Learning Plans in The Context of The 21 Century
Learning Plans in The Context of The 21 Century
Learning Plans in The Context of The 21 Century
OF THE 21 CENTURY
ST
Step 2: Setting My Outcomes for this Course
1. How will I apply all the knowledge and skills that I learned in
TTL 2 in teaching my field of specialization?
2. How will I develop learning plans for my classes to make sure
that available technologies for teaching and learning will be put
to use for meaningful learning?
3. How will I ensure that my goals in this course will be
achieved?
Exchange
Teachers play a very important role in the
facilitation of student learning by designing,
implementing and evaluating the curriculum. In the
Philippines, teachers are expected to actively engage
themselves in curriculum design to ensure that the K
to 12 Curriculum will be best delivered to fully
realize its intended learning outcomes.
Teachers make decisions about how they will implement
the curriculum of their specific field of specialization. They
decide on how they must structure the activities of their
lessons and manage students’ responses and ideas. Hence,
the decision of teachers is very important. It has an impact
on the students’ learning. The following are points to
consider in identifying and understanding teachers’ roles as
curriculum designers:
Undoubtedly, the most important person in the curriculum
implementation process is the teacher. With their knowledge,
experiences and competencies, teachers are central to any
curriculum development effort. Better teachers support better
learning because they are most knowledgeable about the practice
of teaching and are responsible for introducing the curriculum in
the classroom (Alsubaie, 2016).
Curriculum is the planned interaction of pupils with instruction
content, materials, resources, and processes for evaluating the
attainment of educational objectives -Jadhav and Patankar (2013),
Curriculum is content, but when contextualized, it comes alive for
students. The role of teachers in the curriculum process is to help
students develop an engaged relationship with the content. Active
learning increases the focus and retention of the curriculum, resulting in
an exciting learning environment. Teachers build lessons that include
simulations, experiments, case studies and activities to deliver a
curriculum: This interactive approach intertwines curriculum and
practical experiences. that immerse students in learning. The curriculum
process provides an opportunity for teachers to be creative and put their
unique stamp on the classroom experience (Meier, 2018).
ICT-Pedagogy Integration in Language Learning Plan
Teaching has always been a challenging profession since
knowledge has been expanding and essential skills have
been increasing and changing. With these challenges,
teachers need to engage educational technologies to assist
them in the teaching-learning process. Engaging
educational technologies in teaching are founded on
principles and philosophies. Understanding these will help
you successfully integrate technologies to allow your
students to demonstrate the intended learning outcomes of
your field of specialization.
Integrating Technology in Instruction
Various educators and researchers provided the following concepts
and principles about integrating technology in instruction:
a. acquisition;
b. discovery;
c. dialogue;
d. practice; and
e. creation;
Examples of Non
Teaching and Teaching Action or Learning Action or Examples of Computer-Based
Related Media Form Computer-Based
Learning Event Strategy Experience Activity
Activity
Acquisition Show, Demonstrate, Attending, Narrative: TV, video, Film, Lecture notes online, streaming
Describe, Explain Apprehending, Linear presentational. lectures, books, and videos of lectures, DVD,
Listening Usually same ‘text’ other print multimedia
acquired publications including digital video , audio clips
simultaneously by and animation
many people
Discovery Create or set up or Investigating, Interactive: Libraries, galleries, CD based, DVD, or web resources
find out or guide Exploring, Non-linear museums using hypertext, enhanced
through discovery Browsing, Searching presentational, hypermedia, multimedia resources.
spaces and searchable, filterable Also information gateways.
resources etc. but no feedback
Dialogue Set up, Frame, Discussing, Communicative: Seminar, tutorials, Email, discussion, forums, blogs
Moderate, Lead, Collaborating, Conversation with conferences
Facilitate, Reflecting, Arguing, other students, lecture
Discussions Analyzing, Sharing or self
Practice Model Experimenting, Adaptive: Laboratory, field Drill and practice, tutorial
Practicing trip, simulation, programmes, simulations, virtual
Feedback, learner role play environments
control
Creation Facilitating Articulating, Productive: Essay, object, Simple existing tools, as well as
Experimenting, Learner control animation, model especially created programmable
Making, software
Synthesizing
The Laurillard’s Conversational Framework (LCF) is relevant
in the field of language education since this field requires
appropriate and complex use of various technologies. The
framework clearly presents the way teaching events in
language classrooms can be thoroughly related to their
language learning events. Language teachers need to
systematically match their teaching styles to the learning needs
of their students. By this, the integration of ICT and pedagogy
will be done in a comprehensive and meaningful way.
The usefulness of LCF in language education was analyzed in a study
that was conducted by Abeer Aidh Alshwiah in 2016. The study
investigated and evaluated the effectiveness of LCF in developing the
writing component of foreign language learners’ (FLLs’)
communicative competence in blended learning (BL) context, as
compared to a face-to-face (F2F) context. The FLLs in the study
comprised three intact classes from a foundation course at a Saudi
university. The three skills addressed consisted of the use of the past
tense to describe past events and form wh-questions, as part of
grammatical competence, and writing a letter of complaint, as part of
sociolinguistic competence.
To evaluate the effectiveness of LCF, a mixed-methods approach
was used. The quasi-experimental design was applied by measuring
learners’ development in the three aforementioned skills. The
corresponding test results were then compared with those of a
control group. Moreover, the benefits of LCF were examined by
gathering the learners’ perceptions of the intervention and
analyzing their engagement with the teacher, peers, tasks and
language.
The study revealed that LCF was more effective in the BL than in
the F2F context, in terms of developing the learners’ skill in
forming wh-questions. However, both contexts almost equally
developed the learners’ skills in using the past tense and writing a
letter of complaint. Moreover, interviews with volunteers from the
two experimental groups, observing their engagement, and
analyzing their conversations, revealed positive perceptions
amongst learners with an intermediate level of English language
proficiency.
On the other hand, two different factors affected their
perceptions of the intervention: language proficiency and the
willingness of peers to collaborate. Another factor affecting
perceptions of BL was lack-of familiarity with the technology
applied. It is therefore recommended that this barrier be
overcome and the use of BL, given its effectiveness for the
development of more writing skills be encouraged.
B. Three Fundamental Elements of ICT
Integration by Wang (2008)