Based on the information provided, the tolerable error for account receivables would be 75,000 since that is the projected error amount. The auditor's judgment would be that the projected error is below the materiality threshold and therefore immaterial.
Based on the information provided, the tolerable error for account receivables would be 75,000 since that is the projected error amount. The auditor's judgment would be that the projected error is below the materiality threshold and therefore immaterial.
Based on the information provided, the tolerable error for account receivables would be 75,000 since that is the projected error amount. The auditor's judgment would be that the projected error is below the materiality threshold and therefore immaterial.
Based on the information provided, the tolerable error for account receivables would be 75,000 since that is the projected error amount. The auditor's judgment would be that the projected error is below the materiality threshold and therefore immaterial.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19
ISA 300 –Planning an Audit of Financial Statements
Audit Strategy
Audit Plan ISA 300 –Planning an Audit of Financial Statements
Audit Strategy
Resources (team / experts) Allocation to Audit Areas
Timing of audit / Reporting Management, Direction, Supervision (briefing, debriefing, manager’s /partner’s review, engagement QCR ISA 300 –Planning an Audit of Financial Statements
Audit Plan
Description of Audit Procedures of ISA 315 – Identifying and
Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatements through Understanding the Entity & its Environment
Description of Audit Procedures of ISA 330 – The Auditor’s
responses to Assessed Risk
Nature, Timing, Extent of supervision & management
(briefing, debriefing, reviews – both manager’s / Partner’s) Auditors obtain evidence by one or more of the following procedures. • Inspection of tangible assets: confirms existence, not confirm rights and obligations or valuation. • Inspection of documentation or records: provides evidence of varying reliability, depending on the nature, source and effectiveness of controls over production. Provide evidence of existence (financial instrument), not necessarily about ownership or value. • Observation: of limited use, as act of being observed could affect performance • Inquiry: alone does not provide sufficient audit evidence to detect a material misstatement at assertion level nor is it sufficient to test the operating effectiveness of controls. • Recalculation: checking the mathematical accuracy • Re-performance: auditor's independent execution of procedures or controls • Analytical procedures: Investigation of identified fluctuations and relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant information or deviate significantly from predicted amounts. • Evaluation and review Evaluate the matters (e.g. materiality, risk, relevant accounting standards, audit evidence) relating to: • (i) inventory (ii) standard costing systems (iii) statement of cash flows • (iv) changes in accounting policy (v) taxation (including deferred tax) • (vi) segmental reporting (vii) noncurrent assets (viii) fair value (ix) leases • (x) revenue from contracts with customers (xi) employee benefits • (xii) government grants (xiii) related parties • (xiv) earnings per share (xv) impairment • (xvi) provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets • (xvii) intangible assets (xviii) financial instruments (xix) investment properties • (xx) share-based payment transactions (xxi) business combinations • (xxii) assets held for sale and discontinued operations • (xxiii) events after the end of the reporting period • (xxiv) the effects of foreign exchange rates (xxv) borrowing costs ISA 300 –Planning an Audit of Financial Statements
Audit Plan is more detailed than strategy
Risk Assessment Procedures - performed early in audit
Result of Risk Assessment
Auditor decides nature and extent of Further Test (Details)
Auditor considers disclosures that are required
ISA 320 – Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit
Influence Economic Decision Making of Users
Auditor makes professional judgment about materiality
The judgment is not made for specific users
ISA 320 – Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit
Auditor determines materiality at overall strategy level
Auditor also determines materiality for specific accounts
if these can influence decision making of users
Auditor also determines performance materiality
ISA 320 – Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit
A misstatement in the financial statements can be considered
material if knowledge of the misstatement will affect a decision of a reasonable user of the statements a) Amounts are immaterial (ignored… clean opinion) b) Amounts are material but do not overshadow the financial statements as a whole (except for…. Opinion) c) Amounts are so material or so pervasive that overall fairness of the statements is in question (… maybe adverse opinion) • Pervasiveness is when an error affects different parts of FS. • A misclassification between cash and AR affects two accounts • Failure to record a material sale affects sales, AR, income tax expense, and retained earnings etc. • Both the amount (quantity) and nature (quality) of misstatements need to be considered i.e. disclosure • Auditor has to set his own materiality levels – this will always be a matter of judgment • Generally, a percentage is applied to a chosen benchmark as a starting point. The following factors may affect benchmark: a) Elements of the financial statements (e.g. assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, expenses) b) Whether there are items on which users tend to focus c) Nature of the entity, industry and economic environment d) Entity's ownership structure and financing e) Relative volatility of the benchmark The following benchmarks and percentages may be appropriate • Profit before tax 5% • Gross profit ½% – 1% • Revenue ½% – 1% • Total assets 1% – 2% • Net assets 2% – 5% • Profit after tax 5% – 10%
Performance materiality is the amount set by the auditor at
less than materiality for the F/S as a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of misstatements exceeds materiality for the F/S as a whole. Determining performance materiality is dependent on the auditor’s professional judgment. It is affected by: • The nature and extent of misstatements identified in prior audits • The auditor’s understanding of the entity • Result of risk assessment procedures Materiality has qualitative aspects that can cause misstatements: a) Disclosures required by Law i.e. related party transactions, directors emoluments, fee of NED b) Disclosures in relation to the industry i.e. research & development expense c) Aspect requiring emphasis i.e. newly acquired business • Inventory = 1,000,000 • Current Asset = 3,000,000 • Net Profit = 2,000,000 • Error in F/S is 100,000 (overstated inventory – wrong method) • Error is 10% of inventory, 3.3% of CA, 5% of net profit
If inventory error also results in 150,000 of excess A/R
• Error is 8.3% of CA, and 12.5% of net profit • Auditor must consider all accounts affected by a misstatement (pervasiveness). • Materiality is both about amount (quantity) and nature (quality) of transactions. EXAMPLE Rs ‘000 Revenue 22,000 Gross Profit 3,540 Net Profit 1,200 Non-Current Assets 5,900 Current Assets 6,400 Current Liabilities 4,560 Equity 4,740 ALLOCATE PRELIMINARY JUDGMENT TO SEGMENTS (TOLERABLE MISSTATEMENT) • Auditors accumulate evidence by segments (account balances) rather than for the financial statements as a whole. • Most practitioners allocate materiality to BS rather than P&L, because most P&L misstatements have an equal effect on the BS ($20,000 overstatement of accounts receivable is also a $20,000 overstatement of sales). Estimate total misstatement in the segment (account balance) EXAMPLE Rs ‘000 Cash / Bank 828 Account Receivable 2,884 Inventories 2,639 Other Current Assets 49 ESTIMATE COMBINED MISSTATEMENT • Auditor documents all misstatements found. • Known misstatements are those where the auditor can determine the amount of the misstatement in the account. (Wrong classification of 10,000 in PPE) • Likely misstatements 1. Dispute between auditor & management 2. Projected misstatements (3,000 x 10 = 30,000) Error in sample = 3,000 (sample size of 50,000) Total population = 500,000 ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE Rs ‘000 Account Balance 2,884