Security access / priority level



PT ANSI MEGA
FLOW COMPUTER TEST RECORD
1. Report Generation
Description Pass/Fail Remarks

Layout) content) data correctness : current report
Layout) content) data correctness : daily report
Layout) content) data correctness : monthly report
2. Modbus Communication
Description Pass/Fail Remarks

Modbus Mapping Test



PT ANSI MEGA
FLOW CALCULATION TEST RECORD
Simulated Signal Flow Rate

Error
Trial Diff. Calculated Actual Remarks
Press TLei m PLrien %
in H nep es MMSCFD MMSCFD
sPSIG
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

PT ANSI MEGA
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45



PT ANSI MEGA
FLOW CALCULATION – AGA3 1992
INPUT PARAMETER
Pipe ID inch
Orifice Bore inch
Differential Pressure in H2O
Upstream Static Pressure psig
Temperature deg. F
Dynamic 4iscosity cP
Specific Heat Ratio
INPUT PARAMETER FROM AGA8 CALCULATION

Base Compressibility) Zb
Flowing Compressibility) Zf
Standard Density lb/ft3
Flowing Density lb/ft3
INPUT PARAMETER FROM GPA 2172 CALCULATION

Actual Heating 4alue B tu/
s cf
AGA 3 OUTPUT COMPARISON
Parameters Calculation Flow Computer Error (%)
Mass FlowLate (M.lb/day)
Std. Volume FlowLate (MMSCFD)
EneLpy Rate (MMBtu/d)



PT ANSI MEGA
DRAWING
ATTACHMENT

PT ANSI MEGA
LIST OF DRAWING
1. P<I D
2. General Arrangement
3. System Architechture
4. Panel Detail
5. / iring and Power Distribution
6. Field Junction / iring Diagram

PT ANSI MEGA
ATTACHMENT

PT ANSI MEGA
LIST OF ATTACHMENT
1. Bill Of Material
2. Cable Scedule
3. Continuity Test Instrument Cable Report
4. Insulation Test Instrument Cable Report
5. Individual Instrument Test Report
6. Instrument Data Sheet
7. Certificates

PDF Fat Procedure Gresik

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PDF Fat Procedure Gresik

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

PDF Fat Procedure Gresik

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PT ANSI MEGA

Factory Acceptance Test

System Metering Gas Orifice

Pengadaan dan Kon st ru ksi Pem#angunan Pipa Transmisi

FAT Procedure Page 1 of 56

1.2. Definitions and Abbreviations

COMPANY P E R T A M I N A G A S as the ultimate end user and owner

CONTRACTOR Party selected by C O M P A N Y to perform the survey, engineering, detailed

VENDOR Party which supplies equipment/materials or services specified and

MANUFACTURER Party which manufactures equipment/materials specified and ordered

CALIBRATION A certain action performed on instruments and control devices requiring

FAT Procedure Page 2 of 56

results at the various components, and observing the final element as

— Waru & Gresik Station

1.3. Codes and Standard

1.4. Conflicting Requirements

FAT Procedure Page 3 of 56

3. Adequate skilled manpower and technically/organizationally skilled supervision is required to provide

The following instruments must be put in highly attention e.g.:

FAT Procedure Page 4 of 56

4.2 Scope of Activities

FAT Procedure Page 5 of 56

5. FUNCTIONAL LOOP CHECK

A punch-list shall be made and formally issued listing discrepant items.

FAT Procedure Page 6 of 56

LIST OF TEST AND INSPECTION

1. Inspection of Metering Skid Dimensional Detail

FAT Procedure Page 7 of 56

1.0 INSPECTION OF METERING SKID DIMENSIONAL DETAIL

Dimensional Tolerance for inlet and outlet flanges shall be as follows:

1. Flange center height from skid base bottom : ± 6.0 mm

Linear dimensional tolerances shall be as follows:

Tolerance ± 7.0 mm ± 11.0 mm ± 20.0 mm

2.0 INSPECTION OF PAINT WORK

The final and

3.0 EQUIPMENT LAYOUT AND PIPE CONFIGURATION

4.0 INSPECTION OF NAME PLATES

5.0 INSPECTION OF JUNCTION BOX, CABLE AND CABLE GLAND INSTALLATION

FAT Procedure Page 8 of 56

1. Junction Box : Material, nameplate,

6.0 PANEL PHYSICAL AND DIMENSION VERIFICATION

With reference to the Panel Layout and Wiring Diagram Drawing

2. Standard for Judgment

3. Dimensional Examination Result Report

7.0 PANEL VISUAL INSPECTION

With reference to the Panel Layout and Wiring Diagram Drawing

2. Standard for Judgment

FAT Procedure Page 9 of 56

3. Visual Inspection Result Report

8.0 PANEL WIRING VISUAL INSPECTION

With reference to the Panel Layout and Wiring Diagram Drawing

2. Standard for Judgment

3. Visual Inspection Result Report

9.0 LIST OF METERING SYSTEM INSTRUMENT / EQUIPMENT

FAT Procedure Page 10 of 56

1. MOISTURE ANALYZER TEST

2. Operational Functional Test Moisture Analyzer

documenting, and recording the testing requirement specific to each device.

This procedure is applicable to Operational Function Test requirements typical of the