5-Min Atrial Fibrillation

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Antithrombotic therapy in Atrial

Fibrillation

Dr. Asim Biswas


MD Final Part Student
NHFH&RI
• Atrial Fibillation(AF), whether paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent
and whether symptomatic or silent, significantly increases the risk of
thromboembolic ischemic stroke.

• Nonvalvular AF increases the risk of stroke 5 times, and AF in the


setting of mitral stenosis increases the risk of stroke 20 times over
that of patients in sinus rhythm.
Risk Stratification Schemes
Stroke risk
• CHA2DS2-VASc
Bleeding risk
• HAS-BLED
• RIETE
• HEMORR2HAGES
• ATRIA

Evaluated for nonvalvular AF


CHA2DS2-VASc Scoring
• increase in stroke rate of approximately
2.0% for each 1-point increase in score
(from 1.9% with a score of 0 to 18.2% with
a score of 6)

Score 0: no anticoagulant
Score 1: Aspirin or Warfarin
Score ≥ 2: Warfarin
HAS-BLED
HAS-BLED is a score based on the presence of
• Hypertension (systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg),
• Abnormal liver or renal function,
• history of Stroke or Bleeding,
• Labile INRs,
• Elderly age (>65 years),
• use of Drugs that promote bleeding, or alcohol excess .

A score >3 indicates potentially “high risk” for bleeding


Therapeutic options
Pharmacological
• warfarin
• NOAC: direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors
• antiplatelet drugs (aspirin and clopidogrel)
• UFH and LMWH
Nonpharmacological
• Percutaneous Approaches to Occlude the LAA
• Cardiac Surgery—LAA Occlusion/Excision
Valvular AF: Warfarin
• all patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease and AF require
anticoagulation with warfarin unless there is an absolute
contraindication.
Nonvalvular AF:
• 1st line:
• Warfarin
• 2nd line:
• Thrombin inhibitor: Dabigatran
• Factor Xa inhibitor: Rivaroxaban, or Apixaban
• Percutaneous closing device
• Surgical closure of LAA
Warfarin
• Target INR for warfarin: 2-3 (2.5)
• With warfarin, determine INR at least weekly during initiation of
therapy and monthly when stable: I A
NOAC
Benefits:
• more predictable pharmacological profiles
• fewer drug–drug interactions
• an absence of major dietary effects
• less risk of intracranial bleeding than warfarin
• do not require regular monitoring of INR or activated partial thromboplastin time
• rapid onset and offset of action so that bridging with parenteral anticoagulant therapy is not
needed during initiation, and bridging may not be needed in patients on chronic therapy
requiring brief interruption of anticoagulation for invasive procedures.

Disadvantages
• However, strict compliance with these new oral anticoagulants is critical. Missing even 1
dose could result in a period without protection from thromboembolism.
• reversal agents are not available, although the short half-lives lessen the need for an
antidote
Interruption and Bridging Anticoagulation
• For patients who are treated with warfarin and who are at low risk of
thromboembolism or those who are back in normal sinus rhythm and
are undergoing surgical or diagnostic procedures that carry a risk of
bleeding, stopping warfarin for up to 1 week and allowing the INR to
normalize without substituting UFH is a recognized approach. Warfarin
is then resumed after adequate hemostasis has been achieved.

• For patients at higher risk of thromboembolism (mechanical valves,


prior stroke, CHA2DS2-VASc score >2), bridging with UFH or LMWH is a
common practice.
Percutaneous Approaches to Occlude the
LAA
First Strategy: Implantable devices for occluding or plugging the LAA.
Devices for LAA occlusion include the
• WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) and
• The Amplatzer cardiac plug (St. Jude Medical, Plymouth, MN).

Second strategy: to tie off the LAA using an epicardial snare, referred to
as the LARIAT device (SentreHEART, Redwood City, CA).
WATCHMAN device
Cardiac Surgery—LAA Occlusion/Excision
• Surgical excision of the LAA may be considered in patients undergoing
cardiac surgery.
Thank You

You might also like